"Julie Bove" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Ozgirl" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> "W. Baker" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>> Julie Bove > wrote:
>>>
>>> : "Tiger Lily" > wrote in message
>>> : ...
>>> : > On 1/1/2012 4:36 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>>> : >> In >, "Julie
>>> : >> >
>>> : >> wrote:
>>> : >>
>>> : >>> "Robert > wrote in message
>>> : >>> ...
>>> : >>>> There's a post on gastroparesis over in misc.health.diabetes
>>> that I
>>> : >>>> thought you would want to see.
>>> : >>>
>>> : >>> Why? I know I have it. A post telling me that less diabetics
>>> have it
>>> : >>> than
>>> : >>> originally thought just doesn't do me any good.
>>> : >>
>>> : >> once again julie goes to great lengths to demonstrate just how
>>> ungrateful
>>> : >> she is
>>> : >> for any help
>>> : >
>>> : > without even reading the post in question that had nothing to do
>>> with her
>>> : > "i already know it all" approach
>>> : >
>>> : > i give up
>>> : >
>>> : > i've tried
>>> : >
>>> : > and i'm probably be STUPID enough to reply to her again (i know
>>> i have
>>> : > already today)
>>> : >
>>> : > but the animosity that her every post exhibits..................
>>> Julie,
>>> : > send me a FOAD e-mail, you have my info
>>>
>>> : I guess I don't even know what you are talking about.
>>>
>>> : I saw a post by Wendy. She failed to put the link on ASD but she
>>> put a link
>>> : up on MHD. The link said that fewer people have gastroparesis
>>> than
>>> : originally thought. I know I have it. It has been confirmed
>>> twice by a
>>> : gastroenterologist.
>>>
>>> : I also saw Ozgirl reply about a person she knew that not only had
>>> that but
>>> : bowel cancer. And that woman was on a liquid diet.
>>>
>>> : What does this have to do with me? I just don't get it.
>>>
>>> : Apparently I am missing something.
>>>
>>> : You are clearly angry with me but I don't know why.
>>>
>>> I had sent the post about the article to BOTH MHD AND ASD, BUT FOR
>>> SOME
>>> REASON, NOT MY FAULT it never arrived on asd. It was not my
>>> failure!!!!
>>>
>>> The implication that somehow iwas wrong or not good enough to not
>>> have put
>>> it on asd is not vice. Why say I dfailed, rather than something
>>> like it
>>> was just on mhd or no evaluation comment at all?
>>>
>>> Wendy
>>
>> Wendy, the word *failed* doesn't have to have negative connotations.
>> If I send an email and get a message back that the message has failed
>> that doesn't mean I wasn't good enough or wrong etc, just that the
>> sending didn't succeed in its purpose. In this instance I don't think
>> Julie meant you any ill will by using the (correct) word.
>
> I didn't and I honestly don't know why everyone is getting so upset.

Well Wendy feels offended. I don't think it was meant to offend her but
I am not you (who may or may not have meant to offend) or Wendy (who did
feel offended). Kiss and make up?

