On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:24:55 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Stu Rawlings" wrote in message ...
>
>On 2/22/2021 1:50 PM, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>> Oh, and if you have a teenage grand-daughter, you might want to bring her
>> along. I know how lovely it can be for grannies to share firsts with
>> their
>> grand-daughters, and a girl's first rimjob is something special. John and
>> Bruce are the perfect team, Bruce to sniff-check for cleanliness, and John
>> to do the actual licking.
>>
>> Now, before you get all bent out of shape, I'm not saying that I think
>> that
>> your grand-daughter has poor anal hygiene, but John has written that he's
>> very persnickety about cleanliness (you can't really fault him for that),
>> and
>> when it comes to this sort of thing, Bruce has the nose of a bloodhound.
>> If
>> Bruce says she's clean, then you can bet your ass she's clean.
>>
>> --Bryan
>>
>You are one sick ****, pillow biter.
>
>==
>
>+ 1 million

lol

On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 7:27:41 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
>
> On 2/22/2021 2:23 PM, wrote:
> >>
> > Yep, but I don't come back a day or so later with the lame "I was joking" or
> > make a nasty post and end it with a smiley. If I make a dig, I stand by my
> > dig and no backpedaling.
>
> (sigh) I've explained many times that I joke or tease often. It's often
> based on fact though. Something that someone says or does.
> I eventually started ending with a smirky face to indicate that I'm
> only teasing for people like you that doesn't get the joke.
>
Back pedaling.
>
> Days later, I'm often forced to say (Just kidding) for people like you
> that didn't get it. Not backpedaling. Just explaining that it was a joke
> for the humor challenged.
>
More back pedaling.
>
> ? Gary is ****ed off because Jill inherited a house
> > and she won't divulge the amount of any money she might have received.
> >
> Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to run
> the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to maintain
> it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money back to pay the
> inheritance tax.
>
If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
part of the inheritance tax.
>
> They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them off by
> asking them to pay.
>
Read my statement above again. S.l.o.w.l.y. this time, give time to sink in.
>
> And for you, Joan...you just constantly resent me because you wear red
> lipstick to make yourself look pretty and you know my opinion about that.
>
I wear red lipstick because I like it; if it ****es you off, even better!
>
> "A woman scorned..."
>
"A man's fragile ego and it must propped up continuously."

On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
....
> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
> part of the inheritance tax.

Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!

On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!

John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 4:23:00 PM UTC-6, wrote:
>
> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
> ...
> > If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
> > part of the inheritance tax.
>
> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>
I don't think Jill's parents had their money in a trust fund.
>
> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>
He trusted her to have her wits about her, be fair, and the money distributed to ALL
he designated money to.

On 2/23/2021 2:22 PM, Yammering Pus-bucket KOOKthe is:

> stupid!

THIS ISN'T YOUR PERSONAL MESSAGE BOARD, YOU BRAINDEAD ****TARD!

NOBODY CARES ABOUT YOUR CHILDISH GARBAGE, DUMB****!

You're still an unemployable failure and always will be!

You are a waste of air.

Nobody gives a shit about your house.
Nobody gives a shit about your sound system.
Nobody gives a shit about your car.
Nobody gives a shit about your exercise.
Nobody gives a shit about your chronic unemployment.
Nobody gives a shit about your mental illness.
Nobody gives a shit about your feeble attempts at "cooking."
Nobody gives a shit about your pointless pathetic "obsessions."
Nobody gives a shit about your life.

NOBODY GIVES A SHIT ABOUT YOU. SHUT THE **** UP AND LEAVE!

On 2/23/2021 3:31 AM, Stu Rawlings wrote:
> On 2/22/2021 1:50 PM, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>> Oh, and if you have a teenage grand-daughter, you might want to bring her
>> along.Â* I know how lovely it can be for grannies to share firsts with
>> their
>> grand-daughters, and a girl's first rimjob is something special.Â* John
>> and
>> Bruce are the perfect team, Bruce to sniff-check for cleanliness, and
>> John
>> to do the actual licking.
>>
>> Now, before you get all bent out of shape, I'm not saying that I think
>> that
>> your grand-daughter has poor anal hygiene, but John has written that he's
>> very persnickety about cleanliness (you can't really fault him for
>> that), and
>> when it comes to this sort of thing, Bruce has the nose of a
>> bloodhound.Â* If
>> Bruce says she's clean, then you can bet your ass she's clean.
>>
>> --Bryan
>>
> You are one sick ****, pillow biter.
>
OK, if I had been serious, it would have been "sick." As a joke, it
was certainly in poor taste, but it was a pretty well constructed
little vignette. If you didn't find it funny, your loss. As for your
cutesy "pillow biter" thing, gee, aren't you ****ing snazzy? You know
modern urban slang. Calling me *** is silly. I've been slightly
disappointed that I had no potential for enjoying sex with males as
well as females for decades. I really love *Transformer* and *Diamond
Dogs*. If you had half a ****ing brain, you'd come up with a better
insult, and you might have even enjoyed my humorous post.

