I thought this was a text only news group? I just opened a post that was a
picture and was definitely off topic. I did not think attachments were
possible. If they are, I wonder about security.

Ray


--

Ray > wrote:
> I thought this was a text only news group? I just opened a post that was a
> picture and was definitely off topic. I did not think attachments were
> possible. If they are, I wonder about security.

> Ray

If you're referring to the post I think you're referring to, there
was not a picture attatched per-se. Your newsgroup reader saw the
URL for an image an autoloaded it.

Naughty naughty Web-TV-posting-in-html-users!

In article >, wrote:
>Ray > wrote:
>> I thought this was a text only news group? I just opened a post that was a
>> picture and was definitely off topic. I did not think attachments were
>> possible. If they are, I wonder about security.
>
>> Ray
>
>If you're referring to the post I think you're referring to, there
>was not a picture attatched per-se. Your newsgroup reader saw the
>URL for an image an autoloaded it.
>
>Naughty naughty Web-TV-posting-in-html-users!

Add to the list...
naughty naughty MickeySoft for configuring Outhouse Express to do that by
default, and naughty naughty Ray for using Outhouse Express, instead of a
*real* news client, to read newsgroups.

"Doug Miller" > wrote in message
gy.com...
> Add to the list...
> naughty naughty MickeySoft for...

Time to cut this thread short.
Software griping at this level is OT for this NG.

Back to winemaking, please. TIA!

Tom S

"Doug Miller" > wrote in message
gy.com...
> Add to the list...
> naughty naughty MickeySoft for...

Time to cut this thread short.
Software griping at this level is OT for this NG.

Back to winemaking, please. TIA!

Tom S

In article >, wrote:
>Ray > wrote:
>> I thought this was a text only news group? I just opened a post that was a
>> picture and was definitely off topic. I did not think attachments were
>> possible. If they are, I wonder about security.
>
>> Ray
>
>If you're referring to the post I think you're referring to, there
>was not a picture attatched per-se. Your newsgroup reader saw the
>URL for an image an autoloaded it.
>
>Naughty naughty Web-TV-posting-in-html-users!

Add to the list...
naughty naughty MickeySoft for configuring Outhouse Express to do that by
default, and naughty naughty Ray for using Outhouse Express, instead of a
*real* news client, to read newsgroups.

Ray > wrote:
> I thought this was a text only news group? I just opened a post that was a
> picture and was definitely off topic. I did not think attachments were
> possible. If they are, I wonder about security.

> Ray

If you're referring to the post I think you're referring to, there
was not a picture attatched per-se. Your newsgroup reader saw the
URL for an image an autoloaded it.

Naughty naughty Web-TV-posting-in-html-users!