https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9

I better get BUSY!

John Kuthe..

On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
> https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
>
> I better get BUSY!
>
> John Kuthe..

Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.

Cindy Hamilton

Cindy Hamilton wrote:

> On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
> >
https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
> >
> > I better get BUSY!
> >
> > John Kuthe..
>
> Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

No I think he means 'how many per lb' like shrimp are sold.

Carol

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:26:17 -0600, cshenk wrote:

> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>
> https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
>>>
>>> I better get BUSY!
>>>
>>> John Kuthe..
>>
>> Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
> No I think he means 'how many per lb' like shrimp are sold.

That's not how cherries are sold and that's not what he meant. 1 pound
of cherries is about 80 cherries.

-sw

On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:26:17 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
>> On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
>> >
>https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
>> >
>> > I better get BUSY!
>> >
>> > John Kuthe..
>>
>> Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
>>
>> Cindy Hamilton
>
>No I think he means 'how many per lb' like shrimp are sold.
>
> Carol

Um, 200 cherries weigh a lot more than a pound.

On 12/25/2017 10:54 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Dec 2017 20:32:41 -0800 (PST), John Kuthe wrote:
>
>> https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
>>
>> I better get BUSY!
>
> John's when of those Clutter-Mess People. Random junk and trash lying
> all around the house.


http://www.lawrenceperson.com/?p=4073

Richard Cory Went Home Last Night and Put a Bullet Through His Head

This has to be one of the saddest and most inexplicable local stories of
recent memory: Yoli and Michael Amr, founders of Gumbos, Yolis
Jambalaya and Mama Roux, are now dead in an apparent murder-suicide.

This is a profound shame, as in each of their incarnations, they had the
best Cajun food I ever tasted (and this is from someone whos eaten at
K-Pauls in New Orleans).

I have trouble believing it was money troubles, since Mama Roux was
always packed when we went there. Maybe there were health issues.

Im at a loss. Sometimes people, even successful and apparently happy
people, do inexplicable things.

On 12/25/2017 10:48 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> That's not how cherries are sold and that's not what he meant. 1 pound
> of cherries is about 80 cherries.

http://www.lawrenceperson.com/?p=4073

Richard Cory Went Home Last Night and Put a Bullet Through His Head

This has to be one of the saddest and most inexplicable local stories of
recent memory: Yoli and Michael Amr, founders of Gumbos, Yolis
Jambalaya and Mama Roux, are now dead in an apparent murder-suicide.

This is a profound shame, as in each of their incarnations, they had the
best Cajun food I ever tasted (and this is from someone whos eaten at
K-Pauls in New Orleans).

I have trouble believing it was money troubles, since Mama Roux was
always packed when we went there. Maybe there were health issues.

Im at a loss. Sometimes people, even successful and apparently happy
people, do inexplicable things.

On 12/25/2017 10:54 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> What we see here is a Sheldon
> 200 pounds of cherries - they are each the size of softballs.
>
> -sw
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 12/25/2017 10:48 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> That's not how cherries are sold and that's not what he meant.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 12/25/2017 12:48 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:26:17 -0600, cshenk wrote:
>
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>
>> https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
>>>>
>>>> I better get BUSY!
>>>>
>>>> John Kuthe..
>>>
>>> Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> No I think he means 'how many per lb' like shrimp are sold.
>
> That's not how cherries are sold and that's not what he meant. 1 pound
> of cherries is about 80 cherries.
>
> -sw
>

Cherries are sized by "rows"
http://www.ipt.us.com/produce-inspec.../cherry-sizing

On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 6:22:51 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
> > https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
> >
> > I better get BUSY!
> >
> > John Kuthe..
>
> Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

You are correct, I screwed up!

I'll post a better top post, thanks!!

John Kuthe...

"Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message ...

On 12/25/2017 12:48 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:26:17 -0600, cshenk wrote:
>
>> Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>
>>> On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>
>> https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
>>>>
>>>> I better get BUSY!
>>>>
>>>> John Kuthe..
>>>
>>> Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
>>>
>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> No I think he means 'how many per lb' like shrimp are sold.
>
> That's not how cherries are sold and that's not what he meant. 1 pound
> of cherries is about 80 cherries.
>
> -sw
>

Cherries are sized by "rows"
http://www.ipt.us.com/produce-inspec.../cherry-sizing

==

Interesting I haven't see that. But anyway, if he thinks he has 200
whatever, why does it matter to anyone else???



