On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 7:43:00 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 10:53:29 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >
> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
> >> border.
> >
> > There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
> > I think you're safe.
> >
> > Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
> > the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
> > has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
> > They want to make a little money, raise their children, and retire
> > in comfort.
> >
> > Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
> > I don't know why I try.
>
> What are the abbreviations for Canada and California?

Depends who's doing the abbreviating. The U.S. postal
service abbreviation for California is CA. I don't think
it has one for Canada. The Internet country code for
Canada is .ca

Cindy

"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 7:43:00 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 10:53:29 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >
>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>> >> border.
>> >
>> > There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>> > I think you're safe.
>> >
>> > Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>> > the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>> > has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>> > They want to make a little money, raise their children, and retire
>> > in comfort.
>> >
>> > Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>> > I don't know why I try.
>>
>> What are the abbreviations for Canada and California?
>
> Depends who's doing the abbreviating. The U.S. postal
> service abbreviation for California is CA. I don't think
> it has one for Canada. The Internet country code for
> Canada is .ca

OK, thanks, very much! I had seen both but I hadn't know which was which.

--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 2/8/2016 9:12 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

>>>
>>> Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>> the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>> has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>> They want to make a little money, raise their children, and retire
>>> in comfort.
>>>
>>> Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>> I don't know why I try.
>>
>> What are the abbreviations for Canada and California?
>
> Depends who's doing the abbreviating. The U.S. postal
> service abbreviation for California is CA. I don't think
> it has one for Canada. The Internet country code for
> Canada is .ca
>
> Cindy
>

It is CA. Niger is the same as Nebraska New Caledonia is the same as
North Carolina, Seychelles is the same as South Carolina. Want to guess
Mongolia and Morroco? MN and MA.

(PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>> border.
>
>There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>I think you're safe.
>
>Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".

When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
meaningless.

>Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>I don't know why I try.

If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 06:12:08 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 7:43:00 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 10:53:29 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >
>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>> >> border.
>> >
>> > There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>> > I think you're safe.
>> >
>> > Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>> > the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>> > has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>> > They want to make a little money, raise their children, and retire
>> > in comfort.
>> >
>> > Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>> > I don't know why I try.
>>
>> What are the abbreviations for Canada and California?
>
>Depends who's doing the abbreviating. The U.S. postal
>service abbreviation for California is CA. I don't think
>it has one for Canada. The Internet country code for
>Canada is .ca
>
>Cindy

No one with a IQ would think there's a Noo Yawk Calyfornya border...
you were just looking to pick a nit... so I'm a Skeet Shot and you're
a Cheap Shot. LOL

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 14:19:42 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 06:12:08 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>>Depends who's doing the abbreviating. The U.S. postal
>>service abbreviation for California is CA. I don't think
>>it has one for Canada. The Internet country code for
>>Canada is .ca
>>
>>Cindy
>
>No one with a IQ would think there's a Noo Yawk Calyfornya border...

Isn't that border called the fly-over zone?

--
Bruce

On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >
> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
> >> border.
> >
> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
> >I think you're safe.
> >
> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>
> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
> meaningless.

There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.

> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
> >I don't know why I try.

I recalled after I hit send why I try:

"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"

> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,

And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
Muslims right in my own backyard.

> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,

Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
where you live".

> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.

I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.

Cindy Hamilton

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:23:15 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
...
>> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 7:43:00 AM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
>>> "Cindy Hamilton" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>> > On Sunday, February 7, 2016 at 10:53:29 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>>> >> border.
>>> >
>>> > There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>>> > I think you're safe.
>>> >
>>> > Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>> > the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>> > has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>> > They want to make a little money, raise their children, and retire
>>> > in comfort.
>>> >
>>> > Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>> > I don't know why I try.
>>>
>>> What are the abbreviations for Canada and California?
>>
>> Depends who's doing the abbreviating. The U.S. postal
>> service abbreviation for California is CA. I don't think
>> it has one for Canada. The Internet country code for
>> Canada is .ca
>
>OK, thanks, very much! I had seen both but I hadn't know which was which.

