Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 07:22:14 -0500, Gary > wrote:
> Bruce wrote: > > I have now killfiled myself so I don't see my frogger >> anymore ![]() > >lol > > > :-) -- The real Bruce posts with Eternal Smugness |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:49:59 +1100, John Kuthe >
wrote: >On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 10:45:14 +1100, Bruce > wrote: > >>On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 18:08:22 -0500, Dave Smith > wrote: >> >>>On 2021-03-11 5:51 p.m., Lucretia Borgia wrote: >>>> On Fri, 12 Mar 2021 08:36:41 +1100, Bruce > wrote: >>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I learned from you, teaming up with Ofeelya! >>>>> >>>>> You sound like a child. I hope to be a bit more mature than you by the >>>>> time I've reached your age. >>>> >>>> You should hope to even reach my age healthy and well lol >>>> >>> >>>Bruce had a hard time getting through grade school without getting >>>beaten up. >> >>Huh? > >No 'huh?' about it. Fags like you lose all bravado IRL. This is a >venue where you try to compensate for your cowardice IRL, knowing >you're totally safe from consequences. > > >John Kuthe, Superior to you... Huh? -- The real Bruce posts with Eternal September |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 11 Mar 2021 20:14:02 +0000, Ophelia >
wrote: >On 11/03/2021 17:10, dsi1 wrote: >> On Thursday, March 11, 2021 at 12:55:40 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: >>> On 10/03/2021 22:05, Ophelia wrote: >>>> On 10/03/2021 21:29, dsi1 wrote: >>>>> On Wednesday, March 10, 2021 at 10:52:41 AM UTC-10, Ophelia wrote: >>>>>> On 10/03/2021 20:33, Bruce wrote: >>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 20:26:02 +0000, Ophelia > >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 10/03/2021 20:12, Bruce wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 19:48:08 +0000, Ophelia > >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 10/03/2021 19:25, Bruce wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, 10 Mar 2021 10:51:41 -0500, Dave Smith >>>>>>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> She called me a liar for posting that she had emailed me. I had >>>>>>>>>>>> not >>>>>>>>>>>> seen it in the group because I have filtered her for years but >>>>>>>>>>>> I got it >>>>>>>>>>>> in my mail box. I got three emails from her in two days and it >>>>>>>>>>>> was the >>>>>>>>>>>> third one where she said she had never ever emailed me. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I viewed the message source and Her is a cut and paste from the >>>>>>>>>>>> one she >>>>>>>>>>>> denied sending. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> It's not a cut and paste, dumbo. She has an option turned on that >>>>>>>>>>> sends her Usenet posts also as emails to the person she's >>>>>>>>>>> replying to. >>>>>>>>>>> Au to ma ti ca lly. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Ophelia, you just need to find that option in Windows Live Mail and >>>>>>>>>>> turn it off before Dave has a nervous breakdown. In my software >>>>>>>>>>> it's >>>>>>>>>>> called "Email replies to Usenet messages". >>>>>>>>>> === >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you, Bruce! This is a new computer and I don't have the >>>>>>>>>> hang of it >>>>>>>>>> yet! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I will have a look and try to sort it out >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thank you so much for helping! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> This is Windows 10 and I haven't got the hang of it yet! >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Can you help me to find the equivalent of the old one I was using? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I see you're using Thunderbird and not Windows Live Mail anymore. I >>>>>>>>> don't use Thunderbird for newsgroups. What does the button say that >>>>>>>>> you click to send your Usenet post? Does it just say "Send"? >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> == >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Yes! >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> Then there must be an option somewhere under Tools --> Options or >>>>>>> Tools --> Account Settings that sends your Usenet posts also as emails >>>>>>> to the people you're replying to. They'll only notice that if they're >>>>>>> using their real email