On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:51:52 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
> wrote:

>Druce wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:40:30 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Druce wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:35:50 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Druce wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If by very left-wing you mean communist, then I agree.
>>>>>
>>>>> Most of today's communists refuse to admit they are. Modern
>>>>> professors and students are to the left of Breznev.
>>>>
>>>> You'd probably call Bernie Sanders a communist, right?
>>>
>>> No he's a Socialist with 3 houses.
>>>
>>> And a 3-year-old's understanding of economics.
>>
>> You only use 'socialist' and 'communist' to express how much you
>> disagree with people. You don't really know what the words mean.
>
>Moron, I did not *use* either word until you did.

Ah, name calling. No need to read the rest of the drivel.

On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:56:29 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
> wrote:

>Ophelia wrote:
>> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >>
>> Druce wrote:
>>>
>>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
>>> that they're very right wing.
>>
>> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
>> but you seem not to have thought of that.
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
>
>They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
>They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
>rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
>than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
>
>And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
>stoichiometrics either.

lol

"Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news
Ophelia wrote:
> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >
> Druce wrote:
>>
>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
>> that they're very right wing.
>
> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
> but you seem not to have thought of that.
>
>
> ===
>
> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!

They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
than another, then IQ doesn't matter.

And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
stoichiometrics either.

===

Well I must admit, I have never even heard of stoichiometrics

On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:37:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >
>Ophelia wrote:
>> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >>
>> Druce wrote:
>>>
>>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
>>> that they're very right wing.
>>
>> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
>> but you seem not to have thought of that.
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
>
>They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
>They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
>rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
>than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
>
>And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
>stoichiometrics either.
>
>===
>
>Well I must admit, I have never even heard of stoichiometrics

It's the art of measuring the temperature in Tom Del Rosso's stoichio.

"Druce" wrote in message ...

On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:37:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >
>Ophelia wrote:
>> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >>
>> Druce wrote:
>>>
>>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
>>> that they're very right wing.
>>
>> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
>> but you seem not to have thought of that.
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
>
>They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
>They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
>rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
>than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
>
>And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
>stoichiometrics either.
>
>===
>
>Well I must admit, I have never even heard of stoichiometrics

It's the art of measuring the temperature in Tom Del Rosso's stoichio.

===

stoichiometric
/ˌstɔɪkɪə(ʊ)ˈmɛtrɪk/

adjective
Chemistry
adjective: stoichiometric

relating to stoichiometry.

€¢relating to or denoting quantities of reactants in simple integral ratios,
as prescribed by an equation or formula.
"a stoichiometric amount of potassium is required for 90% removal of the SO"

On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:45:46 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
>"Druce" wrote in message ...
>
>On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:37:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
>wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>"Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >>
>>Ophelia wrote:
>>> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >>>
>>> Druce wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
>>>> that they're very right wing.
>>>
>>> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
>>> but you seem not to have thought of that.
>>>
>>>
>>> ===
>>>
>>> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
>>
>>They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
>>They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
>>rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
>>than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
>>
>>And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
>>stoichiometrics either.
>>
>>===
>>
>>Well I must admit, I have never even heard of stoichiometrics
>
>It's the art of measuring the temperature in Tom Del Rosso's stoichio.
>
>===
>
>stoichiometric
>/?st??k??(?)?m?tr?k/
>
>adjective
>Chemistry
>adjective: stoichiometric
>
>relating to stoichiometry.
>
>•relating to or denoting quantities of reactants in simple integral ratios,
>as prescribed by an equation or formula.
>"a stoichiometric amount of potassium is required for 90% removal of the SO"

I guess he wants to poison his significant other.

Tom Del Rosso wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:
>> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >>
>> Druce wrote:
>>>
>>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
>>> that they're very right wing.
>>
>> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
>> but you seem not to have thought of that.
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
>
> They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
> They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
> rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
> than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
>
> And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
> stoichiometrics either.
>
>
>
I was in a restaurant in Washington DC a few years back.

I ordered stoichiometric stew. When they brought the dish, I could not
figure out how to transform it into something I could eat. The waiter
had a high IQ, but even this august servant could not help.

They called on all the senators and representatives on the hill, but
none of them were any help. Some were negros, some white, and some
asian, but none understood this stoichiometric stew.

Druce wrote:
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 15:51:52 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
> > wrote:
>
>> Druce wrote:
>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:40:30 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
>>> > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Druce wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:35:50 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Druce wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If by very left-wing you mean communist, then I agree.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most of today's communists refuse to admit they are. Modern
>>>>>> professors and students are to the left of Breznev.
>>>>>
>>>>> You'd probably call Bernie Sanders a communist, right?
>>>>
>>>> No he's a Socialist with 3 houses.
>>>>
>>>> And a 3-year-old's understanding of economics.
>>>
>>> You only use 'socialist' and 'communist' to express how much you
>>> disagree with people. You don't really know what the words mean.
>>
>> Moron, I did not *use* either word until you did.
>
> Ah, name calling. No need to read the rest of the drivel.
>

Well, looks like this food debate has finally come to a stalemate.

