Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Tea (rec.drink.tea) Discussion relating to tea, the world's second most consumed beverage (after water), made by infusing or boiling the leaves of the tea plant (C. sinensis or close relatives) in water. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Posted to rec.food.drink.tea
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 8, 12:43 pm, "Bluesea" > wrote:
> > wrote in message > > ... > > > On Dec 7, 2:07 pm, wrote: > > > How can you determine if tea contains caffeine if the label does not > > > indicate either way? Are there any ingredients that I can look for to > > > determine this? > > > > Thanks. > > > If it's a green, black, oolong, white (or any other kinds of TEA > > varieties), it will have caffeine. If it does not have caffeine, it > > will say so explicitly on the label (and even then, there are probably > > traces of caffeine) > > > If it's an herbal or rooibos blend,... > > It isn't tea because it didn't come from the Camilla sinensis "tea" plant. > > > ...then it is caffeine free. > > Unless it's Yerba mate which has caffeine. > > > Remember that you can easily "decaffeinate" any tea by steeping it for > > a minute... > > After 30 seconds, you lose too much flavor for practically no additional > benefit. > > The last time I mentioned DIY decaffeination, I got jumped for propagating a > myth. I still don't understand it because, not only is it fairly common > knowledge by now among tea people, the first time I heard about it, I was > told the name of the man who discovered it and that there was a website. > Since that was about 10 years ago, there's no way I can remember the details > of who discovered it or the URL and the man who told me about it, a former > instructor, has since died so I can't go back to him and ask. > > So, now I'm in the position of wondering if the myth about DIY > decaffeinating is a myth since apparently anybody can put up a webpage with > the scientific basis for whatever's being touted. I think this is a more complex issue than just the caffeine, there are other stimulants in tea (I believe at least two other ones). Green and white and oolong teas can have as much or more caffeine than blacks, but blacks have a far different 'buzz' (and stronger) than the other teas, as far as I can tell. There are a huge number of variables that may affect this. The difference in taste itself can have a stimulating effect. The difference in aroma may have an effect as well. Various non-stimulating chemicals may have effect on how stimulants are absorbed. The ratio of the three stimulants may have an effect too. As far as I'm concerned, second, third, etc steeps make tea with notably less stimulating effect but also not as tasty, unless you're talking about gong-fu method. I usually don't bother. I'm so used to white and green tea that I don't get any stimulating effect from 8-9 oz, and the first steep tastes much better to me, even for very good teas, although it may be that I use less leaf than is common.. > > "I know it's true; I read it on the Internet!" > > -- > ~~Bluesea~~ > Spam is great in musubi but not in email. > Please take out the trash before sending a direct reply. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Caffeine and someone who should know better | Tea | |||
Tea and caffeine | Tea | |||
Caffeine | Tea | |||
Low caffeine | Tea | |||
How much caffeine in Pu-er? | Tea |