On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
wrote:

>
>>Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>policy.
>
>Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.

Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>wrote:
>
>>
>>>Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>policy.
>>
>>Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>
>Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.

What question?

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>>Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>policy.
>>>
>>>Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>
>>Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>
>What question?

Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:49:58 -0400, wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>>policy.
>>>>
>>>>Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>>keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>>your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>>
>>>Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>>
>>What question?
>
>Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.

No. The 'white Australia policy' you're referring to was gradually
dismantled, beginning in the late 1940's and was totally gone by 1973,
'74 or '75 (I forget which year). So not anything like 'fairly
recently'.

And what is your point in raising it anyway? Is this some retarded
competition between nations that you're into? What does it have to do
with the topic at hand?

I'm really starting to be disappointed with you, to be totally honest.

On 18/02/2016 4:02 PM, Je�us wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:49:58 -0400, wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>>> policy.
>>>>>
>>>>> Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>>> keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>>> your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>>>
>>>> Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>>>
>>> What question?
>>
>> Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.
>
> No. The 'white Australia policy' you're referring to was gradually
> dismantled, beginning in the late 1940's and was totally gone by 1973,
> '74 or '75 (I forget which year). So not anything like 'fairly
> recently'.
>
I remember at about that time, someone in one of the eastern states
changed his name to something like "John Keep Australia White Party Smith"
to run in an election and wasn't allowed to put that on the voting slip.

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:25:15 -0700, graham > wrote:

>On 18/02/2016 4:02 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:49:58 -0400, wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>>>> policy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>>>> keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>>>> your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>>>>
>>>> What question?
>>>
>>> Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.
>>
>> No. The 'white Australia policy' you're referring to was gradually
>> dismantled, beginning in the late 1940's and was totally gone by 1973,
>> '74 or '75 (I forget which year). So not anything like 'fairly
>> recently'.
>>
>I remember at about that time, someone in one of the eastern states
>changed his name to something like "John Keep Australia White Party Smith"
>to run in an election and wasn't allowed to put that on the voting slip.

I didn't think it was as far back as 75, know my cousins were agin the
all white policy and we wrote about it at the time. Of course, letter
writing didn't have the immediacy of emails (Those are my
Australian cousins to whom I refer)

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 16:25:15 -0700, graham > wrote:

>On 18/02/2016 4:02 PM, Je?us wrote:
>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:49:58 -0400, wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>>>> policy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>>>> keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>>>> your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>>>>
>>>>> Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>>>>
>>>> What question?
>>>
>>> Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.
>>
>> No. The 'white Australia policy' you're referring to was gradually
>> dismantled, beginning in the late 1940's and was totally gone by 1973,
>> '74 or '75 (I forget which year). So not anything like 'fairly
>> recently'.
>>
>I remember at about that time, someone in one of the eastern states
>changed his name to something like "John Keep Australia White Party Smith"
>to run in an election and wasn't allowed to put that on the voting slip.

Quite possibly, I was only 10 y/o at that time and don't recall it,
but then it was only a minor event because I've never heard of him.

On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:02:10 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:

>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:49:58 -0400, wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>
>>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>>>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>>>policy.
>>>>>
>>>>>Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>>>keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>>>your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>>>
>>>>Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>>>
>>>What question?
>>
>>Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.
>
>No. The 'white Australia policy' you're referring to was gradually
>dismantled, beginning in the late 1940's and was totally gone by 1973,
>'74 or '75 (I forget which year). So not anything like 'fairly
>recently'.
>
>And what is your point in raising it anyway? Is this some retarded
>competition between nations that you're into? What does it have to do
>with the topic at hand?
>
>I'm really starting to be disappointed with you, to be totally honest.


I'm thinking more of your compatriot Bwuce, he is so righteous and
it's so easy to be so when he is removed from the Syrian situation. Is
Australia taking any of them ? (I really don't know)

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:03:34 -0400, wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:02:10 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:49:58 -0400, wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>>>>policy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>>>>keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>>>>your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>>>>
>>>>>Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>>>>
>>>>What question?
>>>
>>>Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.
>>
>>No. The 'white Australia policy' you're referring to was gradually
>>dismantled, beginning in the late 1940's and was totally gone by 1973,
>>'74 or '75 (I forget which year). So not anything like 'fairly
>>recently'.
>>
>>And what is your point in raising it anyway? Is this some retarded
>>competition between nations that you're into? What does it have to do
>>with the topic at hand?
>>
>>I'm really starting to be disappointed with you, to be totally honest.
>
>
>I'm thinking more of your compatriot Bwuce, he is so righteous and
>it's so easy to be so when he is removed from the Syrian situation. Is
>Australia taking any of them ? (I really don't know)

He points out that you're talking nonsense, so you're having a go at
me? What kind of logic is that?

--
Bruce

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 20:03:34 -0400, wrote:

>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 10:02:10 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>
>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 18:49:58 -0400, wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 09:02:04 +1100, Jeßus > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 17:35:00 -0400, wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 07:37:10 +1100, Jeßus >
>>>>>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Seems to me that until quite recently Australia had an 'all white'
>>>>>>>policy.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Oh, I'm *so* upset by your ridiculous comment I haven't been
>>>>>>keeping track of this discussion, but apparently you have a stick up
>>>>>>your arse about... well, who knows what. Have it your way then.
>>>>>
>>>>>Whatever - but you didn't answer the question.
>>>>
>>>>What question?
>>>
>>>Didn't Australia have an 'all white' policy until fairly recently.
>>
>>No. The 'white Australia policy' you're referring to was gradually
>>dismantled, beginning in the late 1940's and was totally gone by 1973,
>>'74 or '75 (I forget which year). So not anything like 'fairly
>>recently'.
>>
>>And what is your point in raising it anyway? Is this some retarded
>>competition between nations that you're into? What does it have to do
>>with the topic at hand?
>>
>>I'm really starting to be disappointed with you, to be totally honest.
>
>
>I'm thinking more of your compatriot Bwuce,

So what does Bruce have to do with me - or Australia in general - to
elicit such a response from you? It doesn't make much sense to me.
Anyway, moving on...

>he is so righteous and
>it's so easy to be so when he is removed from the Syrian situation. Is
>Australia taking any of them ? (I really don't know)

We do have Syrian refugees here but couldn't tell you how many.