Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of other
items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? -- Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andy wrote: > Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of other > items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give the ol' sodium > taste buds a jolt? > Oh, this is a BIG subject. Salt does many, many things. If you're really interested, check out this webpage for a list of books and references to what it calls "Molecular Gastronomy." It has the classics like Harold McGee's books and a bunch more, some popular and some esoteric. Could lead to a lot of fun browsing, for those who enjoy this sort of thing. http://folk.uio.no/lersch/mat/index.e.html One of the books in the first list on that page is "The New Kitchen Science" by Howard Hillman. There are 23 entries for salt in the index to that book, including two pages on "effect on taste perceptions" and four entries on "seasoning with." -aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of other > items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give the ol' sodium > taste buds a jolt? We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In addition to it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance flavours by amplifying the response in other taste receptors. A little salt added to a sugar solution can act to make it taste sweeter. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
aem wrote:
> Andy wrote: >> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of >> other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give >> the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? >> > Oh, this is a BIG subject. Salt does many, many things. If you're > really interested aem, BIG subject, SMALL question. ![]() Thanks, -- Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Andy wrote: > aem wrote: > > > Andy wrote: > >> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of > >> other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give > >> the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? > >> > > Oh, this is a BIG subject. Salt does many, many things. If you're > > really interested > > > aem, > > BIG subject, SMALL question. ![]() > Okay, smaller answer. Salt does more than stimulate taste buds. It may affect, in various ways, how things cook, which in turn may affect how they taste. If that "brings out the flavor" then the remark is true. -aem |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> Andy wrote: > >> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of >> other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give >> the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? > > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In > addition to it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance > flavours by amplifying the response in other taste receptors. A > little salt added to a sugar solution can act to make it taste > sweeter. Dave, Nice answer. Short and sweet. ![]() Thanks, -- Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
aem wrote:
> > Andy wrote: >> aem wrote: >> >> > Andy wrote: >> >> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of >> >> other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give >> >> the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? >> >> >> > Oh, this is a BIG subject. Salt does many, many things. If you're >> > really interested >> >> >> aem, >> >> BIG subject, SMALL question. ![]() >> > Okay, smaller answer. Salt does more than stimulate taste buds. It > may affect, in various ways, how things cook, which in turn may affect > how they taste. If that "brings out the flavor" then the remark is > true. -aem aem, Thanks, -- Andy |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Interesting topic! We were out to dinner at friends the other night.
Deborah is a superb cook. Lived in Hong Kong for 20 years. A real foodie (like me). But, she doesn't salt the food - we were discussing it with her. No reason, (maybe thinks it is healthier). I found I had to apply a little salt to my plate, plain rice etc. We had gado gado (I think cold vegetables need to be cooked with a little condiment), a lovely tofu/vegetable stir fry, rendeng curry, chicken curry in coconut. I agree with Dave, it enhances the flavours without making it 'salty'. Many many cakes, sweet pastries have a pinch of salt. Adding salt to a finished dish (like the gado gado) is not the same as salting the water to cook the veg. I found I was grinding fresh peppercorns over it to 'get the flavour' LOL. Pasta really needs to be cooked in salted water IMHO. Cheers Bronwyn Oz |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. I've heard that too and have probably repeated it on occasion, but now I'm wondering. If there are only 5 basic tastes, then how do I know the difference between a pear and a pineapple? They're both sweet and tart, but a pear tastes distinctly like a pear, and a pineapple distinctly like a pineapple. What is that difference if it is not taste? In learning about wine, we learn about all sorts of different tastes. Off the top of my head, there's sweet, acid, fruit, tanin, everything from cassis to shoe leather. When you get good, you can taste the different varietals. What gives? --Lia |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julia Altshuler wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote: > >> We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. > > > > I've heard that too and have probably repeated it on occasion, but now > I'm wondering. If there are only 5 basic tastes, then how do I know the > difference between a pear and a pineapple? They're both sweet and tart, > but a pear tastes distinctly like a pear, and a pineapple distinctly > like a pineapple. What is that difference if it is not taste? According to my chemistry teacher, it's scent. There are things called "esters", apparently, and other things (this class was a long time ago) that tell your brain that one sweet thing tastes different from another sweet thing, for instance. serene |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Smith" > wrote in message
