Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Omelet wrote:
> Here, it's usually shrimp or Broccoli. > > I've finally gone to simply cooking those separately. > > Broccoli is SO easily cooked to mush; I now just steam it on it's own > and add it to the final dish. Timing is everything. > I have never thought to pre-cook broccoli before adding it to a dish and it makes perfect sense. I feel a slap-your-forehead-*duh*-kind-of-moment, here. <g> It would help tremendously in a stir-fry if it was steamed first; broccoli seems to take the longest. Thanks! Another food that can get overcooked easily is steamed asparagus. Cook it too long and it becomes discolored and stringy. It's a fine line, too. One minute it's too crisp and the next it's mush. After many unsuccessful tries, I learned to stop at *just* before fork tender, take the steamer off the heat, and run the spears under cold water to halt the cooking process. I get bright green tender spears every time. (Well, unless I'm grilling or roasting, anyway.) kili |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
"kilikini" > wrote: > Omelet wrote: > > Here, it's usually shrimp or Broccoli. > > > > I've finally gone to simply cooking those separately. > > > > Broccoli is SO easily cooked to mush; I now just steam it on it's own > > and add it to the final dish. Timing is everything. > > > > I have never thought to pre-cook broccoli before adding it to a dish and it > makes perfect sense. I feel a slap-your-forehead-*duh*-kind-of-moment, > here. <g> It would help tremendously in a stir-fry if it was steamed > first; broccoli seems to take the longest. Thanks! Welcome! This has worked very well for us here. > > Another food that can get overcooked easily is steamed asparagus. Oh I do so agree! > Cook it > too long and it becomes discolored and stringy. It's a fine line, too. One > minute it's too crisp and the next it's mush. After many unsuccessful > tries, I learned to stop at *just* before fork tender, take the steamer off > the heat, and run the spears under cold water to halt the cooking process. > I get bright green tender spears every time. (Well, unless I'm grilling or > roasting, anyway.) > > kili That is a good idea. I've not used the cold water rinse to stop stuff from cooking yet. I tend to forget that technique, thanks for the reminder! -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Omelet wrote on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:34:22 -0500:
??>> Omelet wrote: ??>>> Here, it's usually shrimp or Broccoli. ??>>> ??>>> I've finally gone to simply cooking those separately. ??>>> ??>>> Broccoli is SO easily cooked to mush; I now just steam ??>>> it on it's own and add it to the final dish. Timing is ??>>> everything. ??>>> ??>> I have never thought to pre-cook broccoli before adding it ??>> to a dish and it makes perfect sense. I feel a ??>> slap-your-forehead-*duh*-kind-of-moment, here. <g> It ??>> would help tremendously in a stir-fry if it was ??>> steamed first; broccoli seems to take the longest. ??>> Thanks! Sorry, can't resist: broccoli should never be cooked for me or served to me. Raw, it can be used to pick up a dip. Actually, I'm not quite telling the truth since I quite like the *stems* cooked for a couple of minutes and served cold with a vinaigrette (Hungarian I believe). Broccolini will also work that way for me. My candidate for overcooking, based on suffering thro' a British upbringing, is Brussels Sprouts. After much more than three minutes cooking I won't eat them tho' I actually like them cooked to my taste. James Silverton Potomac, Maryland E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:48:21 GMT, "James Silverton"
> wrote: >vinaigrette (Hungarian I believe) Sounds interesting - I found one using hungarian peppers and wasabi paste. That's fusion, not Hungarian. Got a recipe? -- History is a vast early warning system Norman Cousins |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:18:12 -0700:
??>> vinaigrette (Hungarian I believe) s> Sounds interesting - I found one using hungarian peppers and s> wasabi paste. That's fusion, not Hungarian. s> Got a recipe? For mine, a standard vinaigrette (oil, salt and vinegar, perhaps a little garlic) works well. It tastes good as a salad with beef paprika. The broccoli should be cut into bite-size pieces. James Silverton Potomac, Maryland E-mail, with obvious alterations: not.jim.silverton.at.verizon.not |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article <VB9li.3391$Y_3.1063@trnddc04>,