The US Postal service doesn't have an abbreviation for Canada, instead
they use the Province and Territory abbreviations, and spell out
Canada:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canadi..._te rritories
However it was very obvious that I was refering to the New York-Canada
border... people with a functioning brain know that there is no New
York-California border, except in Disneyland.
Before there was an internet, a postal service, or a California, and
even before Canada was divided into provinces and territories, and for
those of us who were educated about Geography even in grade 6 public
schools the abbreviation for Canada was always CA.
http://sustainablesources.com/resour...abbreviations/
Cindy Hamilton needs to check her dictionary (if she even owns one and
is capable of its use) for "context", as in reading for *context*:
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/context
I'm positive Cindy was not a very good student, probably got failing
grades in "Gets along well with others" too. LOL

On 08/02/2016 1:23 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>>> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>>>> border.
>>>
>>> There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>>> I think you're safe.
>>>
>>> Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>> the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>> has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>
>> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>> meaningless.
>
> There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
> talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>
>>> Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>> I don't know why I try.
>
> I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>
> "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>
>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>
> And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
> Muslims right in my own backyard.
>
In the US and Canada, it's the fundie christians about which one has to
worry, judging by the rules and restrictions they want to inflict!
Graham

On 2016-02-08 2:11 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:

> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>

It is hard for me to understand living in a rural area if you are afraid
to go out in the woods without being armed. I am sure I am not the only
one who likes to go for a walk in the woods alone at night. It would
never occur to me to carry a gun to do that.

On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:23:47 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 1:23 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> > On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
> >>>> border.
> >>>
> >>> There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
> >>> I think you're safe.
> >>>
> >>> Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
> >>> the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
> >>> has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
> >>
> >> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
> >> meaningless.
> >
> > There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
> > talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
> >
> >>> Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
> >>> I don't know why I try.
> >
> > I recalled after I hit send why I try:
> >
> > "All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
> >
> >> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
> >> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
> >
> > And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
> > Muslims right in my own backyard.
> >
> In the US and Canada, it's the fundie christians about which one has to
> worry, judging by the rules and restrictions they want to inflict!
> Graham

Agreed.

Cindy Hamilton

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >
>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>> >> border.
>> >
>> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>> >I think you're safe.
>> >
>> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>
>> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>> meaningless.
>
>There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
>talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.

Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
>
>> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>> >I don't know why I try.
>
>I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>
>"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>
>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>
>And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>Muslims right in my own backyard.

So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.

>> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>
>Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
>want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
>or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
>where you live".

You can't be for real.

>> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>
>I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
>proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.

Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
who bombed Pearl Harbor. Try to imagine your world had the US not
nuked those slanty eyed *******s, and interned those who were already
here. I'd intern every mooslim that's already here, and I'd torture
them unmercifully to give up names. You live in La La Disneyland, you
do not comprehend WAR!

On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:51:29 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> > wrote:
>
> >On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> >> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
> >> >> border.
> >> >
> >> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
> >> >I think you're safe.
> >> >
> >> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
> >> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
> >> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
> >>
> >> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
> >> meaningless.
> >
> >There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
> >talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>
> Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
> >
> >> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
> >> >I don't know why I try.
> >
> >I recalled after I hit send why I try:
> >
> >"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
> >
> >> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
> >> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
> >
> >And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
> >Muslims right in my own backyard.
>
> So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.
>
> >> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
> >> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
> >> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
> >> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
> >> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
> >> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
> >> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
> >> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
> >> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
> >> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
> >> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
> >> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
> >
> >Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
> >want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
> >or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
> >where you live".
>
> You can't be for real.
>
> >> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
> >> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
> >> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
> >
> >I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
> >proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.
>
> Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
> terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
> This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
> who bombed Pearl Harbor. Try to imagine your world had the US not
> nuked those slanty eyed *******s, and interned those who were already
> here. I'd intern every mooslim that's already here, and I'd torture
> them unmercifully to give up names. You live in La La Disneyland, you
> do not comprehend WAR!

Yes, I'm sure that torturing the pregnant wife of my
grocer would make us all feel proud.

Cindy Hamilton

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:50:40 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-02-08 2:11 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>>
>
>It is hard for me to understand living in a rural area if you are afraid
>to go out in the woods without being armed. I am sure I am not the only
>one who likes to go for a walk in the woods alone at night. It would
>never occur to me to carry a gun to do that.