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 11:18:12 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>
> Interesting I haven't see that. But anyway, if he thinks he has 200
> whatever, why does it matter to anyone else???
>
>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Anybody with half a brain would know that's not 200lbs of fruit. What is disturbing is that it looks like considerable less than 200 cherries - 126 to my eyes.

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 11:18:12 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> Interesting I haven't see that. But anyway, if he thinks he has 200
>> whatever, why does it matter to anyone else???
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>
> Anybody with half a brain would know that's not 200lbs of fruit. What is
> disturbing is that it looks like considerable less than 200 cherries - 126
> to my eyes.

====

You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL

Cheri

On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>
> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>
> Cheri

I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my superpower.

On 2017-12-25 5:09 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "dsi1" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 11:18:12 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>>>
>>> Interesting Â* I haven't see that.Â* But anyway, if he thinks he has 200
>>> whatever, why does it matter to anyone else???
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
>>
>> Anybody with half a brain would know that's not 200lbs of fruit. What
>> is disturbing is that it looks like considerable less than 200
>> cherries - 126 to my eyes.
>
> ====
>
> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL

I took the challenge and guesstimated that he is probably pretty close.
It sure as heck is not 500 cherries or 500 # (pounds).

"dsi1" wrote in message
...

On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>
> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>
> Cheri

I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my
superpower.

==

Did you listen to that Happy Christmas thing I posted. I thought it might
interest you. It has some future stuff <g>

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

Ophelia wrote:

> "Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On 12/25/2017 12:48 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:26:17 -0600, cshenk wrote:
> >
> > > Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
> > > > >
> > > > > I better get BUSY!
> > > > >
> > > > > John Kuthe..
> > > >
> > > > Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
> > > >
> > > > Cindy Hamilton
> > >
> > > No I think he means 'how many per lb' like shrimp are sold.
> >
> > That's not how cherries are sold and that's not what he meant. 1
> > pound of cherries is about 80 cherries.
> >
> > -sw
> >
>
> Cherries are sized by "rows"
>
http://www.ipt.us.com/produce-inspec.../cherry-sizing
>
> ==
>
> Interesting I haven't see that. But anyway, if he thinks he has
> 200 whatever, why does it matter to anyone else???

No one minds really. It's similar but not the same as shrimp 'i.e' a
size sort of measure. # can also mean 'count'.

"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>>
>> Cheri
>
> I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my
> superpower.


That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.

Cheri

On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 4:23:03 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>
>
> That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.
>
> Cheri

It's one of the minor superpowers but I do win a lot of jelly beans and M&Ms at parties.

On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 4:10:45 PM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
> "dsi1" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 11:18:12 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
> >>
> >> Interesting I haven't see that. But anyway, if he thinks he has 200
> >> whatever, why does it matter to anyone else???
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk
> >
> > Anybody with half a brain would know that's not 200lbs of fruit. What is
> > disturbing is that it looks like considerable less than 200 cherries - 126
> > to my eyes.
>
> ====
>
> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>
> Cheri

That was the easy part!!

John Kuthe...

"cshenk" wrote in message
...

Ophelia wrote:

> "Ed Pawlowski" wrote in message
> ...
>
> On 12/25/2017 12:48 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Dec 2017 11:26:17 -0600, cshenk wrote:
> >
> > > Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Sunday, December 24, 2017 at 11:32:48 PM UTC-5, John Kuthe
> > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > >
https://scontent-ort2-2.xx.fbcdn.net...ac&oe=5ACA54D9
> > > > >
> > > > > I better get BUSY!
> > > > >
> > > > > John Kuthe..
> > > >
> > > > Your subject line indicates 200 pounds of cherries.
> > > >
> > > > Cindy Hamilton
> > >
> > > No I think he means 'how many per lb' like shrimp are sold.
> >
> > That's not how cherries are sold and that's not what he meant. 1
> > pound of cherries is about 80 cherries.
> >
> > -sw
> >
>
> Cherries are sized by "rows"
>
http://www.ipt.us.com/produce-inspec.../cherry-sizing
>
> ==
>
> Interesting I haven't see that. But anyway, if he thinks he has
> 200 whatever, why does it matter to anyone else???

