 |
|
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
how many ways has skanky offended hosts?
Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting
exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. > You snipped away my > real concern > about the other > possibilities. What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your hosts? From some of your posts over the last few days: If it's a stranger, like a neighbourhood welcome group to new neighbours, then you can't be scared to say you are veg*n. -- Skanky I have no trouble saying to people "You might want to think twice about inviting me. I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". -- Skanky They don't mind talking about it either, so if they are having a dinner where the only vegan item is side of green peas, one can eat before the get-together or bring something. -- Skanky Other times they don't get offended if you bring your own, like veg patties to a bbq. -- Skanky It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above "possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message .. . > Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting > exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss one > facet of this dialogue a little deeper. > > > You snipped away my > > real concern > > about the other > > possibilities. > > What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your > hosts? > > From some of your posts over the last few days: > > If it's a stranger, > like a neighbourhood welcome > group to new neighbours, then you > can't be scared to say you are > veg*n. > -- Skanky > > I have no trouble > saying to people "You might want > to think twice about inviting me. > I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". > -- Skanky > > They don't mind > talking about it either, so if they are > having a dinner where the only > vegan item is side of green peas, > one can eat before the get-together > or bring something. > -- Skanky > > Other times they > don't get offended if you bring your > own, like veg patties to a bbq. > -- Skanky > > It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above > "possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how > many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how > your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd > be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. She describes typical experiences that most vegetarians face in a carnivorous world. I've experienced it and I'm sure you have too. The key is to be gracious in either bringing your own food (with permission) or selectively accepting the food being offered. I don't have a problem with eating a little something beforehand either. If somebody notices that you are picking then kindly explain that you are vegetarian. Usually no problem. On the other hand, you have been asked how "gracious" you would be if somebody threw a slab of steak on your plate and you have not yet replied. Somehow I doubt that you would be as gracious as you like to think you are, particularly with your personality disorder. I also find it quite ironic that you accuse somebody else of being an "OFFENSIVE asshole". |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
.. . > Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting > exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss > one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. > > > You snipped away my > > real concern > > about the other > > possibilities. > > What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your > hosts? > > From some of your posts over the last few days: > > If it's a stranger, > like a neighbourhood welcome > group to new neighbours, then you > can't be scared to say you are > veg*n. > -- Skanky Nothing wrong with that when told you'll be offered meatloaves etc. > I have no trouble > saying to people "You might want > to think twice about inviting me. > I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". > -- Skanky I've had great success with this. No offending at all. There has always turned out to be something I could eat. Once a friend's dad made it into a big adventure where everyone tried veggie burgers for the first time. It went over quite well. > They don't mind > talking about it either, so if they are > having a dinner where the only > vegan item is side of green peas, > one can eat before the get-together > or bring something. > -- Skanky True friends let you know. If the meal is too meat based there is also the option of showing up to the party just in time for desert and hanging out. > Other times they > don't get offended if you bring your > own, like veg patties to a bbq. > -- Skanky I've never offended anyone by doing this. Then again, maybe Toronto is just a little more laid back and accepting of other's differences than a hard to the right state like Texas is. > It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above > "possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how > many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how > your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd > be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. I have the skill/ability/luck of not offending those whose meat I have turned down. In fact I only have ever offended one person that way and he turned out to be quite easily offended by anything. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Candy-ass James Strutz wrote:
>>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting >>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss one >>facet of this dialogue a little deeper. >> >> >>>You snipped away my >>>real concern >>>about the other >>>possibilities. >> >>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your >>hosts? >> >>From some of your posts over the last few days: >> >> If it's a stranger, >> like a neighbourhood welcome >> group to new neighbours, then you >> can't be scared to say you are >> veg*n. >> -- Skanky >> >> I have no trouble >> saying to people "You might want >> to think twice about inviting me. >> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". >> -- Skanky >> >> They don't mind >> talking about it either, so if they are >> having a dinner where the only >> vegan item is side of green peas, >> one can eat before the get-together >> or bring something. >> -- Skanky >> >> Other times they >> don't get offended if you bring your >> own, like veg patties to a bbq. >> -- Skanky >> >>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above >>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how >>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how >>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd >>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. > > She describes typical experiences *Atypical* experiences. NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. NORMAL people don't give lectures or diatribes against what's served at parties. NORMAL people don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL people will gratefully eat what's graciously offered. Thanks for admitting that you are, like Skanky is, abnormal. > carnivorous world. Omnivorous. I've yet to attend a party that was strictly meat. > On the other hand, you have been asked And I've already responded by saying I'd much rather put aside my preferences for ONE meal than to offend someone. > Somehow I doubt that you would be as gracious as you like to think you are, For example: Any food offered with love and in the spirit of gratitude is holy. To deny it is to profane all that is good, blessed, and right.... I'm sure you can discuss well beforehand your insecurities and peculiar food obsessions with the person in whose home you will be guest. Perhaps that person will sanctify a fake turkey -- a mockery to God -- to satisfy your eating disorder. What better way, though, than to show others that one can be a cheerful participant of the rest of the thanksgiving feast without eating the bird.... What's wrong with compromise on one bloody day of the entire year? Surely love of God and family outweighs the specious issue of veganism the entire year. yours truly: http://tinyurl.com/8sacw > particularly with your personality disorder. I have none. Has Wendy given up her futile attempt to diagnose yours yet, or has she resigned herself to the fact that you're just a miserable bony asshole who's no fun for a lady to be around? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Asshole wrote:
>>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting >>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss >>one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. >> >> > You snipped away my >> > real concern >> > about the other >> > possibilities. >> >>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your >>hosts? >> >> From some of your posts over the last few days: >> >> If it's a stranger, >> like a neighbourhood welcome >> group to new neighbours, then you >> can't be scared to say you are >> veg*n. >> -- Skanky > > Nothing wrong with that I know WHY you do it: so you can be a smarmy, sanctimonious bitch. >> I have no trouble >> saying to people "You might want >> to think twice about inviting me. >> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". >> -- Skanky > > I've had great success with this. You're unbelievably narcissistic if you think that it's a success to have the WHOLE PARTY have to adapt to your ****ing eating disorder. >> They don't mind >> talking about it either, so if they are >> having a dinner where the only >> vegan item is side of green peas, >> one can eat before the get-together >> or bring something. >> -- Skanky > > True friends let you know. True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat before the party or bring their own food. > If the meal is too meat based You shouldn't be asked to attend. > there is also the option of > showing up to the party just > in time for desert and hanging > out. Dessert. A desert is a barren place, like inside your head. I'd be insulted if my guests only showed up at the end of the party like you do. Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not telling you what a disrespectful asshole you are. >> Other times they >> don't get offended if you bring your >> own, like veg patties to a bbq. >> -- Skanky > > I've never offended anyone Liar. You clearly have. > by doing this. You don't have eyes in the back of your head, else you'd be able to see how others respond to your loony antics. > Then again, maybe > Toronto is just a little more > laid back Your little clicqe may be accepting of you, but you're clearly on the kook fringe even in Toronto. > and accepting of > other's differences Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for all. I live in a minority-majority state -- one of four in the nation where non-white populations exceed the white population. I live in a city which is one of the most diverse and integrated in the country. In 2003, the last year for which I can find hate crimes statistics for Texas, there were 294 reported incidents; our population is over 22 million. Comparatively speaking, the LIBERAL states of New Jersey had 594 reported hate crimes (population just over 8.6 million), New York had 602 reported hate crimes (population of about 19 million), and Massachusetts had 403 reported hate crimes (population 5.2 million). http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050811/D8BTJN0O0.html http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03hc.pdf The states you would call "hard to the right" treat others more respectfully, no matter how weird others are. So don't give me any more of your baseless sterotyping bullshit about "acceptance." If you do, I'll get out your own crime reports and see how well Ontario matches up in terms of hate crimes. Like this: Toronto's Hate Crime Unit reported a 22% rise of hate crimes in Metropolitan Toronto between 1997 and 1998, up to 228 from 187. http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/evidence/series4_e.cfm That's only ONE ****ing city with a metropolitan population a quarter the size of my state. Why does your "accepting" city have nearly four-times as many hate crimes as my entire state, bitch?! > than a > hard to the right state like > Texas is. Hardly to the right. I live in the only county which has voted for the Democratic presidential candidate in every election since Reconstruction. As a whole, this state is about as far to the right as the rest of the nation -- just right of center. Your stereotypes and caricatures are way off base. See above. >>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above >>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how >>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how >>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd >>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. > > I have the skill You have no marketable skills, loser. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"pussy boy" > wrote in message ... > Candy-ass James Strutz wrote: >> She describes typical experiences > > *Atypical* experiences. Then you must live on a different planet. Must be Texas... > NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. NORMAL people don't give > lectures or diatribes against what's served at parties. NORMAL people > don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL people will gratefully eat > what's graciously offered. NORMAL people make compromises graciously and respectfully. > Thanks for admitting that you are, like Skanky is, abnormal. I would gladly associate myself with the likes of her than you. >> carnivorous world. > > Omnivorous. I've yet to attend a party that was strictly meat. You know what I mean, dickhead. Quit picking nits... >> Somehow I doubt that you would be as gracious as you like to think you >> are, > > For example: > > Any food offered with love and in the spirit of gratitude is > holy. To deny it is to profane all that is good, blessed, and > right.... Any person who truely "loves" you will be sympathetic to one's eating preferences. Any host I know would go out of their way to make their guests happy and confortable. They're usually more than happy to have you bring something to share with everyone. > I'm sure you can discuss well beforehand your insecurities and > peculiar food obsessions with the person in whose home you will > be guest. Perhaps that person will sanctify a fake turkey -- a > mockery to God -- to satisfy your eating disorder. What better > way, though, than to show others that one can be a cheerful > participant of the rest of the thanksgiving feast without eating > the bird.... I didn't know we were talking about Thanksgiving, not that it makes a difference. There's almost never a problem finding something I can eat at parties and dinners. Of course, I'm not vegan like you are... > What's wrong with compromise on one bloody day of the entire > year? Surely love of God and family outweighs the specious issue > of veganism the entire year. > yours truly: http://tinyurl.com/8sacw Ironic that you should use the word "bloody" to emphasize Thanksgiving. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Candy-ass James Strutz wrote:
>>>She describes typical experiences >> >>*Atypical* experiences. > > Then you must live on a different planet. No. >>NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. NORMAL people don't give >>lectures or diatribes against what's served at parties. NORMAL people >>don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL people will gratefully eat >>what's graciously offered. > > NORMAL people make compromises graciously and respectfully. She's abnormal. So are you. >>Thanks for admitting that you are, like Skanky is, abnormal. > > I would gladly associate myself with the likes of her At least that would get you off Wendy's back. Are you even seeing her on a professional basis now? >>>carnivorous world. >> >>Omnivorous. I've yet to attend a party that was strictly meat. > > You know what I mean I know what you *wrote*, Putz. >>>Somehow I doubt that you would be as gracious as you like to think you >>>are, >> >>For example: >> >>Any food offered with love and in the spirit of gratitude is >>holy. To deny it is to profane all that is good, blessed, and >>right.... > > Any person who truely "loves" you won't have to wonder if you have Asperger's or some other organic excuse for being an inattentive, distant asshole. >>I'm sure you can discuss well beforehand your insecurities and >>peculiar food obsessions with the person in whose home you will >>be guest. Perhaps that person will sanctify a fake turkey -- a >>mockery to God -- to satisfy your eating disorder. What better >>way, though, than to show others that one can be a cheerful >>participant of the rest of the thanksgiving feast without eating >>the bird.... > > I didn't know we were talking about Thanksgiving, not that it makes a > difference. I gave you examples to demonstrate you're wrong in your portrayal of my gratitude when others invite me over for parties or gatherings. > There's almost never a problem finding something I can eat at > parties and dinners. Your parents must be really proud. >>What's wrong with compromise on one bloody day of the entire >>year? Surely love of God and family outweighs the specious issue >>of veganism the entire year. >>yours truly: http://tinyurl.com/8sacw > > Ironic The only irony is how "compassionate" vegans show their abject contempt for other humans during holy days. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"bonehead" > wrote in message ... > Scented Asshole wrote: >> I've had great success with this. > > You're unbelievably narcissistic if you think that it's a success to have > the WHOLE PARTY have to adapt to your ****ing eating disorder. She never said the WHOLE PARTY had to adapt to her eating preferences. You made it up. >> True friends let you know. > > True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat > before the party or bring their own food. True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. >> If the meal is too meat based > > You shouldn't be asked to attend. You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. > I'd be insulted if my guests only showed up at the end of the party like > you do. Good, I'll keep that in mind the next time you invite me to one of your parties. > Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not telling you > what a disrespectful asshole you are. That leaves you with something less than class and tact. >> and accepting of >> other's differences > > Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for all. I love it when we get under your skin. > I live in a minority-majority state -- one of four in the nation where > non-white populations exceed the white population. I live in a city which > is one of the most diverse and integrated in the country. In 2003, the > last year for which I can find hate crimes statistics for Texas, there > were 294 reported incidents; our population is over 22 million. > Comparatively speaking, the LIBERAL states of New Jersey had 594 reported > hate crimes (population just over 8.6 million), New York had 602 reported > hate crimes (population of about 19 million), and Massachusetts had 403 > reported hate crimes (population 5.2 million). > > http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050811/D8BTJN0O0.html > http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03hc.pdf > > The states you would call "hard to the right" treat others more > respectfully, no matter how weird others are. So don't give me any more of > your baseless sterotyping bullshit about "acceptance." If you do, I'll get > out your own crime reports and see how well Ontario matches up in terms of > hate crimes. Like this: > > Toronto's Hate Crime Unit reported a 22% rise of hate > crimes in Metropolitan Toronto between 1997 and 1998, up to 228 > from 187. > http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/evidence/series4_e.cfm > > That's only ONE ****ing city with a metropolitan population a quarter the > size of my state. Why does your "accepting" city have nearly four-times as > many hate crimes as my entire state, bitch?! > >> than a >> hard to the right state like >> Texas is. > > Hardly to the right. I live in the only county which has voted for the > Democratic presidential candidate in every election since Reconstruction. > As a whole, this state is about as far to the right as the rest of the > nation -- just right of center. Your stereotypes and caricatures are way > off base. See above. You and Texas are far, far to the right. Texas is full of rednecks who wear cowboy hats and drive pickup trucks. Texas is also full of criminals. The re-runs of Walker: Texas Ranger prove it. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"pussy boy" > wrote in message ... > Candy-ass James Strutz wrote: > >>>>She describes typical experiences >>> >>>*Atypical* experiences. >> >> Then you must live on a different planet. > > No. Yes. >>>NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. NORMAL people don't give >>>lectures or diatribes against what's served at parties. NORMAL people >>>don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL people will gratefully eat >>>what's graciously offered. >> >> NORMAL people make compromises graciously and respectfully. > > She's abnormal. So are you. What's normal? >> I didn't know we were talking about Thanksgiving, not that it makes a >> difference. > > I gave you examples to demonstrate you're wrong in your portrayal of my > gratitude when others invite me over for parties or gatherings. Oh, I thought you were "moving goalposts" again. >> There's almost never a problem finding something I can eat at parties and >> dinners. > > Your parents must be really proud. My father is very proud of me, my mother passed away almost 10 years ago from complications of cancer. > The only irony is how "compassionate" vegans show their abject contempt > for other humans during holy days. Since when is Thanksgiving a holy day? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Candy-ass James Strutz wrote:
>>>I've had great success with this. >> >>You're unbelievably narcissistic if you think that it's a success to have >>the WHOLE PARTY have to adapt to your ****ing eating disorder. > > She never said the WHOLE PARTY Once a friend's dad made it into a big adventure where everyone tried veggie burgers for the first time. -- Skanky >>>True friends let you know. >> >>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat >>before the party or bring their own food. > > True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. True friends are honest if your preferences go overboard. >>>If the meal is too meat based >> >>You shouldn't be asked to attend. > > You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. 1. The act of inviting. 2. A spoken or written *REQUEST* for someone's presence or participation. 3. An allurement, enticement, or attraction. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/invitation My emphasis. Are you a dummy or just a liar? >>I'd be insulted if my guests only showed up at the end of the party like >>you do. > > Good, It's impolite, you skinny prick. > I'll keep that in mind the next time There hasn't been a first time. And there won't be one. I've not even told you when I've been in Pittsburgh. >>Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not telling you >>what a disrespectful asshole you are. > > That leaves you I don't mind telling her the truth. Same goes for you, dipshit. >>>and accepting of >>>other's differences >> >>Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for all. > > I love it when we get under your skin. You're not under my skin. >>I live in a minority-majority state -- one of four in the nation where >>non-white populations exceed the white population. I live in a city which >>is one of the most diverse and integrated in the country. In 2003, the >>last year for which I can find hate crimes statistics for Texas, there >>were 294 reported incidents; our population is over 22 million. >>Comparatively speaking, the LIBERAL states of New Jersey had 594 reported >>hate crimes (population just over 8.6 million), New York had 602 reported >>hate crimes (population of about 19 million), and Massachusetts had 403 >>reported hate crimes (population 5.2 million). >> >>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050811/D8BTJN0O0.html >>http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03hc.pdf >> >>The states you would call "hard to the right" treat others more >>respectfully, no matter how weird others are. So don't give me any more of >>your baseless sterotyping bullshit about "acceptance." If you do, I'll get >>out your own crime reports and see how well Ontario matches up in terms of >>hate crimes. Like this: >> >>Toronto's Hate Crime Unit reported a 22% rise of hate >>crimes in Metropolitan Toronto between 1997 and 1998, up to 228 >>from 187. >>http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/evidence/series4_e.cfm >> >>That's only ONE ****ing city with a metropolitan population a quarter the >>size of my state. Why does your "accepting" city have nearly four-times as >>many hate crimes as my entire state, bitch?! >> >> >>>than a >>>hard to the right state like >>>Texas is. >> >>Hardly to the right. I live in the only county which has voted for the >>Democratic presidential candidate in every election since Reconstruction. >>As a whole, this state is about as far to the right as the rest of the >>nation -- just right of center. Your stereotypes and caricatures are way >>off base. See above. > > You and Texas Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or just professionally for your "issues" now? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Candy-ass James Strutz wrote:
>>>>>She describes typical experiences >>>> >>>>*Atypical* experiences. >>> >>>Then you must live on a different planet. >> >>No. > > Yes. No. >>>>NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. NORMAL people don't give >>>>lectures or diatribes against what's served at parties. NORMAL people >>>>don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL people will gratefully eat >>>>what's graciously offered. >>> >>>NORMAL people make compromises graciously and respectfully. >> >>She's abnormal. So are you. > > What's normal? Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, pattern, level, or type; typical. http://www.thefreedictionary.com/normal >>>I didn't know we were talking about Thanksgiving, not that it makes a >>>difference. >> >>I gave you examples to demonstrate you're wrong in your portrayal of my >>gratitude when others invite me over for parties or gatherings. > > Oh, I thought You've never thought before making your bogus claims, Putz. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"moron" > wrote in message .. . > Candy-ass James Strutz wrote: >>>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat >>>before the party or bring their own food. >> >> True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. > > True friends are honest if your preferences go overboard. You automatically assume that vegans go "overboard" imposing themselves on other people. It's far from reality. >>>>If the meal is too meat based >>> >>>You shouldn't be asked to attend. >> >> You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. > > 1. The act of inviting. > 2. A spoken or written *REQUEST* for someone's presence or > participation. > 3. An allurement, enticement, or attraction. > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/invitation 'Invitation' is still a more appropriate word. > My emphasis. Are you a dummy or just a liar? You don't give many alternatives, do you? >> I'll keep that in mind the next time > > There hasn't been a first time. And there won't be one. I've not even told > you when I've been in Pittsburgh. Am I supposed to feel slighted?? >>>Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not telling >>>you what a disrespectful asshole you are. >> >> That leaves you > > I don't mind telling her the truth. Same goes for you, dipshit. You wouldn't know truth if it stared you in the face. >>>Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for >>>all. >> >> I love it when we get under your skin. > > You're not under my skin. Yes we are. >> You and Texas > > Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or > just professionally for your "issues" now? Why are you trying to change the subject again? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message ... > Candy-ass James Strutz wrote: >>>>>>She describes typical experiences >>>>> >>>>>*Atypical* experiences. >>>> >>>>Then you must live on a different planet. >>> >>>No. >> >> Yes. > > No. Yes. >>>>>NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. NORMAL people don't >>>>>give lectures or diatribes against what's served at parties. NORMAL >>>>>people don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL people will >>>>>gratefully eat what's graciously offered. >>>> >>>>NORMAL people make compromises graciously and respectfully. >>> >>>She's abnormal. So are you. >> >> What's normal? > > Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, > pattern, level, or type; typical. > http://www.thefreedictionary.com/normal The point, moron, is that NOBODY is "normal". >>>>I didn't know we were talking about Thanksgiving, not that it makes a >>>>difference. >>> >>>I gave you examples to demonstrate you're wrong in your portrayal of my >>>gratitude when others invite me over for parties or gatherings. >> >> Oh, I thought > > You've never thought before making your bogus claims, Putz. Which bogus claims are those? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Candy-ass James Strutz wrote: > >>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting > >>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss one > >>facet of this dialogue a little deeper. > >> > >> > >>>You snipped away my > >>>real concern > >>>about the other > >>>possibilities. > >> > >>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your > >>hosts? > >> > >>From some of your posts over the last few days: > >> > >> If it's a stranger, > >> like a neighbourhood welcome > >> group to new neighbours, then you > >> can't be scared to say you are > >> veg*n. > >> -- Skanky > >> > >> I have no trouble > >> saying to people "You might want > >> to think twice about inviting me. > >> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". > >> -- Skanky > >> > >> They don't mind > >> talking about it either, so if they are > >> having a dinner where the only > >> vegan item is side of green peas, > >> one can eat before the get-together > >> or bring something. > >> -- Skanky > >> > >> Other times they > >> don't get offended if you bring your > >> own, like veg patties to a bbq. > >> -- Skanky > >> > >>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above > >>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how > >>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how > >>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd > >>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. > > > > She describes typical experiences > > *Atypical* experiences. NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. > NORMAL people don't give lectures or diatribes against what's served at > parties. NORMAL people don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL > people will gratefully eat what's graciously offered. Since you have an admitted aesthetic aversion to meat, I'd love to see you invited to a dinner based around liver, brain and tongue or something like that. Maybe bull testicles. LOL > Thanks for admitting that you are, like Skanky is, abnormal. > > > carnivorous world. > > Omnivorous. I've yet to attend a party that was strictly meat. > > > On the other hand, you have been asked > > And I've already responded by saying I'd much rather put aside my > preferences for ONE meal than to offend someone. "Much rather". Sounds like you're not sure. > > Somehow I doubt that you would be as gracious as you like to think you are, > > For example: > > Any food offered with love and in the spirit of gratitude is > holy. To deny it is to profane all that is good, blessed, and > right.... Wow, you accuse vegans of having religious views on food, but it's really you doing that. > I'm sure you can discuss well beforehand your insecurities and > peculiar food obsessions with the person in whose home you will > be guest. Perhaps that person will sanctify a fake turkey -- a > mockery to God -- to satisfy your eating disorder. What better > way, though, than to show others that one can be a cheerful > participant of the rest of the thanksgiving feast without eating > the bird.... A "mockery to God"?? You say now that you would participate in Thanksgiving without eating the bird (maybe that steak too?). What about when someone puts it on your plate and it's the current course? Do you eat it? I think not. You've been evasive and lying. > What's wrong with compromise on one bloody day of the entire > year? Surely love of God and family outweighs the specious issue > of veganism the entire year. > yours truly: http://tinyurl.com/8sacw > > > particularly with your personality disorder. > > I have none. Has Wendy given up her futile attempt to diagnose yours > yet, or has she resigned herself to the fact that you're just a > miserable bony asshole who's no fun for a lady to be around? You are the only true orthorexic on this newsgroup. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Scented Asshole wrote: > >>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting > >>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss > >>one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. > >> > >> > You snipped away my > >> > real concern > >> > about the other > >> > possibilities. > >> > >>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your > >>hosts? > >> > >> From some of your posts over the last few days: > >> > >> If it's a stranger, > >> like a neighbourhood welcome > >> group to new neighbours, then you > >> can't be scared to say you are > >> veg*n. > >> -- Skanky > > > > Nothing wrong with that > > I know WHY you do it: so you can be a smarmy, sanctimonious bitch. Uh oh, someone didn't take his fiber yesterday... > >> I have no trouble > >> saying to people "You might want > >> to think twice about inviting me. > >> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". > >> -- Skanky > > > > I've had great success with this. > > You're unbelievably narcissistic if you think that it's a success to > have the WHOLE PARTY have to adapt to your ****ing eating disorder. You're the only participant in this newgroup with an authentic eating disorder. > >> They don't mind > >> talking about it either, so if they are > >> having a dinner where the only > >> vegan item is side of green peas, > >> one can eat before the get-together > >> or bring something. > >> -- Skanky > > > > True friends let you know. > > True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat > before the party or bring their own food. Why not? It's completely sensible. > > If the meal is too meat based > > You shouldn't be asked to attend. If it was your's I'd turn down the invite anyways, just like everyone else. > > there is also the option of > > showing up to the party just > > in time for desert and hanging > > out. > > Dessert. A desert is a barren place, like inside your head. I'd be > insulted if my guests only showed up at the end of the party like you > do. Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not > telling you what a disrespectful asshole you are. Your overly sensitive ability to feel insulted and slighted is why people don't like you. > >> Other times they > >> don't get offended if you bring your > >> own, like veg patties to a bbq. > >> -- Skanky > > > > I've never offended anyone > > Liar. You clearly have. Once. He was a little like you. Petty. Pouty. > > by doing this. > > You don't have eyes in the back of your head, else you'd be able to see > how others respond to your loony antics. It's not like where you're from. > > Then again, maybe > > Toronto is just a little more > > laid back > > Your little clicqe may be accepting of you, but you're clearly on the > kook fringe even in Toronto. No. There are lots of vegetarians. I'm often not the only one. > > and accepting of > > other's differences > > Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for > all. I live in a minority-majority state -- one of four in the nation > where non-white populations exceed the white population. I live in a > city which is one of the most diverse and integrated in the country. In > 2003, the last year for which I can find hate crimes statistics for > Texas, there were 294 reported incidents; our population is over 22 > million. Comparatively speaking, the LIBERAL states of New Jersey had > 594 reported hate crimes (population just over 8.6 million), New York > had 602 reported hate crimes (population of about 19 million), and > Massachusetts had 403 reported hate crimes (population 5.2 million). > > http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050811/D8BTJN0O0.html > http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03hc.pdf I don't care what races make up your state, nor are we specifically talking about hate crimes (a fringe crime here). I'm talking about the overall Texan attitude that's very very promeat and anti-ar. Up here in Canada, Alberta is a bit like that. > The states you would call "hard to the right" treat others more > respectfully, no matter how weird others are. So don't give me any more > of your baseless sterotyping bullshit about "acceptance." If you do, > I'll get out your own crime reports and see how well Ontario matches up > in terms of hate crimes. Like this: > > Toronto's Hate Crime Unit reported a 22% rise of hate > crimes in Metropolitan Toronto between 1997 and 1998, up to 228 > from 187. > http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/evidence/series4_e.cfm > > That's only ONE ****ing city with a metropolitan population a quarter > the size of my state. Why does your "accepting" city have nearly > four-times as many hate crimes as my entire state, bitch?! That's funny. You put down hate crimes in the same sentence as you call me a bitch. > > than a > > hard to the right state like > > Texas is. > > Hardly to the right. I live in the only county which has voted for the > Democratic presidential candidate in every election since > Reconstruction. As a whole, this state is about as far to the right as > the rest of the nation -- just right of center. Your stereotypes and > caricatures are way off base. See above. And yet you still have that fear of nonconformity that runs your life. > >>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above > >>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how > >>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how > >>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd > >>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. > > > > I have the skill > > You have no marketable skills, loser. You're more skilled at being being miserable.  |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Candy-ass James Strutz wrote:
> >>>>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat >>>>before the party or bring their own food. >>> >>>True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. >> >>True friends are honest if your preferences go overboard. > > You automatically assume that vegans go "overboard" Veganism is already an extreme, so it's reasonable to point out vegans' extremism when it manifests itself in irrational and offensive actions. > It's far from reality. Liar. Have you read through vegan literature or websites lately to see how "overboard" they go in imposing their wills upon others? Not only in terms of diet, Putz, but with respect to medicine, apparel, and so on. Lesley this morning pasted some diatribe taking credit for shutting down a farm that provided guinea pigs for medical research. >>>>>If the meal is too meat based >>>> >>>>You shouldn't be asked to attend. >>> >>>You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. >> >>1. The act of inviting. >>2. A spoken or written *REQUEST* for someone's presence or >>participation. >>3. An allurement, enticement, or attraction. >>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/invitation > > 'Invitation' is still a more appropriate word. An invitation IS a request. Dummy. >>My emphasis. Are you a dummy or just a liar? > > You don't give many alternatives, do you? One more then: Both. >>Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or >>just professionally for your "issues" now? > > Why are you trying to change the subject again? You're the one who's taken this thread away from discussing Skanky's offenses, Putz. So let's discuss yours. Are you still seeing Wendy personally or just professionally for your "issues"? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Candy-ass James Strutz wrote:
>> >>>>>>>She describes typical experiences >>>>>> >>>>>>*Atypical* experiences. >>>>> >>>>>Then you must live on a different planet. >>>> >>>>No. >>> >>>Yes. >> >>No. > > Yes. No. >>>>>>NORMAL people don't eat before going to parties. NORMAL people don't >>>>>>give lectures or diatribes against what's served at parties. NORMAL >>>>>>people don't bring their OWN food to parties. NORMAL people will >>>>>>gratefully eat what's graciously offered. >>>>> >>>>>NORMAL people make compromises graciously and respectfully. >>>> >>>>She's abnormal. So are you. >>> >>>What's normal? >> >>Conforming with, adhering to, or constituting a norm, standard, >>pattern, level, or type; typical. >>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/normal > > The point Is that she's abnormal. So are you. >>>>>I didn't know we were talking about Thanksgiving, not that it makes a >>>>>difference. >>>> >>>>I gave you examples to demonstrate you're wrong in your portrayal of my >>>>gratitude when others invite me over for parties or gatherings. >>> >>>Oh, I thought >> >>You've never thought before making your bogus claims, Putz. > > Which bogus claims are those? All of them. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Asshole wrote:
>>>>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting >>>>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss >>>>one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. >>>> >>>> >>>>>You snipped away my >>>>>real concern >>>>>about the other >>>>>possibilities. >>>> >>>>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your >>>>hosts? >>>> >>>>From some of your posts over the last few days: >>>> >>>> If it's a stranger, >>>> like a neighbourhood welcome >>>> group to new neighbours, then you >>>> can't be scared to say you are >>>> veg*n. >>>> -- Skanky >>> >>>Nothing wrong with that >> >>I know WHY you do it: so you can be a smarmy, sanctimonious bitch. > > Uh oh, You're wrong, Skanky. >>>> I have no trouble >>>> saying to people "You might want >>>> to think twice about inviting me. >>>> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". >>>> -- Skanky >>> >>>I've had great success with this. >> >>You're unbelievably narcissistic if you think that it's a success to >>have the WHOLE PARTY have to adapt to your ****ing eating disorder. > > You're the only Address the issue, stupid. Why do you think it's a "success" that everyone else has to cater to YOUR peculiar demands? >>>> They don't mind >>>> talking about it either, so if they are >>>> having a dinner where the only >>>> vegan item is side of green peas, >>>> one can eat before the get-together >>>> or bring something. >>>> -- Skanky >>> >>>True friends let you know. >> >>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat >>before the party or bring their own food. > > Why not? It's offensive to make such demands on your host, or to shun your host's generosity in favor of feeding yourself in some fashion as you describe. >>>If the meal is too meat based >> >>You shouldn't be asked to attend. > > If it was your's You'll never be invited to my home, Skanky. >>>there is also the option of >>>showing up to the party just >>>in time for desert and hanging >>>out. >> >>Dessert. A desert is a barren place, like inside your head. I'd be >>insulted if my guests only showed up at the end of the party like you >>do. Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not >>telling you what a disrespectful asshole you are. But I also bet some have confided what others have said behind your back. >>>> Other times they >>>> don't get offended if you bring your >>>> own, like veg patties to a bbq. >>>> -- Skanky >>> >>>I've never offended anyone >> >>Liar. You clearly have. > > Once. That you know of. >>>by doing this. >> >>You don't have eyes in the back of your head, else you'd be able to see >>how others respond to your loony antics. > > It's not You don't have eyes in the back of your head, dummy. >>>Then again, maybe >>>Toronto is just a little more >>>laid back >> >>Your little clicqe may be accepting of you, but you're clearly on the >>kook fringe even in Toronto. > > No. There are lots of vegetarians. So what. There are lots of vegetarians here. >>>and accepting of >>>other's differences >> >>Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for >>all. I live in a minority-majority state -- one of four in the nation >>where non-white populations exceed the white population. I live in a >>city which is one of the most diverse and integrated in the country. In >>2003, the last year for which I can find hate crimes statistics for >>Texas, there were 294 reported incidents; our population is over 22 >>million. Comparatively speaking, the LIBERAL states of New Jersey had >>594 reported hate crimes (population just over 8.6 million), New York >>had 602 reported hate crimes (population of about 19 million), and >>Massachusetts had 403 reported hate crimes (population 5.2 million). >> >>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050811/D8BTJN0O0.html >>http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03hc.pdf > > I don't care That's why you're 43 and still sponging off your parents. >>The states you would call "hard to the right" treat others more >>respectfully, no matter how weird others are. So don't give me any more >>of your baseless sterotyping bullshit about "acceptance." If you do, >>I'll get out your own crime reports and see how well Ontario matches up >>in terms of hate crimes. Like this: >> >>Toronto's Hate Crime Unit reported a 22% rise of hate >>crimes in Metropolitan Toronto between 1997 and 1998, up to 228 >>from 187. >>http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/evidence/series4_e.cfm >> >>That's only ONE ****ing city with a metropolitan population a quarter >>the size of my state. Why does your "accepting" city have nearly >>four-times as many hate crimes as my entire state, bitch?! > > That's funny. I don't think it's funny at all that your city is filled with so much hatred and violence for "different" people. Why is your hate crimes rate FOUR TIMES higher than my state's? >>>than a >>>hard to the right state like >>>Texas is. >> >>Hardly to the right. I live in the only county which has voted for the >>Democratic presidential candidate in every election since >>Reconstruction. As a whole, this state is about as far to the right as >>the rest of the nation -- just right of center. Your stereotypes and >>caricatures are way off base. See above. > > And yet You live in a city with an increasing number of hate crimes, and where the number of officers working hate crimes is doubling because of the serverity of the problem (which has doubled in the last decade). Noting that hate crimes in Ontario have increased by 93 per cent since 1996, Kwinter said the funding will ensure that police stay one step ahead of hatemongers and racists. Last winter, however, the unit’s funding appeared in jeopardy. A spokesperson for Kwinter’s ministry informed the unit its funding would be reduced, but the minister quickly reversed that decision. However, for 10 weeks beginning in late March, the unit’s lone staffer, Abbee Corb, was not paid. Funding resumed on June 15. http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=7162 Why don't you people take violence more seriously up there? And why do you accuse others of intolerance when your city has a hate crimes rate four-times higher? >>>>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above >>>>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how >>>>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how >>>>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd >>>>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. >>> >>>I have the skill >> >>You have no marketable skills, loser. > > You're more skilled Yes, but that's comparing apples to oranges. You're comparable to a slug, or a parasite. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Asshole wrote:
>>And I've already responded by saying I'd much rather put aside my >>preferences for ONE meal than to offend someone. > > "Much rather". Sounds like > you're not sure. "Much rather" is very clear, dumb ass. > Wow, you accuse vegans of > having religious views on food, They do. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
usual suspect wrote: > Scented Asshole wrote: > >>And I've already responded by saying I'd much rather put aside my > >>preferences for ONE meal than to offend someone. > > > > "Much rather". Sounds like > > you're not sure. > > "Much rather" is very clear, dumb ass. > > > Wow, you accuse vegans of > > having religious views on food, > > They do. ~jonnie~, you don't make any more sense as "Usual" than you do as "Rudy". Why not just give up? The only one you impress is yourself......and apparently that doesn't take much. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reasonable people would not expect you to eat something you feel
uncomfortable eating. It is obvious from this thread that "usual suspect" is not a reasonable person. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
I wish the flamewars here would stop and civil discussions by you very
smart folk would reign. I wish we'd stick with veggie issues here too.... I wi--- Anyway just to add something reasonable on this topic.... My guess on reported crimes being higher in Toronto is that generally the various cultures are highly intermingled in Toronto- and several other major Canadian cities. Incidents may therefore be more common than in an American city where cultures will tend to conglomerate more with their own and be less likely to experience such episodes. The studies show as apparently alarming don't reflect the populace's 'general' willingness to get along as one attitude. On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:40:21 GMT, usual suspect > wrote: >Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting >exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss >one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. > > > You snipped away my > > real concern > > about the other > > possibilities. > >What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your >hosts? > > From some of your posts over the last few days: > > If it's a stranger, > like a neighbourhood welcome > group to new neighbours, then you > can't be scared to say you are > veg*n. > -- Skanky > > I have no trouble > saying to people "You might want > to think twice about inviting me. > I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". > -- Skanky > > They don't mind > talking about it either, so if they are > having a dinner where the only > vegan item is side of green peas, > one can eat before the get-together > or bring something. > -- Skanky > > Other times they > don't get offended if you bring your > own, like veg patties to a bbq. > -- Skanky > >It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above >"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how >many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how >your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd >be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
.. . > Candy-ass James Strutz wrote: > > > >>>>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat > >>>>before the party or bring their own food. > >>> > >>>True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. > >> > >>True friends are honest if your preferences go overboard. > > > > You automatically assume that vegans go "overboard" > > Veganism is already an extreme, so it's reasonable to point out vegans' > extremism when it manifests itself in irrational and offensive actions. > > > It's far from reality. > > Liar. Have you read through vegan literature or websites lately to see > how "overboard" they go in imposing their wills upon others? Not only in > terms of diet, Putz, but with respect to medicine, apparel, and so on. > Lesley this morning pasted some diatribe taking credit for shutting down > a farm that provided guinea pigs for medical research. > > >>>>>If the meal is too meat based > >>>> > >>>>You shouldn't be asked to attend. > >>> > >>>You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. > >> > >>1. The act of inviting. > >>2. A spoken or written *REQUEST* for someone's presence or > >>participation. > >>3. An allurement, enticement, or attraction. > >>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/invitation > > > > 'Invitation' is still a more appropriate word. > > An invitation IS a request. Dummy. > > >>My emphasis. Are you a dummy or just a liar? > > > > You don't give many alternatives, do you? > > One more then: Both. > > >>Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or > >>just professionally for your "issues" now? > > > > Why are you trying to change the subject again? > > You're the one who's taken this thread away from discussing Skanky's > offenses, Putz. So let's discuss yours. Are you still seeing Wendy > personally or just professionally for your "issues"? You take offence at the possibility that he is still seeing his girlfriend? You are really uptight and jealous. That also showed when you got caught lying about having a girlfriend for 4 years. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Scented Asshole wrote: > >>And I've already responded by saying I'd much rather put aside my > >>preferences for ONE meal than to offend someone. > > > > "Much rather". Sounds like > > you're not sure. > > "Much rather" is very clear, dumb ass. Saying that you would much rather sounds like you've never been in the situation. If memory serves, you said "I'd much rather.." > > Wow, you accuse vegans of > > having religious views on food, > > They do. Then why are you the only the second person I've seen post about feeling religious about diet (the other being Jai M.)? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
. .. > Scented Asshole wrote: > >>>>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting > >>>>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss > >>>>one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>You snipped away my > >>>>>real concern > >>>>>about the other > >>>>>possibilities. > >>>> > >>>>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your > >>>>hosts? > >>>> > >>>>From some of your posts over the last few days: > >>>> > >>>> If it's a stranger, > >>>> like a neighbourhood welcome > >>>> group to new neighbours, then you > >>>> can't be scared to say you are > >>>> veg*n. > >>>> -- Skanky > >>> > >>>Nothing wrong with that > >> > >>I know WHY you do it: so you can be a smarmy, sanctimonious bitch. > > > > Uh oh, > > You're wrong, Skanky. About what Snipper? > >>>> I have no trouble > >>>> saying to people "You might want > >>>> to think twice about inviting me. > >>>> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". > >>>> -- Skanky > >>> > >>>I've had great success with this. > >> > >>You're unbelievably narcissistic if you think that it's a success to > >>have the WHOLE PARTY have to adapt to your ****ing eating disorder. > > > > You're the only > > Address the issue, stupid. Why do you think it's a "success" that > everyone else has to cater to YOUR peculiar demands? The success is that people can decide for themselves if they want to invite me to an event or not. I get enough invites to satisfy my needs so I'm doing something right. > >>>> They don't mind > >>>> talking about it either, so if they are > >>>> having a dinner where the only > >>>> vegan item is side of green peas, > >>>> one can eat before the get-together > >>>> or bring something. > >>>> -- Skanky > >>> > >>>True friends let you know. > >> > >>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat > >>before the party or bring their own food. > > > > Why not? > > It's offensive to make such demands on your host, or to shun your host's > generosity in favor of feeding yourself in some fashion as you describe. Nonsense. You get slighted over the slightest things. > >>>If the meal is too meat based > >> > >>You shouldn't be asked to attend. > > > > If it was your's > > You'll never be invited to my home, Skanky. I would never attend if I was. Yuk. > >>>there is also the option of > >>>showing up to the party just > >>>in time for desert and hanging > >>>out. > >> > >>Dessert. A desert is a barren place, like inside your head. I'd be > >>insulted if my guests only showed up at the end of the party like you > >>do. Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not > >>telling you what a disrespectful asshole you are. > > But I also bet some have confided what others have said behind your back. No, none of that sort of stuff goes on. My close friends are nothing like the mix of good and bad people here on the newsgroups. I don't tend to hang out with easily slighted and pouty people like you. > >>>> Other times they > >>>> don't get offended if you bring your > >>>> own, like veg patties to a bbq. > >>>> -- Skanky > >>> > >>>I've never offended anyone > >> > >>Liar. You clearly have. > > > > Once. > > That you know of. It's very obvious if this happens. Out of the ordinary but very obvious. > >>>by doing this. > >> > >>You don't have eyes in the back of your head, else you'd be able to see > >>how others respond to your loony antics. > > > > It's not > > You don't have eyes in the back of your head, dummy. You need to assume/hope that I am the subject of derision. That again says loads about you. > >>>Then again, maybe > >>>Toronto is just a little more > >>>laid back > >> > >>Your little clicqe may be accepting of you, but you're clearly on the > >>kook fringe even in Toronto. > > > > No. There are lots of vegetarians. > > So what. There are lots of vegetarians here. > > >>>and accepting of > >>>other's differences > >> > >>Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for > >>all. I live in a minority-majority state -- one of four in the nation > >>where non-white populations exceed the white population. I live in a > >>city which is one of the most diverse and integrated in the country. In > >>2003, the last year for which I can find hate crimes statistics for > >>Texas, there were 294 reported incidents; our population is over 22 > >>million. Comparatively speaking, the LIBERAL states of New Jersey had > >>594 reported hate crimes (population just over 8.6 million), New York > >>had 602 reported hate crimes (population of about 19 million), and > >>Massachusetts had 403 reported hate crimes (population 5.2 million). > >> > >>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050811/D8BTJN0O0.html > >>http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03hc.pdf > > > > I don't care > > That's why you're 43 and still sponging off your parents. Maybe you should go back to the fishing store and buy some different bait. > >>The states you would call "hard to the right" treat others more > >>respectfully, no matter how weird others are. So don't give me any more > >>of your baseless sterotyping bullshit about "acceptance." If you do, > >>I'll get out your own crime reports and see how well Ontario matches up > >>in terms of hate crimes. Like this: > >> > >>Toronto's Hate Crime Unit reported a 22% rise of hate > >>crimes in Metropolitan Toronto between 1997 and 1998, up to 228 > >>from 187. > >>http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/evidence/series4_e.cfm > >> > >>That's only ONE ****ing city with a metropolitan population a quarter > >>the size of my state. Why does your "accepting" city have nearly > >>four-times as many hate crimes as my entire state, bitch?! > > > > That's funny. > > I don't think it's funny at all that your city is filled with so much > hatred and violence for "different" people. Why is your hate crimes rate > FOUR TIMES higher than my state's? In the same year? In the same other years too? Why are we on the subject of hate crimes rather than just crimes in general? > >>>than a > >>>hard to the right state like > >>>Texas is. > >> > >>Hardly to the right. I live in the only county which has voted for the > >>Democratic presidential candidate in every election since > >>Reconstruction. As a whole, this state is about as far to the right as > >>the rest of the nation -- just right of center. Your stereotypes and > >>caricatures are way off base. See above. > > > > And yet > > You live in a city with an increasing number of hate crimes, and where > the number of officers working hate crimes is doubling because of the > serverity of the problem (which has doubled in the last decade). > > Noting that hate crimes in Ontario have increased by 93 per cent > since 1996, Kwinter said the funding will ensure that police > stay one step ahead of hatemongers and racists. > > Last winter, however, the unit’s funding appeared in jeopardy. A > spokesperson for Kwinter’s ministry informed the unit its > funding would be reduced, but the minister quickly reversed that > decision. However, for 10 weeks beginning in late March, the > unit’s lone staffer, Abbee Corb, was not paid. Funding resumed > on June 15. > http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=7162 > > Why don't you people take violence more seriously up there? And why do > you accuse others of intolerance when your city has a hate crimes rate > four-times higher? We were talking about general acceptance of vegetarianism, not racism. Funny you should mention 'ism's though. You are frequently ageist, sizeist, sexist, homophobic, etc, etc. > >>>>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above > >>>>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how > >>>>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how > >>>>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd > >>>>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. > >>> > >>>I have the skill > >> > >>You have no marketable skills, loser. > > > > You're more skilled > > Yes, but that's comparing apples to oranges. You're comparable to a > slug, or a parasite. So (even though you snipped it), you agree that you are more skilled at being miserable? -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pesco-vegan" > wrote in message
ups.com... > Reasonable people would not expect you to eat something you feel > uncomfortable > eating. It is obvious from this thread that "usual suspect" is not a > reasonable person. He has a strong fear of non-conformity. His vegan eating style conflicts with his need to be seen as 'normal'. He sees admission of difference as a fault and thus offensive. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Scented Nectar" > wrote in message news  > "usual suspect" > wrote in message > .. . >> Candy-ass James Strutz wrote: >> > >> >>>>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll > eat >> >>>>before the party or bring their own food. >> >>> >> >>>True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. >> >> >> >>True friends are honest if your preferences go overboard. >> > >> > You automatically assume that vegans go "overboard" >> >> Veganism is already an extreme, so it's reasonable to point out vegans' >> extremism when it manifests itself in irrational and offensive actions. >> >> > It's far from reality. >> >> Liar. Have you read through vegan literature or websites lately to see >> how "overboard" they go in imposing their wills upon others? Not only in >> terms of diet, Putz, but with respect to medicine, apparel, and so on. >> Lesley this morning pasted some diatribe taking credit for shutting down >> a farm that provided guinea pigs for medical research. >> >> >>>>>If the meal is too meat based >> >>>> >> >>>>You shouldn't be asked to attend. >> >>> >> >>>You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. >> >> >> >>1. The act of inviting. >> >>2. A spoken or written *REQUEST* for someone's presence or >> >>participation. >> >>3. An allurement, enticement, or attraction. >> >>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/invitation >> > >> > 'Invitation' is still a more appropriate word. >> >> An invitation IS a request. Dummy. >> >> >>My emphasis. Are you a dummy or just a liar? >> > >> > You don't give many alternatives, do you? >> >> One more then: Both. >> >> >>Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or >> >>just professionally for your "issues" now? >> > >> > Why are you trying to change the subject again? >> >> You're the one who's taken this thread away from discussing Skanky's >> offenses, Putz. So let's discuss yours. Are you still seeing Wendy >> personally or just professionally for your "issues"? > > You take offence at the possibility > that he is still seeing his girlfriend? > You are really uptight and jealous. > That also showed when you got > caught lying about having a > girlfriend for 4 years. No, he's just "fishing" for weaknesses to attack. When he can't get any information out of us he'll invent something to beat us up with. It further demonstrates his character. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
usual suspect wrote: > Any food offered with love and in the spirit of gratitude is > holy. To deny it is to profane all that is good, blessed, and > right.... Any host who offers you food with love would not want you to eat it out of duty. would you feel angry at a hindu who politely declines your beef steak, or a dieter who politely declines your cake? > I'm sure you can discuss well beforehand your insecurities and > peculiar food obsessions with the person in whose home you will > be guest. Perhaps that person will sanctify a fake turkey -- a > mockery to God -- to satisfy your eating disorder. What better > way, though, than to show others that one can be a cheerful > participant of the rest of the thanksgiving feast without eating > the bird.... So it's OK to decline the turkey after all then? > > What's wrong with compromise on one bloody day of the entire > year? Surely love of God and family outweighs the specious issue > of veganism the entire year. > yours truly: http://tinyurl.com/8sacw |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Pesco-vegan" > wrote > > usual suspect wrote: > > >> Any food offered with love and in the spirit of gratitude is >> holy. To deny it is to profane all that is good, blessed, and >> right.... > > Any host who offers you food with love would not want you to eat > it out of duty. Yet they may be disappointed and insulted if you refuse their gift. That kharma is upon your shoulders. > would you feel angry at a hindu who politely declines > your beef steak..? "Though vegetarianism is associated with Hinduism, it is not true that even a majority of Hindus are vegetarian, nor is it a condition of Hinduism to be a vegetarian. In fact, it is stated in the "Manusmriti" (5:56), "There is no sin in eating meat. but abstention brings great rewards." So, one cannot state, "I am a vegetarian because I am a Hindu." Stating this may also imply that all Hindus are vegetarian, which is not true." So if a Hindu declines meat at your table it is because he seeks great rewards on his own behalf, not because he is compelled by his God. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Aren't Hindus supposed to avoid eating beef specifically because
they believe that cattle are sacred animals. Would you be disappointed and offended if a vegan refused a gift of meat that you offered? |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Groan... I assume that you're repling to me... yes fine.