You gotta be very dumb to go out for a walk in the woods at night even
armed.

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:55:22 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:51:29 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>> >> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>> >> >> border.
>> >> >
>> >> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>> >> >I think you're safe.
>> >> >
>> >> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>> >> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>> >> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>> >>
>> >> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>> >> meaningless.
>> >
>> >There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
>> >talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>>
>> Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
>> >
>> >> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>> >> >I don't know why I try.
>> >
>> >I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>> >
>> >"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>> >
>> >> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>> >> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>> >
>> >And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>> >Muslims right in my own backyard.
>>
>> So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.
>>
>> >> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>> >> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>> >> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>> >> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>> >> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>> >> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>> >> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>> >> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>> >> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>> >> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>> >> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>> >> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>> >
>> >Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
>> >want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
>> >or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
>> >where you live".
>>
>> You can't be for real.
>>
>> >> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>> >> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>> >> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>> >
>> >I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
>> >proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.
>>
>> Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>> terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>> This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>> who bombed Pearl Harbor. Try to imagine your world had the US not
>> nuked those slanty eyed *******s, and interned those who were already
>> here. I'd intern every mooslim that's already here, and I'd torture
>> them unmercifully to give up names. You live in La La Disneyland, you
>> do not comprehend WAR!
>
>Yes, I'm sure that torturing the pregnant wife of my
>grocer would make us all feel proud.
>
>Cindy Hamilton

You're just showing how naive you are.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:51:25 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>>> >> border.
>>> >
>>> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>>> >I think you're safe.
>>> >
>>> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>>
>>> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>>> meaningless.
>>
>>There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
>>talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>
>Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
>>
>>> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>> >I don't know why I try.
>>
>>I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>>
>>"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>>
>>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>>
>>And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>>Muslims right in my own backyard.
>
>So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.
>
>>> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>>> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>>> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>>> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>>> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>>> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>>> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>>> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>>> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>>> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>>> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>>> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>>
>>Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
>>want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
>>or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
>>where you live".
>
>You can't be for real.
>
>>> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>>> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>>> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>>
>>I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
>>proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.
>
>Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>who bombed Pearl Harbor.

Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed

Get real, racist.

--
Bruce

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 14:23:59 -0700, graham > wrote:

>On 08/02/2016 1:23 PM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:

snip
>>
>> And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>> Muslims right in my own backyard.
>>
>In the US and Canada, it's the fundie christians about which one has to
>worry, judging by the rules and restrictions they want to inflict!
>Graham

Indeed.
Janet US

On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed

Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.

On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:11:27 PM UTC-7, Jeßus wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
> >Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
> >Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>
> Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.
====
Surely you jest...only conspiracy believers would consider that a truthful statement.
That "stab in the back" was NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN...no matter how much you'd like it to be true.
======

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 15:25:14 -0800 (PST), Roy >
wrote:

>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:11:27 PM UTC-7, Jeßus wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>> >Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>> >Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>
>> Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.
>====
>Surely you jest...only conspiracy believers would consider that a truthful statement.

It's the human condition to be conspiratorial. It happens every day at
every level of life. Just because you throw in a term like 'conspiracy
believers' doesn't automatically invalidate anything. Don't you
believe that people and groups of people sometimes conspire together
to achieve a given result?

>That "stab in the back" was NOT ALLOWED TO HAPPEN...no matter how much you'd like it to be true.
>======

Well, it certainly changed the public's resistance to enter the war,
didn't it? It's an old, tried and true technique.

On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:51:25 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>>>> >> border.
>>>> >
>>>> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>>>> >I think you're safe.
>>>> >
>>>> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>>> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>>> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>>>
>>>> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>>>> meaningless.
>>>
>>>There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
>>>talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>>
>>Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
>>>
>>>> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>>> >I don't know why I try.
>>>
>>>I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>>>
>>>"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>>>
>>>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>>>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>>>
>>>And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>>>Muslims right in my own backyard.
>>
>>So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.
>>
>>>> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>>>> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>>>> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>>>> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>>>> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>>>> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>>>> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>>>> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>>>> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>>>> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>>>> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>>>> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>>>
>>>Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
>>>want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
>>>or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
>>>where you live".
>>
>>You can't be for real.
>>
>>>> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>>>> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>>>> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>>>
>>>I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
>>>proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.
>>
>>Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>>terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>>This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>>who bombed Pearl Harbor.
>
>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>
>Get real, racist.

Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
got.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:51:25 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>>>>> >> border.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>>>>> >I think you're safe.
>>>>> >
>>>>> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>>>> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>>>> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>>>>
>>>>> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>>>>> meaningless.
>>>>
>>>>There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
>>>>talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>>>
>>>Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
>>>>
>>>>> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>>>> >I don't know why I try.
>>>>
>>>>I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>>>>
>>>>"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>>>>
>>>>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>>>>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>>>>
>>>>And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>>>>Muslims right in my own backyard.
>>>
>>>So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.
>>>
>>>>> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>>>>> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>>>>> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>>>>> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>>>>> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>>>>> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>>>>> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>>>>> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>>>>> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>>>>> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>>>>> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>>>>> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>>>>
>>>>Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
>>>>want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
>>>>or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
>>>>where you live".
>>>
>>>You can't be for real.
>>>
>>>>> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>>>>> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>>>>> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>>>>
>>>>I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
>>>>proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.
>>>
>>>Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>>>terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>>>This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>>>who bombed Pearl Harbor.
>>
>>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>
>>Get real, racist.
>
>Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>got.

I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.

--
Bruce

On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:51:25 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>>>>>> >> border.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>>>>>> >I think you're safe.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>>>>> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>>>>> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>>>>>
>>>>>> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>>>>>> meaningless.
>>>>>
>>>>>There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
>>>>>talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>>>>
>>>>Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
>>>>>
>>>>>> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>>>>> >I don't know why I try.
>>>>>
>>>>>I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>>>>>
>>>>>"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>>>>>
>>>>>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>>>>>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>>>>>
>>>>>And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>>>>>Muslims right in my own backyard.
>>>>
>>>>So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.
>>>>
>>>>>> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>>>>>> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>>>>>> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>>>>>> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>>>>>> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>>>>>> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>>>>>> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>>>>>> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>>>>>> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>>>>>> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>>>>>> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>>>>>> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>>>>>
>>>>>Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
>>>>>want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
>>>>>or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
>>>>>where you live".
>>>>
>>>>You can't be for real.
>>>>
>>>>>> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>>>>>> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>>>>>> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>>>>>
>>>>>I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
>>>>>proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.
>>>>
>>>>Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>>>>terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>>>>This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>>>>who bombed Pearl Harbor.
>>>
>>>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>>
>>>Get real, racist.
>>
>>Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>>got.
>
>I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.

I definitely will when we nuke iran, etal.
And it's coming.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:37:21 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:51:25 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>>>>>terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>>>>>This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>>>>>who bombed Pearl Harbor.
>>>>
>>>>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>>>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>>>
>>>>Get real, racist.
>>>
>>>Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>>>got.
>>
>>I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.
>
>I definitely will when we nuke iran, etal.
>And it's coming.

You think like a child. When we hurt them, it's good. When they hurt
us, it's terrible.

--
Bruce

On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
> > wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
> >>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
> >>
> >>Get real, racist.
> >
> >Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
> >got.
>
> I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.

People with big mouths like his usually don't know where 15 of the 19
hijackers came from. It's too easy to blame Muslims in general rather
than educated themselves, however little it takes.

--

sf

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:58:43 -0800, sf > wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
>> > wrote:
>>
>> >On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>> >
>> >>
>> >>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>> >>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>> >>
>> >>Get real, racist.
>> >
>> >Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>> >got.
>>
>> I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.
>
>People with big mouths like his usually don't know where 15 of the 19
>hijackers came from. It's too easy to blame Muslims in general rather
>than educated themselves, however little it takes.

Yes, he's immature.

--
Bruce

On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:01:11 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:58:43 -0800, sf > wrote:
>
>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>> >On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >>
>>> >>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>> >>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>> >>
>>> >>Get real, racist.
>>> >
>>> >Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>>> >got.
>>>
>>> I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.
>>
>>People with big mouths like his usually don't know where 15 of the 19
>>hijackers came from. It's too easy to blame Muslims in general rather
>>than educated themselves, however little it takes.
>
>Yes, he's immature.

