"Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote

> It's Monday, we need something to make us smile.

That's a riot.

Could you do a teensy favor, Ginny? Could you fix
your clock?

nancy

Virginia Tadrzynski wrote:
> It's Monday, we need something to make us smile.
> -ginny
>
>
> YOUR AGE BY CHOCOLATE MATH
>
> This is pretty neat.
>
> It takes less than a minute
> Work this out as you read ...
> Be sure you don't read the bottom until you've worked it out! This is not
> one of those waste of time things, it's fun.
>
> 1. First of all, pick the number of times a week that you would like to have
> chocolate (more than once but less! than 10)
>
> 2. Multiply this number by 2 (just to be bold)
>
> 3. Add 5
>
> 4. Multiply it by 50
>
> 5. If you have already had your birthday this year add 1756 ....If you
> haven't, add 1755.
>
> 6. Now subtract the four digit year that you were born.
>
> You should have a three digit number
> The first digit of this was the number of times you really want to eat
> Chocolate (i.e., how many times you want to have chocolate each week).
>
> The next two numbers are YOUR AGE! (Oh YES, it is!!!!!)
>
> THIS IS THE ONLY YEAR (2006) IT WILL EVER WORK, SO SPREAD IT AROUND WHILE IT
> LASTS.

It works cheers ))

Nancy Young wrote:


> Could you do a teensy favor, Ginny? Could you fix
> your clock?


You don't like getting messages from the future?



Brian
--
If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who
won't shut up.
-- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com)

"Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote in
:

> The next two numbers are YOUR AGE! (Oh YES, it is!!!!!)
>
> THIS IS THE ONLY YEAR (2006) IT WILL EVER WORK, SO SPREAD IT AROUND
> WHILE IT LASTS.
>

Nope, I want chocolate more than 1ce a week and I'm not 44 yet.

Well, it's 3:32 p.m. somewhere;-). . .and it is Monday no matter what!

Oh pshaw, On Mon 10 Jul 2006 03:32:34p, Virginia Tadrzynski was muttering
about...

>
> It's Monday, we need something to make us smile.
> -ginny
>
>
> YOUR AGE BY CHOCOLATE MATH
>
> This is pretty neat.
>
> It takes less than a minute
> Work this out as you read ...
> Be sure you don't read the bottom until you've worked it out! This is
> not one of those waste of time things, it's fun.
>
> 1. First of all, pick the number of times a week that you would like to
> have chocolate (more than once but less! than 10)
>
> 2. Multiply this number by 2 (just to be bold)
>
> 3. Add 5
>
> 4. Multiply it by 50
>
> 5. If you have already had your birthday this year add 1756 ....If you
> haven't, add 1755.
>
> 6. Now subtract the four digit year that you were born.
>
> You should have a three digit number
> The first digit of this was the number of times you really want to eat
> Chocolate (i.e., how many times you want to have chocolate each week).
>
> The next two numbers are YOUR AGE! (Oh YES, it is!!!!!)
>
> THIS IS THE ONLY YEAR (2006) IT WILL EVER WORK, SO SPREAD IT AROUND
> WHILE IT LASTS.

Who stays awake nights thunking up these things?

--

Wayne Boatwright
__________________________________________________ ________________________

I often wonder ...
What do people mean when they say the computer went down on me?

Virginia Tadrzynski wrote:
> It's Monday, we need something to make us smile.
> -ginny
>
>
> YOUR AGE BY CHOCOLATE MATH
>
> This is pretty neat.
>
> It takes less than a minute
> Work this out as you read ...
> Be sure you don't read the bottom until you've worked it out! This is not
> one of those waste of time things, it's fun.
>
> 1. First of all, pick the number of times a week that you would like to have
> chocolate (more than once but less! than 10)
>
> 2. Multiply this number by 2 (just to be bold)
>
> 3. Add 5
>
> 4. Multiply it by 50
>
> 5. If you have already had your birthday this year add 1756 ....If you
> haven't, add 1755.
>
> 6. Now subtract the four digit year that you were born.
>
> You should have a three digit number
> The first digit of this was the number of times you really want to eat
> Chocolate (i.e., how many times you want to have chocolate each week).
>
> The next two numbers are YOUR AGE! (Oh YES, it is!!!!!)
>
> THIS IS THE ONLY YEAR (2006) IT WILL EVER WORK, SO SPREAD IT AROUND WHILE IT
> LASTS.

It will work next year too. Just change the numbers in step 5 to 1757
and 1756 respectively. Following that pattern it will work every year
until a person reaches his 100th birthday.

It's Monday, we need something to make us smile.
-ginny


YOUR AGE BY CHOCOLATE MATH

This is pretty neat.

It takes less than a minute
Work this out as you read ...
Be sure you don't read the bottom until you've worked it out! This is not
one of those waste of time things, it's fun.

1. First of all, pick the number of times a week that you would like to have
chocolate (more than once but less! than 10)

2. Multiply this number by 2 (just to be bold)

3. Add 5

4. Multiply it by 50

5. If you have already had your birthday this year add 1756 ....If you
haven't, add 1755.

6. Now subtract the four digit year that you were born.

You should have a three digit number
The first digit of this was the number of times you really want to eat
Chocolate (i.e., how many times you want to have chocolate each week).

The next two numbers are YOUR AGE! (Oh YES, it is!!!!!)

THIS IS THE ONLY YEAR (2006) IT WILL EVER WORK, SO SPREAD IT AROUND WHILE IT
LASTS.

"Mike H" > wrote in message
9.130...
> "Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote in
> :
>
>> The next two numbers are YOUR AGE! (Oh YES, it is!!!!!)
>>
>> THIS IS THE ONLY YEAR (2006) IT WILL EVER WORK, SO SPREAD IT AROUND
>> WHILE IT LASTS.
>>
>
> Nope, I want chocolate more than 1ce a week and I'm not 44 yet.
=========

Didn't work for me either - unless somebody can explain how -2470 is
correct. LOL


--
Cyndi (again)

"Syssi" > wrote in message
news:fdlwg.2274$Oz3.2119@trnddc02...
>
>
> "Mike H" > wrote in message
> 9.130...
>> "Virginia Tadrzynski" > wrote in
>> :
>>
>>> The next two numbers are YOUR AGE! (Oh YES, it is!!!!!)
>>>
>>> THIS IS THE ONLY YEAR (2006) IT WILL EVER WORK, SO SPREAD IT AROUND
>>> WHILE IT LASTS.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, I want chocolate more than 1ce a week and I'm not 44 yet.
> =========
>
> Didn't work for me either - unless somebody can explain how -2470 is
> correct. LOL
>
>
> --
> Cyndi (again) 00000000000

Oops - my bad. I subtracted something instead of added... <G> Hey, whadja
expect at 4 in the morning?
--
Cyndi (again)