... > Andy wrote: > >> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of other >> items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give the ol' >> sodium >> taste buds a jolt? > > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In addition > to > it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance flavours by > amplifying > the response in other taste receptors. A little salt added to a sugar > solution > can act to make it taste sweeter. > > This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Actually it was 4 taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to say that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the vast universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 tastes is just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do not know the details. -- Peter Aitken |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Aitken wrote:
> This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Actually it was > 4 taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to say > that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the vast > universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 tastes is > just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences between morels, > cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, beef, and lamb. > Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, turkey, and duck. > See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do not know the > details. > You're way off subject. You're talking about taste overall. So rename it if you wish. -- Andy http://tinyurl.com/dzl7h |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Aitken wrote:
> > > > > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In addition > > to > > it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance flavours by > > amplifying > > the response in other taste receptors. A little salt added to a sugar > > solution > > can act to make it taste sweeter. > > > > > > This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited Where was it discredited? I did some web searching and there seems to be a lot of support for it. Unimi was more of an asian thing but recent research has revealed receptors that are specific to glutamate. > . Actually it was 4 > taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to say that taste > has been completely explained, but the idea that the vast universe of subtle > taste differences can be explained by 5 tastes is just plain silly. Try to > explain the taste differences between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 > tastes. Between pork, beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. > Between chicken, turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on > but we do not know the details. The best I can suggest is that it is combinations of stimulation of the specific receptors. You might have the same problem explaining why we can perceive so many tints and hues of colours when the visual receptor cells respond only to black and white or to three primary colours, or how we learn to distinguish the sounds of musical instruments when our audio receptor cells pick up only specific ranges of sound frequencies. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith wrote:
> Peter Aitken wrote: > >> >> > >> > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In >> > addition to >> > it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance flavours by >> > amplifying >> > the response in other taste receptors. A little salt added to a >> > sugar solution >> > can act to make it taste sweeter. >> > >> > >> >> This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited > > Where was it discredited? I did some web searching and there seems to > be a lot of support for it. Unimi was more of an asian thing but > recent research has revealed receptors that are specific to glutamate. > >> . Actually it was 4 >> taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to say >> that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the vast >> universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 tastes is >> just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences between >> morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, beef, >> and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, >> turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do >> not know the details. > > The best I can suggest is that it is combinations of stimulation of > the specific receptors. You might have the same problem explaining > why we can perceive so many tints and hues of colours when the visual > receptor cells respond only to black and white or to three primary > colours, or how we learn to distinguish the sounds of musical > instruments when our audio receptor cells pick up only specific ranges > of sound frequencies. Dave, You really should shift this tangent to a subject line of "Taste"? It would better serve others, myself included, so it doesn't hide under "salt" in the search engines. -- Andy http://tinyurl.com/dzl7h |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Peter Aitken wrote: > "Dave Smith" > wrote in message > ... > > Andy wrote: > > > >> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of other > >> items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give the ol' > >> sodium > >> taste buds a jolt? > > > > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In