Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the KFC
dough there are also cornflakes. Is it true? What do you think? Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of chicken seam to have cornflakes over! Cheers Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny Wheeler" > wrote > KFC comes in (at least) two varieties: Original Recipe (cooked in the > pressure fryers) and Extra Crispy--that kind does rather look like it > has cornflake breading (and for all I know, it does). I don't think > the Extra Crispy is cooked the same way as Original Recipe--and I > don't think much of it at all, actually. Interesting, I hadn't thought of the extra crispy; when people are looking for kentucky fried chicken, I assume the original. As far as I'm concerned, extra crispy is just extra breading, but to each their own. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Nancy Young wrote: > Interesting, I hadn't thought of the extra crispy; when people are > looking for kentucky fried chicken, I assume the original. As far > as I'm concerned, extra crispy is just extra breading, but to each > their own. Burger King has these "chicken fries" thingies, they are bits of meat that have a lot of extra coating - and a choice of SIX dipping sauces! : http://www.villagevoice.com/nyclife/...,71950,15.html For the Birds Burger King demolishes chicken as we know it by Nina Lalli January 27th, 2006 6:43 PM "Chicken will never be the same." This suspicious declaration is the concluding line of Burger King's promotion for its sickest creation since the Enormous Omelet Sandwich: Chicken Fries. Chicken has really been through the ringer in this country over the past few decades. The birds themselves have been bred for maximum dryness and ultimate blandness-that is, bloated white meat. And, as we all know, society's weird beauty standards are never reached easily. The hormones used to achieve the desired white-to-dark meat proportions have been blamed for a slew of unhealthy side effects, including lowering the age girls begin puberty. Poor chicken. It never asked for breast enhancements. But worse than the fact that thighs have been underappreciated is the twisted fact that breasts, which only became popular because they're lean, are so boring to eat that they have been manipulated by scientists through a series of increasingly fatty food inventions. Enter the chicken fry. In a way, Burger King's simplicity is refreshing. Others have bent over backwards to win the prize for originality-Ruby Tuesday's Crispy Buffalo Wontons have garnered a ridiculous amount of attention, for example. But BK just modified the chicken tender or nugget to be less chicken and more fry. The meat, so bragged-about by fast food purveyors for its purity (is "whole white chicken breast meat'' really that impressive?) is now just a steamy sliver encased in a thick cocoon of heavily flavored batter. The flesh itself is a mere casualty, its lack of taste obscenely overcompensated for by a ton of salt. A small order (six pieces for $2.05) contains 15 grams of fat; the nine-piece version has 23. Granted, that's nothing compared with the 47 gram omelet sandwich, but it's a pretty hefty snack. I visited a few Burger Kings around town to experience the end of chicken as we know it. I cannot think of a more appropriate place for mourning any food than the BK on Sixth Avenue between 34th and 35th streets. (Oh, wait-actually, the one under 50th street on Fifth Avenue-in the subway station-maybe wins the prize.) BK 50th Street was almost empty when I got there in the early evening, save for a few homeless people, a table of scared-looking tourists, and some very troubling teenaged girls. To be sure that taste buds are sufficiently assaulted, the fries come with your choice of six dipping sauces. Six! Finding this choice a bit overwhelming, I pretended I was at a restaurant and asked the woman behind the counter whether she had a favorite. From the look she gave me, I realized that I had clearly just outed myself as a nonfunctioning adult. It wasn't scorn, but straight pity. "You can try them all if you want to," she told me in a preschool teacher voice. I didn't really want to, but I did try them all. Along with the traditional sweet 'n' sour, honey mustard, and barbeque (updated to Spicy Honey Barbeque sauce, which an employee explained to a customer: "tastes better than barbeque") there are three newcomers. Two of them, ranch and buffalo sauce, are predictable. But the showstopper is something called "ZESTY Onion Ring Sauce." What's onion ring sauce? Well, kids, it's soybean oil, water, horseradish, vinegar, more water, a lot of salt, more soybean oil, some artificial flavors, thickeners, lemon juice, sugar, and more. The end result makes me crave horseradish mayonnaise. As I sat slumped in my plastic BK chair, I felt depressed: chicken's demise seems to reflect a schism in the way Americans eat. While tortured breasts appear in all kinds of elaborate disguises in fast food restaurants, a strong market has emerged for poultry distinguished as organic, naturally-raised, hormone-free, grain-fed, free-range, etc. So, dear consumers, you've got a choice. You can eat real chicken, such as a natural, hormone-free breast from Murray's (at supermarkets for around $4-5/pound-thighs are even less). Or you can follow the path to