Ozgirl wrote:
> "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "Ozgirl" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>>
>>>
>>> "W. Baker" > wrote in message
>>> ...
>>>> Julie Bove > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "Tiger Lily" > wrote in message
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> On 1/1/2012 4:36 PM, Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
>>>>>>> In >, "Julie
>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> "Robert > wrote in message
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> There's a post on gastroparesis over in misc.health.diabetes
>>>>>>>>> that I thought you would want to see.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Why? I know I have it. A post telling me that less diabetics
>>>>>>>> have it than
>>>>>>>> originally thought just doesn't do me any good.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> once again julie goes to great lengths to demonstrate just how
>>>>>>> ungrateful she is
>>>>>>> for any help
>>>>>>
>>>>>> without even reading the post in question that had nothing to do
>>>>>> with her "i already know it all" approach
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i give up
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i've tried
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and i'm probably be STUPID enough to reply to her again (i know
>>>>>> i have already today)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but the animosity that her every post exhibits..................
>>>>>> Julie, send me a FOAD e-mail, you have my info
>>>>
>>>>> I guess I don't even know what you are talking about.
>>>>
>>>>> I saw a post by Wendy. She failed to put the link on ASD but she
>>>>> put a link up on MHD. The link said that fewer people have
>>>>> gastroparesis than originally thought. I know I have it. It has
>>>>> been confirmed twice by a gastroenterologist.
>>>>
>>>>> I also saw Ozgirl reply about a person she knew that not only had
>>>>> that but bowel cancer. And that woman was on a liquid diet.
>>>>
>>>>> What does this have to do with me? I just don't get it.
>>>>
>>>>> Apparently I am missing something.
>>>>
>>>>> You are clearly angry with me but I don't know why.
>>>>
>>>> I had sent the post about the article to BOTH MHD AND ASD, BUT FOR
>>>> SOME
>>>> REASON, NOT MY FAULT it never arrived on asd. It was not my
>>>> failure!!!!
>>>>
>>>> The implication that somehow iwas wrong or not good enough to not
>>>> have put
>>>> it on asd is not vice. Why say I dfailed, rather than something
>>>> like it
>>>> was just on mhd or no evaluation comment at all?
>>>>
>>>> Wendy
>>>
>>> Wendy, the word *failed* doesn't have to have negative connotations.
>>> If I send an email and get a message back that the message has
>>> failed that doesn't mean I wasn't good enough or wrong etc, just
>>> that the sending didn't succeed in its purpose. In this instance I
>>> don't think Julie meant you any ill will by using the (correct)
>>> word.
>>
>> I didn't and I honestly don't know why everyone is getting so upset.
>
> Well Wendy feels offended. I don't think it was meant to offend her
> but I am not you (who may or may not have meant to offend) or Wendy
> (who did feel offended). Kiss and make up?

Okay sorry Wendy. But I can't say it won't happen again because that is
just the way I speak!

Julie Bove > wrote:
: Ozgirl wrote:
: > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message

: > Well Wendy feels offended. I don't think it was meant to offend her
: > but I am not you (who may or may not have meant to offend) or Wendy
: > (who did feel offended). Kiss and make up?

: Okay sorry Wendy. But I can't say it won't happen again because that is
: just the way I speak!

OK, I will just have to learn to make an exception for you and understand
that you do not really mean what your words say.

Sorry,

Wendy

"W. Baker" > wrote in message
...
> Julie Bove > wrote:
> : Ozgirl wrote:
> : > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
>
> : > Well Wendy feels offended. I don't think it was meant to offend her
> : > but I am not you (who may or may not have meant to offend) or Wendy
> : > (who did feel offended). Kiss and make up?
>
> : Okay sorry Wendy. But I can't say it won't happen again because that is
> : just the way I speak!
>
> OK, I will just have to learn to make an exception for you and understand
> that you do not really mean what your words say.
>
> Sorry,
>
> Wendy

What? I DO mean what my words say!

In article >, "Julie Bove" >
wrote:

> "W. Baker" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Julie Bove > wrote:
> > : Ozgirl wrote:
> > : > "Julie Bove" > wrote in message
> >
> > : > Well Wendy feels offended. I don't think it was meant to offend her
> > : > but I am not you (who may or may not have meant to offend) or Wendy
> > : > (who did feel offended). Kiss and make up?
> >
> > : Okay sorry Wendy. But I can't say it won't happen again because that is
> > : just the way I speak!
> >
> > OK, I will just have to learn to make an exception for you and understand
> > that you do not really mean what your words say.
> >
> > Sorry,
> >
> > Wendy
>
> What? I DO mean what my words say!

you only write what your stomach tells you to write, you should try listening to
yourself, even to the point of trying to understand others and especially how
your words seem to them. this will be a rather new emotion for you...we call it
empathy

On 1/3/2012 12:14 PM, W. Baker wrote:
> OK, I will just have to learn to make an exception for you and understand
> that you do not really mean what your words say.
>
> Sorry,
>
> Wendy

you don't have anything to be sorry about Wendy, so please don't apologize

if person A is allowed to be upset, then persons (everyone else) can
also be upset....... this concept of person A needs "special treatment"
is fine, i guess, but that doesn't mean i'll bother to extend it when we
repeatedly get kicked in the teeth by person A

luv
person (other)