Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message
> ...
>> On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 8:20:52 AM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> Gary wrote:
>>> >
>>> >I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971. One of my jobs was to cut
>>> >up the chickens. I cut up a LOT of chickens those few months. We would
>>> >get several crates (12 count each) of whole fresh chickens. Each was
>>> >cut into 9 pieces and bagged.
>>>
>>> Explain "9 pieces".
>>> I either quarter or eighth.
>>> Where does that odd/9th piece come from?
>>> Or does KFC grow three legged chickens?
>>
>> The "breast" is typically cut into 2 pieces, but KFC has a piece that is
>> part of both breast halves with a portion of the back. Have you really
>> never eaten at KFC?
>
> Are you allowed to choose the cut you want?
>
Yes.

"cibola de oro" > wrote in message
...
> Gary wrote:
>> no bitter backbone taste that some claim here.
>
> This is moronville, what the **** did you expect???

I love chicken backs, and never had any kind of bitter backbone taste.

Cheri

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 11:38:16 AM UTC-6, cibola de oro wrote:
> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> > KFC has a piece that is
> > part of both breast halves with a portion of the back.
>
>
> Bullshit LIE.

KFC cuts chickens into 9 pieces. I was mistaken about *how* the
breast/back portion is cut up. There is only one all breast piece,
and there are two that have parts of both breast and back.

http://www.foodmate.nl/uploads/image...cken%20Cut.jpg

--Bryan

Cheri wrote:
>
> "cibola de oro" > wrote in message
> ...
>> Gary wrote:
>>> no bitter backbone taste that some claim here.
>>
>> This is moronville, what the **** did you expect???
>
> I love chicken backs, and never had any kind of bitter backbone taste.
>
> Cheri

It boggles the mind, doesn't it?

No which one of the "I always tell the truth here" bunch said that?

MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 11:38:16 AM UTC-6, cibola de oro wrote:
>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>>> KFC has a piece that is
>>> part of both breast halves with a portion of the back.
>>
>>
>> Bullshit LIE.
>
> KFC cuts chickens into 9 pieces.

KFC serves FULL breasts, period.

> I was mistaken about *how* the
> breast/back portion is cut up. There is only one all breast piece,
> and there are two that have parts of both breast and back.
>
> http://www.foodmate.nl/uploads/image...cken%20Cut.jpg
>
> --Bryan
>
That is NOT a KFC site.


Try again.

Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> Gary wrote:
> >
> >I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971. One of my jobs was to cut
> >up the chickens. I cut up a LOT of chickens those few months. We would
> >get several crates (12 count each) of whole fresh chickens. Each was
> >cut into 9 pieces and bagged.
>
> Explain "9 pieces".
> I either quarter or eighth.
> Where does that odd/9th piece come from?
> Or does KFC grow three legged chickens?

2 wings
2 thighs
2 drums
2 breasts
1 keel....this is the tip of the breast before it was cut in half.
It's pure breast meat with some cartilage in the middle.

Don't know if they still do it that way but they did back then.

MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>
> On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 8:20:52 AM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> > Gary wrote:
> > >
> > >I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971. One of my jobs was to cut
> > >up the chickens. I cut up a LOT of chickens those few months. We would
> > >get several crates (12 count each) of whole fresh chickens. Each was
> > >cut into 9 pieces and bagged.
> >
> > Explain "9 pieces".
> > I either quarter or eighth.
> > Where does that odd/9th piece come from?
> > Or does KFC grow three legged chickens?
>
> The "breast" is typically cut into 2 pieces, but KFC has a piece that is
> part of both breast halves with a portion of the back. Have you really
> never eaten at KFC?

No portion of the back. The keel is the tip of the breast cut off
before cutting the breast in half...right down the backbone.