addition > > to > > it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance flavours by > > amplifying > > the response in other taste receptors. A little salt added to a sugar > > solution > > can act to make it taste sweeter. > > > > > > This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Bull. > Actually it was 4 taste for a long time Still is in most western scientific circles. , but the facts remain. I do not mean to say that taste > has been completely explained, but the idea that the vast universe of subtle > taste differences can be explained by 5 tastes is just plain silly. Try to > explain the taste differences between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 > tastes. Between pork, beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. > Between chicken, turkey, and duck. See what I mean? > > A lot more is going on but we do not know the details. Ooo, the twilight zone. You need to learn that how humans perceive nuances of taste has mostly to do with olfactory perception. Sheldon |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Aitken wrote:
> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message > ... > >> Andy wrote: >> >> >>> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor >>> of other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to >>> give the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? >> >> We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In >> addition to it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance >> flavours by amplifying the response in other taste receptors. A >> little salt added to a sugar solution can act to make it taste >> sweeter. >> >> > This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Actually it > was 4 taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to > say that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the > vast universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 > tastes is just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences > between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, > beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, > turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do > not know the details. Not discredited. In fact, some researchers are suggesting adding "soapy" to that list of 5. But what we "taste" is actually a combination of more than just what taste buds indicate. Smell is absolutely integral to our perception of what things "taste" like and how we differentiate between ostensibly similar things. Secondary information components like fattiness, moistness, etc. feed into that perception package. Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
serene > wrote: > Julia Altshuler wrote: > > Dave Smith wrote: > > > >> We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. > > > > > > > > I've heard that too and have probably repeated it on occasion, but now > > I'm wondering. If there are only 5 basic tastes, then how do I know the > > difference between a pear and a pineapple? They're both sweet and tart, > > but a pear tastes distinctly like a pear, and a pineapple distinctly > > like a pineapple. What is that difference if it is not taste? > > According to my chemistry teacher, it's scent. There are things called > "esters", apparently, and other things (this class was a long time ago) > that tell your brain that one sweet thing tastes different from another > sweet thing, for instance. > > serene That is an interesting thought... Plug your nose, blindfold yourself, then have someone let you taste a series of things with similar textures. I think that smell provides a lot of the food "experience". -- Om. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote: > Plug your nose, blindfold yourself, then have someone let you taste a > series of things with similar textures. > > I think that smell provides a lot of the food "experience". Well known to be true. It's why nothing tastes like much when you've got a head cold and stuffed up nose. -- http://www.jamlady.eboard.com, updated 11-19-05 - Shiksa Varnishkes. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article >,
Melba's Jammin' > wrote: > In article >, > OmManiPadmeOmelet > wrote: > > Plug your nose, blindfold yourself, then have someone let you taste a > > series of things with similar textures. > > > > I think that smell provides a lot of the food "experience". > > Well known to be true. It's why nothing tastes like much when you've > got a head cold and stuffed up nose. Yep. And why you lose weight when you are ill. ;-) -- Om. "My mother never saw the irony in calling me a son-of-a-bitch." -Jack Nicholson |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy wrote:
> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of > other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give > the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? Salt does sure bring out flavours. As a chicklet and even as an adult I crave salt. See, I don't cook with a lot of salt but mom's food was always very bland... think Ohio. Think Scottish. Dull, boring, bland. Okay, we lived in Bangkok for a couple of years but I don't really like Asian cuisine which is mostly peppery-spicy, not salty. So yes, add some salt to your food. Think about this. Brined = salt. Brined turkey, brined corned beef brisket; brined corned beef & cabbage (oooh, now I'm craving that!). Brined or salted artichoke hearts. Brined jarred bamboo shoots or hearts of palm. Oh YUM! But then again, I also love pepper. Just made some buttermilk biscuits and cream gravy with lots of ground black pepper. Gonna add a dash of cayenne, too. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
jmcquown wrote:
> But then again, I also love pepper. Just made some buttermilk > biscuits and cream gravy with lots of ground black pepper. Gonna add > a dash of cayenne, too. > > Jill Ya had to mention biscuits and gravy?!!! Talk about rubbing salt in wounds... ![]() -- Andy ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
... > Peter Aitken wrote: >> "Dave Smith" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>> Andy wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor >>>> of other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to >>>> give the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? >>> >>> We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In >>> addition to it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance >>> flavours by amplifying the response in other taste receptors. A >>> little salt added to a sugar solution can act to make it taste >>> sweeter. >>> >>> >> This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Actually it >> was 4 taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to >> say that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the >> vast universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 >> tastes is just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences >> between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, >> beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, >> turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do >> not know the details. > > Not discredited. In fact, some researchers are suggesting adding "soapy" > to that list of 5. > So you say it is "not discredited" and then you discredit it with the addition of soapy? We do of course taste those 5 things - or maybe 6 - but not only those. My point is that there is a lot more going on than is understood. -- Peter Aitken |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:58:10 -0600, Andy wrote:
> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of other > items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give the ol' sodium > taste buds a jolt? In my experience, when I've done everything right but the dish still lacks zing... all I need to do is add a little salt and viola. Yum! It doesn't take much, but you may need some. No one is advocating over salting, just enough to bring out the flavor. -- Practice safe eating. Always use condiments. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "sf" > wrote in message news ![]() > On Sat, 19 Nov 2005 13:58:10 -0600, Andy wrote: > >> Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor of other >> items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to give the ol' >> sodium >> taste buds a jolt? > > In my experience, when I've done everything right but the dish still > lacks zing... all I need to do is add a little salt and viola. Yum! > It doesn't take much, but you may need some. No one is advocating > over salting, just enough to bring out the flavor. > -- There are some chefs (on foodnetwork) that have a heavy hand with pepper, too. One thing I forget to do many times is add salt to the water for dried pasta; it makes a world of difference in the taste. It seems that no amount of salt can make up for that which one didn't add at the time it was boiling. The taste is just not the same; but if I forget, I do seem to add a bit of salt at the table. Dee Dee |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Aitken wrote:
> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message > ... > >>Peter Aitken wrote: >> >>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... >>> >>> >>>>Andy wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor >>>>>of other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to >>>>>give the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? >>>> >>>>We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In >>>>addition to it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance >>>>flavours by amplifying the response in other taste receptors. A >>>>little salt added to a sugar solution can act to make it taste >>>>sweeter. >>>> >>>> >>> >>>This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Actually it >>>was 4 taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to >>>say that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the >>>vast universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 >>>tastes is just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences >>>between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, >>>beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, >>>turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do >>>not know the details. >> >>Not discredited. In fact, some researchers are suggesting adding "soapy" >>to that list of 5. >> > So you say it is "not discredited" and then you discredit it with the > addition of soapy? Peter, this is simply silly. Adding to then list while preserving the old is hardly discrediting. > We do of course taste those 5 things - or maybe 6 - but > not only those. My point is that there is a lot more going on than is > understood. And explained in another post of mine. Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message