--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
> ...
>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
>> part of the inheritance tax.
> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>
> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!
>
> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...

"most fairest"?Â* You skipped and English degree.

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:

>John Kuthe wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
>> ...
>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>>
>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!
>>
>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>
>"most fairest"?Â* You skipped and English degree.

Uhm...

Dave Smith wrote:

> On 2021-02-23 8:27 a.m., Gary wrote:
>
> >
> > Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to
> > run the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
> > maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money
> > back to pay the inheritance tax.
>
> I think you are confused there. She has a legitimate beef about the
> income tax that she has to pay on some sort of annuity of something
> that is paid out to her and which she shares equally with her
> brothers. Since is is paid to her she has to pay the income tax on
> it. She gives them each a share of the gross, but then she has to pay
> income tax on the that gross out of her share.
>
>
>
> >
> > They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them
> > off by asking them to pay.
>
> No. She is paying tax on the whole thing out of her 1/3 share, which
> means they get a lot more out of it than she does.

Correct from my understanding. She got a 1/3 share but is paying 100%
of the taxes right?

Bruce wrote:

> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:27:34 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>
> > On 2/22/2021 2:23 PM, wrote:
> > > >
> >> Yep, but I don't come back a day or so later with the lame "I was
> joking" or >> make a nasty post and end it with a smiley. If I make
> a dig, I stand by my >> dig and no backpedaling.
> >
> > (sigh) I've explained many times that I joke or tease often. It's
> > often based on fact though. Something that someone says or does.
> > I eventually started ending with a smirky face to indicate
> > that I'm only teasing for people like you that doesn't get the joke.
> >
> > Days later, I'm often forced to say (Just kidding) for people like
> > you that didn't get it. Not backpedaling. Just explaining that it
> > was a joke for the humor challenged.
> >
> >
> > ? Gary is ****ed off because Jill inherited a house
> >> and she won't divulge the amount of any money she might have
> received.
> >
> > Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to
> > run the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
> > maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money
> > back to pay the inheritance tax.
> >
> > They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them
> > off by asking them to pay.
>
> "I got the house and a lot of money and my brother didn't. And then he
> complains!?"

Who gave up her job and care too of her Mother for years?

On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:35:03 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote:

>Bruce wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:27:34 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>>
>> > On 2/22/2021 2:23 PM, wrote:
>> > > >
>> >> Yep, but I don't come back a day or so later with the lame "I was
>> joking" or >> make a nasty post and end it with a smiley. If I make
>> a dig, I stand by my >> dig and no backpedaling.
>> >
>> > (sigh) I've explained many times that I joke or tease often. It's
>> > often based on fact though. Something that someone says or does.
>> > I eventually started ending with a smirky face to indicate
>> > that I'm only teasing for people like you that doesn't get the joke.
>> >
>> > Days later, I'm often forced to say (Just kidding) for people like
>> > you that didn't get it. Not backpedaling. Just explaining that it
>> > was a joke for the humor challenged.
>> >
>> >
>> > ? Gary is ****ed off because Jill inherited a house
>> >> and she won't divulge the amount of any money she might have
>> received.
>> >
>> > Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to
>> > run the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
>> > maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money
>> > back to pay the inheritance tax.
>> >
>> > They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them
>> > off by asking them to pay.
>>
>> "I got the house and a lot of money and my brother didn't. And then he
>> complains!?"
>
>Who gave up her job and care too of her Mother for years?

Yes, that should count for something too.

In article >,
says...
>
> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>
> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!

Because he knew you were an incompetent spendthrift. As you have
proven to be. That's why your inheritance fund was managed on your
behalf, why when you needed money for the roof you had to go and ask for
it, like a little boy.

It'll be interesting to see what the Trust fund holder does when
you've squandered your entire inheritance.


Janet UK

BryanGSimmons wrote:
> OK, if I had been serious, it would have been "sick." As a joke, it
> was certainly in poor taste, but it was a pretty well constructed
> little vignette. If you didn't find it funny, your loss.

Joan calls this "back pedaling."
She doesn't "get" jokes here.

On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 8:13:18 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> BryanGSimmons wrote:
> > OK, if I had been serious, it would have been "sick." As a joke, it
> > was certainly in poor taste, but it was a pretty well constructed
> > little vignette. If you didn't find it funny, your loss.
> Joan calls this "back pedaling."
> She doesn't "get" jokes here.

Humor is extraordinarily difficult to convey in a text format. IRL
you can observe vocal and physical cues.

Cindy Hamilton

On 2/24/2021 7:57 AM, Janet wrote:
> It'll be interesting to see what the Trust fund holder does when
> you've squandered your entire inheritance.

It sounds like he's already spent it all.

On Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:36:13 -0500, Gary > wrote:

>On 2/24/2021 7:57 AM, Janet wrote:
>> It'll be interesting to see what the Trust fund holder does when
>> you've squandered your entire inheritance.
>
>It sounds like he's already spent it all.

Seems he squandered it all and went into debt... all for totally
useless dreck... wait for da loo's next hail storm and all his clay
roof tiles disintergrate into sand.
Shit for brains can't even hold a JOB!

Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
>
>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
>>> ...
>>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
>>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>>>
>>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!
>>>
>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>> "most fairest"?Â* You skipped and English degree.
> Uhm...

I should have put "and" in quotes.Â* He misuses that word constantly.

On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 7:14:50 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
> >
> >> John Kuthe wrote:
> >>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
> >>> ...
> >>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
> >>>> part of the inheritance tax.
> >>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
> >>>
> >>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!
> >>>
> >>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
> >> "most fairest"? You skipped and English degree.
> > Uhm...
> I should have put "and" in quotes. He misuses that word constantly.

If I had a nickel for every time my fingers added a 'd' to the word "an",
I could take a nice vacation.

As far as misusing "and", I assume you're talking about the rule against starting
a sentence with a coordinate conjunction. If this were formal writing, I'd
agree with you. But it's not.

Cindy Hamilton

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:29:14 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 7:14:50 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
>> >
>> >> John Kuthe wrote:
>> >>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
>> >>> ...
>> >>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
>> >>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>> >>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>> >>>
>> >>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!
>> >>>
>> >>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>> >> "most fairest"? You skipped and English degree.
>> > Uhm...
>> I should have put "and" in quotes. He misuses that word constantly.
>
>If I had a nickel for every time my fingers added a 'd' to the word "an",
>I could take a nice vacation.
>
>As far as misusing "and", I assume you're talking about the rule against starting
>a sentence with a coordinate conjunction. If this were formal writing, I'd
>agree with you. But it's not.

Alex is acting like a school teacher and making mistakes while doing
so. That's what this was about. No need to nerd out about it.
--

The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 4:39:12 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:

> No need to nerd out about it.

I see the words on the screen, but I can't make any sense out of them. ;-)

Cindy Hamilton

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:52:48 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 4:39:12 AM UTC-5, Bruce wrote:
>
>> No need to nerd out about it.
>
>I see the words on the screen, but I can't make any sense out of them. ;-)

lol, ok
--

The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

"Bruce" wrote in message ...

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:29:14 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:

>On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 7:14:50 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
>> >
>> >> John Kuthe wrote:
>> >>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6,
>> >>> wrote:
>> >>> ...
>> >>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have
>> >>>> paid their
>> >>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>> >>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>> >>>
>> >>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people
>> >>> I know. He knows that too!
>> >>>
>> >>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>> >> "most fairest"? You skipped and English degree.
>> > Uhm...
>> I should have put "and" in quotes. He misuses that word constantly.
>
>If I had a nickel for every time my fingers added a 'd' to the word "an",
>I could take a nice vacation.
>
>As far as misusing "and", I assume you're talking about the rule against
>starting
>a sentence with a coordinate conjunction. If this were formal writing, I'd
>agree with you. But it's not.

Alex is acting like a school teacher and making mistakes while doing
so. That's what this was about. No need to nerd out about it.

====

LOL yes he is. Cindy can put him right though)))