No one minds really. It's similar but not the same as shrimp 'i.e' a
size sort of measure. # can also mean 'count'.

==

Ahhh that might be it)7

I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
called prawns or lobsters

Our shrimps are tiny
--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"dsi1" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>>
>> Cheri
>
> I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my
> superpower.


That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.

Cheri

==

I'm still looking for mine

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Cheri" wrote in message news > "dsi1" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my
>> superpower.
>
>
> That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.
>
> Cheri
> ==
>
> I'm still looking for mine

Mine is my hearing.

Cheri

On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 5:44:18 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:

> Ahhh that might be it)7
>
> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
> called prawns or lobsters
>
> Our shrimps are tiny

I'll admit it's a little cognitively dissonant to buy a package of
"jumbo shrimp".

We have two systems (although one isn't very systematic) of shrimp
size nomenclatu

Number of shrimp per pound
Vague identifiers such as small, medium, large, jumbo, colossal.

Serious cooks try to buy their shrimp by "number per pound".

The term prawn is occasionally used for the largest specimens,
although usually on menus.

We use the word "shrimp" to refer to a particular class of
crustaceans; the defining feature appears to be that their legs
aren't strong enough to walk on.

Lobster have stronger legs. Generally, "lobster" unmodified
refers to Homarus americanus. I have eaten a fair number of
"African Rock Lobster" tails and "langostinos" as well.

Freshwater lobsters are generally called crayfish, crawfish, or
crawdads.

Cindy Hamilton

On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 9:16:52 AM UTC-6, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
....
>
> Freshwater lobsters are generally called crayfish, crawfish, or
> crawdads.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

Or MUDBUGS!! :-)

John Kuthe...

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:16:45 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 5:44:18 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> Ahhh that might be it)7
>>
>> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
>> called prawns or lobsters
>>
>> Our shrimps are tiny
>
>I'll admit it's a little cognitively dissonant to buy a package of
>"jumbo shrimp".
>
>We have two systems (although one isn't very systematic) of shrimp
>size nomenclatu
>
>Number of shrimp per pound
>Vague identifiers such as small, medium, large, jumbo, colossal.
>
>Serious cooks try to buy their shrimp by "number per pound".
>
>The term prawn is occasionally used for the largest specimens,
>although usually on menus.
>
>We use the word "shrimp" to refer to a particular class of
>crustaceans; the defining feature appears to be that their legs
>aren't strong enough to walk on.
>
>Lobster have stronger legs. Generally, "lobster" unmodified
>refers to Homarus americanus. I have eaten a fair number of
>"African Rock Lobster" tails and "langostinos" as well.
>
>Freshwater lobsters are generally called crayfish, crawfish, or
>crawdads.
>
>Cindy Hamilton

that was a nice summation. ;-)
P.S. They're all good!
Janet US

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Cheri" wrote in message news > "dsi1" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>>>
>>> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>>>
>>> Cheri
>>
>> I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my
>> superpower.
>
>
> That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.
>
> Cheri
> ==
>
> I'm still looking for mine

Mine is my hearing.

Cheri

==

You have super hearing??? Wow lucky you!!! My sight ain't too hot either

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Cindy Hamilton" wrote in message
...

On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 5:44:18 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:

> Ahhh that might be it)7
>
> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
> called prawns or lobsters
>
> Our shrimps are tiny

I'll admit it's a little cognitively dissonant to buy a package of
"jumbo shrimp".

We have two systems (although one isn't very systematic) of shrimp
size nomenclatu

Number of shrimp per pound
Vague identifiers such as small, medium, large, jumbo, colossal.

Serious cooks try to buy their shrimp by "number per pound".

The term prawn is occasionally used for the largest specimens,
although usually on menus.

We use the word "shrimp" to refer to a particular class of
crustaceans; the defining feature appears to be that their legs
aren't strong enough to walk on.

Lobster have stronger legs. Generally, "lobster" unmodified
refers to Homarus americanus. I have eaten a fair number of
"African Rock Lobster" tails and "langostinos" as well.

Freshwater lobsters are generally called crayfish, crawfish, or
crawdads.

Cindy Hamilton

==

Interesting stuff! Thanks Cindy))

All very complicated though) I think I will just stick to tiny shrimp
etc)



--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"U.S. Janet B." wrote in message
...