... > Peter Aitken wrote: >> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message >> ... >> >>>Peter Aitken wrote: >>> >>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... >>>> >>>> >>>>>Andy wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor >>>>>>of other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to >>>>>>give the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? >>>>> >>>>>We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In >>>>>addition to it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance >>>>>flavours by amplifying the response in other taste receptors. A >>>>>little salt added to a sugar solution can act to make it taste >>>>>sweeter. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Actually it >>>>was 4 taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to >>>>say that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the >>>>vast universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 >>>>tastes is just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences >>>>between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, >>>>beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, >>>>turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do >>>>not know the details. >>> >>>Not discredited. In fact, some researchers are suggesting adding "soapy" >>>to that list of 5. >>> >> So you say it is "not discredited" and then you discredit it with the >> addition of soapy? > > Peter, this is simply silly. Adding to then list while preserving the old > is hardly discrediting. > >> We do of course taste those 5 things - or maybe 6 - but not only those. >> My point is that there is a lot more going on than is understood. > > And explained in another post of mine. > > Pastorio Give it up, Bob. My whole point was that we are not limited to 5 tastes, NOT that those 5 tastes are not present. By adding a 6th you do in fact discredit the idea that we are limited to 5 tastes. Geez, this is high school stuff. -- Peter Aitken |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Peter Aitken wrote:
> "Bob (this one)" > wrote in message > ... > >>Peter Aitken wrote: >> >>>"Bob (this one)" > wrote in message ... >>> >>> >>>>Peter Aitken wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>"Dave Smith" > wrote in message ... >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>Andy wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>Some TV chefs remark that they add salt to bring out the flavor >>>>>>>of other items in a recipe. Is this really true or is it just to >>>>>>>give the ol' sodium taste buds a jolt? >>>>>> >>>>>>We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. In >>>>>>addition to it being one of the basic tastes, salt acts to enhance >>>>>>flavours by amplifying the response in other taste receptors. A >>>>>>little salt added to a sugar solution can act to make it taste >>>>>>sweeter. >>>>>> >>>>>This "5 taste" idea is old and completely discredited. Actually it >>>>>was 4 taste for a long time, but the facts remain. I do not mean to >>>>>say that taste has been completely explained, but the idea that the >>>>>vast universe of subtle taste differences can be explained by 5 >>>>>tastes is just plain silly. Try to explain the taste differences >>>>>between morels, cepes, and shitake with your 5 tastes. Between pork, >>>>>beef, and lamb. Between mackerel, salmon, and bass. Between chicken, >>>>>turkey, and duck. See what I mean? A lot more is going on but we do >>>>>not know the details. >>>> >>>>Not discredited. In fact, some researchers are suggesting adding "soapy" >>>>to that list of 5. >>>> >>>So you say it is "not discredited" and then you discredit it with the >>>addition of soapy? >> >>Peter, this is simply silly. Adding to then list while preserving the old >>is hardly discrediting. >> >>>We do of course taste those 5 things - or maybe 6 - but not only those. >>>My point is that there is a lot more going on than is understood. >> >>And explained in another post of mine. >> >>Pastorio > > Give it up, Bob. My whole point was that we are not limited to 5 tastes, NOT > that those 5 tastes are not present. By adding a 6th you do in fact > discredit the idea that we are limited to 5 tastes. Geez, this is high > school stuff. Peter, adding one more doesn't discredit the 5 already recognized. And it's word games rather than substantive discussion. We don't taste "turkey" as such; we taste the flavor components *and* we sense the scent components. Do a bit of research about gustation before showing this level of unawareness. I'm a bit surprised at your not being more up on the subject given your predilection for good explanation with a scientific background. Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julia Altshuler > wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote: > > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. > I've heard that too and have probably repeated it on occasion, but now > I'm wondering. If there are only 5 basic tastes, then how do I know the > difference between a pear and a pineapple? They're both sweet and tart, Think of the computer monitor you are looking at right now. It has only three colors -- red, green, and blue. Yet by combining these three colors in different combinations, at different levels, you get thousands and thousands of perceptibly different colors. Alternatively, look at all the different colors that a color printer can generate using only cyan, magenta, and yellow. J |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J wrote:
> Julia Altshuler > wrote: >> Dave Smith wrote: >> > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. > >> I've heard that too and have probably repeated it on occasion, but >> now I'm wondering. If there are only 5 basic tastes, then how do I >> know the difference between a pear and a pineapple? They're both >> sweet and tart, > > Think of the computer monitor you are looking at right now. It has > only three colors -- red, green, and blue. Yet by combining these > three colors in different combinations, at different levels, you get > thousands and thousands of perceptibly different colors. > > Alternatively, look at all the different colors that a color printer > can generate using only cyan, magenta, and yellow. > > J > > I want what it's smokin'. -- Andy http://tinyurl.com/dzl7h |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Julia Altshuler wrote: > I'm wondering. If there are only 5 basic tastes, then how do I know the > difference between a pear and a pineapple? They're both sweet and tart, > but a