chicken devolution, which leads underground to 50th Street, where you'll find a stick of fatty, salty something dripping with ZESTY sauce." |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Gregory Morrow" <gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net> wrote > Nancy Young wrote: > >> Interesting, I hadn't thought of the extra crispy; when people are >> looking for kentucky fried chicken, I assume the original. As far >> as I'm concerned, extra crispy is just extra breading, but to each >> their own. > Burger King has these "chicken fries" thingies, they are bits of meat that > have a lot of extra coating - and a choice of SIX dipping sauces! : Heh, funny article. Do people still think those nuggets are a healthful alternative to burgers, I wonder? You also clarified for me, my long ago memory of extra crispy chicken was not only that it was all breading, but that when you got through the breading, you found a very small piece of chicken inside. As though they sorted chicken by size when they determine regular or extra crispy. Wrong, no doubt, just my impression. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the KFC > dough there are also cornflakes. > Is it true? What do you think? > Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of chicken > seam to have cornflakes over! No corn flakes. KFC does chicken with two different coatings; what they call "original" and " extra-crispy." They are only seasoned flour. Original-style has a thin coating. Extra crispy has a thicker coating that forms shapes, when fried, that look like corn flakes have been added to the coating. No corn flakes in the chicken coating. Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>Original-style has a thin coating. Extra crispy has a thicker coating
>that forms shapes, when fried, that look like corn flakes have been >added to the coating. >No corn flakes in the chicken coating. >Pastorio And never use Cornflakes as a coating on chicken... there's no getting around the flavor of cereal on your chicken. I know that some people do a skinless oven "fried" chicken and use cornflakes but a tastier "less corny" option is crumbled Melba Toast. Buy the flavored toasts and you can even by-pass some of the seasoning. It's very good. Kev |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-01-30, Pandora > wrote:
> Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the KFC > dough there are also cornflakes. > Is it true? What do you think? > Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of chicken > seam to have cornflakes over! This is my favorite KFC dish: http://www.panix.com/~clay/thailand/PICT0026.jpg In Thailand, KFC sells what I like to call "Yam KFC". A "yam" is a salad, literally tossed, mixed together. So KFC in Thailand (which is very popular with the Thais) mixes chicken strips with lime juice, fish sauce, chili, onions, and cilantro and serves it with steamed rice and fresh tomato and cucumber. It is very tasty! -- Clay Irving > #11906 Look at the error message! Look at the error message! - Good Advice and Maxims for Programmers, Mark Jason Dominus > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Denny Wheeler" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:20:13 +0100, "Pandora" > > wrote: > >>Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the KFC >>dough there are also cornflakes. >>Is it true? What do you think? >>Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of >>chicken >>seam to have cornflakes over! > > KFC comes in (at least) two varieties: Original Recipe (cooked in the > pressure fryers) and Extra Crispy--that kind does rather look like it > has cornflake breading (and for all I know, it does). I don't think > the Extra Crispy is cooked the same way as Original Recipe--and I > don't think much of it at all, actually. Oh! It's a pity! this friend of mine told me he liked very much Extra Crispy. BTW Thank you Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob (this one)" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > Pandora wrote: >> Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the KFC >> dough there are also cornflakes. >> Is it true? What do you think? >> Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of >> chicken seam to have cornflakes over! > > No corn flakes. KFC does chicken with two different coatings; what they > call "original" and " extra-crispy." They are only seasoned flour. > > Original-style has a thin coating. Extra crispy has a thicker coating that > forms shapes, when fried, that look like corn flakes have been added to > the coating. > > No corn flakes in the chicken coating. Thank you Bob. If you find a recipe for extra -crispy tell me, please. Cheers Pandora > > Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "kevnbro" > ha scritto nel messaggio oups.com... > >Original-style has a thin coating. Extra crispy has a thicker coating >>that forms shapes, when fried, that look like corn flakes have been >>added to the coating. >>No corn flakes in the chicken coating. >>Pastorio > > And never use Cornflakes as a coating on chicken... there's no getting > around the flavor of cereal on your chicken. > > I know that some people do a skinless oven "fried" chicken and use > cornflakes but a tastier "less corny" option is crumbled Melba Toast. > Buy the flavored toasts and you can even by-pass some of the seasoning. > It's very good. Kev Mhhhh! I must try! Thank you! Pandora > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Clay Irving" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > On 2006-01-30, Pandora > wrote: > >> Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the KFC >> dough there are also cornflakes. >> Is it true? What do you think? >> Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of >> chicken >> seam to have cornflakes over! > > This is my favorite KFC dish: > > http://www.panix.com/~clay/thailand/PICT0026.jpg > > In Thailand, KFC sells what I like to call "Yam KFC". A "yam" is a salad, > literally tossed, mixed together. So KFC in Thailand (which is very > popular > with the Thais) mixes chicken strips with lime juice, fish sauce, chili, > onions, and cilantro and serves it with steamed rice and fresh tomato and > cucumber. It is very tasty! And it looks very nice!!!! Good! Pandora > > -- > Clay Irving > > #11906 Look at the error message! Look at the error message! > - Good Advice and Maxims for Programmers, Mark Jason Dominus > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
>In Thailand, KFC sells what I like to call "Yam KFC". A "yam" is a salad,
>literally tossed, mixed together. So KFC in Thailand (which is very popular >with the Thais) mixes chicken strips with lime juice, fish sauce, chili, >onions, and cilantro and serves it with steamed rice and fresh tomato and >cucumber. It is very tasty! Now that's about as far from American "KFC" as one can get. They should call it, "TLC" (No! Not that TLC....Thai Lime Chicken) Kev |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-01-30, Gregory Morrow <gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net> wrote:
> But BK > just modified the chicken tender or nugget to be less chicken and more fry. > sliver encased in a thick cocoon of heavily flavored batter. The flesh At least there's a sliver. It would be impossible for BK to make their chicken fries "less" than a McD's chicken nugget. For the first couple decades of the Chicken McNugget, there was no chicken meat whatsoever. Seriously. I looked. My daughter loved them and we'd occasionally buy them for her. One day I was bored and started wondering about them. I disected half an order. No meat. They were just some sort of breaded and fried fat absorbing sponge matrix thingie. It wasn't until just a few years ago McD's started putting real chicken meat in their nuggets. This all-breading and little meat is not new. I remember the old Sizzler all-you-can-eat promos. I once ...only once... bought into their all-you-can-eat shrimp-a-thon. They brought out small plate of popcorn shrimp that were 33% shrimp and 67% breading. I was ****ed. I started in earnest relieving these micro shrimp of their grease/bread casing and piling the shrimp up on another plate till I went through them all. Then I ordered more and ate the now naked shrimp. After a half a dozen or so plates and a couple ****ed server-droids, I figure I'd had enough. I felt no satisfaction, though. The shrimp still sucked. Sizzler was the master of these trick eat-till-you-puke gimmicks. They did another with all-you-can-eat ribs. We tried it ...again, once! They were tough old beef ribs that had a sauce so repugnant, I couldn't eat even one. I no longer frequent these types of restaurants (chains), but I'm sure places like Olive Garden and Red Lobster still pull the same crap with their never ending gluttony promos. Hey, twenty-nine cents worth of wet noodles for only $9.99! Bleh. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-01-30, kevnbro > wrote:
> cornflakes but a tastier "less corny" option is crumbled Melba Toast. Another option for more texture are Japanese style "panko" bread (rice?) crumbs. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Nancy Young wrote:
> "Gregory Morrow" > <gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net> wrote > >> Nancy Young wrote: >> >>> Interesting, I hadn't thought of the extra crispy; when people are >>> looking for kentucky fried chicken, I assume the original. As far >>> as I'm concerned, extra crispy is just extra breading, but to each >>> their own. > >> Burger King has these "chicken fries" thingies, they are bits of >> meat that have a lot of extra coating - and a choice of SIX dipping >> sauces! : > > Heh, funny article. Do people still think those nuggets are a > healthful alternative to burgers, I wonder? You also clarified > for me, my long ago memory of extra crispy chicken was not > only that it was all breading, but that when you got through the > breading, you found a very small piece of chicken inside. As > though they sorted chicken by size when they determine regular > or extra crispy. > > Wrong, no doubt, just my impression. > > nancy I'm nuts, I guess. I really prefer the crispy (I mean CRISPY!) breading to the bit of chicken inside ![]() store down the street where some real old-style country cooks know how to cook fried chicken. Crispy outside, juicy inside, I don't mind eating the chicken! Don't do it very often but at least I've seen Yvonne back there hand-coating chicken pieces in flour just before lunch time. I know they don't buy frozen "fried chicken" from a restaurant supplier and pretend it's the real deal. It IS. And dang if it doesn't taste great! Thanks for setting