Jack Jones wrote:
> My point is, she should not pretend it's her home kitchen, and she should
> not pretend she does all that in 30 minutes. All of you who didn't get
> that are idiots.
>
> I know it's rather trivial but it just adds to the annoyance factor. She
> already is quite annoying with her silly giggles and patting herself on
> the back for everything. To the morons who say "Don't watch" I say don't
> read my messages. Same thing, so please cram it up your asses next time.
> She offers up nice easy dishes so I like watching the show from time to
> time. I just don't like that she misleads people into thinking that's her
> house and her kitchen.
>
> BTW, genius, there's a typo in your sig.
>

Gee. What an endearing way to enter into a usenet group. I can see
that you anticipate getting a lot of assistance from the people here.
<cough> Yeah, right.

Does the acronym (assuming that you know what those are) F.O.A.D. mean
anything to you troll?

--
Steve

If the speed of light is 186,000 miles/sec., what's the speed of
darkness?

Jack Jones wrote:
> My point is, she should not pretend it's her home kitchen, and she should
> not pretend she does all that in 30 minutes. All of you who didn't get
> that are idiots.
>
> I know it's rather trivial but it just adds to the annoyance factor. She
> already is quite annoying with her silly giggles and patting herself on
> the back for everything. To the morons who say "Don't watch" I say don't
> read my messages. Same thing, so please cram it up your asses next time.
> She offers up nice easy dishes so I like watching the show from time to
> time. I just don't like that she misleads people into thinking that's her
> house and her kitchen.
>
> BTW, genius, there's a typo in your sig.
>

Gee. What an endearing way to enter into a usenet group. I can see
that you anticipate getting a lot of assistance from the people here.
<cough> Yeah, right.

Does the acronym (assuming that you know what those are) F.O.A.D. mean
anything to you troll?

--
Steve

If the speed of light is 186,000 miles/sec., what's the speed of
darkness?

Jack Jones wrote:
> My point is, she should not pretend it's her home kitchen, and she should
> not pretend she does all that in 30 minutes. All of you who didn't get
> that are idiots.
>
> I know it's rather trivial but it just adds to the annoyance factor. She
> already is quite annoying with her silly giggles and patting herself on
> the back for everything. To the morons who say "Don't watch" I say don't
> read my messages. Same thing, so please cram it up your asses next time.
> She offers up nice easy dishes so I like watching the show from time to
> time. I just don't like that she misleads people into thinking that's her
> house and her kitchen.
>
> BTW, genius, there's a typo in your sig.
>

Gee. What an endearing way to enter into a usenet group. I can see
that you anticipate getting a lot of assistance from the people here.
<cough> Yeah, right.

Does the acronym (assuming that you know what those are) F.O.A.D. mean
anything to you troll?

--
Steve

If the speed of light is 186,000 miles/sec., what's the speed of
darkness?

>She wants you to think she comes up with these amazing
>recipes that can be done in 30 minutes or less, but it's all planned out.
>I have seen her go to the oven to turn it on. She places her hand on the
>knob but she doesn't turn it. It's a total fake out. When she goes to
>break and returns, all the trash in her famous garbage bowl that she
>thinks is the most amazing thing since sliced bread will be empty, all the
>crap that was on the counters will be gone and cleaned up real tidy, and
>food that would take 5-10 minutes to cook will be done. I saw her frying
>up some ravioli. She had just put them in the pan when she went to break.
>When they came back there was a huge stack of them already done, nicely
>browned. There was no way she could have fried all of those ravioli in 2
>minutes. IT'S ALL CRAP!



Anybody remember the show "Cooking Live" with Sara Moulton? Once a week she
would have a "cook along" show in which the she would cook in real time on live
tv and anyone at home could follow along. The only caveat was you had to have
to ingredients ready ahead of time. She would usually give instructions on
what needed to be done ahead of time several days before the "cook along" show
was to air.