pear tastes distinctly like a pear, and a pineapple distinctly > like a pineapple. What is that difference if it is not taste? Your smeller busted? Aroma prepares the brain for the tastes to come well before anything enters the mouth, and even before that folks eat with their eyes. Tastebuds in fact play only a very small roll in distinguishing tastes. And in fact by the age 30 most tastebuds humans are born with have long ago disappeared... which is why the eldery have problems with appetite... not only don't they have many taste buds intact their smeller is shot all to hell, and they don't really see too gud either... the elderly tend to return to eating with their fingers just like infants, they actually perceive taste by tactile perception combined with memory. Have you never entered a strange place and have distant memories triggered by a very faint odor... deje vous. Somehow the aroma of oatmeal cooking invokes the memory of my mother's breasts. Sheldon |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
there is one easy way of working this out for yourself
take 2 potato's and boil both in separate saucepans with water add salt to one pan about 1/2 teaspoon and leave the other without when the potato's are tender try them with no butter i might add just eat them on their own. now which has the better flavour...??? Quote:
__________________
Good food, Great Wine, and excellent company at the dinner table, what more could you ask for!! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
J wrote:
> Think of the computer monitor you are looking at right now. It has > only three colors -- red, green, and blue. Yet by combining these > three colors in different combinations, at different levels, you get > thousands and thousands of perceptibly different colors. > > Alternatively, look at all the different colors that a color printer > can generate using only cyan, magenta, and yellow. But when I play around with combining and recombining salt, white vinegar, sugar and something bitter (can't think of anything that's edible and pure bitter), I don't get thousands and thousands of perceptively different tastes. I don't get something that's recognizeably pear or pineapple. I just get salty, sweet, tart and bitter in different strengths and amounts. It's not like color really at all. I realize you were only trying to explain by analogy, but this one isn't working for me. --Lia |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Julia Altshuler wrote:
> J wrote: > >> Think of the computer monitor you are looking at right now. It has >> only three colors -- red, green, and blue. Yet by combining these >> three colors in different combinations, at different levels, you get >> thousands and thousands of perceptibly different colors. >> >> Alternatively, look at all the different colors that a color printer >> can generate using only cyan, magenta, and yellow. ....and black. > But when I play around with combining and recombining salt, white > vinegar, sugar and something bitter (can't think of anything that's > edible and pure bitter), I don't get thousands and thousands of > perceptively different tastes. I don't get something that's > recognizeably pear or pineapple. And that would be because you don't have any of the elements that provide the scent of pineapple. > I just get salty, sweet, tart and > bitter in different strengths and amounts. It's not like color really > at all. I realize you were only trying to explain by analogy, but this > one isn't working for me. It actually is very much like color as in printing. It's additive, where one color is added to another. Same for the perception of taste, it's all the tastes *and* the smells combined. The problem with your notion is that it doesn't factor in smell. Put a few drops of any kind of wine on your tongue and hold your nose so you can't smell it. The likelihood is that you can't tell if it's red or white. Very, very few people can do that. Pastorio |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"johannap73" > wrote in message
... > > there is one easy way of working this out for yourself > take 2 potato's <snipped> It's "potatoes." An apostrophe does not mean "here comes an "s". -- Peter Aitken |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 02:02:07 -0500, Bob (this one) wrote:
> The problem with your notion is that it doesn't factor in smell. Put a > few drops of any kind of wine on your tongue and hold your nose so you > can't smell it. The likelihood is that you can't tell if it's red or > white. Very, very few people can do that. Yes, smell is a very important component of taste.... just as your nose is a very important component of sound. If you question this: Pinch your nose to block off air and make the sound /n/, and don't say "nuh".... say /n/ as in "needle". Now hold your nose and say /ng/ and in "song/long". No sound (if you're doing it properly).... no matter how hard you try. Conclusiion: Catuions about cutting off your nose even have deeper meanings. ![]() -- Practice safe eating. Always use condiments. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Smith > wrote in
: > > We only detect 5 tastes; salt, sour, sweet. bitter and umami. > > And this was recently updated to add fat to the list - ain't science wonderful ![]() http://news.inq7.net/lifestyle/index...=57822&col=130 K |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
R.I.P. Henry Chung, 98, "Helped Bring Hunans Flavors to America" | General Cooking | |||
Hot New Flavors: "Tiger's Blood", "Batman" | General Cooking | |||
Salt.....the industry and food manufacturers are pushing back againstthe "lower the salt" forces. | General Cooking | |||
Kosher, vegetarian, low-sodium "Bacon Salt". Its a miracle! | General Cooking | |||
Silly Campbell's Soup "Sea Salt" Shtick... | General Cooking |