Kalmia, I saw an interview...one of those quick, on-the-fly photog questions,
where he pulled his hair back in the front...it is his real hair. that probably
disappoints you, I know.

N.

In article >,
says...
>
> Kalmia, I saw an interview...one of those quick, on-the-fly photog questions,
> where he pulled his hair back in the front...it is his real hair. that probably
> disappoints you, I know.

The fact it's attached to his head, doesn't mean it grew there.

Janet UK

On Sun, 5 Jul 2015 22:12:31 +0100, Janet > wrote:

>In article >,
says...
>>
>> Kalmia, I saw an interview...one of those quick, on-the-fly photog questions,
>> where he pulled his hair back in the front...it is his real hair. that probably
>> disappoints you, I know.
>
> The fact it's attached to his head, doesn't mean it grew there.

LOL, true. He's like a poster child for poor taste.

On 7/5/2015 3:16 PM, wrote:
> He's like a poster child for poor taste.


And you for evil rabbit-killing.

Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.

What would be your reaction if a female candidate had so much emphasis on
their hair?? You would likely be incensed at the shallowness of the criticism,
and never attach the personality traits to her that you have claimed Donald has.

N.

In article >,
says...
>
> Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
> over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
> popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
> I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.
>
> What would be your reaction if a female candidate had so much emphasis on
> their hair?? You would likely be incensed at the shallowness of the criticism,
> and never attach the personality traits to her that you have claimed Donald has.
>
> N.

Janet wrote:
>ellorysgirl wrote:
>>
>> Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
>> over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
>> popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
>> I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.

I don't find Trump's hair style meaningful one way or another... who I
don't trust are men with lots of facial hair, I would never vote for a
man with a full beard, nor would I associate with bearded men
socially... all that hair hides their facial expressions, makes it
impossible to tell how they feel about what they are saying or their
response to what others are saying... and I definitely don't want to
sit across the dinner table from a guy with a beard, disgustingly
gross.

>> What would be your reaction if a female candidate had so much emphasis on
>> their hair?? You would likely be incensed at the shallowness of the criticism,
>> and never attach the personality traits to her that you have claimed Donald has.

I really don't notice a female's hair... in fact I'd prefer she were
clean shaven. . .

On 7/6/2015 11:59 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Janet wrote:
>> ellorysgirl wrote:
>>>
>>> Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
>>> over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
>>> popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
>>> I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.
>
> I don't find Trump's hair style meaningful one way or another... who I
> don't trust are men with lots of facial hair, I would never vote for a
> man with a full beard, nor would I associate with bearded men
> socially... all that hair hides their facial expressions, makes it
> impossible to tell how they feel about what they are saying or their
> response to what others are saying... and I definitely don't want to
> sit across the dinner table from a guy with a beard, disgustingly
> gross.
>

Wow, a facial hair bigot, who knew?

Did you think God gave men face hair to hide their facial expressions
from Him?

You nutter.

On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 8:20:55 AM UTC-10, Acme Bully Control wrote:
> On 7/6/2015 11:59 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > Janet wrote:
> >> ellorysgirl wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
> >>> over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
> >>> popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
> >>> I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.
> >
> > I don't find Trump's hair style meaningful one way or another... who I
> > don't trust are men with lots of facial hair, I would never vote for a
> > man with a full beard, nor would I associate with bearded men
> > socially... all that hair hides their facial expressions, makes it
> > impossible to tell how they feel about what they are saying or their
> > response to what others are saying... and I definitely don't want to
> > sit across the dinner table from a guy with a beard, disgustingly
> > gross.
> >
>
> Wow, a facial hair bigot, who knew?
>
> Did you think God gave men face hair to hide their facial expressions
> from Him?
>
> You nutter.

I have heard that people have a general distrust of beards. I don't understand it myself. I guess people is superficial sods. Hee hee.

I've been wearing a beard for the last couple of months. My aim was to get a Hayao Miyazaki kind of vibe about me but when I look in the mirror it's more Gabby Hayes than anything. That's always one of the hazards of beard wearing.

On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 1:59:56 PM UTC-4, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> Janet wrote:
> >ellorysgirl wrote:
> >>
> >> Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
> >> over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
> >> popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
> >> I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.
>
> I don't find Trump's hair style meaningful one way or another... who I
> don't trust are men with lots of facial hair, I would never vote for a
> man with a full beard, nor would I associate with bearded men
> socially... all that hair hides their facial expressions, makes it
> impossible to tell how they feel about what they are saying or their
> response to what others are saying... and I definitely don't want to
> sit across the dinner table from a guy with a beard, disgustingly
> gross.