>She wants you to think she comes up with these amazing
>recipes that can be done in 30 minutes or less, but it's all planned out.
>I have seen her go to the oven to turn it on. She places her hand on the
>knob but she doesn't turn it. It's a total fake out. When she goes to
>break and returns, all the trash in her famous garbage bowl that she
>thinks is the most amazing thing since sliced bread will be empty, all the
>crap that was on the counters will be gone and cleaned up real tidy, and
>food that would take 5-10 minutes to cook will be done. I saw her frying
>up some ravioli. She had just put them in the pan when she went to break.
>When they came back there was a huge stack of them already done, nicely
>browned. There was no way she could have fried all of those ravioli in 2
>minutes. IT'S ALL CRAP!



Anybody remember the show "Cooking Live" with Sara Moulton? Once a week she
would have a "cook along" show in which the she would cook in real time on live
tv and anyone at home could follow along. The only caveat was you had to have
to ingredients ready ahead of time. She would usually give instructions on
what needed to be done ahead of time several days before the "cook along" show
was to air.

Jack Jones wrote:
>
> My point is, she should not pretend it's her home kitchen, and she should
> not pretend she does all that in 30 minutes. All of you who didn't get
> that are idiots.

Do you whine this much when someone mentions "my office?"
It's theirs, right? Even if it does sit in a building
belonging to some big corporation.
I never heard her claim it was her "home" but it certainly
is "her set"... so what's the problem? Why are you so
bothered by this?
Goomba

Jack Jones wrote:
>
> My point is, she should not pretend it's her home kitchen, and she should
> not pretend she does all that in 30 minutes. All of you who didn't get
> that are idiots.

Do you whine this much when someone mentions "my office?"
It's theirs, right? Even if it does sit in a building
belonging to some big corporation.
I never heard her claim it was her "home" but it certainly
is "her set"... so what's the problem? Why are you so
bothered by this?
Goomba

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:07:36 GMT, "Bob Myers"
> wrote:

>
>"Kevintsheehy" > wrote in message
...
>> Did you know that James Caviezel isn't really Jesus and that
>> he wasn't really crucified, at least not to the point of dying?
>> Good thing - it would kind of put a crimp in a movie career.
>
>Oh, geeze, Kevin, thanks a bunch for giving away the
>ending to the movie! And I was all set to get that DVD, too....
>
>:-)
>
>Bob M.
>
all i heard is that there was a happy ending.

your pal,
blake

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:07:36 GMT, "Bob Myers"
> wrote:

>
>"Kevintsheehy" > wrote in message
...
>> Did you know that James Caviezel isn't really Jesus and that
>> he wasn't really crucified, at least not to the point of dying?
>> Good thing - it would kind of put a crimp in a movie career.
>
>Oh, geeze, Kevin, thanks a bunch for giving away the
>ending to the movie! And I was all set to get that DVD, too....
>
>:-)
>
>Bob M.
>
all i heard is that there was a happy ending.

your pal,
blake

On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:10:07 -0400, "Robert Sparkman"
> wrote:

> Rachel is a total babe..I'll believe anything she wants me to believe

My husband tunes in to watch Her, not her recipes. If he
learns something cooking related as a result, that's icing
on the cake.

LOL

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Mon, 6 Sep 2004 23:10:07 -0400, "Robert Sparkman"
> wrote:

> Rachel is a total babe..I'll believe anything she wants me to believe

My husband tunes in to watch Her, not her recipes. If he
learns something cooking related as a result, that's icing
on the cake.

LOL

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:13:17 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> wrote:

> And the giggle - don't get me started. She
> sounds like Betty Rubble.

If you've got a problem, save yourself the trouble of caring
and don't watch.

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:13:17 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> wrote:

> And the giggle - don't get me started. She
> sounds like Betty Rubble.

If you've got a problem, save yourself the trouble of caring
and don't watch.