Then I hope those freaks rape and murder your family, right in front
of your eyes so perhaps you will learn.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:18:27 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:01:11 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:58:43 -0800, sf > wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>>> >>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Get real, racist.
>>>> >
>>>> >Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>>>> >got.
>>>>
>>>> I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.
>>>
>>>People with big mouths like his usually don't know where 15 of the 19
>>>hijackers came from. It's too easy to blame Muslims in general rather
>>>than educated themselves, however little it takes.
>>
>>Yes, he's immature.
>
>Then I hope those freaks rape and murder your family, right in front
>of your eyes so perhaps you will learn.

You have a big mouth and an underdeveloped brain.

--
Bruce

On 2016-02-08 5:17 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:50:40 -0500, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
>
>>
>> It is hard for me to understand living in a rural area if you are afraid
>> to go out in the woods without being armed. I am sure I am not the only
>> one who likes to go for a walk in the woods alone at night. It would
>> never occur to me to carry a gun to do that.
>
> You gotta be very dumb to go out for a walk in the woods at night even
> armed.
>

Why? I am not afraid of the boogeyman.

On 2016-02-08 6:11 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>> Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>> Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>
> Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.
>


I cannot buy the idea that the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen. The
theory, as I understand it, is that Roosevelt wanted war and figured the
only way isolationists would agree to go to war would be if they were
attacked. It makes no sense to sacrifice the Pacific fleet to get
drawn into a way when they needed that same fleet to fight the war.
They would at least have been on a higher state of readiness to fight
off the attack an minimize losses. It would still have been an attack
and would have allowed them to get into the war... and to have a better
chance against a formidable foe.

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:22:46 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-02-08 5:17 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:50:40 -0500, Dave Smith
>> > wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> It is hard for me to understand living in a rural area if you are afraid
>>> to go out in the woods without being armed. I am sure I am not the only
>>> one who likes to go for a walk in the woods alone at night. It would
>>> never occur to me to carry a gun to do that.
>>
>> You gotta be very dumb to go out for a walk in the woods at night even
>> armed.
>>
>
>Why? I am not afraid of the boogeyman.

How about bear, cougar and wolves? When I knew cougar had been
sighted within the hills of our city, I wouldn't even walk the dog at
night in my own neighborhood. I don't know about Sheldon's area, but
hunting is allowed within some miles of here. That means it is
reasonable to assume there are animals nearby.
Janet US

On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:33:23 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:

>On 2016-02-08 6:11 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>
>>> Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>> Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>
>> Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.
>>
>
>
>I cannot buy the idea that the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen. The
>theory, as I understand it, is that Roosevelt wanted war and figured the
>only way isolationists would agree to go to war would be if they were
>attacked. It makes no sense to sacrifice the Pacific fleet to get
>drawn into a way when they needed that same fleet to fight the war.
>They would at least have been on a higher state of readiness to fight
>off the attack an minimize losses. It would still have been an attack
>and would have allowed them to get into the war... and to have a better
>chance against a formidable foe.

