--
"Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in
one pretty well preserved piece, but to skid across the line broadside,
thoroughly used up, worn out, shouting GERONIMO !"
Bruce

"Ol' Hippie" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> --
> "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely
in
> one pretty well preserved piece, but to skid across the line broadside,
> thoroughly used up, worn out, shouting GERONIMO !"
> Bruce
>
Spoofing someone's ID is strictly forbidden in Usenet.
If everyone forwards the headers from this guys spoofing posts,
Google will cut him off and complain to his provider.
He may well get UDP'd and never bother anyone again.
Copy the entire message including headers along with a complaint
that he is spoofing and send to:




----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 09:34:39 -0600, Anonymous <Nobody> wrote:

>Spoofing someone's ID is strictly forbidden in Usenet.

"Strictly forbidden"? By some ISPs. Strictly speaking, the bozo isn't
spoofing anyone. He's simply appending a name you recognize to the
domain "operamail.com."


--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

Nobody says...

>Spoofing someone's ID is strictly forbidden in Usenet.

Actually, it's only the email address that some ISPs won't
let you spoof. The handle you use isn't protected. That's
why I can call myself "Monroe, of course..." or "Dot Matrix"
without getting into trouble with Supernews - as long as I
don't use the email adresses of those individuals.

Maybe I should post everything as "Monroe, of course...".
Or maybe I should rotate the names of the other flamers
in my killfile. What do you think?


----------------------------------------------------------------------
| Just Another Internet Wise Guy Macon, GA USA |
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Anonymous wrote:
>
> Spoofing someone's ID is strictly forbidden in Usenet.
> If everyone forwards the headers from this guys spoofing posts,
> Google will cut him off and complain to his provider.
> He may well get UDP'd and never bother anyone again.
> Copy the entire message including headers along with a complaint
> that he is spoofing and send to:

Even if Google cancels the troll's account it won't matter because it
was a throwaway anyway. The troll will simply spawn a new tentacle.

I knew as soon as we saw it spoof Harry that it was getting tired of its
Operamail accounts being plonked. So it changed its MO slightly,
forging the sender to try to get by the blanket filters and even faking
the subject line. But it doesn't change the style of its posts, so you
know it as soon as you read it, regardless of the name in the "From"
field. If it looks like a duck...

Obviously, Salamander/TofuBoy/VegHead/whatever is only interested in
stirring up the newsgroup for its enjoyment, not for engaging in
discussion. Anytime we respond to its troll posts, even to tell it that
it's been killfiled, it wins. Filtering out its posts is going to be
less effective from now on. So we fall back to the old Usenet adage:

PLEASE DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS!

Now get back out there and start Q'en!
--
Aloha,

Nathan Lau
San Jose, CA

#include <std.disclaimer>

On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 17:35:22 +0000, "Monroe, of course..."
> wrote:

>Actually, it's only the email address that some ISPs won't
>let you spoof. The handle you use isn't protected. That's
>why I can call myself "Monroe, of course..." or "Dot Matrix"
>without getting into trouble with Supernews - as long as I
>don't use the email adresses of those individuals.

>Maybe I should post everything as "Monroe, of course...".

If you feel froggy, Chuckles, then go ahead and jump. Just be sure to
post here that you're doing it to purposely disrupt the newsgroup and
deprive others of their ability to use it. If you don't, then we'll
know that your a snivelling coward who isn't really interested in
finding out what supernews does and does not allow.

>Or maybe I should rotate the names of the other flamers
>in my killfile.

You'll have to actually killfile someone to be able to do that.
Besides, what good would it do you? You're so widely killfiled that
few would ever see your posts. There's your sock-puppet Smiles, of
course, and your master, me. Who else would see your posts?

>What do you think?

I think you're a putz.


--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology

"Lying asshole" wrote:

> Maybe I should post everything as "Monroe, of course...".
> Or maybe I should rotate the names of the other flamers
> in my killfile. What do you think?

I think that I just need to add your email address to my filters to
complement the previous filter on your moniker. That will solve the
problem from my end.



Brian Rodenborn

In article >, "Monroe, of course..."
> wrote:

> Maybe I should post everything as "Monroe, of course...".
> Or maybe I should rotate the names of the other flamers
> in my killfile. What do you think?

Great Idea! Then I can change my name and you can join the chorus of
'they who've plonked me' whinging about how I've morphed to avoid their
killfiles. I'd rather you had a really great idea like "I think I'll
forget to breathe" or "I think I'll frenchkiss this 220V socket" or
something like that.
ObQ-pressure cooked ribs still suck bongwater through a cow's butthole
and only the stoopidest mouthbreather efftard would disagree. The
fundamentalistpuristpiousasshole beef backribs I did yesterday were,
however, tee-riffic. Much better than anything plopped on a plate
lately in Macon Ga, that's for sure. And I didn't even have daylight to
read my % opacity by, neither did I ggive a red wet one about my %
humidity. HAW HAW HAW!

monroe(the real deal)

"Ol' Hippie" > wrote in message
...
>
>
> --
> "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely
in
> one pretty well preserved piece, but to skid across the line broadside,
> thoroughly used up, worn out, shouting GERONIMO !"
> Bruce
>
>

I knew it wasn't you, Bruce. It was far to obvious.