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

Anything Rachel Ray says I'll believe. She's a cutie!

blake murphy wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:07:36 GMT, "Bob Myers"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>"Kevintsheehy" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>>Did you know that James Caviezel isn't really Jesus and that
>>>he wasn't really crucified, at least not to the point of dying?
>>>Good thing - it would kind of put a crimp in a movie career.
>>
>>Oh, geeze, Kevin, thanks a bunch for giving away the
>>ending to the movie! And I was all set to get that DVD, too....
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>Bob M.
>>
>
> all i heard is that there was a happy ending.
>
> your pal,
> blake
>

Anything Rachel Ray says I'll believe. She's a cutie!

blake murphy wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 15:07:36 GMT, "Bob Myers"
> > wrote:
>
>
>>"Kevintsheehy" > wrote in message
...
>>
>>>Did you know that James Caviezel isn't really Jesus and that
>>>he wasn't really crucified, at least not to the point of dying?
>>>Good thing - it would kind of put a crimp in a movie career.
>>
>>Oh, geeze, Kevin, thanks a bunch for giving away the
>>ending to the movie! And I was all set to get that DVD, too....
>>
>>:-)
>>
>>Bob M.
>>
>
> all i heard is that there was a happy ending.
>
> your pal,
> blake
>

sf wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:13:17 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> > wrote:
>
>> And the giggle - don't get me started. She
>> sounds like Betty Rubble.
>
> If you've got a problem, save yourself the trouble of caring
> and don't watch.
>
> sf
> Practice safe eating - always use condiments

LOL! I'm guessing that the batteries are dead in the remote, so the channel
can't be changed and the TV can't be turned off. Bummer!

BOB

sf wrote:
> On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:13:17 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> > wrote:
>
>> And the giggle - don't get me started. She
>> sounds like Betty Rubble.
>
> If you've got a problem, save yourself the trouble of caring
> and don't watch.
>
> sf
> Practice safe eating - always use condiments

LOL! I'm guessing that the batteries are dead in the remote, so the channel
can't be changed and the TV can't be turned off. Bummer!

BOB

" BOB" > wrote in message
. ..
> sf wrote:
> > On Tue, 07 Sep 2004 04:13:17 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> > > wrote:
> >
> >> And the giggle - don't get me started. She
> >> sounds like Betty Rubble.
> >
> > If you've got a problem, save yourself the trouble of caring
> > and don't watch.
> >
> > sf
> > Practice safe eating - always use condiments
>
> LOL! I'm guessing that the batteries are dead in the remote, so the
channel
> can't be changed and the TV can't be turned off. Bummer!

Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a show
and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.

Paul

>

Paul M. Cook©® wrote:

> Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a show
> and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.
>
> Paul

The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
apparently?
Goomba

Paul M. Cook©® wrote:

> Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a show
> and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.
>
> Paul

The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
apparently?
Goomba

Paul M. Cook©® wrote:

> Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a show
> and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.
>
> Paul

The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
apparently?
Goomba

>"Paul M. Kook" kvetches:
>
>" BOB" wrote:
>> sf wrote:
"Paul M. Kook" kvetches:
>> >
>> >> And the giggle - don't get me started. She sounds like Betty Rubble.
>> >
>> > If you've got a problem, save yourself the trouble of caring and don't
watch.
>>
>> LOL! I'm guessing that the batteries are dead in the remote, so the channel
>> can't be changed and the TV can't be turned off. Bummer!
>
>Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a show
>and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.

Um, kvetching is not critiquing and/or opining. You're like the brats who
whine incessantly that they want to go to the zoo and once there kvetch
incessantly about the smell... so, presuming you're an adult, why pray tell do
you insist on watching a tv personality you don't like, is your mommy
threatening to spank you if you don't watch a particular tv program... IDIOT!


---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````

>"Paul M. Kook" kvetches:
>
>" BOB" wrote:
>> sf wrote:
"Paul M. Kook" kvetches:
>> >
>> >> And the giggle - don't get me started. She sounds like Betty Rubble.
>> >
>> > If you've got a problem, save yourself the trouble of caring and don't
watch.
>>
>> LOL! I'm guessing that the batteries are dead in the remote, so the channel
>> can't be changed and the TV can't be turned off. Bummer!
>
>Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a show
>and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.