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 07:16:45 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 5:44:18 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
>
>> Ahhh that might be it)7
>>
>> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones
>> are
>> called prawns or lobsters
>>
>> Our shrimps are tiny
>
>I'll admit it's a little cognitively dissonant to buy a package of
>"jumbo shrimp".
>
>We have two systems (although one isn't very systematic) of shrimp
>size nomenclatu
>
>Number of shrimp per pound
>Vague identifiers such as small, medium, large, jumbo, colossal.
>
>Serious cooks try to buy their shrimp by "number per pound".
>
>The term prawn is occasionally used for the largest specimens,
>although usually on menus.
>
>We use the word "shrimp" to refer to a particular class of
>crustaceans; the defining feature appears to be that their legs
>aren't strong enough to walk on.
>
>Lobster have stronger legs. Generally, "lobster" unmodified
>refers to Homarus americanus. I have eaten a fair number of
>"African Rock Lobster" tails and "langostinos" as well.
>
>Freshwater lobsters are generally called crayfish, crawfish, or
>crawdads.
>
>Cindy Hamilton

that was a nice summation. ;-)
P.S. They're all good!
Janet US

===

I can't argue with that)


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Cheri" wrote in message news >
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Cheri" wrote in message news >> "dsi1" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my
>>> superpower.
>>
>>
>> That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.
>>
>> Cheri
>> ==
>>
>> I'm still looking for mine
>
> Mine is my hearing.
>
> Cheri
>
> ==
>
> You have super hearing??? Wow lucky you!!! My sight ain't too hot
> either

Yes, I do. It drives me crazy at times, but my eyesight is not good.

Cheri

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
...
> "Cheri" wrote in message news >
> "Ophelia" > wrote in message
> ...
>> "Cheri" wrote in message news >> "dsi1" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:10:45 PM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:
>>>>
>>>> You actually took the time to count them? Really? LOL
>>>>
>>>> Cheri
>>>
>>> I'm very good at estimating quantities and values of stuff. It's my
>>> superpower.
>>
>>
>> That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.
>>
>> Cheri
>> ==
>>
>> I'm still looking for mine
>
> Mine is my hearing.
>
> Cheri
>
> ==
>
> You have super hearing??? Wow lucky you!!! My sight ain't too hot
> either

Yes, I do. It drives me crazy at times, but my eyesight is not good.

Cheri

==

I am deaf and have hearing aids but that is nothing new)

The retina in one eye is stuffed so ... I am still running around doing
what I want to do so it isn't all bad)




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On 12/25/2017 12:42 PM, Sqwertz wrote:
> And the subject IS about pounds. Nowhere near
> 200/#.
>
> -sw
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

>> Omelet wrote:
>
>> He hates me 'cause I never slept with him...
>
> He hates himself because he is all he has to sleep with
> I don't know, sometimes he used to seem normal, then he went petty
> trough vindictive and now I just shun contact. I have enough crazies to
> deal with in my world without encouraging those who refuse to take their
> meds.

For the record, I never once even considered sleeping with you. And
you know that. You're the one who somehow got the idea that I was
going to move in with you - and you posted that to RFC just out of the
total blue.

After having met you twice at casual austin.food gatherings 2 or 3
years ago and not giving you any indication that there was any sort of
romantic interest in the least, you somehow twisted that into MY
MOVING IN WITH YOU?

That was just way too Psycho for me. I sat there at stared at the
screen for at least 15 minutes wondering, WTF? That was just way too
spooky. I've met weird, semi-psycho women before but you win, hands
down. Mapi of austin.general still holds the male title, but at least
he announced his psychosis right there lying on the floor of the bar
at B.D. Reilly's rather than romantically obsessing over me for 2
years.

Needless to say, you need to come to terms with what happened and why
your mind works that way and stop making up excuses for your fixation
and disappointment before we become the next Yoli and Michael. I'd
prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

And Jeremy, I was just tired of your decade of bullshit and visions of
grandeur about all these things you're "working on" or have not done
in the past. Even posting a call for meetings with imaginary people
about imaginary projects of yours at "the normal time and place", as
if you are somebody important with a life. I'm pretty sure you're
manic depressive mixed with habitual liar.

Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Ophelia wrote:
>
> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
> called prawns or lobsters
>
> Our shrimps are tiny

Here in the USA, at least in my area, shrimp size is labeled by
number of shrimp in a pound. Buy 21-30 count shrimp and that
means an average of 21-30 shrimp in a pound. Buy 31-40 count and
that's 31-40 shrimp in a pound.

For eating plain, I prefer the 31-40 or the 41-50. Nice
bite-sized. Also, the smaller the shrimp, the more taste they
have. The large ones are more bland but work well to butterfly
and sautee in garlic, etc.

On 12/26/2017 11:42 AM, Gary wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:
>>
>> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
>> called prawns or lobsters
>>
>> Our shrimps are tiny
>
> Here in the USA, at least in my area, shrimp size is labeled by
> number of shrimp in a pound. Buy 21-30 count shrimp and that
> means an average of 21-30 shrimp in a pound. Buy 31-40 count and
> that's 31-40 shrimp in a pound.
>
> For eating plain, I prefer the 31-40 or the 41-50. Nice
> bite-sized. Also, the smaller the shrimp, the more taste they
> have. The large ones are more bland but work well to butterfly
> and sautee in garlic, etc.
>
>
What do shrimp watch when they're horny?

Prawnography.

"Ophelia" wrote in message ...

"Cheri" wrote in message news
"Ophelia" > wrote in message
>> That's good, everyone should have at least one superpower.
>>
>> Cheri
>> ==
>>
>> I'm still looking for mine
>
> Mine is my hearing.
>
> Cheri
>
> ==
>
> You have super hearing??? Wow lucky you!!! My sight ain't too hot
> either

Yes, I do. It drives me crazy at times, but my eyesight is not good.

Cheri

==

I am deaf and have hearing aids but that is nothing new)

The retina in one eye is stuffed so ... I am still running around doing
what I want to do so it isn't all bad)

--

I should have added, I do have one superpower ... my sense of smell)

See, tis not all bad))




--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

"Gary" wrote in message ...

Ophelia wrote:
>
> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
> called prawns or lobsters
>
> Our shrimps are tiny

Here in the USA, at least in my area, shrimp size is labeled by
number of shrimp in a pound. Buy 21-30 count shrimp and that
means an average of 21-30 shrimp in a pound. Buy 31-40 count and
that's 31-40 shrimp in a pound.

For eating plain, I prefer the 31-40 or the 41-50. Nice
bite-sized. Also, the smaller the shrimp, the more taste they
have. The large ones are more bland but work well to butterfly
and sautee in garlic, etc.

==

Those larger ones we would call prawns.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 11:47:05 -0500, Casa del Sol naciente
> wrote:

>On 12/26/2017 11:42 AM, Gary wrote:
>> Ophelia wrote:
>>>
>>> I haven't come across that 'shrimp count' thing here. Our bigger ones are
>>> called prawns or lobsters
>>>
>>> Our shrimps are tiny
>>
>> Here in the USA, at least in my area, shrimp size is labeled by
>> number of shrimp in a pound. Buy 21-30 count shrimp and that
>> means an average of 21-30 shrimp in a pound. Buy 31-40 count and
>> that's 31-40 shrimp in a pound.
>>
>> For eating plain, I prefer the 31-40 or the 41-50. Nice
>> bite-sized. Also, the smaller the shrimp, the more taste they
>> have. The large ones are more bland but work well to butterfly
>> and sautee in garlic, etc.
>>
> >
>What do shrimp watch when they're horny?
>
>Prawnography.

The very horny shrimp take a few laps on that grubbermint treadmill.

On Monday, December 25, 2017 at 12:56:56 PM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote:
>
> Did you listen to that Happy Christmas thing I posted. I thought it might
> interest you. It has some future stuff <g>
>
> --
> http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk

I did listen to it - not very carefully, I'm afraid. I'll check it out again and get back to you.

On Tuesday, December 26, 2017 at 3:13:39 AM UTC-10, Cheri wrote:

>
> Mine is my hearing.
>
> Cheri

That's pretty good. I have a mild to moderate flat hearing loss. It's worse than some and better than others in my age group. I also have tinnitus. It's no fun but it could be worse.

Your super hearing probably means your ear hardware and brain processing is in tip top shape. My brain is deteriorating somewhat. That's the breaks.