I think we shall have to employ the services of a wise nautical arbitrator.

Popeye, where art thou? Yoose are needed on deck "double time"!

Druce wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 20:03:04 -0400, Alex > wrote:
>
>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 1:32:11 PM UTC-5, graham wrote:
>>> I think after Nordictracking HARD for 30mins I may just make me a Third Cuppa Plus! Before LUNCH! Of Best Beef in STL! Sugarfire's Beef Brisket on an Asiago Cheese Bagel toasted from STL BreadCo!!!
>>>
>>> I eat like a KING! :-)
>>>
>>> John Kuthe...
>> Maybe you won't have to sit down to rest from standing at the next
>> Socialist rally!!!!!!
> Sanders wants to pry power from the hands of the ugly corporations and
> give it back to the people. That's not socialism. That's honesty,
> fairness, decency, common sense.

No, he wants to pry money from anyone who has any and give it to those
that don't even if it results if massive deficits that we could never
pay off. Even John will agree that money doesn't always equal power.

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 7:05:48 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
>> John Kuthe wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 11:35:33 AM UTC-5, Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>>>> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 11:11:12 AM UTC-4, graham wrote:
>>>>> I've read that it takes a gallon of water to produce ONE almond in
>>>>> California but many of the sources for such statistics are dubious to
>>>>> say the least.
>>>> I would suppose the Almond Alliance has no reason to overstate the
>>>> amount of water used in growing almonds:
>>>>
>>>> <https://almondalliance.org/goverment-affairs/policy-issues/water/>
>>>>
>>>> Cindy Hamilton
>>> YOU and YOUR TYPE have NO REASON to doubt anyone's "calculations"!
>>>
>>> You are INCALCULABLE! ;-) For example,. I could EASILY live on $1000/mo income! I own my home, have NO outstanding debts, and my house makes me MONEY!
>>>
>>> And I LOVE LIVING CHEAPLY! Have for most of my years! I've gotten VERY GOOD AT IT TOO! VERY good!
>>>
>>> John Kuthe
>> Real estate taxes, income taxes, HO insurance, auto insurance,
>> utilities, maintenance, etc. on $1K per month?
> You underestimate my frugality!! I was taught by masters. My parents both survived The Great Depression AND WWII!! I was taught well.
>
> I pay for NO GASOLINE, and THAT is YUGE!! And NO FOR PROFIT Health Insurance at $600/mo for NOTHING!
>
> John Kuthe...

Someone is paying for your health coverage. You will participate too
now that you have a taxable income as a landlord.

John Kuthe wrote:
> On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 9:47:49 PM UTC-5, Druce wrote:
>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:40:30 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
>> > wrote:
>>
>>> Druce wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:35:50 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
>>>> > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Druce wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 22:20:48 -0400, "Tom Del Rosso"
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Druce wrote:
>>>>>>>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the
>>>>>>>> chance that they're very right wing.
>>>>>>> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very
>>>>>>> left-wing, but you seem not to have thought of that.
>>>>>> If by very left-wing you mean communist, then I agree.
>>>>> Most of today's communists refuse to admit they are. Modern
>>>>> professors and students are to the left of Breznev.
>>>> You'd probably call Bernie Sanders a communist, right?
>>> No he's a Socialist with 3 houses.
>>>
>>> And a 3-year-old's understanding of economics.
>> You only use 'socialist' and 'communist' to express how much you
>> disagree with people. You don't really know what the words mean.
> Exactly!
>
> Families are socialistic, generally! Because they CARE ABOUT EACH OTHER!!
>
> United States Capitalists DON'T CARE ABOUT EACH OTHER, they are SELFISH and EGOCENTRIC AS POSSIBLE FOR PROFITS!!
>
> And that's what's WRONG with Capitalism in the WORLD TODAY!
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Lw30BeBZ6k
>
> John Kuthe...

Responsible family members take care of each other because they signed
up for that when they had children.

Business MUST be profitable to pay their employees and provide a return
for their shareholders.

On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 3:38:04 PM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >
> Ophelia wrote:
> > "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news > >
> > Druce wrote:
> >>
> >> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
> >> that they're very right wing.
> >
> > Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
> > but you seem not to have thought of that.
> >
> >
> > ===
> >
> > Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
>
> They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
> They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
> rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
> than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
>
> And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
> stoichiometrics either.
>
> ===
>
> Well I must admit, I have never even heard of stoichiometrics

Some weird branch of engineering mathematics. Markov Walks and stuff like that!

John Kuthe...