That is a good argument, but a little presumptuous not needing to
'sacrifice the fleet' to make the isolationists go along with entering
the war.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 20:37:21 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 16:51:25 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:23:51 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 2:11:28 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>>> (PST), Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>>>>> >Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >> Protection from smelly towelheads... I no longer trust the NY/CA
>>>>>>> >> border.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >There is a lot of territory between NY (New York) and CA (California).
>>>>>>> >I think you're safe.
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> >Given that you meant Canada and not California (and simply bollixed
>>>>>>> >the abbreviation), you probably are still safe. Southeast Michigan
>>>>>>> >has a lot of Muslims and for the most part "they" are just like "us".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> When there's a Billion or more 'for the most part' is totally
>>>>>>> meaningless.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>There aren't a billion Muslims in southeast Michigan. I'm
>>>>>>talking about the ones here, not the ones in Indonesia.
>>>>>
>>>>>Do you really believe the bad ones don't find there way here? duh
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> >Still, at your age, there's no talking you out of your bigotry, so
>>>>>>> >I don't know why I try.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I recalled after I hit send why I try:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>"All that is necessary for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing"
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you read newpapers you'd know that they have already picked up
>>>>>>> several terrorists in rural NY, they don't all inhabit the big cities,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And there are tens of thousands of decent, law-abiding
>>>>>>Muslims right in my own backyard.
>>>>>
>>>>>So what, there are still a few hundred bad ones.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> they live out in the woods because there are far fewer eyeballs on
>>>>>>> their comings and goings. I've always had a shotgun, I just wanted a
>>>>>>> newer nicer one, now I'll have two. And keeping firearms has nothing
>>>>>>> to do with bigotry, people in rural areas are ripe targets for
>>>>>>> break-ins, everyone here keeps firearms because the druggie population
>>>>>>> is huge, there are lots of burglaries, and there are no police for
>>>>>>> several miles. I don't go wandering about here without being armed,
>>>>>>> there are bears in the woods and other dangerous preditors... when I
>>>>>>> go out to saw up a fallen tree in my back field I bring a shotgun, if
>>>>>>> I need to go out to my barn at night I go armed. I know very well
>>>>>>> that there are bad people of every persuasion but nowadays the most
>>>>>>> violent are the terrorist mooslims, and NY is their biggest prize,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oddly, I care very little about New York. If they really
>>>>>>want to terrorize the U.S., they'll pick Branson, MO,
>>>>>>or Peoria. Something that tells people "we can hit you
>>>>>>where you live".
>>>>>
>>>>>You can't be for real.
>>>>>
>>>>>>> they arrive any which way they can. You sound like a very shallow
>>>>>>> thinking/naive city mouse... you're likely one of those plastic
>>>>>>> Calyfornian potheads with the typical Disneyland mentality.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>I'll convey your regards to my Muslim co-worker and to the
>>>>>>proprietor of the ethnic grocery store across the street.
>>>>>
>>>>>Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>>>>>terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>>>>>This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>>>>>who bombed Pearl Harbor.
>>>>
>>>>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>>>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>>>
>>>>Get real, racist.
>>>
>>>Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>>>got.
>>
>>I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.
>
>I definitely will when we nuke iran,

Iran? (ahain?). What have they done?

>etal.
>And it's coming.

Yeah... 'etal'. You mean brown people. I wish I could cave you head
in.

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 21:18:27 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:

>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 13:01:11 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 17:58:43 -0800, sf > wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 11:46:35 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 19:32:05 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>>> >>Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Get real, racist.
>>>> >
>>>> >Too bad it wasn't a thousand times more... they deserved what they
>>>> >got.
>>>>
>>>> I guess you feel the same way about 9/11.
>>>
>>>People with big mouths like his usually don't know where 15 of the 19
>>>hijackers came from. It's too easy to blame Muslims in general rather
>>>than educated themselves, however little it takes.
>>
>>Yes, he's immature.
>
>Then I hope those freaks rape and murder your family, right in front
>of your eyes so perhaps you will learn.

Look out for the boogyman... OGABOOGABOOGABOOGA!
Be afraid, always be afraid... LOL.

On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:33:27 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2016-02-08 6:11 PM, Je�us wrote:
> > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
> >
> >> Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
> >> Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
> >
> > Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.
> >
>
>
> I cannot buy the idea that the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen. The
> theory, as I understand it, is that Roosevelt wanted war and figured the
> only way isolationists would agree to go to war would be if they were
> attacked. It makes no sense to sacrifice the Pacific fleet to get
> drawn into a way when they needed that same fleet to fight the war.
> They would at least have been on a higher state of readiness to fight
> off the attack an minimize losses. It would still have been an attack
> and would have allowed them to get into the war... and to have a better
> chance against a formidable foe.

My dad knew the radar operator that spotted the really big group of planes coming into Oahu in 1941. The guy was told not to worry about it - it was our planes. This doesn't make much sense because people were expecting an invasion so who knows what happened.

My father's high school class spent a lot of time clearing out the coastline of brush - I guess so big guns could be set up. It was a heck of a time for kids in high school. Twenty years later my dad would help build a network of missile defense radar installations on atolls throughout the Pacific. I guess you could say he spent a lot of time getting the country ready for enemy attacks.