address. >>>>>> == >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you!! D. and I will have a good look and try to sort it. >>>>>> >>>>>> Apologies to anyone who got the wrong emails from me ... >>>>>> I can promise it was never intentional. >>>>>> >>>>>> .... except for those who are using it against me, because that is all >>>>>> they are interested in doing ![]() >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to hear of your troubles. I've done it before and boy was I >>>>> embarrassed! I Twice! don't know what mail/news client you're using >>>>> but Thunderbird used to default to group and email replays. That was >>>>> pretty stupid of them. It's a pretty good program otherwise. I'm a >>>>> little surprised that people still use a real email addresses in this >>>>> sewer. ![]() >>>>> >>>> >>>> ==== >>>> >>>> Yes ![]() ![]() >>> >>> ==== >>> >>> I think I found it??????????????? yeahhhhh ![]() >>> >>> Did I??? >> >> It's an old problem with Thunderbird and one that might occur again with major updates. I can't tell if you've solved the problem because I don't use a real email address so you can't send me email. This might work but I can't say for sure because I haven't used Thunderbird in ages: >> >> https://groups.google.com/g/rec.food...m/GC9ys6VmnDsJ > > >This is the first time I have ever had Thunderbird! I have always had >Windows! lol. Has no idea at all. -- The real Bruce posts with Eternal September |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12/03/2021 15:52, jmcquown wrote:
> On 3/12/2021 10:30 AM, Gary wrote: >> On 3/11/2021 2:07 PM, Bruce wrote: >>> Unless you also use Thunderbird for email, it's best not to fill in >>> the mail server in Thunderbird, so you're protected from the mistake. >> >> It's easy enough to know what sub-program you're in. Mail or NGs. >> >>> (And beats me why Thunderbird people still haven't done something >>> about this.) >> >> The oddest feature they have is the "Reply to sender and newsgroup." >> I can't envision why anyone would want to send to both. >> One or the other, yes but not both. >> > Someone on the development team must have thought it was a good idea. It > didn't help that recent updates switched the positions of the Reply and > the Followup buttons on the screen.* Why?* If I'd been testing the > updates I'd have said no, no, no.* It was stupid. > > I like Thunderbird, for both email and newgroups.* I haven't used > Windows Mail at home in ages.* Back when Outlook Express came with > computers someone outside actually took the time to create an add-on > that would make OE properly word-wrap newsgroup posts because OE didn't > handle it anymore.* (Kind of like Google Groups now.)* Thunderbird (and > other actual newsreaders are able to properly display word-wrap in posts > from Google Groups users. > > At any rate, Ophelia took me up on my offer and she emailed me about > creating filters.* I just emailed her back with hopefully clear > instructions.* I know you think filters are stupid, Gary, but you have > yet to show me a "valid poster" who uses those domains many of us > killefiled long ago. > > Jill ==== When D. has time later, we will be looking at your instructions! You are very kind. Thank you! |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 13 Mar 2021 18:49:59 +1100, John Kuthe wrote:
> This is a venue where you try to compensate for your cowardice IRL Cowardice? Try belligerence, selfishness, and stupidity. He's the consumate ass-hole of the group, but at least he gives us his first name and does use faked headers to conflate himself with the #2 group bozo. (Remember what Steve did just with the first name of someone's gardiner.) |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ophelia wrote:
> On 12/03/2021 15:52, jmcquown wrote: > > On 3/12/2021 10:30 AM, Gary wrote: > > > On 3/11/2021 2:07 PM, Bruce wrote: > > > > Unless you also use Thunderbird for email, it's best not to > > > > fill in the mail server in Thunderbird, so you're protected > > > > from the mistake. > > > > > > It's easy enough to know what sub-program you're in. Mail or NGs. > > > > > > > (And beats me why Thunderbird people still haven't done > > > > something about this.) > > > > > > The oddest feature they have is the "Reply to sender and > > > newsgroup." I can't envision why anyone would want to send to > > > both. One or the other, yes but not both. > > > > > Someone on the development team must have thought it was a good > > idea. It didn't help that recent updates switched the positions of > > the Reply and the Followup buttons on the screen.