Gary wrote:
> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>>
>> On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 8:20:52 AM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971. One of my jobs was to cut
>>>> up the chickens. I cut up a LOT of chickens those few months. We would
>>>> get several crates (12 count each) of whole fresh chickens. Each was
>>>> cut into 9 pieces and bagged.
>>>
>>> Explain "9 pieces".
>>> I either quarter or eighth.
>>> Where does that odd/9th piece come from?
>>> Or does KFC grow three legged chickens?
>>
>> The "breast" is typically cut into 2 pieces, but KFC has a piece that is
>> part of both breast halves with a portion of the back. Have you really
>> never eaten at KFC?
>
> No portion of the back.

STOP THE ****ING LIES!

> The keel is the tip of the breast cut off

STOP THE ****ING LIES!


There is no "9 piece" cut:

http://www.kfc.com/menu/chicken/original-recipe

ENJOY OUR WORLD-FAMOUS CHICKEN IN A VARIETY OF WAYS:
8pc. Bucket Meal: 8pc. Chicken, 2 Large Sides, 4 Biscuits (Feeds 4+)
12pc. Bucket Meal: 12pc. Chicken, 3 Large Sides, 6 Biscuits (Feeds 6+)
16pc. Bucket Meal: 16pc. Chicken, 4 Large Sides, 8 Biscuits (Feeds 8+)

http://www.kfc.com/nutrition/full-nutrition-guide

ORIGINAL RECIPE CHICKEN
Original Recipe® Chicken Drumstick
Original Recipe® Chicken Thigh
Original Recipe® Chicken Whole Wing4




PERIOD!


End of ****ing "9 piece cut" lies!

NOW SHUT THE **** UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 9:41:52 AM UTC-6, Ophelia wrote:
> "MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 8:20:52 AM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >> Gary wrote:
> >> >
> >> >I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971. One of my jobs was to cut
> >> >up the chickens. I cut up a LOT of chickens those few months. We would
> >> >get several crates (12 count each) of whole fresh chickens. Each was
> >> >cut into 9 pieces and bagged.
> >>
> >> Explain "9 pieces".
> >> I either quarter or eighth.
> >> Where does that odd/9th piece come from?
> >> Or does KFC grow three legged chickens?
> >
> > The "breast" is typically cut into 2 pieces, but KFC has a piece that is
> > part of both breast halves with a portion of the back. Have you really
> > never eaten at KFC?
>
> Are you allowed to choose the cut you want?
>
These days you can, but used to be they came in assortments called buckets
and barrels.
>

https://news.google.com/newspapers?n...,4510825&hl=en

--Bryan

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 3:49:16 AM UTC-10, sf wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 14:56:58 -0800 (PST), dsi1 <>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm guessing that the mega-franchise chicken industry doesn't have time to make stock nor do they want to deal with processing backbones. I suppose the chicken processing factory could make dried chicken stock powder as a secondary product but my guess is that the numbers just don't add up.
> >
> > My understanding is that KFC makes their gravy from a mix into which the dregs from the fryer is added. You just know that gonna make your taste buds go yippie!
>
> I sincerely doubt that, but if they did - how would adding the solid
> bits from the fryer be any different from the way a lot of Americans
> make their gravy after frying pork or chicken? Also, how is KFC using
> a powdered mix to start their gravy any worse than the way people (and
> some even post here) use Better than Bouillon to start a gravy? It's
> just done on a larger scale.
>
> --
>
> sf

I buy gravy mix in the big containers at Costco. Hawaiians eat a lot more gravy than regular folks. OTOH, one has to only examine KFC's gravy to confirm that they're using that gritty stuff on the bottom of their fry oil. There's fine speckled material in there. One has to only taste their gravy to see it's not very good. There's a certain burnt bitterness to it that comes from the dregs. OTOH, maybe it's coming from chicken backbones.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:28:45 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:18:10 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >
> >> sf wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:21:52 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> >>>>> The best thing at McD's
> >>>>> is the fruit & yogurt parfaits.
> >>>>
> >>>> NO.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's the fries, period.
> >>>
> >>> Agree, in spite of them not being fried in beef fat anymore. Now I'm
> >>> wondering if they'll switch back.
> >>>
> >>
> >> No way.
> >>
> >> It's cheaper to do it as they do now.
> >
> > I don't know about cheaper, but they'd lose the vegan, vegetarian
> > crowd.
> >
>
>
> Well there's less than 1% of their bidness!