On 2/23/2021 7:11 PM, BryanGSimmons wrote:
> On 2/23/2021 3:31 AM, Stu Rawlings wrote:
>> On 2/22/2021 1:50 PM, Bryan Simmons wrote:
>>> Oh, and if you have a teenage grand-daughter, you might want to bring
>>> her
>>> along.Â* I know how lovely it can be for grannies to share firsts with
>>> their
>>> grand-daughters, and a girl's first rimjob is something special.
>>> John and
>>> Bruce are the perfect team, Bruce to sniff-check for cleanliness, and
>>> John
>>> to do the actual licking.
>>>
>>> Now, before you get all bent out of shape, I'm not saying that I
>>> think that
>>> your grand-daughter has poor anal hygiene, but John has written that
>>> he's
>>> very persnickety about cleanliness (you can't really fault him for
>>> that), and
>>> when it comes to this sort of thing, Bruce has the nose of a
>>> bloodhound.Â* If
>>> Bruce says she's clean, then you can bet your ass she's clean.
>>>
>>> --Bryan
>>>
>> You are one sick ****, pillow biter.
> >
> OK, if I had been serious, it would have been "sick."Â* As a joke, it
> was certainly in poor taste, but it was a pretty well constructed
> little vignette.
>
It only displays how your demented mind works.
>
> As for your
> cutesy "pillow biter" thing, gee, aren't you ****ing snazzy?Â* You know
> modern urban slang.Â* Calling me *** is silly.Â* I've been slightly
> disappointed that I had no potential for enjoying sex with males.
>
I'm sure your scorned lover koOkie Kuthe would go for another
naked canoe trip with you if you ask him nicely.

On 2/24/2021 4:42 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:35:03 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote:
>
>> Bruce wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:27:34 -0500, Gary > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/22/2021 2:23 PM, wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, but I don't come back a day or so later with the lame "I was
>>> joking" or >> make a nasty post and end it with a smiley. If I make
>>> a dig, I stand by my >> dig and no backpedaling.
>>>>
>>>> (sigh) I've explained many times that I joke or tease often. It's
>>>> often based on fact though. Something that someone says or does.
>>>> I eventually started ending with a smirky face to indicate
>>>> that I'm only teasing for people like you that doesn't get the joke.
>>>>
>>>> Days later, I'm often forced to say (Just kidding) for people like
>>>> you that didn't get it. Not backpedaling. Just explaining that it
>>>> was a joke for the humor challenged.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ? Gary is ****ed off because Jill inherited a house
>>>>> and she won't divulge the amount of any money she might have
>>> received.
>>>>
>>>> Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to
>>>> run the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
>>>> maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money
>>>> back to pay the inheritance tax.
>>>>
>>>> They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them
>>>> off by asking them to pay.
>>>
>>> "I got the house and a lot of money and my brother didn't. And then he
>>> complains!?"
>>
>> Who gave up her job and care too of her Mother for years?
>
> Yes, that should count for something too.

Maybe not really. She didn't give up some great career.
She got to retire early and stay home with her mom.

Room and board is a fair trade for taking care of your mother, imo.

I've always been willing to do that for mine. She can come live with me
or if she wants to stay in her own home, I'll do that for her. I won't
expect any special inheritance for doing so.

All inheritance will be split evenly 3 ways when my mom dies. That is
her wish and that will be done.

On Thursday, February 25, 2021 at 7:06:53 AM UTC-5, Gary wrote:
> On 2/24/2021 4:42 AM, Bruce wrote:
> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 20:35:03 -0600, "cshenk" > wrote:
> >
> >> Bruce wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 08:27:34 -0500, Gary > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 2/22/2021 2:23 PM, wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> Yep, but I don't come back a day or so later with the lame "I was
> >>> joking" or >> make a nasty post and end it with a smiley. If I make
> >>> a dig, I stand by my >> dig and no backpedaling.
> >>>>
> >>>> (sigh) I've explained many times that I joke or tease often. It's
> >>>> often based on fact though. Something that someone says or does.
> >>>> I eventually started ending with a smirky face to indicate
> >>>> that I'm only teasing for people like you that doesn't get the joke.
> >>>>
> >>>> Days later, I'm often forced to say (Just kidding) for people like
> >>>> you that didn't get it. Not backpedaling. Just explaining that it
> >>>> was a joke for the humor challenged.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> ? Gary is ****ed off because Jill inherited a house
> >>>>> and she won't divulge the amount of any money she might have
> >>> received.
> >>>>
> >>>> Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to
> >>>> run the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
> >>>> maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money
> >>>> back to pay the inheritance tax.
> >>>>
> >>>> They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them
> >>>> off by asking them to pay.
> >>>
> >>> "I got the house and a lot of money and my brother didn't. And then he
> >>> complains!?"
> >>
> >> Who gave up her job and care too of her Mother for years?
> >
> > Yes, that should count for something too.
> Maybe not really. She didn't give up some great career.
> She got to retire early and stay home with her mom.

Not everybody wants that. Not every mother wants that. I know
that neither my mother nor I does.