"Pesco-vegan" > wrote > Aren't Hindus supposed to avoid eating beef specifically because > they believe that cattle are sacred animals. No, that's a fallacy. > Would you be disappointed and offended if a vegan refused a gift > of meat that you offered? I'm disappointed and offended just knowing that people are "vegan". |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pesco-vegan wrote:
> Reasonable people don't call themselves "pesco-vegan." |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Joe wrote:
> Anyway just to add something reasonable on this topic.... My guess on > reported crimes being higher in Toronto is that generally the various > cultures are highly intermingled in Toronto- and several other major > Canadian cities. Perhaps you should get out of Canada sometime and see that our populations are a lot more alike than you seem to think. > Incidents may therefore be more common than in an > American city where cultures will tend to conglomerate more with their > own Tend to conglomerate with their own where? Does Vancouver not have a Chinatown just like nearly every other large city in North America? Does Skanky not live near "Greektown" on Danforth Avenue in Toronto? Again, I think you should come to the US sometime and see just how benighted and stereotypical your remarks are. > and be less likely to experience such episodes. The studies show > as apparently alarming don't reflect the populace's 'general' > willingness to get along as one attitude. Crime statistics show that urban Canada has at least as many problems with hate crimes as US urban areas. In some cases, the problems in Canada are much worse. That appears to be true with respect to Toronto, the hate crimes capital of North America. > On Wed, 31 Aug 2005 13:40:21 GMT, usual suspect > > wrote: > > >>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting >>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss >>one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. >> >> >>>You snipped away my >>>real concern >>>about the other >>>possibilities. >> >>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your >>hosts? >> >>From some of your posts over the last few days: >> >> If it's a stranger, >> like a neighbourhood welcome >> group to new neighbours, then you >> can't be scared to say you are >> veg*n. >> -- Skanky >> >> I have no trouble >> saying to people "You might want >> to think twice about inviting me. >> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". >> -- Skanky >> >> They don't mind >> talking about it either, so if they are >> having a dinner where the only >> vegan item is side of green peas, >> one can eat before the get-together >> or bring something. >> -- Skanky >> >> Other times they >> don't get offended if you bring your >> own, like veg patties to a bbq. >> -- Skanky >> >>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above >>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how >>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how >>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than you'd >>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. > > |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Skanky Nutball wrote:
>>>>>>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll > > eat > >>>>>>before the party or bring their own food. >>>>> >>>>>True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. >>>> >>>>True friends are honest if your preferences go overboard. >>> >>>You automatically assume that vegans go "overboard" >> >>Veganism is already an extreme, so it's reasonable to point out vegans' >>extremism when it manifests itself in irrational and offensive actions. >> >> >>>It's far from reality. >> >>Liar. Have you read through vegan literature or websites lately to see >>how "overboard" they go in imposing their wills upon others? Not only in >>terms of diet, Putz, but with respect to medicine, apparel, and so on. >>Lesley this morning pasted some diatribe taking credit for shutting down >>a farm that provided guinea pigs for medical research. >> >> >>>>>>>If the meal is too meat based >>>>>> >>>>>>You shouldn't be asked to attend. >>>>> >>>>>You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. >>>> >>>>1. The act of inviting. >>>>2. A spoken or written *REQUEST* for someone's presence or >>>>participation. >>>>3. An allurement, enticement, or attraction. >>>>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/invitation >>> >>>'Invitation' is still a more appropriate word. >> >>An invitation IS a request. Dummy. >> >> >>>>My emphasis. Are you a dummy or just a liar? >>> >>>You don't give many alternatives, do you? >> >>One more then: Both. >> >> >>>>Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or >>>>just professionally for your "issues" now? >>> >>>Why are you trying to change the subject again? >> >>You're the one who's taken this thread away from discussing Skanky's >>offenses, Putz. So let's discuss yours. Are you still seeing Wendy >>personally or just professionally for your "issues"? > > You take offence No, Wendy did. That's why she tried to diagnose him with Asperger's. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Asshole wrote:
>>>>>>Skanky's irrational obsession with my diet has led to an interesting >>>>>>exchange about how she's offended her hosts in the past. Let's discuss >>>>>>one facet of this dialogue a little deeper. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>>You snipped away my >>>>>>>real concern >>>>>>>about the other >>>>>>>possibilities. >>>>>> >>>>>>What "other possibilities"? How many OTHER ways have you offended your >>>>>>hosts? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>From some of your posts over the last few days: >>>>> >>>>>> If it's a stranger, >>>>>> like a neighbourhood welcome >>>>>> group to new neighbours, then you >>>>>> can't be scared to say you are >>>>>> veg*n. >>>>>> -- Skanky >>>>> >>>>>Nothing wrong with that >>>> >>>>I know WHY you do it: so you can be a smarmy, sanctimonious bitch. >>> >>>Uh oh, >> >>You're wrong, Skanky. > > About what Snipper? So far, everything. >>>>>> I have no trouble >>>>>> saying to people "You might want >>>>>> to think twice about inviting me. >>>>>> I'm hard to feed being vegetarian.". >>>>>> -- Skanky >>>>> >>>>>I've had great success with this. >>>> >>>>You're unbelievably narcissistic if you think that it's a success to >>>>have the WHOLE PARTY have to adapt to your ****ing eating disorder. >>> >>>You're the only >> >>Address the issue, stupid. Why do you think it's a "success" that >>everyone else has to cater to YOUR peculiar demands? > > The success is that people The other guests were forced to eat what YOU eat because you made a big deal of your eating disorder in advance. That's NOT a success. It's a ****ing tragedy. > I get enough invites to > satisfy my needs You're agoraphobic. Your "needs" are satisfied by laying about your apartment, dummy. >>>>>> They don't mind >>>>>> talking about it either, so if they are >>>>>> having a dinner where the only >>>>>> vegan item is side of green peas, >>>>>> one can eat before the get-together >>>>>> or bring something. >>>>>> -- Skanky >>>>> >>>>>True friends let you know. >>>> >>>>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll eat >>>>before the party or bring their own food. >>> >>>Why not? >> >>It's offensive to make such demands on your host, or to shun your host's >>generosity in favor of feeding yourself in some fashion as you describe. > > Nonsense. It IS offensive. Why should they throw a party or invite *you* if you're not going to gratefully and graciously accept their kindness? >>>>>If the meal is too meat based >>>> >>>>You shouldn't be asked to attend. >>> >>>If it was your's >> >>You'll never be invited to my home, Skanky. > > I would never attend You'll never be invited to my home, Skanky. >>>>>there is also the option of >>>>>showing up to the party just >>>>>in time for desert and hanging >>>>>out. >>>> >>>>Dessert. A desert is a barren place, like inside your head. I'd be >>>>insulted if my guests only showed up at the end of the party like you >>>>do. Your friends show a lot more class and tact than you do by not >>>>telling you what a disrespectful asshole you are. >> >>But I also bet some have confided what others have said behind your back. > > No, Yes. >>>>>> Other times they >>>>>> don't get offended if you bring your >>>>>> own, like veg patties to a bbq. >>>>>> -- Skanky >>>>> >>>>>I've never offended anyone >>>> >>>>Liar. You clearly have. >>> >>>Once. >> >>That you know of. > > It's very obvious if this happens. Not to you. >>>>>by doing this. >>>> >>>>You don't have eyes in the back of your head, else you'd be able to see >>>>how others respond to your loony antics. >>> >>>It's not >> >>You don't have eyes in the back of your head, dummy. > > You need to assume/hope that I > am the subject of derision. No, I don't. You already are. >>>>>Then again, maybe >>>>>Toronto is just a little more >>>>>laid back >>>> >>>>Your little clicqe may be accepting of you, but you're clearly on the >>>>kook fringe even in Toronto. >>> >>>No. There are lots of vegetarians. >> >>So what. There are lots of vegetarians here. >> >> >>>>>and accepting of >>>>>other's differences >>>> >>>>Okay, you ****ing asshole, let's deal with this bullshit once and for >>>>all. I live in a minority-majority state -- one of four in the nation >>>>where non-white populations exceed the white population. I live in a >>>>city which is one of the most diverse and integrated in the country. In >>>>2003, the last year for which I can find hate crimes statistics for >>>>Texas, there were 294 reported incidents; our population is over 22 >>>>million. Comparatively speaking, the LIBERAL states of New Jersey had >>>>594 reported hate crimes (population just over 8.6 million), New