off a craving for some real fried chicken and quarter fries ![]() Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the > KFC dough there are also cornflakes. > Is it true? What do you think? > Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of > chicken seam to have cornflakes over! > Cheers > Pandora I don't know about KFC and the cornflakes but I used to make a very good "oven fried" chicken which is seasoned and then coated with crushed cornflake crumbs. It turns out as if it had been fried but is not. Off the top of my head: the pieces of chicken (usually chicken breasts and thighs, on the bone) were dipped in an egg wash. Then rolled in cornflake crumbs seasoned with garlic powder, salt & pepper to taste, maybe some dried marjoram. Coat the chicken well and let sit so the coating dries and adheres to the chicken well. To a baking dish of adequate size for the chicken pieces, add a little cooking oil, about 3-4 Tablespoonfuls (not olive oil, too strong! canola or corn oil). Heat it up in a hot oven (about 400F degrees). Quickly arrange the chicken in the dish with the hot oil. Bake at a very high temperature; if I remember correctly (and I may not) it was 400F or maybe 425F for about 20 minutes. No need to cover or turn the chicken; it turned out crispy. And very tasty! Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
kevnbro wrote:
>> Original-style has a thin coating. Extra crispy has a thicker coating >> that forms shapes, when fried, that look like corn flakes have been >> added to the coating. >> No corn flakes in the chicken coating. >> Pastorio > > And never use Cornflakes as a coating on chicken... there's no > getting around the flavor of cereal on your chicken. > I don't agree with that. Cornflakes don't have all that much flavour. > I know that some people do a skinless oven "fried" chicken and use > cornflakes but a tastier "less corny" option is crumbled Melba Toast. Now see? Melba Toast, even plain, has a stronger taste to me than does cornflake crumbs ![]() toast rounds for snacking on! Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > ha scritto nel messaggio .. . > Pandora wrote: >> Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the >> KFC dough there are also cornflakes. >> Is it true? What do you think? >> Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of >> chicken seam to have cornflakes over! >> Cheers >> Pandora > > I don't know about KFC and the cornflakes but I used to make a very good > "oven fried" chicken which is seasoned and then coated with crushed > cornflake crumbs. It turns out as if it had been fried but is not. This is a great new! > > Off the top of my head: the pieces of chicken (usually chicken breasts and > thighs, on the bone) were dipped in an egg wash. Then rolled in cornflake > crumbs seasoned with garlic powder, salt & pepper to taste, maybe some > dried > marjoram. Coat the chicken well and let sit so the coating dries and > adheres to the chicken well. Do you break cornflakes, or do you use them whole? Another thing. Why don't you put spices inside eggs, rather then in cornflakes breadcrumb? > > To a baking dish of adequate size for the chicken pieces, add a little > cooking oil, about 3-4 Tablespoonfuls (not olive oil, too strong! canola > or > corn oil). Heat it up in a hot oven (about 400F degrees). Quickly > arrange > the chicken in the dish with the hot oil. Bake at a very high > temperature; > if I remember correctly (and I may not) it was 400F or maybe 425F for > about > 20 minutes. No need to cover or turn the chicken; it turned out crispy. > And very tasty! Gnam gnam! I like this recipe! I will eat KFC till summer because I must try almost all ![]() Cheers and thank you Pandora (hoping your father stay better then the last time I have heard of him) > > Jill > > |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> "jmcquown" > ha scritto nel messaggio > .. . >> Pandora wrote: >> I don't know about KFC and the cornflakes but I used to make a very >> good "oven fried" chicken which is seasoned and then coated with >> crushed cornflake crumbs. It turns out as if it had been fried but >> is not. > > This is a great new! >> >> Off the top of my head: the pieces of chicken (usually chicken >> breasts and thighs, on the bone) were dipped in an egg wash. Then >> rolled in cornflake crumbs seasoned with garlic powder, salt & >> pepper to taste, maybe some dried >> marjoram. Coat the chicken well and let sit so the coating dries and >> adheres to the chicken well. > > Do you break cornflakes, or do you use them whole? In the U.S. they sell boxes of crushed cornflake crumbs specifically for baking with. If you can't find this, use a rolling pin and place cornflakes between two sheets of waxed paper and crush them. You don't want a powder but you don't want big pieces of corn flakes, either. > Another thing. Why don't you put spices inside eggs, rather then in > cornflakes breadcrumb? > No reason; it's just the way my mom taught me to do it. >> To a baking dish of adequate size for the chicken pieces, add a >> little cooking oil, about 3-4 Tablespoonfuls (not olive oil, too >> strong! canola or >> corn oil). Heat it up in a hot oven (about 400F degrees). Quickly >> arrange >> the chicken in the dish with the hot oil. Bake at a very high >> temperature; >> if I remember correctly (and I may not) it was 400F or maybe 425F for >> about >> 20 minutes. No need to cover or turn the chicken; it turned out >> crispy. And very tasty! > > Gnam gnam! I like this recipe! I will eat KFC till summer because I > must try almost all ![]() > Cheers and thank you > Pandora > (hoping your father stay better then the last time I have heard of > him) >> Thank you... we'll know more about his condition after his trip to the doctor on February 2nd. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Gregory Morrow" <gregorymorrowEMERGENCYCANCELLATIONARCHIMEDES@eart hlink.net> writes:
>For the Birds >by Nina Lalli >This suspicious declaration is the concluding line of Burger King's >promotion for its sickest creation since the Enormous Omelet Sandwich: >Chicken Fries. Ages ago I used to eat at Burger King quite a bit, but even though I love their sick and twisted commercials, I just can't make myself eat there anymore. Not with the craptastic food they've been creating lately. Chicken Fries was just another nasty nonfood food item on their list of atrocities. >are predictable. But the showstopper is something called "ZESTY Onion Ring >Sauce." I confess I love this onion ring sauce. Too bad the onion rings at BK are soggy, disgusting rings of doom. Stacia |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
notbob > writes:
>At least there's a sliver. It would be impossible for BK to make >their chicken fries "less" than a McD's chicken nugget. For the first >couple decades of the Chicken McNugget, there was no chicken meat >whatsoever. Seriously. I looked. My daughter loved them and we'd >occasionally buy them for her. One day I was bored and started >wondering about them. I disected half an order. No meat. They were >just some sort of breaded and fried fat absorbing sponge matrix >thingie. Mostly chicken skin, if I recall, with some cartilage and filler. What grossed me out the most was that McNuggets require an "anti foaming agent" ingredient. I wish I could go back in time and uneat those McNuggets I ate when I was a kid. >This all-breading and little meat is not new. One of the local Chinese restaurants has all breading and no meat in half their pieces of sweet and sour and similar dishes. I'm sure it's to save money. It's also really gross tasting. It's hard to find non-battered and non-fried dishes around here, because it's Kansas, and everything has to be either deep fried or steak. >Sizzler was the master of these trick eat-till-you-puke gimmicks. They >did another with all-you-can-eat ribs. We tried it ...again, once! All you can eat meat is beyond imagination. There's a lot of steak buffets here in Kansas and they just boggle my mind. I refuse to go to them so I don't know if they're decent or not, but the simple idea of a steak buffet makes me feel kind of ill. >restaurants (chains), but I'm sure places like Olive Garden and Red >Lobster still pull the same crap with their never ending gluttony >promos. I just said this on LJ but I never understood why Olive Garden and Red Lobster are the two restaurants singled out for complaints. They're no worse than any chain restaurant. I'm not saying I'm a big fan of chain restaurants but I will occasionally go to an Olive Garden or Red Lobster, as well as Ruby Tuesday's or Applebee's or Chili's or whatever. Is it because OG and RL are sometimes thought of as high class restaurants by people who don't know better? Stacia |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> "Bob (this one)" > ha scritto nel messaggio > ... > >>Pandora wrote: >> >>>Some italian people who have tasted KFC abroad, told me that in the KFC >>>dough there are also cornflakes. >>>Is it true? What do you think? >>>Searching with Google, I have seen a photo on the web and pieces of >>>chicken seam to have cornflakes over! >> >>No corn flakes. KFC does chicken with two different coatings; what they >>call "original" and " extra-crispy." They are only seasoned flour. >> >>Original-style has a thin coating. Extra crispy has a thicker coating that >>forms shapes, when fried, that look like corn flakes have been added to >>the coating. >> >>No corn flakes in the chicken coating. > > > Thank you Bob. If you find a recipe for extra -crispy tell me, please. The real KFC chicken recipes need to be cooked under pressure, not in an open pot or deep fryer. Most pressure cooker makers say not to fry in their cookers, but if you do, use no more than 1/4 or 1/2 cup of oil. But here are some ways to approximate KFC extra-crispy. <http://www.recipezaar.com/58948> <http://www.recipezaar.com/4859> Several more recipes for regular, not extra-crispy: <http://www.hungrybrowser.com/phaedrus/m091902.htm> Extra-crispy: <http://www.russkatz.com/recipes/index.asp> This is one way to do it at home, but I don't recommend it. I'm just passing it along. <http://www.themediadrome.com/content/recipes/chicken_broasted.htm> Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "jmcquown" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > Pandora wrote: >> "jmcquown" > ha scritto nel messaggio >> .. . >>> Pandora wrote: >>> I don't know about KFC and the cornflakes but I used to make a very >>> good "oven fried" chicken which is seasoned and then coated with >>> crushed cornflake crumbs. It turns out as if it had been fried but >>> is not. >> >> This is a great new! >>> >>> Off the top of my head: the pieces of chicken (usually chicken >>> breasts and thighs, on the bone) were dipped in an egg wash. Then >>> rolled in cornflake crumbs seasoned with garlic powder, salt & >>> pepper to taste, maybe some dried >>> marjoram. Coat the chicken well and let sit so the coating dries and >>> adheres to the chicken well. >> >> Do you break cornflakes, or do you use them whole? > > In the U.S. they sell boxes of crushed cornflake crumbs specifically for > baking with. If you can't find this, use a rolling pin and place > cornflakes > between two sheets of waxed paper and crush them. You don't want a powder > but you don't want big pieces of corn flakes, either. I understand! > >> Another thing. Why don't you put spices inside eggs, rather then in >> cornflakes breadcrumb? >> > No reason; it's just the way my mom taught me to do it. Ah! Ok! Mother's advices are always precious ![]() > >>> To a baking dish of adequate size for the chicken pieces, add a >>> little cooking oil, about 3-4 Tablespoonfuls (not olive oil, too >>> strong! canola or >>> corn oil). Heat it up in a hot oven (about 400F degrees). Quickly >>> arrange >>> the chicken in the dish with the hot oil. Bake at a very high >>> temperature; >>> if I remember correctly (and I may not) it was 400F or maybe 425F for >>> about >>> 20 minutes. No need to cover or turn the chicken; it turned out >>> crispy. And very tasty! >> >> Gnam gnam! I like this recipe! I will eat KFC till summer because I >> must try almost all ![]() >> Cheers and thank you >> Pandora >> (hoping your father stay better then the last time I have heard of >> him) >>> > Thank you... we'll know more about his condition after his trip to the > doctor on February 2nd. The day after tomorrow, then! Let us know and good luck! Thank you Pandora |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thank you Bob, for these links, there are many recipe. But now I wonder if I
must use a skinless chicken for KFC!?! What do you think? Is the original KFC with or without skin? TIA Pandora ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Bob (this one)" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > Pandora wrote: >> "Bob (this one)" > ha scritto nel messaggio >> ... >> >>>Pandora wrote: >> >> Thank you Bob. If you find a recipe for extra -crispy tell me, please. > > The real KFC chicken recipes need to be cooked under pressure, not in an > open pot or deep fryer. Most pressure cooker makers say not to fry in > their cookers, but if you do, use no more than 1/4 or 1/2 cup of oil. But > here are some ways to approximate KFC extra-crispy. > > <http://www.recipezaar.com/58948> > <http://www.recipezaar.com/4859> > > Several more recipes for regular, not extra-crispy: > <http://www.hungrybrowser.com/phaedrus/m091902.htm> > > Extra-crispy: > <http://www.russkatz.com/recipes/index.asp> > > This is one way to do it at home, but I don't recommend it. I'm just > passing it along. > <http://www.themediadrome.com/content/recipes/chicken_broasted.htm> > > Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue 31 Jan 2006 03:25:53a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Denny
Wheeler? > On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:21:55 +0100, "Pandora" > > wrote: > >>> KFC comes in (at least) two varieties: Original Recipe (cooked in the >>> pressure fryers) and Extra Crispy--that kind does rather look like it >>> has cornflake breading (and for all I know, it does). I don't think >>> the Extra Crispy is cooked the same way as Original Recipe--and I >>> don't think much of it at all, actually. >> >>Oh! It's a pity! this friend of mine told me he liked very much Extra >>Crispy. > > A lot of people do. I don't much like it. I do like Original quite a > bit. > >>BTW >>Thank you > > You're most welcome, Pandora. > Personally, I think all of the chicken at KFC is disgusting. But, then, I've always had real southern fried chicken at home. There's absolutely no comparison. -- Wayne Boatwright o¿o ____________________ BIOYA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote in message 28.19... > On Tue 31 Jan 2006 03:25:53a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Denny > Wheeler? > > > > > Personally, I think all of the chicken at KFC is disgusting. But, then, > I've always had real southern fried chicken at home. There's absolutely no > comparison. > > -- Not only can you make fried chicken better at home, but the cost difference is enough reason right there! We buy a whole chicken at WalMart for $.67 US per pound, cut it up, fry it, and the entire breaded and fried chicken costs us about $3.00. KFC would charge about $12 for that. kili |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote > Personally, I think all of the chicken at KFC is disgusting. But, then, > I've always had real southern fried chicken at home. There's absolutely > no > comparison. To me it's one of those things I do not expect to be like what you make at home, the texture is different (whether you like it or not), hence all the discussion on broasters and pressure fryers, etc. I love homemade fried chicken, of course, but I have room for the occasional kentucky fried as well. Can't really make that at home. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue 31 Jan 2006 06:45:29a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Nancy Young?