Cindy Hamilton

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:16:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:29:14 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>>On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 7:14:50 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
>>> Bruce wrote:
>>> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> John Kuthe wrote:
>>> >>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6,
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> ...
>>> >>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have
>>> >>>> paid their
>>> >>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>>> >>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people
>>> >>> I know. He knows that too!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>> >> "most fairest"? You skipped and English degree.
>>> > Uhm...
>>> I should have put "and" in quotes. He misuses that word constantly.
>>
>>If I had a nickel for every time my fingers added a 'd' to the word "an",
>>I could take a nice vacation.
>>
>>As far as misusing "and", I assume you're talking about the rule against
>>starting
>>a sentence with a coordinate conjunction. If this were formal writing, I'd
>>agree with you. But it's not.
>
>Alex is acting like a school teacher and making mistakes while doing
>so. That's what this was about. No need to nerd out about it.
>
>====
>
> LOL yes he is. Cindy can put him right though)))

Yes. Can you explain in detail exactly in what way he is? It would
sure help.

--

The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:03:27 +1100, Bruce > wrote:

>On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:16:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Bruce" wrote in message ...
>>
>>On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:29:14 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
> wrote:
>>
>>>On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 7:14:50 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
>>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>> > On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >> John Kuthe wrote:
>>>> >>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6,
>>>> >>> wrote:
>>>> >>> ...
>>>> >>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have
>>>> >>>> paid their
>>>> >>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>>>> >>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people
>>>> >>> I know. He knows that too!
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>>> >> "most fairest"? You skipped and English degree.
>>>> > Uhm...
>>>> I should have put "and" in quotes. He misuses that word constantly.
>>>
>>>If I had a nickel for every time my fingers added a 'd' to the word "an",
>>>I could take a nice vacation.
>>>
>>>As far as misusing "and", I assume you're talking about the rule against
>>>starting
>>>a sentence with a coordinate conjunction. If this were formal writing, I'd
>>>agree with you. But it's not.
>>
>>Alex is acting like a school teacher and making mistakes while doing
>>so. That's what this was about. No need to nerd out about it.
>>
>>====
>>
>> LOL yes he is. Cindy can put him right though)))
>
>Yes. Can you explain in detail exactly in what way he is? It would
>sure help.

This is the fake Bruce, as you can see by the headers: he doesn't post
with Eternal September.
--

The real Bruce posts with Eternal September

Bruce wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:03:27 +1100, Bruce > wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:16:10 -0000, "Ophelia" >
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "Bruce" wrote in message ...
>>>
>>> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 01:29:14 -0800 (PST), Cindy Hamilton
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 7:14:50 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
>>>>> Bruce wrote:
>>>>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6,
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> ...
>>>>>>>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have
>>>>>>>>> paid their
>>>>>>>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>>>>>>>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people
>>>>>>>> I know. He knows that too!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>>>>>> "most fairest"? You skipped and English degree.
>>>>>> Uhm...
>>>>> I should have put "and" in quotes. He misuses that word constantly.
>>>>
>>>> If I had a nickel for every time my fingers added a 'd' to the word "an",
>>>> I could take a nice vacation.
>>>>
>>>> As far as misusing "and", I assume you're talking about the rule against
>>>> starting
>>>> a sentence with a coordinate conjunction. If this were formal writing, I'd
>>>> agree with you. But it's not.
>>>
>>> Alex is acting like a school teacher and making mistakes while doing
>>> so. That's what this was about. No need to nerd out about it.
>>>
>>> ====
>>>
>>> LOL yes he is. Cindy can put him right though)))
>>
>> Yes. Can you explain in detail exactly in what way he is? It would
>> sure help.
>
> This is the fake Bruce, as you can see by the headers: he doesn't post
> with Eternal September.
>

If a person sniffs someones asshole, wherefore can he NOT be called
master druce?

All the masters are masters!

On 2/23/2021 10:19 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2021-02-23 8:27 a.m., Gary wrote:
>
>>
>> Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to run
>> the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
>> maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money back
>> to pay the inheritance tax.
>
> I think you are confused there. She has a legitimate beef about the
> income tax that she has to pay on some sort of annuity of something that
> is paid out to her and which she shares equally with her brothers. Since
> is is paid to her she has to pay the income tax on it. She gives them
> each a share of the gross, but then she has to pay income tax on the
> that grossÂ* out of her share.
>
Gary doesn't understand stuff like that. I thought the sole beneficiary
on the annuity was my middle brother. (Lord knows he wouldn't have
shared it.) When it came to settling the estate, my mother had changed
it to me. I chose to split it three ways per the terms of my her Will
and got hit with the tax liability. I sure as hell don't ever expect to
see them pay me back but I do feel they owed their share of the taxes.

It was the way it was written. She should have been told to list three
beneficiaries, then it would have been split three ways and each of us
would have assumed tax liability. Mom didn't know to do that. I did
the fair thing and got ripped off by doing what she wanted.