York >>>>had 602 reported hate crimes (population of about 19 million), and >>>>Massachusetts had 403 reported hate crimes (population 5.2 million). >>>> >>>>http://apnews.myway.com/article/20050811/D8BTJN0O0.html >>>>http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/03hc.pdf >>> >>>I don't care >> >>That's why you're 43 and still sponging off your parents. > > Maybe you should YOU should take care of yourself, Skanky, and let your old parents enjoy retirement. >>>>The states you would call "hard to the right" treat others more >>>>respectfully, no matter how weird others are. So don't give me any more >>>>of your baseless sterotyping bullshit about "acceptance." If you do, >>>>I'll get out your own crime reports and see how well Ontario matches up >>>>in terms of hate crimes. Like this: >>>> >>>>Toronto's Hate Crime Unit reported a 22% rise of hate >>>>crimes in Metropolitan Toronto between 1997 and 1998, up to 228 >>> >>>>from 187. >>> >>>>http://www.pch.gc.ca/progs/multi/evidence/series4_e.cfm >>>> >>>>That's only ONE ****ing city with a metropolitan population a quarter >>>>the size of my state. Why does your "accepting" city have nearly >>>>four-times as many hate crimes as my entire state, bitch?! >>> >>>That's funny. >> >>I don't think it's funny at all that your city is filled with so much >>hatred and violence for "different" people. Why is your hate crimes rate >>FOUR TIMES higher than my state's? > > In the same year? In the same > other years too? Why are we on > the subject of hate crimes rather > than just crimes in general? You brought up the issue of tolerance and acceptance. As usual, your points come back to bite your pimply, sagging old ass. >>>>>than a >>>>>hard to the right state like >>>>>Texas is. >>>> >>>>Hardly to the right. I live in the only county which has voted for the >>>>Democratic presidential candidate in every election since >>>>Reconstruction. As a whole, this state is about as far to the right as >>>>the rest of the nation -- just right of center. Your stereotypes and >>>>caricatures are way off base. See above. >>> >>>And yet >> >>You live in a city with an increasing number of hate crimes, and where >>the number of officers working hate crimes is doubling because of the >>serverity of the problem (which has doubled in the last decade). >> >>Noting that hate crimes in Ontario have increased by 93 per cent >>since 1996, Kwinter said the funding will ensure that police >>stay one step ahead of hatemongers and racists. >> >>Last winter, however, the unit’s funding appeared in jeopardy. A >>spokesperson for Kwinter’s ministry informed the unit its >>funding would be reduced, but the minister quickly reversed that >>decision. However, for 10 weeks beginning in late March, the >>unit’s lone staffer, Abbee Corb, was not paid. Funding resumed >>on June 15. >>http://www.cjnews.com/viewarticle.asp?id=7162 >> >>Why don't you people take violence more seriously up there? And why do >>you accuse others of intolerance when your city has a hate crimes rate >>four-times higher? > > We were talking about general > acceptance of vegetarianism You made a very blanket statement (stereotype) about the state of Texas with regard to acceptance and tolerance. I showed you that your city -- the hate crimes capital of North America -- is far less tolerant and accepting of "different" people in the aggregate. >>>>>>It sounds like you have plenty of experience with all of the above >>>>>>"possibilities," you carless orthorexic OFFENSIVE asshole. Tell us how >>>>>>many other ways you've offended gracious hosts, and please explain how >>>>>>your serial offenses to other humans make you a better person than > > you'd > >>>>>>be if you'd eat what they graciously offer. >>>>> >>>>>I have the skill >>>> >>>>You have no marketable skills, loser. >>> >>>You're more skilled >> >>Yes, but that's comparing apples to oranges. You're comparable to a >>slug, or a parasite. > > So You're unskilled. That's why you know so much about Ontario's welfare system. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Asshole wrote:
>>>>And I've already responded by saying I'd much rather put aside my >>>>preferences for ONE meal than to offend someone. >>> >>>"Much rather". Sounds like >>>you're not sure. >> >>"Much rather" is very clear, dumb ass. > > Saying that you would much rather > sounds like It means I've established my priorities as far as your hypothetical scenarios go. >>>Wow, you accuse vegans of >>>having religious views on food, >> >>They do. > > Then why are you the only the second > person I've seen post about feeling > religious about diet I don't "feel religious about diet." |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Scented Asshole wrote:
>>Reasonable people would not expect you to eat something you feel >>uncomfortable >>eating. It is obvious from this thread that "usual suspect" is not a >>reasonable person. > > He has a strong fear I have no fear. > of non-conformity. Non-conformists, particularly the type who childlishly conform to non-conformity, amuse me. BTW, you're that childish conforming-to-non-conformity type. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message news > Skanky Nutball wrote: >>>>>Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or >>>>>just professionally for your "issues" now? >>>> >>>>Why are you trying to change the subject again? >>> >>>You're the one who's taken this thread away from discussing Skanky's >>>offenses, Putz. So let's discuss yours. Are you still seeing Wendy >>>personally or just professionally for your "issues"? >> >> You take offence > > No, Wendy did. That's why she tried to diagnose him with Asperger's. Why do you try to hurt people? Unlike you, we're all human beings who have successes and struggles in life. You seem to like to seek out people's struggles and hardships and exaggerate them repeatedly. Nobody needs you to remind us of our issues. We know what they are and we deal with them however we are able. All of this from you, the person who writes stuff like "Any food offered with love and in the spirit of gratitude is holy. To deny it is to profane all that is good, blessed, and right". Anybody who treats people as you do doesn't know anything about love, spirit, or goodness. That you even pretend to express goodness in your endeavors makes me want to vomit. |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
... > Scented Asshole wrote: > >>>>And I've already responded by saying I'd much rather put aside my > >>>>preferences for ONE meal than to offend someone. > >>> > >>>"Much rather". Sounds like > >>>you're not sure. > >> > >>"Much rather" is very clear, dumb ass. > > > > Saying that you would much rather > > sounds like > > It means I've established my priorities as far as your hypothetical > scenarios go. Hypothetical? So you've never eaten at other people's places? > >>>Wow, you accuse vegans of > >>>having religious views on food, > >> > >>They do. > > > > Then why are you the only the second > > person I've seen post about feeling > > religious about diet > > I don't "feel religious about diet." http://tinyurl.com/8sacw Yes you do. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
"usual suspect" > wrote in message
news > Skanky Nutball wrote: > >>>>>>True friends needn't ask ahead of time so they can decide if they'll > > > > eat > > > >>>>>>before the party or bring their own food. > >>>>> > >>>>>True friends are sympathetic to one's eating preferences. > >>>> > >>>>True friends are honest if your preferences go overboard. > >>> > >>>You automatically assume that vegans go "overboard" > >> > >>Veganism is already an extreme, so it's reasonable to point out vegans' > >>extremism when it manifests itself in irrational and offensive actions. > >> > >> > >>>It's far from reality. > >> > >>Liar. Have you read through vegan literature or websites lately to see > >>how "overboard" they go in imposing their wills upon others? Not only in > >>terms of diet, Putz, but with respect to medicine, apparel, and so on. > >>Lesley this morning pasted some diatribe taking credit for shutting down > >>a farm that provided guinea pigs for medical research. > >> > >> > >>>>>>>If the meal is too meat based > >>>>>> > >>>>>>You shouldn't be asked to attend. > >>>>> > >>>>>You mean 'invited'. An invitation is not a request. > >>>> > >>>>1. The act of inviting. > >>>>2. A spoken or written *REQUEST* for someone's presence or > >>>>participation. > >>>>3. An allurement, enticement, or attraction. > >>>>http://www.thefreedictionary.com/invitation > >>> > >>>'Invitation' is still a more appropriate word. > >> > >>An invitation IS a request. Dummy. > >> > >> > >>>>My emphasis. Are you a dummy or just a liar? > >>> > >>>You don't give many alternatives, do you? > >> > >>One more then: Both. > >> > >> > >>>>Let's talk about you and Wendy. Are you still seeing her personally or > >>>>just professionally for your "issues" now? > >>> > >>>Why are you trying to change the subject again? > >> > >>You're the one who's taken this thread away from discussing Skanky's > >>offenses, Putz. So let's discuss yours. Are you still seeing Wendy > >>personally or just professionally for your "issues"? > > > > You take offence > > No, Wendy did. That's why she tried to diagnose him with Asperger's. You are jealous of anyone who has a real girlfriend instead of a blowup doll like you. You also wish him to not be doing well. You're pathetic. -- SN http://www.scentednectar.com/veg/ |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| New survey on the RFC site: Would you get offended if... | General Cooking | |||
| Preserving and TV Hosts | Preserving | |||
| Skanky's pot abuse problem | Vegan | |||
| Skanky Carpetmuncher's dilemma | Vegan | |||
| Skanky Carpetmuncher's ignorance compounds her arrogance | Vegan | |||
Linear Mode