They want to hang on to every last customer. 1% is still customers.

--

sf

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 3:50:00 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> Ophelia wrote:
> > I always buy whole chickens and
> > cut them up myself.
>
> When I buy whole chickens, I usually cook them whole with stuffing OR,
> more often, I'll split them right down the middle to make 2 equal
> halves. Cook one half that day and freeze the other half for another
> time. Remember though, this is just for one person.

Typically, people won't cut a chicken in half like that. There's nothing wrong with doing that but most people don't have a Chinese cleaver to be able to split the backbone down the middle.

Here's how regular folk cut up whole chicken. They should make being able to cut up a whole chicken a requirement for graduating high school. As far as I know, nobody will cut up their chicken like KFC does - thank god!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xRAFMFc-z-Y

>
> Dsil guessed (lol):
> > > My understanding is that KFC makes their gravy from a mix into which the
> > > dregs from the fryer is added. You just know that gonna make your taste
> > > buds go yippie!
> >
> > Errr ...lovely ...
>
> I never made the gravy when I worked there. They either had premade or
> maybe a mix. One thing I do know is that they never included "the
> dregs" from the cooked chicken. I ate most of those. heheh
>
> The dregs are nothing but the bits of seasoned flour that fall off
> when you dump the cooked chicken onto the rack to drain. While working
> there, I snacked on those...open a soft warm dinner roll and put a
> pile of them in there. yum.

You got your crispy pieces and then you have that fine sludge on the bottom of the fryer. Try spreading some of that on a dinner roll. yum.

>
> That said, even though they never put those little bits into the
> gravy, imo it would have made even better gravy.
>
>

On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 2:58:32 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
> >
> > On Sunday, January 17, 2016 at 3:23:58 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> > > dsi1 wrote:
> > > >
> > > > KFC has changed in a most fundamental and awful way - The way they cut
> > > > up the chicken, while fast, and cost-effective, tends to make eating
> > > > franchise fried chicken an unpleasant experience.
> > >
> > > Explain please? :-o
> >
> > These days the chicken is cut up to include the backbone in the thigh and breast portions. It's not how anybody would cut up a chicken at home - unless you were some kind of demented, sadistic, cook. The backbone on a cut up chicken is usually used to make stock. It is not presented to the eater to mull over.
>
> That's the way they used to do it too.
>
> Again, I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971. One of my jobs was to cut
> up the chickens. I cut up a LOT of chickens those few months. We would
> get several crates (12 count each) of whole fresh chickens. Each was
> cut into 9 pieces and bagged. Each bag contained 2 chickens - 18
> pieces.
>
> The entire chicken was used, including backbones. We sawed those boys
> right down the center of the backbones. That's the way it was done and
> no bitter backbone taste that some claim here.
>

That's not the way it was done here when I was a kid - thank god.

> When we cooked a "batch" we used 6 large pressure cookers (not a
> pressure fryer that they use today). Each pressure cooker did one bag
> (18 pieces). So one batch cooked 108 pieces.

A pressure fryer is a pressure cooker but a pressure cooker is not a pressure fryer. A pressure cooker would use water and steam to cook. A pressure fryer uses oil.

KFC uses a process where a large amount of chicken is introduced into the fryer which causes a rapid drop in temperature. The chicken is literally boiled in oil. This is desireable because otherwise the chicken would be too dark if cooked at a high temperature. The temperature is allowed to build up and the chicken ends up with frying at a high temperature.

My guess is that the pressurized vessel suppresses the amount of water lost as steam. It works great but the fact that it's impractical to do this at home is probably the reason for KFC's success.

>
> Back then too, it was only "original recipe." Mashed potatoes and
> gravy. Coleslaw. Soft, warmed dinner rolls (not biscuits). Small
> desserts and whole pies were also offered but we didn't make those.

