Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Leo Bueno
 
Posts: n/a
Default Hang time dispute: California growers vs. winemakers


An issue surrounding the current (ongoing is a better description
perhaps) row between California growers and vintners regarding how
long to keep the grapes on the vine has piqued my interest. See
excerpt (and link to an article):
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...IGB0AONQB1.DTL
"Growers say winemakers ask them to harvest fruit at 27 or 28 Brix
(percent of sugar), which is far greater than the 24 Brix of the fruit
that was harvested in the 1980s. By picking that late, the grapes
partially dehydrate -- and a new interpretation of state law permits
wineries to add the water back at the crusher to help wines ferment
more efficiently."

Why don't both players simply contract for grapes at say 27.5 brix (or
whatever value) and price them accordingly?


--
=================================================
Do you like wine? Do you live in South Florida?
Visit the MIAMI WINE TASTERS group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/miamiWINE
=================================================
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Tom S
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Leo Bueno" > wrote in message
...
>
> An issue surrounding the current (ongoing is a better description
> perhaps) row between California growers and vintners regarding how
> long to keep the grapes on the vine has piqued my interest. See
> excerpt (and link to an article):
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...IGB0AONQB1.DTL
> "Growers say winemakers ask them to harvest fruit at 27 or 28 Brix
> (percent of sugar), which is far greater than the 24 Brix of the fruit
> that was harvested in the 1980s. By picking that late, the grapes
> partially dehydrate -- and a new interpretation of state law permits
> wineries to add the water back at the crusher to help wines ferment
> more efficiently."
>
> Why don't both players simply contract for grapes at say 27.5 brix (or
> whatever value) and price them accordingly?


I suspect that the growers want to go back to a points system such as was in
use back in the 1980s. Grape prices were routinely established at a given
Brix (e.g. 23°). A surcharge was added for every 0.1° in excess of that
baseline. As I recall, the practice was abandoned during the grape glut,
when it became a buyers' market and the growers were eager to please and
hold onto the few customers they had.

Tom S


  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Redhart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why don't you get a life??
"Leo Bueno" > wrote in message
...
>
> An issue surrounding the current (ongoing is a better description
> perhaps) row between California growers and vintners regarding how
> long to keep the grapes on the vine has piqued my interest. See
> excerpt (and link to an article):
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...IGB0AONQB1.DTL
> "Growers say winemakers ask them to harvest fruit at 27 or 28 Brix
> (percent of sugar), which is far greater than the 24 Brix of the fruit
> that was harvested in the 1980s. By picking that late, the grapes
> partially dehydrate -- and a new interpretation of state law permits
> wineries to add the water back at the crusher to help wines ferment
> more efficiently."
>
> Why don't both players simply contract for grapes at say 27.5 brix (or
> whatever value) and price them accordingly?
>
>
> --
> =================================================
> Do you like wine? Do you live in South Florida?
> Visit the MIAMI WINE TASTERS group at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/miamiWINE
> =================================================



  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Redhart
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Why don't you get a life??
"Leo Bueno" > wrote in message
...
>
> An issue surrounding the current (ongoing is a better description
> perhaps) row between California growers and vintners regarding how
> long to keep the grapes on the vine has piqued my interest. See
> excerpt (and link to an article):
> http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...IGB0AONQB1.DTL
> "Growers say winemakers ask them to harvest fruit at 27 or 28 Brix
> (percent of sugar), which is far greater than the 24 Brix of the fruit
> that was harvested in the 1980s. By picking that late, the grapes
> partially dehydrate -- and a new interpretation of state law permits
> wineries to add the water back at the crusher to help wines ferment
> more efficiently."
>
> Why don't both players simply contract for grapes at say 27.5 brix (or
> whatever value) and price them accordingly?
>
>
> --
> =================================================
> Do you like wine? Do you live in South Florida?
> Visit the MIAMI WINE TASTERS group at
> http://groups.yahoo.com/group/miamiWINE
> =================================================



Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Wine industry website allows winemakers and grape-growers to trade FREE. Petar Winemaking 0 09-05-2011 06:49 AM
I think I am getting the hang of this.. Childfree Abby Barbecue 9 14-09-2007 09:50 PM
Christmas Tea Canceled Over Bible Dispute NG2000 Tea 1 05-12-2006 02:51 PM
Vine growers; experience with Kaligreen? Ric Winemaking 3 18-07-2006 01:53 PM
New Hampshire growers? PvtPilot Winemaking 1 04-08-2004 02:38 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"