--
Fosco Gamgee Whitfurrows
and his 6" boner

F.G. Whitfurrows wrote:
> "Ol' Hippie" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>>
>> --
>> "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
>> safely in one pretty well preserved piece, but to skid across the
>> line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, shouting GERONIMO !"
>> Bruce
>>
>>
>
> I knew it wasn't you, Bruce. It was far to obvious.


How do we know it's *you* replying to this, FAG Whitfurrows????

LOFL,
TFM®

"The Fat Man®" > wrote in message
.. .
> F.G. Whitfurrows wrote:
> > "Ol' Hippie" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
> >> safely in one pretty well preserved piece, but to skid across the
> >> line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, shouting GERONIMO !"
> >> Bruce
> >>
> >>
> >
> > I knew it wasn't you, Bruce. It was far to obvious.
>
>
> How do we know it's *you* replying to this, FAG Whitfurrows????
>
> LOFL,
> TFM®
>
Okay, I have bitten my tongue long enough, so now at the risk of being
banned from this group for life, I gotta say it.
Don't pick on Fos, because everyone in this group has confessed to eating a
little meat at least once!

(tee hee)

"doyle" > wrote in message
...
>
> "The Fat Man®" > wrote in message
> .. .
> > F.G. Whitfurrows wrote:
> > > "Ol' Hippie" > wrote in message
> > > ...
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
> > >> safely in one pretty well preserved piece, but to skid across the
> > >> line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, shouting GERONIMO !"
> > >> Bruce
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > > I knew it wasn't you, Bruce. It was far to obvious.
> >
> >
> > How do we know it's *you* replying to this, FAG Whitfurrows????
> >
> > LOFL,
> > TFM®
> >
> Okay, I have bitten my tongue long enough, so now at the risk of being
> banned from this group for life, I gotta say it.
> Don't pick on Fos, because everyone in this group has confessed to eating
a
> little meat at least once!
>
> (tee hee)
>
>
YOU *******!

--
Fosco Gamgee Whitfurrows
and his 6" boner
Very confident in my manhood and sexuality

"F.G. Whitfurrows" > wrote in message
...
>
> "doyle" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "The Fat Man®" > wrote in message
> > .. .
> > > F.G. Whitfurrows wrote:
> > > > "Ol' Hippie" > wrote in message
> > > > ...
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> "Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving
> > > >> safely in one pretty well preserved piece, but to skid across the
> > > >> line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, shouting GERONIMO !"
> > > >> Bruce
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I knew it wasn't you, Bruce. It was far to obvious.
> > >
> > >
> > > How do we know it's *you* replying to this, FAG Whitfurrows????
> > >
> > > LOFL,
> > > TFM®
> > >
> > Okay, I have bitten my tongue long enough, so now at the risk of being
> > banned from this group for life, I gotta say it.
> > Don't pick on Fos, because everyone in this group has confessed to
eating
> a
> > little meat at least once!
> >
> > (tee hee)
> >
> >
> YOU *******!
>
> --
> Fosco Gamgee Whitfurrows
> and his 6" boner
> Very confident in my manhood and sexuality
>
Thank you very much!!!

"Monroe, of course..." > wrote in message g>...
> In article >, "Monroe, of course..."
> > wrote:
>
> > Maybe I should post everything as "Monroe, of course...".
> > Or maybe I should rotate the names of the other flamers
> > in my killfile. What do you think?
>
> Great Idea! Then I can change my name and you can join the chorus of
> 'they who've plonked me' whinging about how I've morphed to avoid their
> killfiles. I'd rather you had a really great idea like "I think I'll
> forget to breathe" or "I think I'll frenchkiss this 220V socket" or
> something like that.
> ObQ-pressure cooked ribs still suck bongwater through a cow's butthole
> and only the stoopidest mouthbreather efftard would disagree. The
> fundamentalistpuristpiousasshole beef backribs I did yesterday were,
> however, tee-riffic. Much better than anything plopped on a plate
> lately in Macon Ga, that's for sure. And I didn't even have daylight to
> read my % opacity by, neither did I ggive a red wet one about my %
> humidity. HAW HAW HAW!
>
> monroe(the real deal)
For some real 'q' come up to Canada son. We offer boiled ribs and
saurkraut at every restaurant in the cityies. Some muight argue that
that's some kind of fag German cusine. Nothing could be further from
the trufe. In WWI Canadian soldiers introduced to hte Germans a
cabbage dish called 'saurkraut'. The rest is history. Shyould you
feel the need to learn more about Canadian cusine and culture just
e-mail me and i';lll send you a copy of my new boodK: 'Johynny Canuk
Does Quoich'.e

On 23 Nov 2003 08:47:22 -0800, (Mac The
Finger) wrote:

<snip>


--
Kevin S. Wilson
Tech Writer at a University Somewhere in Idaho
"Anything, when cooked in large enough batches, will be vile."
--Dag Right-square-bracket-gren, in alt.religion.kibology