There were no desserts at KFC when I was a kid - there were no backbones either. A most fair tradeoff!

"MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message
...
> On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 9:41:52 AM UTC-6, Ophelia wrote:
>> "MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> > On Monday, January 18, 2016 at 8:20:52 AM UTC-6, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >> Gary wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> >I worked at a KFC the summer of 1971. One of my jobs was to cut
>> >> >up the chickens. I cut up a LOT of chickens those few months. We
>> >> >would
>> >> >get several crates (12 count each) of whole fresh chickens. Each was
>> >> >cut into 9 pieces and bagged.
>> >>
>> >> Explain "9 pieces".
>> >> I either quarter or eighth.
>> >> Where does that odd/9th piece come from?
>> >> Or does KFC grow three legged chickens?
>> >
>> > The "breast" is typically cut into 2 pieces, but KFC has a piece that
>> > is
>> > part of both breast halves with a portion of the back. Have you really
>> > never eaten at KFC?
>>
>> Are you allowed to choose the cut you want?
>>
> These days you can, but used to be they came in assortments called buckets
> and barrels.
>>
>
> https://news.google.com/newspapers?n...,4510825&hl=en
>

OK, thanks. And I suspect depending on the cut ... the price?


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

sf wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:28:45 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:18:10 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>>>
>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:21:52 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>>>>>>> The best thing at McD's
>>>>>>> is the fruit & yogurt parfaits.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> NO.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's the fries, period.
>>>>>
>>>>> Agree, in spite of them not being fried in beef fat anymore. Now I'm
>>>>> wondering if they'll switch back.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No way.
>>>>
>>>> It's cheaper to do it as they do now.
>>>
>>> I don't know about cheaper, but they'd lose the vegan, vegetarian
>>> crowd.
>>>
>>
>>
>> Well there's less than 1% of their bidness!
>
> They want to hang on to every last customer. 1% is still customers.
>
Not at the expense of the 99%.

MisterDiddyWahDidy wrote:
>cibola de oro wrote:
>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>> >
>> > KFC has a piece that is part of both
>> > breast halves with a portion of the back.
>>
>> Bullshit LIE.
>
>KFC cuts chickens into 9 pieces. I was mistaken about *how* the
>breast/back portion is cut up. There is only one all breast piece,
>and there are two that have parts of both breast and back.
>
>http://www.foodmate.nl/uploads/image...cken%20Cut.jpg

You're ignoreant of avian anatomy.

That upper most piece in the picture is lopped off of both breast
pieces before they are separated... no back involved. contains all
that gristle too... I call that cheating. That bird was not properly
gutted, its organs and blood clots are still there and they left all
the back bone, they didn't pull out the rib bones either, they even
left all those globs of fat. ik They cover it with thick breading to
make the fast food imbeciles think they got a lot of food for their
money, but it's mostly high cholesterol fat and carbs.

I went to KFC once, more than 40 years ago... it's the most disgusting
chicken I've ever seen and it tastes awful... I couldn't take more
than one bite and spit it out.... under that heavy breading is all RAW
skin. Blech! If you toss all that breading, raw skin, and bone
there's very little edible chicken. I don't like chicken breaded over
its skin because the skin is therefore always RAW, that's why I don't
like southern fried. I like chicken skin but it has to be CRISP, no
breading. If I wanted bread and grease I'd order a chicken sandwich
super heavy on the mayo. KFC prices are sky high for cheapo food
(they charge nearly $20 for a dollar worth of chicken. people are
buying cardboard buckets), I always considered KFC the biggest rip off
in the fast food industry... I don't consider a bucket of crusted
blubber edible. Chicken is probably the least expensive animal
protein at the market and it's extremely easy to prepare... I can buy
a roasting chicken for less than a dollar a pound, often on sale at
79¢/lb. When I feel like eating chicken I prepare and cook my own...
I can gorge on that $5 roasting chicken 3-4 days, with plenty for my
indoor cats and lots of drippings and giblets for my outdoor cats...
even the crows enjoy the parts we don't want like the fat trimmings
and 'last over the fence' (ass). Nothing wasted, the carcass goes out
in my yard under a tree and some hungry critter survives a frigid
night. KFC should be ashamed of themselves for ripping people off and
wasting food... the colonel belongs in poultry prison.