I've never seen my husband's face. He's had a beard for the entire
time I've known him. He keeps it trimmed fairly short. He is
extremely fastidious while eating, and makes use of a napkin when
necessary. I can always read his expressions. You might consider
looking at the eyes. They reveal everything.


Cindy Hamilton

My 37 year old son has never seen his dad without a beard. He started growing it in 1974 when he finished his 6 years of service in the Air National Guard. It was very long, as was his hair for many, many years. Now he wears a traditional haircut and keeps the beard trimmed to about an inch. I doubt if I will ever see his face again as he has no intention of ever shaving it off, and that's fine with me. I love beards. Not Duck Dynasty beards but neatly trimmed ones.

Denise in NH

On 7/6/2015 6:26 AM, Nancy2 wrote:
> Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
> over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
> popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
> I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.
>
> What would be your reaction if a female candidate had so much emphasis on
> their hair?? You would likely be incensed at the shallowness of the criticism,
> and never attach the personality traits to her that you have claimed Donald has.
>
> N.
>


Has anyone looked at Madame Billary's head mess lately?

Shocking.

On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:39:42 +1000, Bruce > wrote:

> Didn't Elton John have hair from his toes transplanted to his head?
> Maybe Trump did something similar.

It's a comb over from back to front. He's made fun of because someone
as vain as he is, with all the money he claims to have, would have
invested in a decent toupee or gotten transplants by this time.

--

sf

On 7/6/2015 7:57 AM, sf wrote:
> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:39:42 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>
>> Didn't Elton John have hair from his toes transplanted to his head?
>> Maybe Trump did something similar.
>
> It's a comb over from back to front. He's made fun of because someone
> as vain as he is, with all the money he claims to have, would have
> invested in a decent toupee or gotten transplants by this time.
>
Or he could just be himself and not give a **** what the haters think.

On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 11:03:28 AM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control wrote:
> On 7/6/2015 7:57 AM, sf wrote:
> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:39:42 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
> >
> >> Didn't Elton John have hair from his toes transplanted to his head?
> >> Maybe Trump did something similar.
> >
> > It's a comb over from back to front. He's made fun of because someone
> > as vain as he is, with all the money he claims to have, would have
> > invested in a decent toupee or gotten transplants by this time.
> >
> Or he could just be himself and not give a **** what the haters think.

Being himself is the problem. He is a consummate asshole. He is a
caricature of the Republican mindset. No wonder they want to exclude him
from the debates. Jeb Bush will be the nominee, as he is the only one who
is qualified other than Graham, who is too weird.

The Democratic debates will be more interesting, as Sanders is the favorite
of progressives, and Clinton seems to be more appealing to moderates, and
many voters like the idea of the first female President. I predict that
Hillary will be the eventual nominee, but Sanders will bring plenty of
delegates along who will shape a more progressive platform that will give
Clinton more coattails, and might influence her choice of a more progressive
VP running mate (Robert Reich?). If Clinton can excite the Democratic base,
she is a shoe in, as young women will register and vote in record numbers,
and Sanders is no Nader. He will help rally progressives behind the nominee.
The Republicans will likely keep the House because of successful
gerrymandering, but the Senate could swing, and there could be some surprise
Dem victories in red states because of the failures of the extreme Right to achieve economic results where they have been in office.

--Bryan

On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 18:22:26 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> wrote:

>On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 11:03:28 AM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control wrote:
>> On 7/6/2015 7:57 AM, sf wrote:
>> > On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:39:42 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>> >
>> >> Didn't Elton John have hair from his toes transplanted to his head?
>> >> Maybe Trump did something similar.
>> >
>> > It's a comb over from back to front. He's made fun of because someone
>> > as vain as he is, with all the money he claims to have, would have
>> > invested in a decent toupee or gotten transplants by this time.
>> >
>> Or he could just be himself and not give a **** what the haters think.
>
>Being himself is the problem. He is a consummate asshole. He is a
>caricature of the Republican mindset. No wonder they want to exclude him
>from the debates. Jeb Bush will be the nominee, as he is the only one who
>is qualified other than Graham, who is too weird.

Too weird? I don't know who Graham is, or what he looks like, but Jeb
Bush sure as hell looks weird to me, with those trademark Bush eyes
set too close to each other.

"Bryan-TGWWW" > wrote in message
news:ea1f1710-2225-4a97-8908-

> The Democratic debates will be more interesting, as Sanders is the
> favorite
> of progressives, and Clinton seems to be more appealing to moderates, and
> many voters like the idea of the first female President. I predict that
> Hillary will be the eventual nominee, but Sanders will bring plenty of
> delegates along who will shape a more progressive platform that will give
> Clinton more coattails, and might influence her choice of a more
> progressive
> VP running mate (Robert Reich?). If Clinton can excite the Democratic
> base,
> she is a shoe in, as young women will register and vote in record numbers,
> and Sanders is no Nader. He will help rally progressives behind the
> nominee.
> The Republicans will likely keep the House because of successful
> gerrymandering, but the Senate could swing, and there could be some
> surprise
> Dem victories in red states because of the failures of the extreme Right
> to achieve economic results where they have been in office.
>
> --Bryan

Paragraphs are your friend.

Cheri

On 7/6/2015 7:22 PM, Bryan-TGWWW wrote:
> The Democratic debates will be more interesting, as Sanders is the favorite
> of progressives, and Clinton seems to be more appealing to moderates, and
> many voters like the idea of the first female President.


Because it's fine to be elected based ONLY on sex or color, right, you
racist ****wit?

On 7/6/2015 7:28 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 18:22:26 -0700 (PDT), Bryan-TGWWW
> > wrote:
>
>> On Monday, July 6, 2015 at 11:03:28 AM UTC-5, Acme Bully Control wrote:
>>> On 7/6/2015 7:57 AM, sf wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 06 Jul 2015 22:39:42 +1000, Bruce > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Didn't Elton John have hair from his toes transplanted to his head?
>>>>> Maybe Trump did something similar.
>>>>
>>>> It's a comb over from back to front. He's made fun of because someone
>>>> as vain as he is, with all the money he claims to have, would have
>>>> invested in a decent toupee or gotten transplants by this time.
>>>>
>>> Or he could just be himself and not give a **** what the haters think.
>>
>> Being himself is the problem. He is a consummate asshole. He is a
>> caricature of the Republican mindset. No wonder they want to exclude him
>>from the debates. Jeb Bush will be the nominee, as he is the only one who
>> is qualified other than Graham, who is too weird.
>>
>> The Democratic debates will be more interesting, as Sanders is the favorite
>> of progressives, and Clinton seems to be more appealing to moderates, and
>> many voters like the idea of the first female President. I predict that
>> Hillary will be the eventual nominee, but Sanders will bring plenty of
>> delegates along who will shape a more progressive platform that will give
>> Clinton more coattails, and might influence her choice of a more progressive
>> VP running mate (Robert Reich?).
>
> Weren't his father and grandfather in politics too, making him the
> third Reich?
>


Why do you Auzzies OBSESS over OUR politics?

Live in a know-nothing land down under?

Have NO life of your own?

DIE NOW!

On 7/6/2015 6:39 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Jul 2015 05:26:28 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> > wrote:
>
>> Janet, it has always looked like that, and it seems to be thinning a little all
>> over. Why does it bother you so much? I think you are just jumping on a
>> popular bandwagon to claim it isn't natural, without bothering with the truth.
>> I am not a fan of Donald's but it is so annoying when people emphasize his hair.
>>
>> What would be your reaction if a female candidate had so much emphasis on
>> their hair?? You would likely be incensed at the shallowness of the criticism,
>> and never attach the personality traits to her that you have claimed Donald has.
>
> Didn't Elton John have hair from his toes transplanted to his head?
> Maybe Trump did something similar.
>


Isn't there ANYONE in OZ you can fixate on?

It must suck to be form a nation so devoid of anything of interest that
you have to feed off of OUR celebrities.

On 7/6/2015 9:22 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On Sun, 5 Jul 2015 05:30:33 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> > wrote:
>
>> Kalmia, I saw an interview...one of those quick, on-the-fly photog questions,
>> where he pulled his hair back in the front...it is his real hair. that probably
>> disappoints you, I know.
>
> Besides, anyone who has a cat, can't be all bad:
> http://www.freewoodpost.com/wp-conte...0/TrumpCat.jpg
>

NO life Auzzie turd!