On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 5:20:52 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:55:22 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton

> >> Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
> >> terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
> >> This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
> >> who bombed Pearl Harbor. Try to imagine your world had the US not
> >> nuked those slanty eyed *******s, and interned those who were already
> >> here. I'd intern every mooslim that's already here, and I'd torture
> >> them unmercifully to give up names. You live in La La Disneyland, you
> >> do not comprehend WAR!
> >
> >Yes, I'm sure that torturing the pregnant wife of my
> >grocer would make us all feel proud.
> >
> >Cindy Hamilton
>
> You're just showing how naive you are.

I've come to realize you are correct. But we'll need a name for the
internment/torture facilities. I believe the names Buchenwald, Dachau,
and Auschwitz are available.

Cindy Hamilton

On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:49:54 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
wrote:

> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:33:27 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
> > On 2016-02-08 6:11 PM, Je?us wrote:
> > > On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
> > >
> > >> Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
> > >> Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
> > >
> > > Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.
> > >
> >
> > I cannot buy the idea that the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen. The
> > theory, as I understand it, is that Roosevelt wanted war and figured the
> > only way isolationists would agree to go to war would be if they were
> > attacked. It makes no sense to sacrifice the Pacific fleet to get
> > drawn into a way when they needed that same fleet to fight the war.
> > They would at least have been on a higher state of readiness to fight
> > off the attack an minimize losses. It would still have been an attack
> > and would have allowed them to get into the war... and to have a better
> > chance against a formidable foe.
>
> My dad knew the radar operator that spotted the really big group of planes coming into Oahu in 1941. The guy was told not to worry about it - it was our planes. This doesn't make much sense because people were expecting an invasion so who knows what happened.
>

The way I heard it, a message was decoded and the mainland was
frantically trying to send a warning, which didn't arrive until after
the attack started. But it's just another conspiracy theory that
didn't have enough followers to make it to Wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_...spiracy_theory



--

sf

On Mon, 08 Feb 2016 22:35:28 -0700, Janet B >
wrote:

>On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 21:22:46 -0500, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>On 2016-02-08 5:17 PM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 16:50:40 -0500, Dave Smith
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> It is hard for me to understand living in a rural area if you are afraid
>>>> to go out in the woods without being armed. I am sure I am not the only
>>>> one who likes to go for a walk in the woods alone at night. It would
>>>> never occur to me to carry a gun to do that.
>>>
>>> You gotta be very dumb to go out for a walk in the woods at night even
>>> armed.
>>>
>>
>>Why? I am not afraid of the boogeyman.
>
>How about bear, cougar and wolves? When I knew cougar had been
>sighted within the hills of our city, I wouldn't even walk the dog at
>night in my own neighborhood. I don't know about Sheldon's area, but
>hunting is allowed within some miles of here. That means it is
>reasonable to assume there are animals nearby.
>Janet US

Hunting is permitted most everywhere in this county that is more than
500' from occupied buildings, by property owner or with written
permission of property owner. There are plenty of dangerous critters
that I've sighted on my property; black bear, cougar, coyote, several
types of poisonous snakes, even does will attack when with fawns and
you inadvertantly surprise them.

On 2/9/2016 7:15 AM, sf wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 02:49:54 -0800 (PST), dsi1 >
> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 4:33:27 PM UTC-10, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2016-02-08 6:11 PM, Je?us wrote:
>>>> On Tue, 09 Feb 2016 09:56:47 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Pearl Harbor - military target - 2,403 killed
>>>>> Hiroshima & Nagasaki - civilian targets - 250,000+ killed
>>>>
>>>> Besides, Pearl harbour was allowed to happen for political reasons.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I cannot buy the idea that the US allowed Pearl Harbor to happen. The
>>> theory, as I understand it, is that Roosevelt wanted war and figured the
>>> only way isolationists would agree to go to war would be if they were
>>> attacked. It makes no sense to sacrifice the Pacific fleet to get
>>> drawn into a way when they needed that same fleet to fight the war.
>>> They would at least have been on a higher state of readiness to fight
>>> off the attack an minimize losses. It would still have been an attack
>>> and would have allowed them to get into the war... and to have a better
>>> chance against a formidable foe.
>>
>> My dad knew the radar operator that spotted the really big group of planes coming into Oahu in 1941. The guy was told not to worry about it - it was our planes. This doesn't make much sense because people were expecting an invasion so who knows what happened.
>>
>
> The way I heard it, a message was decoded and the mainland was
> frantically trying to send a warning, which didn't arrive until after
> the attack started. But it's just another conspiracy theory that
> didn't have enough followers to make it to Wikipedia.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pearl_...spiracy_theory
>
>

My understanding is that a message concerning the positions of the
moorings of the Pacific Fleet in Pearl Harbor was intercepted and
decoded a couple of weeks before the attack. Like the warning of the
approaching planes on Dec 7th, it was ignored. America is a country that
is reactive rather than pro-active. We're not a before-the-fact kind of
people.

Did you hear the one about Tojo sending a message to the
Japanese-American solders in Hawaii encouraging them to be loyal to
their emperor (Roosevelt) and to fight with all their strength for their
country? It's kind of a nutty story but it just goes to show you how
strongly loyalty and honor and the Bushido code was held by the Japanese
military.

On Tue, 9 Feb 2016 03:19:08 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Monday, February 8, 2016 at 5:20:52 PM UTC-5, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:55:22 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>
>> >> Go right ahead, but remember they know very well who are the
>> >> terrorists who attend their mosques, they are just too ascared to say.
>> >> This mooslim terrorist thing is no different from the terrorist japs
>> >> who bombed Pearl Harbor. Try to imagine your world had the US not
>> >> nuked those slanty eyed *******s, and interned those who were already
>> >> here. I'd intern every mooslim that's already here, and I'd torture
>> >> them unmercifully to give up names. You live in La La Disneyland, you
>> >> do not comprehend WAR!
>> >
>> >Yes, I'm sure that torturing the pregnant wife of my
>> >grocer would make us all feel proud.
>> >
>> >Cindy Hamilton
>>
>> You're just showing how naive you are.
>
>I've come to realize you are correct. But we'll need a name for the
>internment/torture facilities. I believe the names Buchenwald, Dachau,
>and Auschwitz are available.
>
>Cindy Hamilton

You're backhandedly admitting I'm correct, torture does not mean
annihilation if an entire people, it means squeezing out information
from an individual... your local police do it all the time, how do you
think they get the one bad person they apprehended to give up their
accomplices... and compared to other countries solitary in US prisons
is like a private suite at the Sheraton. I was 100% correct, you are
extremely naive and as smarmy as smarmy gets. you have no concept
whatsoever of how other contries treat prisoners. My mother's brother
was tortured by the north koreans and as a lowly helicopter mechanic
he knew less than nothing... he was 23 years old, a new father who
never saw his child, those slanty eyed *******s amputated both his
legs above the knee by tourniquitte, he died in a VA hospice in
Homestead Fl, alone. I'd have no problem nuking ALL koreans off this
planet like they never existed. I have a BIL who suffered torture at
the hands of the gooks in nam who is living out his remaining days as
a vegetable in a VA home, he doesn't even know where he is or who he
is, he's held together with nuts, bolts, and steel plates, would have
been more humane they killed him. I'm glad you and your family were
never touched by war, obviously you couldn't handle it. You are as
other worldly in your comprehension of this world as some ET from
Billions of light years away.

I know exactly what's needs to be done to save the human race. First
and most critical is to outlaw ALL religions, anyone who refuses must
be eliminated immediately, not even a burial, just a mass composting.
The next biggest problem on this planet is over population... marriage
needs to be eliminated and no ten people are to be permitted more than
one child... there are ways to work this out, probably by lottery, and
no one has jursidiction over any newborn, newborns come equally under
the auspices of all inhabitants. And there would be no government,
government would be considered as a religion and must be annihlated.
The concept of family must be eliminated as well. If what I've
proposed is not adopted the human race cannot exist another hundred
years neither will any life on this planet because as everything is
progressing within less than 30 years there will occur a nuclear
holocast that will eliminate all life including viral.