>> They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them off
>> by asking them to pay.
>
> No. She is paying tax on the whole thing out of her 1/3 share, which
> means they get a lot more out of it than she does.
>
You're exactly right, Dave. I'll never see that money and don't expect
to. Gary is the only one here who doesn't seem to understand this. He
just loves to rag on me.

Jill

On 2/23/2021 9:34 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote:
>
>> On 2021-02-23 8:27 a.m., Gary wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to
>>> run the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
>>> maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money
>>> back to pay the inheritance tax.
>>
>> I think you are confused there. She has a legitimate beef about the
>> income tax that she has to pay on some sort of annuity of something
>> that is paid out to her and which she shares equally with her
>> brothers. Since is is paid to her she has to pay the income tax on
>> it. She gives them each a share of the gross, but then she has to pay
>> income tax on the that gross out of her share.
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them
>>> off by asking them to pay.
>>
>> No. She is paying tax on the whole thing out of her 1/3 share, which
>> means they get a lot more out of it than she does.
>
> Correct from my understanding. She got a 1/3 share but is paying 100%
> of the taxes right?
>
Exactly. On that annuity, I split the money but was the only one hit
with the taxes.

Jill

On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 17:35:42 -0500, jmcquown >
wrote:

>Gary doesn't understand stuff like that. I thought the sole beneficiary
>on the annuity was my middle brother. (Lord knows he wouldn't have
>shared it.) When it came to settling the estate, my mother had changed
>it to me. I chose to split it three ways per the terms of my her Will
>and got hit with the tax liability. I sure as hell don't ever expect to
>see them pay me back but I do feel they owed their share of the taxes.
>
>It was the way it was written. She should have been told to list three
>beneficiaries, then it would have been split three ways and each of us
>would have assumed tax liability. Mom didn't know to do that. I did
>the fair thing and got ripped off by doing what she wanted.
>
>>> They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip them off
>>> by asking them to pay.
>>
>> No. She is paying tax on the whole thing out of her 1/3 share, which
>> means they get a lot more out of it than she does.
>>
>You're exactly right, Dave. I'll never see that money and don't expect
>to. Gary is the only one here who doesn't seem to understand this. He
>just loves to rag on me.

That's nothing compared to how you rag on John.

On 2021-02-25 5:35 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/23/2021 10:19 AM, Dave Smith wrote:

> Gary doesn't understand stuff like that.Â* I thought the sole beneficiary
> on the annuity was my middle brother.Â* (Lord knows he wouldn't have
> shared it.)Â* When it came to settling the estate, my mother had changed
> it to me.Â* I chose to split it three ways per the terms of my her Will
> and got hit with the tax liability.Â* I sure as hell don't ever expect to
> see them pay me back but I do feel they owed their share of the taxes.
>
> It was the way it was written.Â* She should have been told to list three
> beneficiaries, then it would have been split three ways and each of us
> would have assumed tax liability.Â* Mom didn't know to do that.Â* I did
> the fair thing and got ripped off by doing what she wanted.



Maybe it is time to start passing the cost of the tax onto them. Figure
out your taxes based on the whole amount and then with only 1/3 of the
annuity. If they complain you can threaten to let the IRS know about
their undeclared income.


>> No. She is paying tax on the whole thing out of her 1/3 share, which
>> means they get a lot more out of it than she does.
>>
> You're exactly right, Dave.Â* I'll never see that money and don't expect
> to.Â* Gary is the only one here who doesn't seem to understand this.Â* He
> just loves to rag on me.



About the time that my mother was going to sell her house my younger
brother had retired and wanted to move back to town. He thought it would
be a mutually beneficial deal for him to buy the house. Not a major
problem,even though he thought since she was selling it to him she
should discount the price. Then, since he expected to inherit an equal
25% share of her estate, he should only have to pay 75% of the price,

That was where it stopped being fair. She was buying a condo and needed
the money for her new home. Who knows how long she could live on her
own. There was a chance that she could end up having to sell that and
moved into a home of some type. She would likely need some of the
proceeds of the sell to pay for her care. If it turned out to be really
expensive and she hung on for a long time it could have take a huge
bite out of her resources and that would have reduced the estate that my
other two brothers and I would share.

There was also the chance that her condo would soar in value and the
other three of us would end up getting much more. I would not be
surprised if, when realizing how much more we got than he, he might
expect us to share some of that windfall with him. To be honest, I
would consider him to have already had his share.