* Why?* If I'd > > been testing the updates I'd have said no, no, no.* It was stupid. > > > > I like Thunderbird, for both email and newgroups.* I haven't used > > Windows Mail at home in ages.* Back when Outlook Express came with > > computers someone outside actually took the time to create an > > add-on that would make OE properly word-wrap newsgroup posts > > because OE didn't handle it anymore.* (Kind of like Google Groups > > now.)* Thunderbird (and other actual newsreaders are able to > > properly display word-wrap in posts from Google Groups users. > > > > At any rate, Ophelia took me up on my offer and she emailed me > > about creating filters.* I just emailed her back with hopefully > > clear instructions.* I know you think filters are stupid, Gary, > > but you have yet to show me a "valid poster" who uses those > > domains many of us killefiled long ago. > > > > Jill > > ==== > > When D. has time later, we will be looking at your instructions! > You are very kind. Thank you! Jill is very helpful! In Thunderbird, I think you have to add the feature with the Message-ID: @aioe.com (sorry, I block them and that may not be exact since I can't see them now). Once I triggered that, it made me try adding that same to Xananews and it worked. Xananews is free and does almost everything Thunderbird does. It's also simpler to setup and a whole lot better for blocking individual accounts quickly. Xananews is also proactive if set so. That means it doesn't even download the offending messages (other setting it does, but marks them as spam right away so easier to skip). I forget what options it doesn't have in Xananews, but recall it's stuff I don't care about. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 3/13/2021 4:23 AM, Ophelia wrote:
> On 12/03/2021 15:52, jmcquown wrote: >> On 3/12/2021 10:30 AM, Gary wrote: >>> On 3/11/2021 2:07 PM, Bruce wrote: >>>> Unless you also use Thunderbird for email, it's best not to fill in >>>> the mail server in Thunderbird, so you're protected from the mistake. >>> >>> It's easy enough to know what sub-program you're in. Mail or NGs. >>> >>>> (And beats me why Thunderbird people still haven't done something >>>> about this.) >>> >>> The oddest feature they have is the "Reply to sender and newsgroup." >>> I can't envision why anyone would want to send to both. >>> One or the other, yes but not both. >>> >> Someone on the development team must have thought it was a good idea. >> It didn't help that recent updates switched the positions of the Reply >> and the Followup buttons on the screen.* Why?* If I'd been testing the >> updates I'd have said no, no, no.* It was stupid. >> >> I like Thunderbird, for both email and newgroups.* I haven't used >> Windows Mail at home in ages.* Back when Outlook Express came with >> computers someone outside actually took the time to create an add-on >> that would make OE properly word-wrap newsgroup posts because OE >> didn't handle it anymore.* (Kind of like Google Groups now.) >> Thunderbird (and other actual newsreaders are able to properly display >> word-wrap in posts from Google Groups users. >> >> At any rate, Ophelia took me up on my offer and she emailed me about >> creating filters.* I just emailed her back with hopefully clear >> instructions.* I know you think filters are stupid, Gary, but you have >> yet to show me a "valid poster" who uses those domains many of us >> killefiled long ago. >> >> Jill > > ==== > > ** When D. has time later, we will be looking at your instructions! You > are very kind.* Thank you! > It's not difficult, just takes a little getting used to. You can always edit or delete filters you've created. Jill |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 13/03/2021 19:26, jmcquown wrote:
> On 3/13/2021 4:23 AM, Ophelia wrote: >> On 12/03/2021 15:52, jmcquown wrote: >>> On 3/12/2021 10:30 AM, Gary wrote: >>>> On 3/11/2021 2:07 PM, Bruce wrote: >>>>> Unless you also use Thunderbird for email, it's best not to fill in >>>>> the mail server in Thunderbird, so you're protected from the mistake. >>>> >>>> It's easy enough to know what sub-program you're in. Mail or NGs. >>>> >>>>> (And beats me why Thunderbird people still haven't done something >>>>> about this.) >>>> >>>> The oddest feature they have is the "Reply to sender and newsgroup." >>>> I can't envision why anyone would want to send to both. >>>> One or the other, yes but not both. >>>> >>> Someone on the development team must have thought it was a good idea. >>> It didn't help that recent updates switched the positions of the >>> Reply and the Followup buttons on the screen.* Why?* If I'd been >>> testing the updates I'd have said no, no, no.* It was stupid. >>> >>> I like Thunderbird, for both email and newgroups.* I haven't used >>> Windows Mail at home in ages.* Back when Outlook Express came with >>> computers someone outside actually took the time to create an add-on >>> that would make OE properly word-wrap newsgroup posts because OE >>> didn't handle it anymore.* (Kind of like Google Groups now.) >>> Thunderbird (and other actual newsreaders are able to properly >>> display word-wrap in posts from Google Groups users. >>> >>> At any rate, Ophelia took me up on my offer and she emailed me about >>> creating filters.* I just emailed her back with hopefully clear >>> instructions.* I know you think filters are stupid, Gary, but you >>> have yet to show me a "valid poster" who uses those domains many of >>> us killefiled long ago. >>> >>> Jill >> >> ==== >> >> *** When D. has time later, we will be looking at your instructions! >> You are very kind.* Thank you! >> > It's not difficult, just takes a little getting used to.* You can always > edit or delete filters you've created. > > Jill == Thanks ![]() |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, March 13, 2021 at 7:29:48 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote:
> Ophelia wrote: > > > On 12/03/2021 15:52, jmcquown wrote: > > > On 3/12/2021 10:30 AM, Gary wrote: > > > > On 3/11/2021 2:07 PM, Bruce wrote: > > > > > Unless you also use Thunderbird for email, it's best not to > > > > > fill in the mail server in Thunderbird, so you're protected > > > > > from the mistake. > > > > > > > > It's easy enough to know what sub-program you're in. Mail or NGs. > > > > > > > > > (And beats me why Thunderbird people still haven't done > > > > > something about this.) > > > > > > > > The oddest feature they have is the "Reply to sender and > > > > newsgroup." I can't envision why anyone would want to send to > > > > both. One or the other, yes but not both. > > > > > > > Someone on the development team must have thought it was a good > > > idea. It didn't help that recent updates switched the positions of > > > the Reply and the Followup buttons on the screen. Why? If I'd > > > been testing the updates I'd have said no, no, no. It was stupid. > > > > > > I like Thunderbird, for both email and newgroups. I haven't used > > > Windows Mail at home in ages. Back when Outlook Express came with > > > computers someone outside actually took the time to create an > > > add-on that would make OE properly word-wrap newsgroup posts > > > because OE didn't handle it anymore. (Kind of like Google Groups > > > now.) Thunderbird (and other actual newsreaders are able to > > > properly display word-wrap in posts from Google Groups users. > > > > > > At any rate, Ophelia took me up on my offer and she emailed me > > > about creating filters. I just emailed her back with hopefully > > > clear instructions. I know you think filters are stupid, Gary, > > > but you have yet to show me a "valid poster" who uses those > > > domains many of us killefiled long ago. > > > > > > Jill > > > > ==== > > > > When D. has time later, we will be looking at your instructions! > > You are very kind. Thank you! > Jill is very helpful! > > In Thunderbird, I think you have to add the feature with the > > Message-ID: @aioe.com > > (sorry, I block them and that may not be exact since I can't see them > now). > > Once I triggered that, it made me try adding that same to Xananews and > it worked. Xananews is free and does almost everything Thunderbird > does. It's also simpler to setup and a whole lot better for blocking > individual accounts quickly. Xananews is also proactive if set so. > That means it doesn't even download the offending messages (other > setting it does, but marks them as spam right away so easier to skip). > > I forget what options it doesn't have in Xananews, but recall it's > stuff I don't care about. I'd filter out posts that contain: goblin.stu.neva.ru! Unfortunately, Google won't allow that. That's the breaks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sunday supper | General Cooking | |||
Sunday Supper | General Cooking | |||
Sunday Supper | General Cooking |