On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 3:46:03 PM UTC-5, Ophelia wrote:
> "Druce" wrote in message ... .
>
> On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 21:37:48 +0100, "Ophelia" >
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >"Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news > >
> >Ophelia wrote:
> >> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news > >>
> >> Druce wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
> >>> that they're very right wing.
> >>
> >> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
> >> but you seem not to have thought of that.
> >>
> >>
> >> ===
> >>
> >> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
> >
> >They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
> >They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
> >rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
> >than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
> >
> >And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
> >stoichiometrics either.
> >
> >===
> >
> >Well I must admit, I have never even heard of stoichiometrics
>
> It's the art of measuring the temperature in Tom Del Rosso's stoichio.
>
> ===
>
> stoichiometric
> /ˌstɔɪkɪə(ʊ)ˈmɛtrɪk/
>
> adjective
> Chemistry
> adjective: stoichiometric
>
> relating to stoichiometry.
>
> €¢relating to or denoting quantities of reactants in simple integral ratios,
> as prescribed by an equation or formula.
> "a stoichiometric amount of potassium is required for 90% removal of the SO"

Aha!! Chemistry! Predicting the total reactant from the components of the reaction producing them. Easy peasy concept, fancy schmancy word!

John Kuthe...

"Hank Rogers" wrote in message news
Tom Del Rosso wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:
>> "Tom Del Rosso" wrote in message news >>
>> Druce wrote:
>>>
>>> Not all, but the more intelligent people are, the smaller the chance
>>> that they're very right wing.
>>
>> Which doesn't mean they aren't also less likely to be very left-wing,
>> but you seem not to have thought of that.
>>
>>
>> ===
>>
>> Have you noticed, the left wingers know EVERYTHING about EVERYTHING!!!
>
> They don't seem to know that there are different kinds of intelligence.
> They focus on IQ as the only kind when comparing college professors to
> rednecks, but when the stats show people of one race has a higher IQ
> than another, then IQ doesn't matter.
>
> And since they couldn't argue with my point, they don't know about
> stoichiometrics either.
>
>
>
I was in a restaurant in Washington DC a few years back.

I ordered stoichiometric stew. When they brought the dish, I could not
figure out how to transform it into something I could eat. The waiter
had a high IQ, but even this august servant could not help.

They called on all the senators and representatives on the hill, but
none of them were any help. Some were negros, some white, and some
asian, but none understood this stoichiometric stew.

==

;p

On 9/5/2018 8:56 AM, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 09:11:08 -0600, graham wrote:
>
>> I've read that it takes a gallon of water to produce ONE almond in
>> California but many of the sources for such statistics are dubious to
>> say the least. All it takes is one quackie magazine to print something
>> as fact and then it gets quoted so many times that it falsely becomes
>> "common knowledge" or a "truism".
>> There's something about the "gallon per nut" statistic that leaves an
>> uneasy feeling.
>
> And while we're at it (my comments at the end):
>
> --------------
>
> http://www.latimes.com/food/dailydis...124-story.html
>
> A 1/3-pound burger requires 660 gallons of water. Most of this water
> is for producing beef (see below).
>
> 1 pound of beef requires 1,799 gallons of water, which includes
> irrigation of the grains and grasses in feed, plus water for
> drinking and processing.
>

Most beef is grass fed most of their lives, so that water is rainfall
that is going no place anyway.

In article >, lid
says...
>
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2018 06:27:47 -0700, Taxed and Spent wrote:
>
> > Most beef is grass fed most of their lives, so that water is rainfall
> > that is going no place anyway.
>
> Beef in feedlots are fed very little, if any grass. It's almost all
> grain. And the vast majority of beef come from feedlots and feed on
> grain.

In America.

Not here.

Janet UK

On Thursday, September 6, 2018 at 6:50:26 PM UTC-5, Alex wrote:
.....
> Responsible family members take care of each other because they signed
> up for that when they had children.

By laws, right? Democratically DECIDED LAWS!


> Business MUST be profitable to pay their employees and provide a return
> for their shareholders.

Businesses have become far too profitable when 4 individuals (Jeff Bezos, The Walton ADULT Children!) have more money than...

We NEED GOVERNMENTAL BUSINESS CONTROLS!!!! Democratically DECIDED LAWS to CORRECT the excesses Capitalism evidently leads to! Make CORPORATIONS (which says SCOTUS ARE PEOPLE!) behave "more like good parents to all its children" to END this terrible distribution of OUR MONEY!! Resources! Etc! We the PEOPLE OF THE PLANET now need to take care of the MESS WE MADE of Mother Gaia's PLANET!!

John Kuthe...

On Friday, September 7, 2018 at 8:27:50 AM UTC-5, Taxed and Spent wrote:
....
>
> Most beef is grass fed most of their lives, so that water is rainfall
> that is going no place anyway.

Going no place anyway? Rain is ALWAYS going somewhere!! Creeks, rivers, the oceans, etc. The Water Cycles? I read encyclopedias as a kid. And I loved the models of The Water Cycles, and I always wanted to make a Science Fair project out of one! That would have been cool!

John Kuthe...