Um, kvetching is not critiquing and/or opining. You're like the brats who
whine incessantly that they want to go to the zoo and once there kvetch
incessantly about the smell... so, presuming you're an adult, why pray tell do
you insist on watching a tv personality you don't like, is your mommy
threatening to spank you if you don't watch a particular tv program... IDIOT!


---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````

"Goomba38" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook©® wrote:
>
> > Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a
show
> > and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.
> >
> > Paul
>
> The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
> have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
> you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
> a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
> apparently?


"That crazy?" I think you're overreacting, bub. I see nothing in what I
wrote to even so much as imply that my life is as tiny as yours and I'd make
a big ****ing deal about some lame-assed TV show - as you clearly would.
You are clearly projecting your own mindset and that is a reflection on you,
not me. And why don't you practice your own advice if you get all ****ed
off and worked into a lather at newsgroup posts and just shut your computer
off.

Next time I'll post some stupid smileys so as not to offend such delicate
sensibilities as yours.

Paul

"Goomba38" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook©® wrote:
>
> > Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a
show
> > and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.
> >
> > Paul
>
> The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
> have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
> you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
> a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
> apparently?


"That crazy?" I think you're overreacting, bub. I see nothing in what I
wrote to even so much as imply that my life is as tiny as yours and I'd make
a big ****ing deal about some lame-assed TV show - as you clearly would.
You are clearly projecting your own mindset and that is a reflection on you,
not me. And why don't you practice your own advice if you get all ****ed
off and worked into a lather at newsgroup posts and just shut your computer
off.

Next time I'll post some stupid smileys so as not to offend such delicate
sensibilities as yours.

Paul

"Goomba38" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook©® wrote:
>
> > Just what is your point, anyway? Nobody has the right to critique a
show
> > and offer an opinion? With your attitude we'd be stuck with crap 24x7.
> >
> > Paul
>
> The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
> have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
> you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
> a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
> apparently?


Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.

Paul

>

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:38:22 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> wrote:

> Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
> the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.

Goomba's weenie is the cocktail type, for sure!

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:38:22 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> wrote:

> Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
> the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.

Goomba's weenie is the cocktail type, for sure!

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 02:38:22 GMT, "Paul M. Cook©®"
> wrote:

> Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
> the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.

Goomba's weenie is the cocktail type, for sure!

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

Paul M. Cook©® wrote:


>>The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
>>have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
>>you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
>>a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
>>apparently?
>
>
>
> Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
> the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.
>
> Paul

This coming from the man who ranted so long and hard about
accidentally observing a baby breastfeeding?
Good lord but you've got issues. LOL
Goomba-ette

Paul M. Cook©® wrote:


>>The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
>>have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
>>you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
>>a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
>>apparently?
>
>
>
> Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
> the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.
>
> Paul

This coming from the man who ranted so long and hard about
accidentally observing a baby breastfeeding?
Good lord but you've got issues. LOL
Goomba-ette

>Goomba38 writes:
>
>Paul M. Kook wrote:
>
>>>The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
>>>have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
>>>you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
>>>a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
>>>apparently?
>>
>> Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
>> the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.
>>
>> Paul
>
>This coming from the <STRONG>man</STRONG> who ranted so long and hard about
>accidentally observing a baby breastfeeding?
>Good lord but you've got issues.

Huh... you refer to that juvenile piece of dreck as a man?!?!?


---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````

>Goomba38 writes:
>
>Paul M. Kook wrote:
>
>>>The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
>>>have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
>>>you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
>>>a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
>>>apparently?
>>
>> Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you love
>> the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.
>>
>> Paul
>
>This coming from the <STRONG>man</STRONG> who ranted so long and hard about
>accidentally observing a baby breastfeeding?
>Good lord but you've got issues.