On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:30:44 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

> sf wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:28:45 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >
> >> sf wrote:
> >>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:18:10 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> sf wrote:
> >>>>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:21:52 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
> >>>>>>> The best thing at McD's
> >>>>>>> is the fruit & yogurt parfaits.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> NO.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> It's the fries, period.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Agree, in spite of them not being fried in beef fat anymore. Now I'm
> >>>>> wondering if they'll switch back.
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> No way.
> >>>>
> >>>> It's cheaper to do it as they do now.
> >>>
> >>> I don't know about cheaper, but they'd lose the vegan, vegetarian
> >>> crowd.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> Well there's less than 1% their bidness!
> >
> > They want to hang on to every last customer. 1% is still customers.
> >
> Not at the expense of the 99%.

What expense? The 99% love their beef flavored fries and you can only
imagine how much better they would be if it was real beef fat. I
certainly remember noticing the difference when they switched *from*
beef fat.

--

sf

sf wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 15:30:44 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> sf wrote:
>>> On Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:28:45 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>>>
>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 22:18:10 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> sf wrote:
>>>>>>> On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 15:21:52 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> MisterDiddyWahDiddy wrote:
>>>>>>>>> The best thing at McD's
>>>>>>>>> is the fruit & yogurt parfaits.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> NO.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the fries, period.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agree, in spite of them not being fried in beef fat anymore. Now I'm
>>>>>>> wondering if they'll switch back.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> No way.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It's cheaper to do it as they do now.
>>>>>
>>>>> I don't know about cheaper, but they'd lose the vegan, vegetarian
>>>>> crowd.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Well there's less than 1% their bidness!
>>>
>>> They want to hang on to every last customer. 1% is still customers.
>>>
>> Not at the expense of the 99%.
>
> What expense? The 99% love their beef flavored fries and you can only
> imagine how much better they would be if it was real beef fat. I
> certainly remember noticing the difference when they switched *from*
> beef fat.
>

I must be one of the few who didn't think it was that big a deal,
taste-wise.

They are still excellent.

In article >, Gary > wrote:

> 2 wings
> 2 thighs
> 2 drums
> 2 breasts
> 1 keel....this is the tip of the breast before it was cut in half.
> It's pure breast meat with some cartilage in the middle.
>
> Don't know if they still do it that way but they did back then.

My mom cut up chicken that way. I don't know why I don't. I'm going to
find out why I quit doing it. We didn't call the ninth piece the keel
piece; we called it the wishbone piece. The "whole" breast contains the
keel which runs from just back of the neck to the end of carcass bones
on the breast side of the chicken with the wishbone on the front of the
breast. One side of the breast always contains the keel. The other part
doesn't.
I know exactly what you're talking about. The next time I butcher a
whole fryer, I'll find out why I quit doing it. I think it's because
that wishbone piece used to be significant when chickens lived longer
and is not quite a portion now.
2 cents

leo

Leonard Blaisdell wrote:
>Gary wrote:
>
>> 2 wings
>> 2 thighs
>> 2 drums
>> 2 breasts
>> 1 keel....this is the tip of the breast before it was cut in half.
>> It's pure breast meat with some cartilage in the middle.
>>
>> Don't know if they still do it that way but they did back then.
>
>My mom cut up chicken that way. I don't know why I don't. I'm going to
>find out why I quit doing it. We didn't call the ninth piece the keel
>piece; we called it the wishbone piece. The "whole" breast contains the
>keel which runs from just back of the neck to the end of carcass bones
>on the breast side of the chicken with the wishbone on the front of the
>breast. One side of the breast always contains the keel. The other part
>doesn't.
>I know exactly what you're talking about. The next time I butcher a
>whole fryer, I'll find out why I quit doing it. I think it's because
>that wishbone piece used to be significant when chickens lived longer
>and is not quite a portion now.
>2 cents

About half the time I quarter a chicken, two breast halves with wings
attached and two thighs with legs attached. The other times I cut a
chicken into eighths, separating the legs from the thighs makes four
pieces. Then I halve each breast half leaving the wings attached (I
rarely separate the wings, instead I tuck the wing tips under). I
also carefully remove the back bone (spine) so as not to lose muscle
meat and for easier eating I also extract all the rib bones, easy to
grip with a paper towel, they yank right out. I remove all blood
clots and any organ bits and pare away extraneoous fat/skin and rinse
well... all those scraps feed crows, nothing wasted... crows think
it's road kill and so do I. I've been served chicken at other
people's homes and restaurants where there was no attempt made at
proper preparation that it was so unpalatable I couldn't eat it...
often even some pin feathers remain, blech. When a restaurant serves
me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.

On 1/22/2016 7:40 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> I quarter a chicken,
**** off you mincing little New Yawk asslicker!

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> About half the time I quarter a chicken

So ****ing what!

On 1/22/2016 7:40 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> When a restaurant serves
> me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.

Nice trick to walk out on your bill, you cheap old fart!

Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> I've been served chicken at other
> people's homes and restaurants where there was no attempt made at
> proper preparation that it was so unpalatable I couldn't eat it...
> often even some pin feathers remain, blech. When a restaurant serves
> me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.

You sound like a finicky cat with your eating habits.

On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 2:16:24 PM UTC-6, Cheri wrote:
> "MisterDiddyWahDiddy" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Saturday, January 16, 2016 at 9:13:20 AM UTC-6, Gary wrote:
> >> barbie gee wrote:
> >> >
> >> > but the KFC "Original Recipe" has changed, and tastes nothing like it
> >> > did
> >> > 40 years ago. KFC is not as good as it used to be.
> >>
> >> How can you possibly compare it today from your failing memory of 40
> >> years ago? Seriously...the only real way to compare is side by side
> >> comparison.
> >>
> >> I bought some about a year ago and I loved it. They do use a
> >> different oil and they use pressure fryers rather than the old
> >> pressure cookers. That said, I loved what I got. As far as I'm
> >> concerned (and can remember), the original recipe is just as good as
> >> it ever was.
> >
> > People are ALWAYS saying that about stuff from their childhoods. I
> > get on a local nostalgia page, and it's full of this-or-that was THE
> > BEST. Sometimes I feel like replying, "Yeah, that why they went out
> > of business," but heck, I'd be writing that every week about something.
> > --Bryan
>
> You mean like YOU do with your raves about the food YOU think is best, while
> calling others choices crap, YOU mean like that? Dullard.
>
> Cheri

Yep, all symptoms of Bryan's probable Narcissistic Personality Disorder!!

Me! Me! Me! :-(


John Kuthe...

On Sunday, January 24, 2016 at 5:56:46 AM UTC-10, Gary wrote:
> Brooklyn1 wrote:
> >
> > I've been served chicken at other
> > people's homes and restaurants where there was no attempt made at
> > proper preparation that it was so unpalatable I couldn't eat it...
> > often even some pin feathers remain, blech. When a restaurant serves
> > me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.
>
> You sound like a finicky cat with your eating habits.

That's not too surprising. I don't have much use for cats and I eat like a dog - grateful for whatever I can get.

dsi1 wrote:
>Gary wrote:
>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> >
>> > I've been served chicken at other
>> > people's homes and restaurants where there was no attempt made at
>> > proper preparation that it was so unpalatable I couldn't eat it...
>> > often even some pin feathers remain, blech. When a restaurant serves
>> > me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.
>>
>> You sound like a finicky cat with your eating habits.

Being served chicken with its spine attached is like being served an
omelet with cracked shells in it, served over easys garnished with a
curly pubic hair.

>I don't have much use for cats and I eat like a dog.

