On Fri, 10 May 2013 07:00:18 -0700, Goo cluelessly puled:

>On 11/14/2012 11:39 AM, dh@. wrote:
>> On Tue, 13 Nov 2012 18:33:09 +0000, Derek > wrote:
>>
>>> He's never been able to coherently explain why his
>>> argument for cock fighting doesn't also defend dog fighting.
>>
>> For one thing the dogs aren't game by their nature but the game roosters
>> are. That alone is more than you can appreciate.
>
>A distinction without a difference. By your shitty cracker illogic,
>even if
>the fowl may once have been bred as game, they aren't now - none of you
>cracker ****stain fighting cock breeders breeds them in order to hunt
>them and eat them.

LOL! That's not the definition of game that their name refers to you stupid
clueless Goober. You have proven that what I pointed out is more than you can
appreciate, Goo.