|
Chopped pecans
Bruce wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Mar 2018 15:14:21 -0500, Gary > wrote: > >> Bruce wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 16:30:36 -0500, Gary > wrote: >>> >>>> A bucket of fresh dog poo? I would have looked up a recipe. >>>> "Heck, I'd even eat a turd if it was properly prepared." >>> >>> You often do, at MacDonald's. >> >> Well there ya go. Proof that properly preparing turds can work. >> Look at all their success...restaurants worldwide, etc. >> >> McDonald's sure doesn't give a "turd" about the few that >> constantly bitch about their food. >> >> Example: "I tried one of their hamburgers 20 years ago and I had >> to spit it out." LOL > > I never really minded the taste of their hamburgers or of the turtle > poo they serve with their matchstick fries. I don't like the whole > chain, the damage they do, the industry tortured animals they serve, > the crap they add to their food. > They do it ALL just to make you whinge, truly... |
Chopped pecans
Gary wrote:
> Julie Bove wrote: >> >> "Wayne Boatwright" >>> It's probably safe to say that many here are sorely fed up with you >>> too! There are reasons that there are moderated newsgroups and you >>> are definitely one of those reasons. >> >> Well go to one of those then! > > +1 for sure > Farcebook RFC awaits! |
Chopped pecans
On 2018-03-31 4:14 PM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote: >>> A bucket of fresh dog poo? I would have looked up a recipe. >>> "Heck, I'd even eat a turd if it was properly prepared." >> >> You often do, at MacDonald's. > > Well there ya go. Proof that properly preparing turds can work. > Look at all their success...restaurants worldwide, etc. > > McDonald's sure doesn't give a "turd" about the few that > constantly bitch about their food. > > Example: "I tried one of their hamburgers 20 years ago and I had > to spit it out." LOL That is a bullshit example. Count me among the many who tried McD burgers years ago and was not impressed. I don't care for their burgers or their fries and I remain surprised that they are so many people who actually like it. It would not kill me to eat at McDs. I will admit that on my way south last month we got a really early start and ended up having breakfast at one in PA. I opted for the breakfast burrito. It was edible. It was just some sausage and some scrambled eggs in a wrap. I had not realized when I ordered that you would need at least three of them for a meal. |
Chopped pecans
On 2018-03-31 4:15 PM, Gary wrote:
> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >> >> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You >> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that >> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. > > Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you > should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you > off? Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention. |
Chopped pecans
On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote: >> >> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You >>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that >>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >> >> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen >> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright) > > He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last > sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now. Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there. While she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with her he was probably more like a saint for having put up with her strange ways for so long. |
Chopped pecans
On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote:
> Bruce wrote: >> >> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You >>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that >>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >> >> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen >> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright) > > He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last > sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now. You can't figure out why some guy would leave her? |
Chopped pecans
On 2018-03-31 5:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote: > >> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote: >> >>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or >>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a >>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere? >>> >>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook >>> times. >> >> >> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken. > > Really? I do that all the time. > Not you too? |
Chopped pecans
On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 11:20:06 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote:
> > Really? I do that all the time. I cooked a whole chicken a couple of weeks ago by simmering it in plain water for about 40 minutes. It was perfect. I also roasted a whole chicken by removing the backbone and laying it flat. It was perfect. I've been trying to cook chicken breast by boiling it but they've been a bit on the tough side. It's a problem I'm working on presently. |
Chopped pecans
jmcquown wrote:
> On 3/30/2018 12:40 PM, U.S. Janet B. wrote: > >On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 11:51:35 -0500, Gary > wrote: > > > > > "U.S. Janet B." wrote: > > > > > >>>On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 14:11:23 -0500, Gary > wrote: > > > > > > > > > jmcquown wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Balderdash. > > > > > > > > > > lol! Only OLD ppl still use that word! lol ;) > > > > > You seriously need to sell, get out of the old-ppls sheltered > > > > > neighborhood and move back into the real world while you still > > > > > have a few good years left. hehehe > > > > > > > > just someone who has an extensive vocabulary, reads a lot and > > > > wanted to inject the right amount of disdain into this thread ;) > > > > Janet US > > > > > > I read a lot (every single night) but I usually avoid "big" or > > > rarely used words. That often signals someone just trying to show > > > off to me. I tend to use more current terms. Call me crude but I > > > would have said, "Bullshit." Same definition. ;) > > > > What you consider 'big' words are simply someone else's working > > vocabulary. People generally think, talk and speak they way they > > are,. There is no intent to show off. Others have no way of > > knowing the limitations of your vocabulary. > > Janet US > > > I don't understand what the fuss is about. My correct use of a word? > Am I supposed to dumb down in case someone here doesn't understand? > Sorry, I'm not going to do that. If you have to look up a word or > phrase, do so. Don't accuse me of being a show off because I happen > to have a good vocabulary. > > Jill Don't worry Jill, no one minds any of it. For work, I have pretty 'high falootin' lingo but that's a requirement of the job. |
Chopped pecans
U.S. Janet B. wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2018 10:18:41 -0400, jmcquown > > wrote: > > > On 3/29/2018 3:11 PM, Gary wrote: > >> jmcquown wrote: > > > > > >>> Balderdash. > >> > >> lol! Only OLD ppl still use that word! lol ;) > >> You seriously need to sell, get out of the old-ppls sheltered > >> neighborhood and move back into the real world while you still > >> have a few good years left. hehehe > >> > > Oh I'm sorry, did the word go out of style? Foshizzle! > > > > Jill > > I love hornswoggle but it doesn't apply here :) > Janet US Bit widdershins of current vernacular (grin) |
Chopped pecans
Hank Rogers wrote:
> On 3/31/2018 1:49 PM, Bruce wrote: >> That he's pompous and takes himself too seriously is one thing. But >> he's also plain nasty. > > Says Mr. Snarkopolus! Hiya brother! Good to see yoose again! I havent seen yoose since yoose came home on leave. I remember Yoose seeing ma's giant breasts and trying to hump her. Dad didn't like it and kicked yoose out. Then yoose imported a woman from british honduras with big tits! Lawsy, biggest ones in noo yawk. Yoose go brother! I am glad yoose is back. Do yoose remember when we would go and sit outside the whorehouses in brooklyn and try to get a peek up the wimens skirts? None were as good as maws. And her jewish chicken soup was to die for .... right brother? |
Chopped pecans
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 4:15 PM, Gary wrote: >> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>> >>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You >>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that >>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >> >> Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you >> should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you >> off? > > Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention. > "She"? Wayne is not a "she", you gender bigot. |
Chopped pecans
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote: >> Bruce wrote: >>> >>> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You >>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that >>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >>> >>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen >>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright) >> >> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last >> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now. > > Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there. While > she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with herÂ* he > was probably more like a saint for having put up with her strange ways > for so long. > Why do you always bully women? |
Chopped pecans
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote: >> Bruce wrote: >>> >>> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You >>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that >>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >>> >>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen >>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright) >> >> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last >> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now. > > > You can't figure out why some guy would leave her? > Why hasn't "megatron" dumped your bully butt? |
Chopped pecans
Dave Smith wrote:
> On 2018-03-31 5:19 PM, cshenk wrote: >> Dave Smith wrote: >> >>> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote: >>> >>>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or >>>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a >>>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere? >>>> >>>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook >>>> times. >>> >>> >>> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken. >> >> Really?Â* I do that all the time. >> > > > Not you too? > Better bully her too... |
Chopped pecans
dsi1 wrote:
> On Saturday, March 31, 2018 at 11:20:06 AM UTC-10, cshenk wrote: >> >> Really? I do that all the time. > > I cooked a whole chicken a couple of weeks ago by simmering it in plain water for about 40 minutes. It was perfect. I also roasted a whole chicken by removing the backbone and laying it flat. It was perfect. I've been trying to cook chicken breast by boiling it but they've been a bit on the tough side. It's a problem I'm working on presently. > Sous vide perhaps? |
Chopped pecans
On 3/31/2018 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote: > >> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote: >> >>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or >>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a >>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere? >>> >>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook >>> times. >> >> >> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken. > > Really? I do that all the time. > Bird murderess. |
