"Tim McNamara" > wrote in message
...
> In article > ,
> "tar~bal" > wrote:
>
>> "Tim McNamara" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article > ,
>> > "tar~bal" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> I guess this is what passes for a constructive and healthy dialog
>> >> on the issues in the *** community. While not all gays did this,
>> >> I would suspect that a number of them are in solidarity with the
>> >> act. This is the kind of thing that gives gays low standing in the
>> >> community. And exactly why I voted against *** marriage. This
>> >> kind of thing will continue until the rest of us make it clear
>> >> that there will be NO acceptance of the homosexual community so
>> >> long as they resort to militant activist methods.
>> >
>> > This is the same type of insane troll logic that was used to defend
>> > Jim Crow. It was bullshit then and it was bullshit now.
>> >
>> > The article that "tar~bal" cut-and-pasted draws a connection
>> > between the envelopes and the Mormon Church's support of the ban on
>> > *** marriage, yet no connection in known. It prejudicial
>> > supposition and nothing more. Whatever nutbar sent those envelopes
>> > could have had a different agenda entirely.
>> >
>> > It makes no difference whatsoever to my life if homosexuals can
>> > marry. The "defense of marriage" bullshit is purely that: bullshit.
>> > It's bigotry and prejudice wrapped in a cloak of sanctity to try
>> > to make it look better. My wife and I have been married 14 years
>> > and there is no effect that *** marriage can have on the sanctity
>> > of our marriage. Since *** marriage can have no deleterious effect
>> > on the marriages and families of straight Americans, why should
>> > gays and *******s be denied the right to marry?
>> >
>> > The Right Wing's belief that they should have the power to
>> > interfere in and control the private lives of others is a stunning
>> > example of their hypocrisy. Limited government, fiscal
>> > responsibility and personal freedom my ass. The Right Wing is
>> > about theocracy, pure and simple. Why do they hate the
>> > Constitution?
>>
>> No one's telling you where you can and can't stick it. Go butt****
>> each other and have fun.
>
> You are just another bigoted homophobe- so much so that you can't even
> conceive of a straight man supporting the rights of gays/*******s to
> marry. No wonder you hide behind a sock puppet.

Thanks for the fine example of tolerance...

"Michelle Steiner" > wrote in message
...
> In article > ,
> "tar~bal" > wrote:
>
>> >> No one's telling you where you can and can't stick it. Go
>> >> butt**** each other and have fun.
>> >
>> > You are just another bigoted homophobe- so much so that you can't
>> > even conceive of a straight man supporting the rights of
>> > gays/*******s to marry. No wonder you hide behind a sock puppet.
>>
>> Thanks for the fine example of tolerance...
>
> You don't know what tolerance is. It's really simple; if you fight
> someone, expect them to fight back. If you don't like that, then don't
> start a fight.

Exactly. Reread the article and get back to me. Unless you think this
behavior is acceptable.

"Michelle Steiner" > wrote in message
...
> In article > ,
> "tar~bal" > wrote:
>
>> No one's telling you where you can and can't stick it. Go butt****
>> each other and have fun.
>
> But you're trying to tell me who I can and can't marry. What ****ing
> business is it of yours who I marry?

I guess you haven't been paying attention. Your militant *** agenda has
turned normal people against you.

In article > ,
"tar~bal" > wrote:

> "Michelle Steiner" > wrote in message
> ...
> > In article > ,
> > "tar~bal" > wrote:
> >
> >> No one's telling you where you can and can't stick it. Go
> >> butt**** each other and have fun.
> >
> > But you're trying to tell me who I can and can't marry. What
> > ****ing business is it of yours who I marry?
>
> I guess you haven't been paying attention. Your militant *** agenda
> has turned normal people against you.

Wrong-o again, dude. In fact, the militant agenda is on the parts of
the homophobes like you.

And you know what they say about homophobes.

"Tim McNamara" > wrote in message
...
> In article > ,
> "tar~bal" > wrote:
>
>> "Michelle Steiner" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > In article > ,
>> > "tar~bal" > wrote:
>> >
>> >> No one's telling you where you can and can't stick it. Go
>> >> butt**** each other and have fun.
>> >
>> > But you're trying to tell me who I can and can't marry. What
>> > ****ing business is it of yours who I marry?
>>
>> I guess you haven't been paying attention. Your militant *** agenda
>> has turned normal people against you.
>
> Wrong-o again, dude. In fact, the militant agenda is on the parts of
> the homophobes like you.

I'm not afraid of homos, they disgust me. There's a difference.

>
> And you know what they say about homophobes.

That you hope to turn them *** some day? Yeah, I know, you people surround
yourselves with so many deviants that you don't know where reality ends and
the gays' perception of it begins...

"Michelle Steiner" > wrote in message
...
> In article > ,
> "tar~bal" > wrote:
>
>> > But you're trying to tell me who I can and can't marry. What
>> > ****ing business is it of yours who I marry?
>>
>> I guess you haven't been paying attention. Your militant *** agenda
>> has turned normal people against you.
>
> On the contrary, normal people have no problem with us. Only evil
> people like you are against us.

So the vast amount of people that voted down homo weddings are evil? Ok.

"Michelle Steiner" > wrote in message
...
> In article > ,
> "tar~bal" > wrote:
>
>> >> I guess you haven't been paying attention. Your militant ***
>> >> agenda has turned normal people against you.
>> >
>> > On the contrary, normal people have no problem with us. Only evil
>> > people like you are against us.
>>
>> So the vast amount of people that voted down homo weddings are evil?
>> Ok.
>
> There is a difference between being against us, as you are, and being
> ignorant, as most of those voters were.


Do you think for a moment that maybe, JUST MAYBE, those voters may have
known EXACTLY what they were doing? Or is being all knowing innate like
being *** supposedly is (but isn't).


> You are a malignancy, destroying the fabric of civilization.

LOLOL!!! Yeah, you belong to the contingent that want to force the concepts
of sodomy in a ten year old's classroom, but I'm destroying the fabric of
civilization!

Sorry, pal. I'm the normal one and you're the sicko.