Yeah, a TIAD Mutt that badly needs bathing. At least cats are clean,
they constantly groom themselves and exhibit the class to bury their
poop, unlike dogs who eat their poop and other dog's poop too... dogs
will dig up cat poop and eat that too... dogs exhibit the epitomy of
TIAD, literally! LOL Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.

On 1/25/2016 10:06 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
>> Gary wrote:
>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've been served chicken at other
>>>> people's homes and restaurants where there was no attempt made at
>>>> proper preparation that it was so unpalatable I couldn't eat it...
>>>> often even some pin feathers remain, blech. When a restaurant serves
>>>> me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.
>>>
>>> You sound like a finicky cat with your eating habits.
>
> Being served chicken with its spine attached is like being served an
> omelet with cracked shells in it, served over easys garnished with a
> curly pubic hair.
>
>> I don't have much use for cats and I eat like a dog.
>
> Yeah, a TIAD Mutt that badly needs bathing. At least cats are clean,
> they constantly groom themselves and exhibit the class to bury their
> poop, unlike dogs who eat their poop and other dog's poop too... dogs
> will dig up cat poop and eat that too... dogs exhibit the epitomy of
> TIAD, literally! LOL Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>

Nope, I still don't have much use for a cat. Sorry.

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:27:16 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:

>On 1/25/2016 10:06 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>> dsi1 wrote:
>>> Gary wrote:
>>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> I've been served chicken at other
>>>>> people's homes and restaurants where there was no attempt made at
>>>>> proper preparation that it was so unpalatable I couldn't eat it...
>>>>> often even some pin feathers remain, blech. When a restaurant serves
>>>>> me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.
>>>>
>>>> You sound like a finicky cat with your eating habits.
>>
>> Being served chicken with its spine attached is like being served an
>> omelet with cracked shells in it, served over easys garnished with a
>> curly pubic hair.
>>
>>> I don't have much use for cats and I eat like a dog.
>>
>> Yeah, a TIAD Mutt that badly needs bathing. At least cats are clean,
>> they constantly groom themselves and exhibit the class to bury their
>> poop, unlike dogs who eat their poop and other dog's poop too... dogs
>> will dig up cat poop and eat that too... dogs exhibit the epitomy of
>> TIAD, literally! LOL Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>
>
>Nope, I still don't have much use for a cat. Sorry.

Figures you've never had any pussy, being a faggot.

On 1/25/2016 11:31 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:27:16 -1000, dsi1 > wrote:
>
>> On 1/25/2016 10:06 AM, Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>> Gary wrote:
>>>>> Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I've been served chicken at other
>>>>>> people's homes and restaurants where there was no attempt made at
>>>>>> proper preparation that it was so unpalatable I couldn't eat it...
>>>>>> often even some pin feathers remain, blech. When a restaurant serves
>>>>>> me chicken with the backbone attached I send it back and leave.
>>>>>
>>>>> You sound like a finicky cat with your eating habits.
>>>
>>> Being served chicken with its spine attached is like being served an
>>> omelet with cracked shells in it, served over easys garnished with a
>>> curly pubic hair.
>>>
>>>> I don't have much use for cats and I eat like a dog.
>>>
>>> Yeah, a TIAD Mutt that badly needs bathing. At least cats are clean,
>>> they constantly groom themselves and exhibit the class to bury their
>>> poop, unlike dogs who eat their poop and other dog's poop too... dogs
>>> will dig up cat poop and eat that too... dogs exhibit the epitomy of
>>> TIAD, literally! LOL Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>>
>>
>> Nope, I still don't have much use for a cat. Sorry.
>
> Figures you've never had any pussy, being a faggot.
>

Yoose supposed to make yer statement and move on. Get movin'!

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
> wrote:
snip

Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.

Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
feet. They mark all the time
Janet US

On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
> > wrote:
> snip
>
> Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>
> Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
> feet. They mark all the time
> Janet US
>

I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself on us
when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect that
was his plan from day one.

