On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:58:41 -1000, dsi1
> wrote:

>On 6/17/2014 1:14 PM, Jeßus wrote:
>> On 17 Jun 2014 23:11:13 GMT, notbob > wrote:
>>
>>> On 2014-06-17, Mark Thorson > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Baloney. The link between saturated fat intake
>>>> and cardiovascular disease was established by
>>>> studies in humans. Nothing has "reversed" the
>>>> data from those studies.
>>>
>>> No more bolagnos than yer unsubstantiated claim to the contrary.
>>>
>>> Another article, out last week, is the Time magazine story on fats,
>>> with a huge picture of a curl of butter centerpiecing the mag's cover.
>>> It is much better researched and highlights doctors and their studies
>>> which refute the long standing "anti-fat" diet campaign that has too
>>> long dominated this country's diet dogma.
>>>
>>> http://time.com/2863227/ending-the-war-on-fat/
>>
>> Now that such an article has appeared in 'Time', now suddenly it has
>> credibility in many people's eyes... sigh.
>>
>
>I don't buy into all these butter backlash. Butter is bad!

Let's hope we're both here to discuss this topic in another ten years.
Just amazing how... never mind.

>You can take that to the bank right there. :-)

LOL, you would too. As though a bank is some sort of pillar of
integrity and security