Huh... you refer to that juvenile piece of dreck as a man?!?!?


---= BOYCOTT FRANCE (belgium) GERMANY--SPAIN =---
---= Move UNITED NATIONS To Paris =---
*********
"Life would be devoid of all meaning were it without tribulation."
Sheldon
````````````

"Goomba38" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook©® wrote:
>
>
> >>The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
> >>have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
> >>you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
> >>a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
> >>apparently?
> >
> >
> >
> > Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you
love
> > the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.
> >
> > Paul
>
> This coming from the man who ranted so long and hard about
> accidentally observing a baby breastfeeding?
> Good lord but you've got issues. LOL

It was no accident! She planned it I tell ya! I was framed! And quite
frankly the pro-boob crowd impressed me as a bunch of repressed fetishists.

Paul

"Goomba38" > wrote in message
...
> Paul M. Cook©® wrote:
>
>
> >>The point is.. if something makes you that crazy but you can
> >>have total control over it by turning it off... why don't
> >>you do so? Then again, some people like to get worked up in
> >>a lather over trivial things. I dunno why? But some do,
> >>apparently?
> >
> >
> >
> > Oh BTW, Goomby, I don't think she'll **** you no matter how much you
love
> > the show. She doesn't look like a cocktail weenie chick to me.
> >
> > Paul
>
> This coming from the man who ranted so long and hard about
> accidentally observing a baby breastfeeding?
> Good lord but you've got issues. LOL

It was no accident! She planned it I tell ya! I was framed! And quite
frankly the pro-boob crowd impressed me as a bunch of repressed fetishists.

Paul

Jack Schidt® wrote:
>
> Oh, stop. It's a TV show, we know it is, you know it is and she knows it
> is. She's just offering some 'schtick', making it homespun and homemade.
> Did you try the recipe and kek or something?

Didn't Julia Childs do her first few shows in her actual kitchen?
It is remotely possible that Ray has the kitchen in her home equiped
as a TV studio. Highly doubtfull but possible.

> caveat: TV killed the United States so I'm certainly not defending it. Ok,
> so I liked Fireball XL5 a long time ago.

No problem. Fireball XL5, Supercar, Stingray and Thunderbirds puppet
shows were originally produced in Canada. It was a conspiracy I say.
The folks north of the border listened to their national anthem, listened
to our national anthem, and concluded they could sell us unlimited low
quality stuff like TV shows. Then someone goes and moves the production
studios for Stargate: SG1 to Vancouver and some good beer sneaks across
the border, too. ;^)

Jack Schidt® wrote:
>
> Oh, stop. It's a TV show, we know it is, you know it is and she knows it
> is. She's just offering some 'schtick', making it homespun and homemade.
> Did you try the recipe and kek or something?

Didn't Julia Childs do her first few shows in her actual kitchen?
It is remotely possible that Ray has the kitchen in her home equiped
as a TV studio. Highly doubtfull but possible.

> caveat: TV killed the United States so I'm certainly not defending it. Ok,
> so I liked Fireball XL5 a long time ago.

No problem. Fireball XL5, Supercar, Stingray and Thunderbirds puppet
shows were originally produced in Canada. It was a conspiracy I say.
The folks north of the border listened to their national anthem, listened
to our national anthem, and concluded they could sell us unlimited low
quality stuff like TV shows. Then someone goes and moves the production
studios for Stargate: SG1 to Vancouver and some good beer sneaks across
the border, too. ;^)

On 10 Sep 2004 15:05:51 -0700, (Doug Freyburger)
wrote:

>Jack Schidt® wrote:
>>
>> Oh, stop. It's a TV show, we know it is, you know it is and she knows it
>> is. She's just offering some 'schtick', making it homespun and homemade.
>> Did you try the recipe and kek or something?
>
>Didn't Julia Childs do her first few shows in her actual kitchen?
>It is remotely possible that Ray has the kitchen in her home equiped
>as a TV studio. Highly doubtfull but possible.

Who owns the studio that Rachael Ray does her show "30 Minute Meals"
in? If it is Rachael Ray then I would have no problem with her calling
it her kitchen even if it is not in her home. After all it is not
carved in stone that one can only have one kitchen,,,

>> caveat: TV killed the United States so I'm certainly not defending it. Ok,
>> so I liked Fireball XL5 a long time ago.
>
>No problem. Fireball XL5, Supercar, Stingray and Thunderbirds puppet
>shows were originally produced in Canada. It was a conspiracy I say.
>The folks north of the border listened to their national anthem, listened
>to our national anthem, and concluded they could sell us unlimited low
>quality stuff like TV shows. Then someone goes and moves the production
>studios for Stargate: SG1 to Vancouver and some good beer sneaks across
>the border, too. ;^)

As a Canadian I would love to see Canada take credit for great (if
cheap and campy) shows like Fireball XL5, but that isn't possible.
Supercar, Fireball XL5, etc. were all created in the UK as you can
read in places like:

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0055673/
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0054567/

Canada can take credit for (or blame depending on your point of view)
for such cultural milestones (or is that millstones) as "Rocket Robin
Hood", "Spider-Man" and "The Starlost":

http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0135735/
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0061301/
http://us.imdb.com/title/tt0069638/

Colin McGregor

"Goomba38" > wrote in message
...
> Jack Jones wrote:
> >
> > My point is, she should not pretend it's her home kitchen, and she
should
> > not pretend she does all that in 30 minutes. All of you who didn't get
> > that are idiots.
>
> Do you whine this much when someone mentions "my office?"
> It's theirs, right? Even if it does sit in a building
> belonging to some big corporation.
> I never heard her claim it was her "home" but it certainly
> is "her set"... so what's the problem? Why are you so
> bothered by this?


Because people have a right to express an opinion and especially so on a
NEWSGROUP where discussions like this are part opf the whole reason people
come here.

Why do you want to turn this into some romper room kiddie poo playground
full of stuffed animals and smiley face stickers? I got news for you, this
is a group for adults and by adults and if an adult wants to express an
opinion that is germane to the topic of this group than they have every god
damned right to do so and in fact I will submit they have MORE of a right to
do so than some feeble brained pinheads who get their backs up and their
panties in a twist over NOTHING and then blame the other person for being
too touchy. If you don't like it, IGNORE it! Move on, get a life, get a
grip, get a job but by all means GET OVER IT, it was not meant to offend YOU
and in fact was not even directed at YOU!

And now for dinner - crab cakes, mashed potatoes, steamed corn and some nice
chardonnay.

Paul

>

"Goomba38" > wrote in message
...
> Jack Jones wrote:
> >
> > My point is, she should not pretend it's her home kitchen, and she
should
> > not pretend she does all that in 30 minutes. All of you who didn't get
> > that are idiots.
>
> Do you whine this much when someone mentions "my office?"
> It's theirs, right? Even if it does sit in a building
> belonging to some big corporation.
> I never heard her claim it was her "home" but it certainly
> is "her set"... so what's the problem? Why are you so
> bothered by this?


Because people have a right to express an opinion and especially so on a
NEWSGROUP where discussions like this are part opf the whole reason people
come here.

Why do you want to turn this into some romper room kiddie poo playground
full of stuffed animals and smiley face stickers? I got news for you, this
is a group for adults and by adults and if an adult wants to express an
opinion that is germane to the topic of this group than they have every god
damned right to do so and in fact I will submit they have MORE of a right to
do so than some feeble brained pinheads who get their backs up and their
panties in a twist over NOTHING and then blame the other person for being
too touchy. If you don't like it, IGNORE it! Move on, get a life, get a
grip, get a job but by all means GET OVER IT, it was not meant to offend YOU
and in fact was not even directed at YOU!

And now for dinner - crab cakes, mashed potatoes, steamed corn and some nice
chardonnay.

Paul

>