"James Silverton" > wrote: > Omelet wrote on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:34:22 -0500: > > ??>> Omelet wrote: > ??>>> Here, it's usually shrimp or Broccoli. > ??>>> > ??>>> I've finally gone to simply cooking those separately. > ??>>> > ??>>> Broccoli is SO easily cooked to mush; I now just steam > ??>>> it on it's own and add it to the final dish. Timing is > ??>>> everything. > ??>>> > ??>> I have never thought to pre-cook broccoli before adding it > ??>> to a dish and it makes perfect sense. I feel a > ??>> slap-your-forehead-*duh*-kind-of-moment, here. <g> It > ??>> would help tremendously in a stir-fry if it was > ??>> steamed first; broccoli seems to take the longest. > ??>> Thanks! > > Sorry, can't resist: broccoli should never be cooked for me or > served to me. Raw, it can be used to pick up a dip. Actually, > I'm not quite telling the truth since I quite like the *stems* > cooked for a couple of minutes and served cold with a > vinaigrette (Hungarian I believe). Broccolini will also work > that way for me. I LIKE raw Broccoli, but it does not like me. Unfortunately. :-( > > My candidate for overcooking, based on suffering thro' a British > upbringing, is Brussels Sprouts. After much more than three > minutes cooking I won't eat them tho' I actually like them > cooked to my taste. > > James Silverton I've not eaten them in years and have been trying to work up the courage to try again. I understand they are best done roasted. -- Peace, Om Remove _ to validate e-mails. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a Son of a bitch" -- Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:48:21 GMT, "James Silverton"
> wrote: > Omelet wrote on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:34:22 -0500: > > ??>> Omelet wrote: > ??>>> Here, it's usually shrimp or Broccoli. > ??>>> > ??>>> I've finally gone to simply cooking those separately. > ??>>> > ??>>> Broccoli is SO easily cooked to mush; I now just steam > ??>>> it on it's own and add it to the final dish. Timing is > ??>>> everything. > ??>>> > ??>> I have never thought to pre-cook broccoli before adding it > ??>> to a dish and it makes perfect sense. I feel a > ??>> slap-your-forehead-*duh*-kind-of-moment, here. <g> It > ??>> would help tremendously in a stir-fry if it was > ??>> steamed first; broccoli seems to take the longest. > ??>> Thanks! > >Sorry, can't resist: broccoli should never be cooked for me or >served to me. Raw, it can be used to pick up a dip. Actually, >I'm not quite telling the truth since I quite like the *stems* >cooked for a couple of minutes and served cold with a >vinaigrette (Hungarian I believe). Broccolini will also work >that way for me. > >James Silverton the stems are an underrated, overlooked part of the vegetable. your pal, blake |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
blake murphy wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Jul 2007 18:48:21 GMT, "James Silverton" > > wrote: > >> Omelet wrote on Wed, 11 Jul 2007 12:34:22 -0500: >> >>>> Omelet wrote: >>>>> Here, it's usually shrimp or Broccoli. >>>>> >>>>> I've finally gone to simply cooking those separately. >>>>> >>>>> Broccoli is SO easily cooked to mush; I now just steam >>>>> it on it's own and add it to the final dish. Timing is >>>>> everything. >>>>> >>>> I have never thought to pre-cook broccoli before adding it >>>> to a dish and it makes perfect sense. I feel a >>>> slap-your-forehead-*duh*-kind-of-moment, here. <g> It >>>> would help tremendously in a stir-fry if it was >>>> steamed first; broccoli seems to take the longest. >>>> Thanks! >> >> Sorry, can't resist: broccoli should never be cooked for me or >> served to me. Raw, it can be used to pick up a dip. Actually, >> I'm not quite telling the truth since I quite like the *stems* >> cooked for a couple of minutes and served cold with a >> vinaigrette (Hungarian I believe). Broccolini will also work >> that way for me. >> >> James Silverton > > the stems are an underrated, overlooked part of the vegetable. That's a fact. I love 'em. -- Dave www.davebbq.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
what do you do with overcooked lamb? | Diabetic | |||
overcooked broccoli | General Cooking | |||
OT Easily Amused | General Cooking | |||
I Don't Get Disturbed Easily, But.. | General Cooking |