Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I ate out at a restaurant recently where I was served a most delicious
meal of chicken livers. It was entree size (for US readers please read here starter size). I would say there were about 6-8 full livers chopped into bite-sized pieces. I asked for the recipe and was given the following. These are ingredients only for the sauce I think and there is certainly not enough in the quantity (for one-size serving) because the serving I received was quite smothered in the delicious sauce. A good experimental (or creative) cook out there will be able to sort this out. The taste was right but the texture of the sauce and the amount was wrong. For one person: 20ml green ginger wine 15ml port wine half tsp cracked pepper half tsp reduced chicken stock powder half tsp salt 1 tsp finely diced fried bacon half tsp sugar 6-8 whole chicken livers. I was not given a method. So I improvised and it worked up to a point only. I combined all the ingredients above except the livers together and then heated them in a small saucepan. I cleaned and chopped the livers into bite-size pieces, and dried them and then coated them in flour. I heated abiyt 2 Tbps oil in a skillet. I fried off the livers in the hot oil very quickly until only the centres were pink (I have done this before so I know what to do!) I then added the sauce. There was (a) not enough and (b) it was not thick. If anyone out there is familiar with a recipe like this, I would really like to know how to do it properly. My first reaction was to double the amount of sauce and thicken it a bit with cornflour. Love to know what to do. Cheers Daisy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daisy wrote:
<snip> Perhaps try frying the bacon in a little butter first, then add a teaspoon of flour, fry, then add a bit more stock than mentioned in the recipe, and then the other ingredients? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
US Readers please read as starter size?...
Anyway, the recipe sounds great. Was this served over noodles or rice? I almost think I'd cut the livers after cooking. Did they disintegrate? Karen |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jan 2005 13:04:55 -0800, "Karen" > wrote:
>US Readers please read as starter size?... In the US I find the entree sizes are what we call mains and the starter sizes what we call entrees. I also find US starter serving sizes generally almost the size we call mains, in other words quite big. We use European terminology. >Anyway, the recipe sounds great. Was this served over noodles or rice? No, but there was a small amount of crispy hokkien noodles at the bottom of the dish, and it was served with baby salad leaves. > >I almost think I'd cut the livers after cooking. Did they disintegrate? No. >Karen Daisy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daisy wrote:
> >US Readers please read as starter size?... > > In the US I find the entree sizes are what we call mains and the > starter sizes what we call entrees. I also find US starter serving > sizes generally almost the size we call mains, in other words quite > big. We use European terminology. I am confused about the terminology. When I was in France, an entree was, I think, what you call a starter and what we call an entree was the main plate. So I get a little confused when restaurants use French terminology for something different than the French do. Never the less, the size of various dinner courses varies with the restaurant and the dish. I am reluctant to order anything with smoked salmon here because the size of the serving is so pitifully tiny that is is just a teaser. But if I order Calamari, I usually get enough that I don't need a main course. Salads can be a small bowl of greens with some interesting accompanying veggies and garnish, or they can be huge bowls, the size I would make for 2-3 people. During several trips to Europe I was often surprised as the size of the appetizer servings. At one meal in Verdun my wife ordered a shrimp and avocado salad, and we expected half an avocado with a scoop of shrimp salad. What arrived was a huge pile of shrimp salad, which was mostly shrimp rather than mostly filler, a dozen whole shrimp on top and an entire avocado sliced up and arranged around the pile of salad. I had ordered a Tourte Lorrain, expecting a slice or tart sized mini quiche. It turned out to be small pie, about 6 inches across and almost 2 inches deep, a huge wad of sausage meat underneath the the custard. By the time we got through our appetizers we wondered how we were going to manage the steaks that had been ordered for the main course. We thought that perhaps they would be the tiny servings of beef that some people report from their journeys. This was not he case at all. They were 12 oz strip steaks, accompanied by a huge serving of potatoes and fresh green beans. Not bad for a 99FF ($22 Cdn) three course fixed price meal. It wasn't much different in most of the other places we visited. I had a Sunday night special at our hotel in Denmark. The fish course was enough for a meal. In Breda , Holland, my appetizer was a pate platter, and once again, it was enough for a meal. There were 2 huge slabs of pate. Luckily, the salmon filet that followed was not so generous or else I never would have managed to eat it all. In Paris, the appetizers were slightly smaller, but the main dishes were quite ample. There was only one restaurant in Paris where the servings were small, and in that place the food was not very good at all. It was extremely disappointing, and also the most expensive. > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daisy wrote:
> >US Readers please read as starter size?... > > In the US I find the entree sizes are what we call mains and the > starter sizes what we call entrees. I also find US starter serving > sizes generally almost the size we call mains, in other words quite > big. We use European terminology. I am confused about the terminology. When I was in France, an entree was, I think, what you call a starter and what we call an entree was the main plate. So I get a little confused when restaurants use French terminology for something different than the French do. Never the less, the size of various dinner courses varies with the restaurant and the dish. I am reluctant to order anything with smoked salmon here because the size of the serving is so pitifully tiny that is is just a teaser. But if I order Calamari, I usually get enough that I don't need a main course. Salads can be a small bowl of greens with some interesting accompanying veggies and garnish, or they can be huge bowls, the size I would make for 2-3 people. During several trips to Europe I was often surprised as the size of the appetizer servings. At one meal in Verdun my wife ordered a shrimp and avocado salad, and we expected half an avocado with a scoop of shrimp salad. What arrived was a huge pile of shrimp salad, which was mostly shrimp rather than mostly filler, a dozen whole shrimp on top and an entire avocado sliced up and arranged around the pile of salad. I had ordered a Tourte Lorrain, expecting a slice or tart sized mini quiche. It turned out to be small pie, about 6 inches across and almost 2 inches deep, a huge wad of sausage meat underneath the the custard. By the time we got through our appetizers we wondered how we were going to manage the steaks that had been ordered for the main course. We thought that perhaps they would be the tiny servings of beef that some people report from their journeys. This was not he case at all. They were 12 oz strip steaks, accompanied by a huge serving of potatoes and fresh green beans. Not bad for a 99FF ($22 Cdn) three course fixed price meal. It wasn't much different in most of the other places we visited. I had a Sunday night special at our hotel in Denmark. The fish course was enough for a meal. In Breda , Holland, my appetizer was a pate platter, and once again, it was enough for a meal. There were 2 huge slabs of pate. Luckily, the salmon filet that followed was not so generous or else I never would have managed to eat it all. In Paris, the appetizers were slightly smaller, but the main dishes were quite ample. There was only one restaurant in Paris where the servings were small, and in that place the food was not very good at all. It was extremely disappointing, and also the most expensive. > |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
ah... I was thinking that it was sort of a slam on portion sizes for
Americans. Thanks for clearing that up. Karen |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Karen wrote:
> US Readers please read as starter size?... > I thank you for the translation. It's interesting how we have different terms for the same things ![]() Jill |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10 Jan 2005 13:04:55 -0800, "Karen" > wrote:
>US Readers please read as starter size?... In the US I find the entree sizes are what we call mains and the starter sizes what we call entrees. I also find US starter serving sizes generally almost the size we call mains, in other words quite big. We use European terminology. >Anyway, the recipe sounds great. Was this served over noodles or rice? No, but there was a small amount of crispy hokkien noodles at the bottom of the dish, and it was served with baby salad leaves. > >I almost think I'd cut the livers after cooking. Did they disintegrate? No. >Karen Daisy |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Karen wrote:
> US Readers please read as starter size?... > I thank you for the translation. It's interesting how we have different terms for the same things ![]() Jill |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daisy > typed:
.. > > For one person: > > 20ml green ginger wine > 15ml port wine > half tsp cracked pepper > half tsp reduced chicken stock powder Is that something you can buy there? Never seen it here. Could you use ordinary stock powder, I wonder? > half tsp salt > 1 tsp finely diced fried bacon > half tsp sugar > 6-8 whole chicken livers. > > I was not given a method. So I improvised and it worked up to a > point only. It sounds very nice to me. I would think that reducing it would thicken it, but of course you would need even more that way :-) -- Cheers, Judy -- some quotes perceptive, some pedestrian, none mine :-) Experience is that marvellous thing that enables you recognise a mistake when you make it again. - (Franklin P. Jones) |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Daisy wrote:
<snip> Perhaps try frying the bacon in a little butter first, then add a teaspoon of flour, fry, then add a bit more stock than mentioned in the recipe, and then the other ingredients? |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
US Readers please read as starter size?...
Anyway, the recipe sounds great. Was this served over noodles or rice? I almost think I'd cut the livers after cooking. Did they disintegrate? Karen |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Question: Chicken Livers | General Cooking | |||
chicken livers | Barbecue | |||
Speaking of Chicken Livers - | General Cooking | |||
Chicken Livers | General Cooking |