On 2/25/2021 6:07 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2021-02-25 5:35 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>
>
> Maybe it is time to start passing the cost of the tax onto them. Figure
> out your taxes based on the whole amount and then with only 1/3 of the
> annuity. If they complain you can threaten to let the IRS know about
> their undeclared income.
>
It doesn't work that way. Probate was finalized in 2009. Prior to that
I talked to at least seven agents via the phone at the IRS (in one phone
call!) about this issue before I filed the Estate taxes. They were all
very helpful and understood my questions. Each tried to find a way to
make them file on their share. Unfortunately the tax code isn't written
that way. It all came down to the beneficiary listed on the annuity. I
was responsible even if I distributed the money to my siblings. I
cannot go back and change a settled estate now. The IRS doesn't
consider it "undeclared income". Done deal. Oh well.

Jill

On 2/25/2021 2:35 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/23/2021 10:19 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2021-02-23 8:27 a.m., Gary wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to run
>>> the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
>>> maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money back
>>> to pay the inheritance tax.
>>
>> I think you are confused there. She has a legitimate beef about the
>> income tax that she has to pay on some sort of annuity of something that
>> is paid out to her and which she shares equally with her brothers. Since
>> is is paid to her she has to pay the income tax on it. She gives them
>> each a share of the gross, but then she has to pay income tax on the
>> that grossÂ* out of her share.
>>
> Gary doesn't understand stuff like that. I thought the sole beneficiary
> on the annuity was my middle brother. (Lord knows he wouldn't have
> shared it.) When it came to settling the estate, my mother had changed
> it to me. I chose to split it three ways per the terms of my her Will
> and got hit with the tax liability. I sure as hell don't ever expect to
> see them pay me back but I do feel they owed their share of the taxes.
>
> It was the way it was written. She should have been told to list three
> beneficiaries, then it would have been split three ways and each of us
> would have assumed tax liability. Mom didn't know to do that. I did
> the fair thing and got ripped off by doing what she wanted.
>

>
> Jill
>

You got ripped off by your own foolish handling of this matter. Don't
blame your mom.

On 2021-02-25 6:45 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/25/2021 6:07 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>> On 2021-02-25 5:35 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>
>>
>> Maybe it is time to start passing the cost of the tax onto them.
>> Figure out your taxes based on the whole amount and then with only 1/3
>> of the annuity. If they complain you can threaten to let the IRS know
>> about their undeclared income.
>>
> It doesn't work that way.Â* Probate was finalized in 2009.Â* Prior to that
> I talked to at least seven agents via the phone at the IRS (in one phone
> call!) about this issue before I filed the Estate taxes.Â* They were all
> very helpful and understood my questions.Â* Each tried to find a way to
> make them file on their share.Â* Unfortunately the tax code isn't written
> that way.Â* It all came down to the beneficiary listed on the annuity.Â* I
> was responsible even if I distributed the money to my siblings.Â* I
> cannot go back and change a settled estate now.Â* The IRS doesn't
> consider it "undeclared income".Â* Done deal.Â* Oh well.
>

In that case, do that same calculation to figure out how much you owe
with the annuity and without. Deduct that from the gross of the annuity
and split that equally.

Taxed and Spent wrote:
> On 2/25/2021 2:35 PM, jmcquown wrote:
> > On 2/23/2021 10:19 AM, Dave Smith wrote:
> >> On 2021-02-23 8:27 a.m., Gary wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance to run
> >>> the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and enough to
> >>> maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her brothers for money back
> >>> to pay the inheritance tax.
> >>
> >> I think you are confused there. She has a legitimate beef about the
> >> income tax that she has to pay on some sort of annuity of something that
> >> is paid out to her and which she shares equally with her brothers. Since
> >> is is paid to her she has to pay the income tax on it. She gives them
> >> each a share of the gross, but then she has to pay income tax on the
> >> that gross out of her share.
> >>
> > Gary doesn't understand stuff like that. I thought the sole beneficiary
> > on the annuity was my middle brother. (Lord knows he wouldn't have
> > shared it.) When it came to settling the estate, my mother had changed
> > it to me. I chose to split it three ways per the terms of my her Will
> > and got hit with the tax liability. I sure as hell don't ever expect to
> > see them pay me back but I do feel they owed their share of the taxes.
> >
> > It was the way it was written. She should have been told to list three
> > beneficiaries, then it would have been split three ways and each of us
> > would have assumed tax liability. Mom didn't know to do that. I did
> > the fair thing and got ripped off by doing what she wanted.
> >
>
> >
> > Jill
> >
>
> You got ripped off by your own foolish handling of this matter. Don't
> blame your mom.


And I have to "wonder" about someone spilling the beans on a public forum about such very private familial financial matters...all Jill has ever done in her natterings is to attempt to stoke sympathy for herself. She's like an elderly bratty junior high school girl...

