Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
PA scale is an indication of where you might end up. You still have to
calculate where you actually ended up when the fermentation is over. Ray "frederick ploegman" > wrote in message ... > What is the purpose and function of the PA scale on my hydrometer ?? > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Ray" > wrote in message m>...
> PA scale is an indication of where you might end up. You still have to > calculate where you actually ended up when the fermentation is over. > > Ray > > PA is Potential Alcohol, an estimate of the alochol content if all of the sugar is consumed. If any sugar is left in the must, you will not reach this potential. Andy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am very serious about this question. I can site references that state
differently that what you say. Can you give me accepted, published references that agree with your statement? Ray "JEP" > wrote in message om... > "Ray" > wrote in message m>... > > PA scale is an indication of where you might end up. You still have to > > calculate where you actually ended up when the fermentation is over. > > > > Ray > > > > > > PA is Potential Alcohol, an estimate of the alochol content if all of > the sugar is consumed. If any sugar is left in the must, you will not > reach this potential. > > Andy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ray" > wrote in message . .. > I am very serious about this question. I can site references that state > differently that what you say. Can you give me accepted, published > references that agree with your statement? > > Ray > > "JEP" > wrote in message > om... > > "Ray" > wrote in message > m>... > > > PA scale is an indication of where you might end up. You still have to > > > calculate where you actually ended up when the fermentation is over. > > > > > > Ray > > > > > > > > > > PA is Potential Alcohol, an estimate of the alochol content if all of > > the sugar is consumed. If any sugar is left in the must, you will not > > reach this potential. > > > > Andy Ray & Andy, One mole of sugar produces 2 moles of alcohol. The molecular weight of sugar is 180 and the molecular weight of ethanol is 46. So theoretically, 180 grams of sugar can produce 92 grams of alcohol. 92 divided by 180 is ..511 or 51.1 percent. But in practical fermentations, only 90 - 92 percent of the sugar produces ethanol. The rest of the sugar produces higher alcohols, acetaldehyde, succinic acid, etc. In addition, some alcohol is blown off by the escaping carbon dioxide gas. See Margalit, "Concepts in Wine Chemistry," page 56. Regards, lum |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks Lum but that is not what I am looking for. I know all that. I can
calculate the theoretical, maximum yield but I want the practical yield. What I really am looking for is published raw data on beginning and ending SG (or equivalent) and actual measured alcohol in the finished wine using a laboratory determination rather than charts. I am embroiled in a dispute with certain parties as a result of the article on determining alcohol that I published in WineMaker. I have good references to accepted publications that that state what the tables that are but I have not found raw data that really verifies their tables and how they should be used. I have tried to get this type of information from a number of laboratories that should have it but have not been successful. (I am not willing to pay for it, that is why I want published numbers.) If anyone can come up the this type of information I would be really grateful. Ray "Lum" > wrote in message ... > > "Ray" > wrote in message > . .. > > I am very serious about this question. I can site references that state > > differently that what you say. Can you give me accepted, published > > references that agree with your statement? > > > > Ray > > > > "JEP" > wrote in message > > om... > > > "Ray" > wrote in message > > m>... > > > > PA scale is an indication of where you might end up. You still have > to > > > > calculate where you actually ended up when the fermentation is over. > > > > > > > > Ray > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PA is Potential Alcohol, an estimate of the alochol content if all of > > > the sugar is consumed. If any sugar is left in the must, you will not > > > reach this potential. > > > > > > Andy > > Ray & Andy, > > One mole of sugar produces 2 moles of alcohol. The molecular weight of > sugar is 180 and the molecular weight of ethanol is 46. So theoretically, > 180 grams of sugar can produce 92 grams of alcohol. 92 divided by 180 is > .511 or 51.1 percent. > > But in practical fermentations, only 90 - 92 percent of the sugar produces > ethanol. The rest of the sugar produces higher alcohols, acetaldehyde, > succinic acid, etc. > > In addition, some alcohol is blown off by the escaping carbon dioxide gas. > > See Margalit, "Concepts in Wine Chemistry," page 56. > > Regards, > lum > > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Ray" > wrote in message m... > Thanks Lum but that is not what I am looking for. I know all that. I can > calculate the theoretical, maximum yield but I want the practical yield. > What I really am looking for is published raw data on beginning and ending > SG (or equivalent) and actual measured alcohol in the finished wine using a > laboratory determination rather than charts. I am embroiled in a dispute > with certain parties as a result of the article on determining alcohol that > I published in WineMaker. I have good references to accepted publications > that that state what the tables that are but I have not found raw data that > really verifies their tables and how they should be used. I have tried to > get this type of information from a number of laboratories that should have > it but have not been successful. (I am not willing to pay for it, that is > why I want published numbers.) If anyone can come up the this type of > information I would be really grateful. > > Ray Ray, I have not followed this discussion, so please pardon my ignorance. I hope the following data is of interest to you. Starting Finished Brix Brix Alc. 1 Alc. 2 Alc. 3 24.3 -1.6 13.0 13.2 12.6 24.1 -1.4 13.1 - 12.8 22.8 -1.7 12.4 - - 23.5 -1.5 12.4 12.7 - 25.1 -1.3 13.6 13.7 - 23.2 -1.5 12.3 12.4 12.2 These data from a few wines made in my garage over the past few years. All are red fermentations done in !/2 ton fruit bins without temperature control. The time from starting Brix to finished Brix is 7 to 10 days, except for the 25.1 Brix fermentation. It was hot and fast and finished in 5 days. The first column is the starting Brix. The second column is finished Brix. The third column is the alcohol measured by my home made ebulliometer. The fourth column is the alcohol measured by a well calibrated commercial ebulliometer. The fifth column is the alcohol measured by a standard distillation method. Regards, Lum Del Mar, California, USA |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ray
A good library will have Polarimetry, Saccarimetry and the Sugars by Bates, NBS Circular C440. It's out of print, a 1942 publication. NIST still uses it. It is a definitive text but it's pretty deep. If your regular library does not have it, try a nearby college. (We have several copies here in Pittsburgh, NIST recommended the book to me a few years ago when I had similar questions and I had a hard time finding it; once I found one copy a few other sources became obvious.) I have a copy and can email you an excel spreadsheet with values taken from the book, but the bottom line is outside influences make prediction of alcohol content an approximation only. They used standardzed sucrose solutions for the values, not juice. I corrected the tables for the changes in our understanding of mass and volume; they are miniscule, but I did it anyway. Lum, I have though about making my own ebulliometer since they are so pricey. I have a good RTD somewhere, how hard was it to make the boiling chamber? I was wondering if I could just use a boiling flask and stopper. Could you share your setup and tables? Regards, Joe "Lum" > wrote in message >... > "Ray" > wrote in message > m... > > Thanks Lum but that is not what I am looking for. I know all that. I can > > calculate the theoretical, maximum yield but I want the practical yield. > > What I really am looking for is published raw data on beginning and ending > > SG (or equivalent) and actual measured alcohol in the finished wine using > a > > laboratory determination rather than charts. I am embroiled in a dispute > > with certain parties as a result of the article on determining alcohol > that > > I published in WineMaker. I have good references to accepted publications > > that that state what the tables that are but I have not found raw data > that > > really verifies their tables and how they should be used. I have tried to > > get this type of information from a number of laboratories that should > have > > it but have not been successful. (I am not willing to pay for it, that is > > why I want published numbers.) If anyone can come up the this type of > > information I would be really grateful. > > > > Ray > > Ray, > > I have not followed this discussion, so please pardon my ignorance. > > I hope the following data is of interest to you. > > Starting Finished > Brix Brix Alc. 1 Alc. 2 Alc. 3 > 24.3 -1.6 13.0 13.2 12.6 > 24.1 -1.4 13.1 - 12.8 > 22.8 -1.7 12.4 - - > 23.5 -1.5 12.4 12.7 - > 25.1 -1.3 13.6 13.7 - > 23.2 -1.5 12.3 12.4 12.2 > > These data from a few wines made in my garage over the past few years. All > are red fermentations done in !/2 ton fruit bins without temperature > control. The time from starting Brix to finished Brix is 7 to 10 days, > except for the 25.1 Brix fermentation. It was hot and fast and finished in > 5 days. > > The first column is the starting Brix. > The second column is finished Brix. > The third column is the alcohol measured by my home made ebulliometer. > The fourth column is the alcohol measured by a well calibrated commercial > ebulliometer. > The fifth column is the alcohol measured by a standard distillation method. > > Regards, > Lum > Del Mar, California, USA |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lum" > wrote in message >...