> > "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote > >> Personally, I think all of the chicken at KFC is disgusting. But, then, >> I've always had real southern fried chicken at home. There's absolutely >> no comparison. > > To me it's one of those things I do not expect to be like what you > make at home, the texture is different (whether you like it or not), > hence all the discussion on broasters and pressure fryers, etc. > > I love homemade fried chicken, of course, but I have room for > the occasional kentucky fried as well. Can't really make that at > home. LOL! I wouldn't want to. :-) -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote > On Tue 31 Jan 2006 06:45:29a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Nancy > Young? >> I love homemade fried chicken, of course, but I have room for >> the occasional kentucky fried as well. Can't really make that at >> home. > > LOL! I wouldn't want to. :-) (laugh!) YES, WAYNE, we got that! Was saying, when people are looking for kentucky fried chicken, they aren't looking for what you call fried chicken at home. Apples and oranges, whether you think that is good or bad. We know, you think good. As in, you don't want them to be alike. nancy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue 31 Jan 2006 07:37:38a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Nancy
Young? > > "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote > >> On Tue 31 Jan 2006 06:45:29a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Nancy >> Young? > >>> I love homemade fried chicken, of course, but I have room for >>> the occasional kentucky fried as well. Can't really make that at >>> home. >> >> LOL! I wouldn't want to. :-) > > (laugh!) YES, WAYNE, we got that! Was saying, when people > are looking for kentucky fried chicken, they aren't looking for > what you call fried chicken at home. Apples and oranges, whether > you think that is good or bad. We know, you think good. As > in, you don't want them to be alike. hehehe! Such a sad demise for a chicken. :-) -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> ha scritto nel messaggio 28.19... > On Tue 31 Jan 2006 03:25:53a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Denny > Wheeler? > >> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:21:55 +0100, "Pandora" > >> wrote: >> >>>> KFC comes in (at least) two varieties: Original Recipe (cooked in the >>>> pressure fryers) and Extra Crispy--that kind does rather look like it >>>> has cornflake breading (and for all I know, it does). I don't think >>>> the Extra Crispy is cooked the same way as Original Recipe--and I >>>> don't think much of it at all, actually. >>> >>>Oh! It's a pity! this friend of mine told me he liked very much Extra >>>Crispy. >> >> A lot of people do. I don't much like it. I do like Original quite a >> bit. >> >>>BTW >>>Thank you >> >> You're most welcome, Pandora. >> > > Personally, I think all of the chicken at KFC is disgusting. But, then, > I've always had real southern fried chicken at home. There's absolutely > no > comparison. I just wanted to ask what was the difference! Only pressure fryer? Chhers Pandora > > -- > Wayne Boatwright o¿o > ____________________ > > BIOYA |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Pandora wrote:
> Thank you Bob, for these links, there are many recipe. But now I wonder if I > must use a skinless chicken for KFC!?! > What do you think? > Is the original KFC with or without skin? > TIA With skin. And the chicken used to be - I don't know if they still do it - cut into 9 pieces rather than the normal 8. They cut the breast into three pieces vertically so there were two "side breasts" and a "center breast" that included the keel bone and a bit of meat on either side. I cut mine into 8. Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Bob (this one)" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > Pandora wrote: >> Thank you Bob, for these links, there are many recipe. But now I wonder >> if I must use a skinless chicken for KFC!?! >> What do you think? >> Is the original KFC with or without skin? >> TIA > > With skin. And the chicken used to be - I don't know if they still do it - > cut into 9 pieces rather than the normal 8. They cut the breast into three > pieces vertically so there were two "side breasts" and a "center breast" > that included the keel bone and a bit of meat on either side. Very interesting. Perhpas the number 9 give the recipe a sort of magic...like the secret in which it is wrapped ![]() > > I cut mine into 8. More simple..yes ![]() Thank you Bob! Pandora > > Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Denny Wheeler wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:21:55 +0100, "Pandora" > > wrote: > > Oh! It's a pity! this friend of mine told me he liked very much > > Extra Crispy. > > A lot of people do. I don't much like it. I do like Original quite a > bit. I've never been a big fan of KFC, either variety. When I get fried chicken (and that's increasing rare these days) I go for Popeye's. Brian -- If televison's a babysitter, the Internet is a drunk librarian who won't shut up. -- Dorothy Gambrell (http://catandgirl.com) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-01-31, Wayne Boatwright <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> Personally, I think all of the chicken at KFC is disgusting. I have to agree. I never buy the stuff. I remember eating it occasionally when friends would bring a bucket over, but never could eat more than about one piece. I used to joke KFC was good for motorcycles. I imagined wiring a chicken leg to the frame just above the rear drive chain, the dripping grease keeping the chain well lubed. My brother came up with a good approach to eating KFC. Take the meat off the bone and stick it between one of the biscuits to soak up the excess grease, then dose with black pepper and a good Louisiana hot sauce. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "notbob" > wrote in message news ![]() I used to joke KFC was good for > motorcycles. I imagined wiring a chicken leg to the frame just above > the rear drive chain, the dripping grease keeping the chain well > lubed. > > nb I suppose you've seen the TV stories about the guys traveling across the US with just used-grease from the fast food place(s) for their vehicle. I don't know if they get their free grease exclusively from one fast-food restaurant or not. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2006-01-31, Dee Randall > wrote:
> don't know if they get their free grease exclusively from one fast-food > restaurant or not. I don't know. It's my understanding deep fryer fat is a waste product that's a real pain for any restaurant using it. I think they have to pay for its disposal. I could be wrong on this. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Excuse me the English question. Why, sometimes, do you write "fried" and why do you write sometimes "fryer" when there is a consonant before the "Y"? Sorry if I would like to understand ![]() cheers Pandora -------------------------------------------------------- "notbob" > ha scritto nel messaggio ... > On 2006-01-31, Dee Randall > wrote: > > >> don't know if they get their free grease exclusively from one fast-food >> restaurant or not. > > I don't know. It's my understanding deep fryer fat is a waste > product that's a real pain for any restaurant using it. I think they > have to pay for its disposal. I could be wrong on this. > > nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue 31 Jan 2006 09:19:07a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Pandora?
> > "Wayne Boatwright" <wayneboatwright_at_gmail.com> ha scritto nel > messaggio 28.19... >> On Tue 31 Jan 2006 03:25:53a, Thus Spake Zarathustra, or was it Denny >> Wheeler? >> >>> On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:21:55 +0100, "Pandora" > >>> wrote: >>> >>>>> KFC comes in (at least) two varieties: Original Recipe (cooked in >>>>> the pressure fryers) and Extra Crispy--that kind does rather look >>>>> like it has cornflake breading (and for all I know, it does). I >>>>> don't think the Extra Crispy is cooked the same way as Original >>>>> Recipe--and I don't think much of it at all, actually. >>>> >>>>Oh! It's a pity! this friend of mine told me he liked very much Extra >>>>Crispy. >>> >>> A lot of people do. I don't much like it. I do like Original quite a >>> bit. >>> >>>>BTW >>>>Thank you >>> >>> You're most welcome, Pandora. >>> >> >> Personally, I think all of the chicken at KFC is disgusting. But, >> then, I've always had real southern fried chicken at home. There's >> absolutely no comparison. > > I just wanted to ask what was the difference! Only pressure fryer? Yes, that's the main difference. Although, I don't much like the coating they use either. -- Wayne Boatwright Õ¿Õ¬ ________________________________________ Okay, okay, I take it back! UnScrew you! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cognac question- US location question- | Wine | |||
Niagara Question / Vidal Blanc Question | Winemaking | |||
Please Answer My Serious Question [was Question about Wine, Bacteria, and Stench] | Winemaking | |||
Please Answer My Serious Question [was Question about Wine, Bacteria, and Stench] | Wine | |||
Chili question (Or maybe it should be chile question) | General Cooking |