--
Best
Greg

On 2/25/2021 7:18 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2021-02-25 6:45 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>> On 2/25/2021 6:07 PM, Dave Smith wrote:
>>> On 2021-02-25 5:35 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Maybe it is time to start passing the cost of the tax onto them.
>>> Figure out your taxes based on the whole amount and then with only
>>> 1/3 of the annuity. If they complain you can threaten to let the IRS
>>> know about their undeclared income.
>>>
>> It doesn't work that way.Â* Probate was finalized in 2009.Â* Prior to
>> that I talked to at least seven agents via the phone at the IRS (in
>> one phone call!) about this issue before I filed the Estate taxes.
>> They were all very helpful and understood my questions.Â* Each tried to
>> find a way to make them file on their share.Â* Unfortunately the tax
>> code isn't written that way.Â* It all came down to the beneficiary
>> listed on the annuity.Â* I was responsible even if I distributed the
>> money to my siblings.Â* I cannot go back and change a settled estate
>> now.Â* The IRS doesn't consider it "undeclared income".Â* Done deal.Â* Oh
>> well.
>>
>
> In that case, do that same calculation to figure out how much you owe
> with the annuity and without. Deduct that from the gross of the annuity
> and split that equally.
>
>
What are you talking about? I said that was finished in 2009. There is
nothing left to calculate or deal with.

Jill

On 2/25/2021 3:29 AM, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
> On Wednesday, February 24, 2021 at 7:14:50 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
>> Bruce wrote:
>>> On Tue, 23 Feb 2021 19:27:43 -0500, Alex > wrote:
>>>
>>>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday, February 23, 2021 at 3:46:32 PM UTC-6, wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>> If they got money from the heritance, then yes, they should have paid their
>>>>>> part of the inheritance tax.
>>>>> Not with a Living Trust established! My Father was not stupid!
>>>>>
>>>>> On his death, my sister got everything as she is most fairest people I know. He knows that too!
>>>>>
>>>>> John Kuthe, RN, BSN...
>>>> "most fairest"? You skipped and English degree.
>>> Uhm...
>> I should have put "and" in quotes. He misuses that word constantly.
>
> If I had a nickel for every time my fingers added a 'd' to the word "an",
> I could take a nice vacation.
>
> As far as misusing "and", I assume you're talking about the rule against starting
> a sentence with a coordinate conjunction. If this were formal writing, I'd
> agree with you. But it's not.
>
I try not to start narrative sentences with and or but, but sometimes
it's the thing to do. Certainly in dialog, there are times when a
person begins speaking with a coordinating conjunction, and dialog
that includes those kind of sentences seems especially authentic. I
don't know whether I had any or many such sentences in my novel, but
I wouldn't have hesitated, especially if one person was finishing
another's idea.

Oh, and I think it's been a while since I told *you* that you should
read my book.
>
> Cindy Hamilton
>


--
--Bryan
For your safety and protection, this sig. has been thoroughly
tested on laboratory animals.

On 2021-02-25 7:32 p.m., jmcquown wrote:
> On 2/25/2021 7:18 PM, Dave Smith wrote:

>>
>> In that case, do that same calculation to figure out how much you owe
>> with the annuity and without. Deduct that from the gross of the
>> annuity and split that equally.
>>
>>
> What are you talking about?Â* I said that was finished in 2009.Â* There is
> nothing left to calculate or deal with.

Sorry, I thought it was an ongoing thing.

jmcquown wrote:

> On 2/23/2021 9:34 PM, cshenk wrote:
> > Dave Smith wrote:
> >
> > > On 2021-02-23 8:27 a.m., Gary wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Over a series of posts, Jill told enough about her inheritance
> > > > to run the numbers. I don't care that she got the house and
> > > > enough to maintain it but she shouldn't have asked her
> > > > brothers for money back to pay the inheritance tax.
> > >
> > > I think you are confused there. She has a legitimate beef about
> > > the income tax that she has to pay on some sort of annuity of
> > > something that is paid out to her and which she shares equally
> > > with her brothers. Since is is paid to her she has to pay the
> > > income tax on it. She gives them each a share of the gross, but
> > > then she has to pay income tax on the that gross out of her
> > > share.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > They didn't rip her off by not paying. She was trying to rip
> > > > them off by asking them to pay.
> > >
> > > No. She is paying tax on the whole thing out of her 1/3 share,
> > > which means they get a lot more out of it than she does.
> >
> > Correct from my understanding. She got a 1/3 share but is paying
> > 100% of the taxes right?
> >
> Exactly. On that annuity, I split the money but was the only one hit
> with the taxes.
>
> Jill

Yup. Not sure what the tax difference was but that's your private
issue but you paid it all so they have nothing to scream about.