On Tue, 14 Aug 2018 13:20:50 -0400, jmcquown >
wrote:

>On 8/14/2018 1:03 PM, wrote:
>> On Mon, 13 Aug 2018 22:45:04 -0400, jmcquown >
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/13/2018 10:29 PM, Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>> On 8/13/2018 9:04 PM, wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ed Pawlowski wrote:
>>>>>>> On 8/13/2018 6:53 PM, jmcquown wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> After lamb pancakes are my least favorite food...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I've never heard of lamb pancakes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You demonstrate the reading ability of a retarded five year old.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Grammar really isn't your forte, is it?* It should read: "After lamb,
>>>>>>>> pancakes are..."
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jill
>>>>>
>>>>> *A comma does NOT belong in
>>>>> my sentence.* With all the reading you claim to do you are wasting
>>>>> your time... you are incapable of reading comprehension as well.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> When starting* sentence with "After" it clues you in that it is a list
>>>> that requires a comma.* It sounds like you are talking about lamb
>>>> pancakes* Substitute blueberry and it sounds like you are talking about
>>>> pancakes with blueberries, not two separate items.
>>>
>>> Thank you, Ed. Lamb pancakes don't sound very interesting.
>>
>> Two stutterers.
>>
>Admit it, you're wrong. It's not that difficult.
>
>Jill

Ahahahahahahaha. . . . you can't even construct a full sentence...
you write like an immigrant speaking broken English.... it's no wonder
you can't read.