Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Someone told me that when cooking with charcoal, I should wait for them
to turn white before cooking (they told me to wait about 45 minutes), and the reason was because black charcoal leaches something toxic. Any comments or suggestions? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message ups.com... > Someone told me that when cooking with charcoal, I should wait for them > to turn white before cooking (they told me to wait about 45 minutes), > and the reason was because black charcoal leaches something toxic. Any > comments or suggestions? > Don't use chopped and formed charcoal and you won't have that problem. Use real charcoal. Ms P |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() > wrote in message ups.com... > Someone told me that when cooking with charcoal, I should wait for them > to turn white before cooking (they told me to wait about 45 minutes), > and the reason was because black charcoal leaches something toxic. Any > comments or suggestions? rule of thumb used to be 1/3 white -but that was before the "easy-start" charcoal. I assume the quick-start briquet coating has a type of paraffin/oil that coats the entire briquet, so with that type I would want the entire surface to be white so I would be sure the quick-start material was totally gone. > ha |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:31:05 GMT, Steve Wertz
> wrote: >On 31 Dec 2006 11:06:48 -0800, wrote: > >> Someone told me that when cooking with charcoal, I should wait for them >> to turn white before cooking (they told me to wait about 45 minutes), >> and the reason was because black charcoal leaches something toxic. Any >> comments or suggestions? > >Kingsford ingredients > >Kingsford sends a form letter in response to consumers' questions >about the ingredients. According to the form letter sent in >August, 2000, Kingsford contains the following ingredients: > > * wood char > * mineral char > * mineral carbon > * limestone > * starch > * borax > * sodium nitrate > * sawdust > >I don't know why you'd use them to cook food. Use lump charcoal >instead (pure charred wood). > Because you have to go on a wild goose chase to find lump around here. -- See return address to reply by email |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:31:05 GMT, Steve Wertz > > wrote: > > Kingsford ingredients > > I don't know why you'd use them to cook food. Use lump charcoal > > instead (pure charred wood). > > > Because you have to go on a wild goose chase to find lump around here. A good bet is always Doitbest hardware stores. They have Royal Oak lump as a standard item, if the store nearest you doesn't have it in stock they can order it for you. You can use the store finder at their web site to see if there's one near you: <http://doitbest.com/> Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Bugg wrote: >> If you're talking briquettes rather than real lump charcoal, then it has > more to do with making sure all the briquettes are ignited and stabilized to > reduce temperature fluctuations. Some folks fire up briquettes with starting > fluid,a petroleum derivative, --- can we say YUCK --- which does add > unpleasent flavor to the food; but so do most briquettes. Kingsford, for > example, uses a mixture of anthracite coal (yup, that stuff in the ground) > and fir tree char (which you would never use for real barbecue, unless you > love the taste of turpentine). It is then bound together with starches and > other binders. No amount of burning will remove the off-taste that is > inherent to these products. After using a gas grill for the last 15 years, there's no way I could go back to charcoal. I eat a charcoal grilled hamburger and all I can taste is charcoal. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
" wrote:
> > Dave Bugg wrote: > >> If you're talking briquettes rather than real lump charcoal, then it has > > more to do with making sure all the briquettes are ignited and stabilized to > > reduce temperature fluctuations. Some folks fire up briquettes with starting > > fluid,a petroleum derivative, --- can we say YUCK --- which does add > > unpleasent flavor to the food; but so do most briquettes. Kingsford, for > > example, uses a mixture of anthracite coal (yup, that stuff in the ground) > > and fir tree char (which you would never use for real barbecue, unless you > > love the taste of turpentine). It is then bound together with starches and > > other binders. No amount of burning will remove the off-taste that is > > inherent to these products. > > After using a gas grill for the last 15 years, there's no way I could > go back to charcoal. I eat a charcoal grilled hamburger and all I can > taste is charcoal. That would be the crap lighter fluid and coal issue as noted above, not charcoal. Try grilling a burger formed from just ground beef (<5 min from grinder to grill) over proper lump charcoal (low grill position, 600+ degrees) and taste a new culinary world. Pete C. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Pete C. wrote: > " wrote: > > > > Dave Bugg wrote: > > >> If you're talking briquettes rather than real lump charcoal, then it has > > > more to do with making sure all the briquettes are ignited and stabilized to > > > reduce temperature fluctuations. Some folks fire up briquettes with starting > > > fluid,a petroleum derivative, --- can we say YUCK --- which does add > > > unpleasent flavor to the food; but so do most briquettes. Kingsford, for > > > example, uses a mixture of anthracite coal (yup, that stuff in the ground) > > > and fir tree char (which you would never use for real barbecue, unless you > > > love the taste of turpentine). It is then bound together with starches and > > > other binders. No amount of burning will remove the off-taste that is > > > inherent to these products. > > > > After using a gas grill for the last 15 years, there's no way I could > > go back to charcoal. I eat a charcoal grilled hamburger and all I can > > taste is charcoal. > > That would be the crap lighter fluid and coal issue as noted above, not > charcoal. > > Try grilling a burger formed from just ground beef (<5 min from grinder > to grill) over proper lump charcoal (low grill position, 600+ degrees) > and taste a new culinary world. The thing is lump charcaoal is not all that clean either, it's a dirty fuel, burning even the so-called finest lump charcaoal produces lots of soot... gas burns far cleaner... I gave up on lump charcoal long ago, maks a steak smell like pencil sharpener leavings. No grill is all that great for cooking. In almost all cases they are filthy dirty things, loaded with rancid grease from long ago cooked meats, a steak cooked on the typical grill tastes like it's been cooked in a pan that's never been cleaned. The best way to cook steak is on a freshly stoned griddle. Sheldon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 31 Dec 2006 23:45:49 GMT, "Default User" >
wrote: >sf wrote: > >> On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:31:05 GMT, Steve Wertz >> > wrote: > >> > Kingsford ingredients > > >> > I don't know why you'd use them to cook food. Use lump charcoal >> > instead (pure charred wood). >> > >> Because you have to go on a wild goose chase to find lump around here. > >A good bet is always Doitbest hardware stores. They have Royal Oak lump >as a standard item, if the store nearest you doesn't have it in stock >they can order it for you. > >You can use the store finder at their web site to see if there's one >near you: > ><http://doitbest.com/> > > > > Thanks, Brian. I've never heard of them before but it turns out there are several in my immediate area. Is it a concept like Ace or a chain? -- See return address to reply by email |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sf wrote:
> On 31 Dec 2006 23:45:49 GMT, "Default User" > > wrote: > > > sf wrote: > >> Because you have to go on a wild goose chase to find lump around > here. > > > > A good bet is always Doitbest hardware stores. They have Royal Oak > > lump as a standard item, if the store nearest you doesn't have it > > in stock they can order it for you. > > > > You can use the store finder at their web site to see if there's one > > near you: > > > ><http://doitbest.com/> > Thanks, Brian. I've never heard of them before but it turns out there > are several in my immediate area. Is it a concept like Ace or a > chain? I think it's just a bunch of independents grouped together. What you can do is look up the item online at the web site above and get the SKU number. Then talk to the store and see about ordering it if they don't stock it. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Steve Wertz wrote:
> On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 14:13:05 -0800, sf wrote: > > >>Because you have to go on a wild goose chase to find lump around here. > > > Several places in the BA to get lump. > > http://www.lazzari.com/ > > According to their retail page, available at Orchard Supply and > Safeway. As well as several restaurant supply house, IIRC. Correct. Restaurant Depot is one. -- Reg |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Passive Pasta Cooking (turn off the heat) | General Cooking | |||
Cooking with White Zinfandel? | General Cooking | |||
Why does old chocolate turn white | General Cooking | |||
Turn 60, turn this cellar out! | Wine | |||
White Trash Cooking | General Cooking |