Chopped pecans
Elm wrote:
>Dave wrote: >>Gary wrote: >>>Wayne wrote: >>>> >>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.* You >>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.* It's no wonder that >>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >>> >>> Now this is not even teasing, just plain mean crap. Perhaps you >>> should go back to the moderated RFC facebook or did they kick you >>> off? >> >> Don't lose any sleep over it. She thrives on the attention. > >"She"? >Wayne is not a "she", you gender bigot. Um, Wayne is a faggIT, IT, IT, IT... you POS, S, S, S! Ahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah ahahahaha. . . . |
Chopped pecans
|
Chopped pecans
Rafe Elm wrote:
> Dave Smith wrote: >> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote: >>> Bruce wrote: >>>> >>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You >>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that >>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >>>> >>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen >>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright) >>> >>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last >>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now. >> >> Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there. >> While she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with >> her he was probably more like a saint for having put up with her >> strange ways for so long. >> > Why do you always bully women? Uh oh ... Julie's kotex porter is here! Rafe, be sure you get it tight. Last time it slipped out. |
Chopped pecans
Hank Rogers wrote:
> Rafe Elm wrote: >> Dave Smith wrote: >>> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote: >>>> Bruce wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here.Â* You >>>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings.Â* It's no wonder that >>>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >>>>> >>>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen >>>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright) >>>> >>>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last >>>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now. >>> >>> Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there. >>> While she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with >>> herÂ* he was probably more like a saint for having put up with her >>> strange ways for so long. >>> >> Why do you always bully women? > > Uh oh ... Julie's kotex porter is here! > > Rafe, be sure you get it tight. Last time it slipped out. > > Hank, do try and pile on her too. |
Chopped pecans
Bruce wrote:
> On 3/31/2018 3:19 PM, cshenk wrote: >> Dave Smith wrote: >> >>> On 2018-03-29 1:21 AM, Julie Bose wrote: >>> >>>>> You do understand that any part of a chicken could be used?Â* Or >>>>> turkey, or pork or whatever?Â* That the 'recipe' is guidance for a >>>>> procedure that can be adapted elsewhere? >>>> >>>> Well, no... Given that white and dark meat have different cook >>>> times. >>> >>> >>> That is why it is impossible to cook an entire chicken. >> >> Really?Â* I do that all the time. >> > Bird murderess. New form of tweeting? |
Chopped pecans
Rafe Elm wrote:
> Hank Rogers wrote: >> Rafe Elm wrote: >>> Dave Smith wrote: >>>> On 2018-03-31 4:18 PM, Gary wrote: >>>>> Bruce wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Wayne Boatwright wrote: >>>>>>> Then perhaps you'd be better off if you stopped postingh here. You >>>>>>> know that you're nothing if not a pain in the ass, pitifully drawing >>>>>>> attention to yourself and ypur shortcomings. It's no wonder that >>>>>>> your husband left you and your daughter is no longer there. >>>>>> >>>>>> "RFC is rife with posts that are either negative or positive, ofen >>>>>> from the same posters" (Wayne Boatwright) >>>>> >>>>> He takes arguments too far, imo. No need for especially that last >>>>> sentence. He has no idea why Julie is alone now. >>>> >>>> Are you kidding. We get a pretty good view of what goes on there. >>>> While she had some people convinced that he had been pretty harsh with >>>> her he was probably more like a saint for having put up with her >>>> strange ways for so long. >>>> >>> Why do you always bully women? >> >> Uh oh ... Julie's kotex porter is here! >> >> Rafe, be sure you get it tight. Last time it slipped out. >> >> > Hank, do try and pile on her too. Nope, I'm saving her for you and my evil twin brother, as he don't like seconds. |
Chopped pecans
Gary wrote:
> Julie Bove wrote: > > > > Bullshit! I will not stand for your subterfuge. This is just > > another one of your whoppers Dave. How dare you sit at your > > computer spewing your back biting repugnance. Your calumniation is > > is disgraceful. I am sorely fed up with your loathsome > > prevaricating. Be off with you! Hie thee to the mucculent > > hinterlands from whence you came! > > lol. Hi Jill! What did you do with Julie? ;) LOL! Had to look up Muculent. It's an English (UK) term for slimey. One that didn't really come over to the USA. |
Chopped pecans
On Sun, 01 Apr 2018 10:54:49 -0500, "cshenk" > wrote:
>Gary wrote: > >> Julie Bove wrote: >> > >> > Bullshit! I will not stand for your subterfuge. This is just >> > another one of your whoppers Dave. How dare you sit at your >> > computer spewing your back biting repugnance. Your calumniation is >> > is disgraceful. I am sorely fed up with your loathsome >> > prevaricating. Be off with you! Hie thee to the mucculent >> > hinterlands from whence you came! >> >> lol. Hi Jill! What did you do with Julie? ;) > >LOL! Had to look up Muculent. It's an English (UK) term for slimey. >One that didn't really come over to the USA. Whereas the English keep going on about it. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:29 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter