Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/10/2015 10:56 PM, Kalmia wrote:
> Is this just a new name for an old food idea? > Seems to me what we call sliders these days originated in places like White Castle in the Northern US and later served at Krystal in the South. Small burgers served on small buns. Now they are trendy and cost a lot in restaurants. I have no idea why. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/10/2015 10:34 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/10/2015 10:56 PM, Kalmia wrote: >> Is this just a new name for an old food idea? >> > > Seems to me what we call sliders these days originated in places like > White Castle in the Northern US and later served at Krystal in the > South. Small burgers served on small buns. Now they are trendy and > cost a lot in restaurants. I have no idea why. > Small size food is cute and more fun to eat, plus one serving means you can indulge and still have room to try other foods. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Moe DeLoughan wrote:
> > On 2/10/2015 10:34 PM, jmcquown wrote: > > On 2/10/2015 10:56 PM, Kalmia wrote: > >> Is this just a new name for an old food idea? > >> > > > > Seems to me what we call sliders these days originated in places like > > White Castle in the Northern US and later served at Krystal in the > > South. Small burgers served on small buns. Now they are trendy and > > cost a lot in restaurants. I have no idea why. > > > > Small size food is cute and more fun to eat, plus one serving means > you can indulge and still have room to try other foods. If you like small servings, just look at the "serving size" on any package of food. It's so silly small, just to make it seem low calorie. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2/11/2015 10:58 AM, Gary wrote:
> If you like small servings, just look at the "serving size" on any > package of food. It's so silly small, just to make it seem low > calorie. > It works for me, because I'm focused on minimizing my intake of processed foods. If I'm in the mood for some of that, all I really need is enough to enjoy the taste of it, and then go back to the healthier stuff on my plate. Same goes for meats - I love hamburgers, but really, a four ounce portion of meat is a reasonable serving size. Same goes for hot dogs - just one is sufficient. Problem is, when I'm done with my one, everyone else is enjoying their second, or still working on a single massive third- or half-pound burger. If I make two sliders out of that single portion of meat, or cut the hot dog in half, I'm doing more with my reasonable portion, without going to excess. I know, it sounds silly. But it helps keep me from feeling deprived, thus helps keep me on track for eating more healthily, and not to excess. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Who makes better cooks? | General Cooking | |||
Makes me wish for hot weather | General Cooking | |||
Makes You Wonder. | General Cooking | |||
what makes you feel better? | General Cooking | |||
Slider Stuffing and Giblets | Recipes (moderated) |