> Ray & Andy, > > One mole of sugar produces 2 moles of alcohol. The molecular weight of > sugar is 180 and the molecular weight of ethanol is 46. So theoretically, > 180 grams of sugar can produce 92 grams of alcohol. 92 divided by 180 is > .511 or 51.1 percent. > > But in practical fermentations, only 90 - 92 percent of the sugar produces > ethanol. The rest of the sugar produces higher alcohols, acetaldehyde, > succinic acid, etc. > > In addition, some alcohol is blown off by the escaping carbon dioxide gas. > > See Margalit, "Concepts in Wine Chemistry," page 56. > > Regards, > lum Ar a recent talk, a professional winemaker here from BC mentioned that they were getting higher alcohol levels for the starting Brix than they used to, often by 1% or even more. She said this was confirmed by other winemakers from the area. Her hypothesis was that the yeast were getting more efficient in alcohol production. This could have large repercussions if that were indeed the case. I'm wondering if this is happening in other, hotter areas, as well? Pp Vancouver, Canada |
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "pp" > wrote in message om... > "Lum" > wrote in message >... > > Ray & Andy, > > > > One mole of sugar produces 2 moles of alcohol. The molecular weight of > > sugar is 180 and the molecular weight of ethanol is 46. So theoretically, > > 180 grams of sugar can produce 92 grams of alcohol. 92 divided by 180 is > > .511 or 51.1 percent. > > > > But in practical fermentations, only 90 - 92 percent of the sugar produces > > ethanol. The rest of the sugar produces higher alcohols, acetaldehyde, > > succinic acid, etc. > > > > In addition, some alcohol is blown off by the escaping carbon dioxide gas. > > > > See Margalit, "Concepts in Wine Chemistry," page 56. > > > > Regards, > > lum > > Ar a recent talk, a professional winemaker here from BC mentioned that > they were getting higher alcohol levels for the starting Brix than > they used to, often by 1% or even more. She said this was confirmed by > other winemakers from the area. Her hypothesis was that the yeast were > getting more efficient in alcohol production. This could have large > repercussions if that were indeed the case. I'm wondering if this is > happening in other, hotter areas, as well? > > Pp > Vancouver, Canada Some types of wine yeast produce more alcohol than others, so the above situation certainly seems possible. But, I don't understand what the "large repercussions" would be. Lum Del Mar, California, USA |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Lum" > wrote in message news:<uutAc.480> >
> > Ar a recent talk, a professional winemaker here from BC mentioned that > > they were getting higher alcohol levels for the starting Brix than > > they used to, often by 1% or even more. She said this was confirmed by > > other winemakers from the area. Her hypothesis was that the yeast were > > getting more efficient in alcohol production. This could have large > > repercussions if that were indeed the case. I'm wondering if this is > > happening in other, hotter areas, as well? > > > > Pp > > Vancouver, Canada > > Some types of wine yeast produce more alcohol than others, so the above > situation certainly seems possible. But, I don't understand what the "large > repercussions" would be. > Lum > Del Mar, California, USA Well, if the yeast got consistenly more efficient in producing alcohol, then the winemaking practice would have to adjust to that somehow, particularly in hot areas, otherwise we'd end up with hot, unbalanced wines, no? 1% is a lot as an average change. I believe she's been using the same yeast over the years, so it's not a change in the type of yeast. Pp Vancouver, BC, Canada |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Could you locate contact information, name, or whatever, for the person
giving the talk. If you can, you could pass it to me directly at my email rather than putting it on the news group. (They may or may not appreciate that.) Ray "pp" > wrote in message om... > "Lum" > wrote in message >... > > Ray & Andy, > > > > One mole of sugar produces 2 moles of alcohol. The molecular weight of > > sugar is 180 and the molecular weight of ethanol is 46. So theoretically, > > 180 grams of sugar can produce 92 grams of alcohol. 92 divided by 180 is > > .511 or 51.1 percent. > > > > But in practical fermentations, only 90 - 92 percent of the sugar produces > > ethanol. The rest of the sugar produces higher alcohols, acetaldehyde, > > succinic acid, etc. > > > > In addition, some alcohol is blown off by the escaping carbon dioxide gas. > > > > See Margalit, "Concepts in Wine Chemistry," page 56. > > > > Regards, > > lum > > Ar a recent talk, a professional winemaker here from BC mentioned that > they were getting higher alcohol levels for the starting Brix than > they used to, often by 1% or even more. She said this was confirmed by > other winemakers from the area. Her hypothesis was that the yeast were > getting more efficient in alcohol production. This could have large > repercussions if that were indeed the case. I'm wondering if this is > happening in other, hotter areas, as well? > > Pp > Vancouver, Canada |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
My new scale... | Baking | |||
My new scale... | General Cooking | |||
My new scale... | Sourdough | |||
The Definitive Chord & Scale Bible - Literally EVERY chord and scale! | Vegan | |||
Tea Scale | Tea |