Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/2/2018 2:57 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote:
> I'm certainly not trying to be a moderator here, nor do I wish to be > one. However, it would be nice to have more food related posts. > Thread drift is inevitable and ofen very interesting. However, when so > many posts begin as "off topic", it would be nice if the subject always > contained "OT:", it would be really easy to filter those out > altogether. > I concur. Even food related topics should have a meaningful subject line. Just plain courtesy. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Taxed and Spent" > wrote in message
news ![]() > On 8/2/2018 2:57 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> I'm certainly not trying to be a moderator here, nor do I wish to be >> one. However, it would be nice to have more food related posts. >> Thread drift is inevitable and ofen very interesting. However, when so >> many posts begin as "off topic", it would be nice if the subject always >> contained "OT:", it would be really easy to filter those out >> altogether. >> > > > I concur. Even food related topics should have a meaningful subject line. > Just plain courtesy. Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/3/2018 12:10 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "Taxed and Spent" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> On 8/2/2018 2:57 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> I'm certainly not trying to be a moderator here, nor do I wish to be >>> one. However, it would be nice to have more food related posts. >>> Thread drift is inevitable and ofen very interesting. However, when so >>> many posts begin as "off topic", it would be nice if the subject always >>> contained "OT:", it would be really easy to filter those out >>> altogether. >>> >> >> >> I concur. Even food related topics should have a meaningful subject line. >> Just plain courtesy. > > Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. > > Cheri > > each participant can change the subject line. Ever thought of that? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 2:11:22 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
.... > Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. > > Cheri Actually, each person who replies (as I am now!) controls where the CONVERSATION goes! See? John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Taxed and Spent" > wrote in message
news ![]() > On 8/3/2018 12:10 PM, Cheri wrote: >> "Taxed and Spent" > wrote in message >> news ![]() >>> On 8/2/2018 2:57 PM, Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>> I'm certainly not trying to be a moderator here, nor do I wish to be >>>> one. However, it would be nice to have more food related posts. >>>> Thread drift is inevitable and ofen very interesting. However, when so >>>> many posts begin as "off topic", it would be nice if the subject always >>>> contained "OT:", it would be really easy to filter those out >>>> altogether. >>>> >>> >>> >>> I concur. Even food related topics should have a meaningful subject >>> line. >>> Just plain courtesy. >> >> Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. >> >> Cheri >> >> > > > each participant can change the subject line. Ever thought of that? Which just takes carries it further which is a total waste of time. Also, you can't dictate what others do with the subject line. Ever thought of that? Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"John Kuthe" > wrote in message
... > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 2:11:22 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote: > ... >> Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. >> >> Cheri > > Actually, each person who replies (as I am now!) controls where the > CONVERSATION goes! > > See? > > John Kuthe... No, you can only control yourself, I might want to take it to somewhere completely different which YOU have no control over. I would say this CONVERSATION is over, but if you carry it on, there's nothing I can do about it. See how that works? Cheri |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 3 Aug 2018 17:43:48 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote: >"John Kuthe" > wrote in message ... >> On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 2:11:22 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote: >> ... >>> Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. >>> >>> Cheri >> >> Actually, each person who replies (as I am now!) controls where the >> CONVERSATION goes! >> >> See? >> >> John Kuthe... > > >No, you can only control yourself, I might want to take it to somewhere >completely different which YOU have no control over. I would say this >CONVERSATION is over, but if you carry it on, there's nothing I can do about >it. See how that works? But you can stop talking when someone disagrees with you. As you are wont. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 8/3/2018 5:41 PM, Cheri wrote:
> "Taxed and Spent" > wrote in message > news ![]() >> On 8/3/2018 12:10 PM, Cheri wrote: >>> "Taxed and Spent" > wrote in message >>> news ![]() >>>>> I'm certainly not trying to be a moderator here, nor do I wish to be >>>>> one. However, it would be nice to have more food related posts. >>>>> Thread drift is inevitable and ofen very interesting. However, when so >>>>> many posts begin as "off topic", it would be nice if the subject always >>>>> contained "OT:", it would be really easy to filter those out >>>>> altogether. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> I concur. Even food related topics should have a meaningful subject >>>> line. >>>> Just plain courtesy. >>> >>> Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. >>> >>> Cheri >>> >>> >> >> >> each participant can change the subject line. Ever thought of that? > > > Which just takes carries it further which is a total waste of time. Also, > you can't dictate what others do with the subject line. Ever thought of > that? > > Cheri > Yes, you can't dictate. But you can point out courteous behavior and hope for the best. Give up much? |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 7:44:58 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote:
> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message > ... > > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 2:11:22 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote: > > ... > >> Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. > >> > >> Cheri > > > > Actually, each person who replies (as I am now!) controls where the > > CONVERSATION goes! > > > > See? > > > > John Kuthe... > > > No, you can only control yourself, I might want to take it to somewhere > completely different which YOU have no control over. I would say this > CONVERSATION is over, but if you carry it on, there's nothing I can do about > it. See how that works? > > Cheri Precisely! Yeah, in Usenet you cannot say "this conversation is over" but HOW MANY TIMES IRL do you SAY that? I'll bet hardly ever. You CAN however CHOOSE not to reply on Usenet. See how that works? :-) John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 11:05:59 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> wrote: >On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 7:44:58 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote: >> "John Kuthe" > wrote in message >> ... >> > On Friday, August 3, 2018 at 2:11:22 PM UTC-5, Cheri wrote: >> > ... >> >> Once a thread is started nobody can control where it goes. Period. >> >> >> >> Cheri >> > >> > Actually, each person who replies (as I am now!) controls where the >> > CONVERSATION goes! >> > >> > See? >> > >> > John Kuthe... >> >> >> No, you can only control yourself, I might want to take it to somewhere >> completely different which YOU have no control over. I would say this >> CONVERSATION is over, but if you carry it on, there's nothing I can do about >> it. See how that works? >> >> Cheri > >Precisely! Yeah, in Usenet you cannot say "this conversation is over" but HOW MANY TIMES IRL do you SAY that? I'll bet hardly ever. Cheri quite often says that to me. She has trouble handling disagreement. Which is when I say to her: "To each their own!" Bring up Trump -who she admires- and see how quickly she'll end the conversation. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:26:40 PM UTC-5, Druce wrote:
> On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 11:05:59 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe .... > >Precisely! Yeah, in Usenet you cannot say "this conversation is over" but HOW MANY TIMES IRL do you SAY that? I'll bet hardly ever. > > Cheri quite often says that to me. She has trouble handling > disagreement. Which is when I say to her: "To each their own!" > > Bring up Trump -who she admires- and see how quickly she'll end the > conversation. Uh, yeah, like Cheri EVER is NEAR YOUR NYM-SHIFTING ASSHOLE? THIS conversation is OVER!! NYM-SHIFTING ASSHOLE! John Kuthe... |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 5 Aug 2018 06:59:14 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe
> wrote: >On Saturday, August 4, 2018 at 1:26:40 PM UTC-5, Druce wrote: >> On Sat, 4 Aug 2018 11:05:59 -0700 (PDT), John Kuthe >... >> >Precisely! Yeah, in Usenet you cannot say "this conversation is over" but HOW MANY TIMES IRL do you SAY that? I'll bet hardly ever. >> >> Cheri quite often says that to me. She has trouble handling >> disagreement. Which is when I say to her: "To each their own!" >> >> Bring up Trump -who she admires- and see how quickly she'll end the >> conversation. > >Uh, yeah, like Cheri EVER is NEAR YOUR NYM-SHIFTING ASSHOLE? Huh? >THIS conversation is OVER!! NYM-SHIFTING ASSHOLE! I have no idea what you're so worked up about, and neither do you. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Moderator needs to take action | General Cooking | |||
ADMINISTRIVIA: Would you like to be a Moderator? | Recipes (moderated) | |||
Australian Moderator? | Winemaking | |||
Moderator - Administrator | General Cooking |