On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-7, dsi1 wrote:
> On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
> > > wrote:
> > snip
> >
> > Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
> >> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
> >
> > Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
> > feet. They mark all the time
> > Janet US
> >
>
> I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
> appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself on us
> when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
> that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
> the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect that
> was his plan from day one.

Yes, they are cunning that way.
-----

On 1/25/2016 2:59 PM, Roy wrote:
> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-7, dsi1 wrote:
>> On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>> > wrote:
>>> snip
>>>
>>> Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>>>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>>
>>> Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
>>> feet. They mark all the time
>>> Janet US
>>>
>>
>> I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
>> appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself on us
>> when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
>> that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
>> the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect that
>> was his plan from day one.
>
> Yes, they are cunning that way.
> -----
>

The highest level of serving man any cat could attain would be as a
autonomous killing machine but my cat won't kill a damn thing. He just
sits there and watches as spiders and roaches parade in front of him as
we point and yell "kill it, kill it!" Mostly, he's a drain on our
resources. My wife has to get that premium cat food but if it were up to
me, he'd get the cheapest bag of crap I could find!

dsi1 wrote:
> On 1/25/2016 2:59 PM, Roy wrote:
>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-7, dsi1 wrote:
>>> On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>>> > wrote:
>>>> snip
>>>>
>>>> Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>>>>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>>>
>>>> Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
>>>> feet. They mark all the time
>>>> Janet US
>>>>
>>>
>>> I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
>>> appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself on us
>>> when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
>>> that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
>>> the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect that
>>> was his plan from day one.
>>
>> Yes, they are cunning that way.
>> -----
>>
>
> The highest level of serving man any cat could attain would be as a
> autonomous killing machine but my cat won't kill a damn thing. He just
> sits there and watches as spiders and roaches parade in front of him as
> we point and yell "kill it, kill it!" Mostly, he's a drain on our
> resources. My wife has to get that premium cat food but if it were up to
> me, he'd get the cheapest bag of crap I could find!

LOL!

Wal Mart it is then!

On 1/25/2016 4:09 PM, cibola de oro wrote:
> dsi1 wrote:
>> On 1/25/2016 2:59 PM, Roy wrote:
>>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-7, dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>> snip
>>>>>
>>>>> Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>>>>>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
>>>>> feet. They mark all the time
>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
>>>> appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself
>>>> on us
>>>> when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
>>>> that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
>>>> the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect that
>>>> was his plan from day one.
>>>
>>> Yes, they are cunning that way.
>>> -----
>>>
>>
>> The highest level of serving man any cat could attain would be as a
>> autonomous killing machine but my cat won't kill a damn thing. He just
>> sits there and watches as spiders and roaches parade in front of him as
>> we point and yell "kill it, kill it!" Mostly, he's a drain on our
>> resources. My wife has to get that premium cat food but if it were up to
>> me, he'd get the cheapest bag of crap I could find!
>
> LOL!
>
> Wal Mart it is then!

That second cheapest cat food mind tricks won't work on me!

dsi1 wrote:
> On 1/25/2016 4:09 PM, cibola de oro wrote:
>> dsi1 wrote:
>>> On 1/25/2016 2:59 PM, Roy wrote:
>>>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-7, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>> On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>> snip
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>>>>>>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
>>>>>> feet. They mark all the time
>>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
>>>>> appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself
>>>>> on us
>>>>> when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
>>>>> that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
>>>>> the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect
>>>>> that
>>>>> was his plan from day one.
>>>>
>>>> Yes, they are cunning that way.
>>>> -----
>>>>
>>>
>>> The highest level of serving man any cat could attain would be as a
>>> autonomous killing machine but my cat won't kill a damn thing. He just
>>> sits there and watches as spiders and roaches parade in front of him as
>>> we point and yell "kill it, kill it!" Mostly, he's a drain on our
>>> resources. My wife has to get that premium cat food but if it were up to
>>> me, he'd get the cheapest bag of crap I could find!
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> Wal Mart it is then!
>
> That second cheapest cat food mind tricks won't work on me!

LOL!

OK then, I leave you with Mike's pigeons and lotsa feathers...

On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:41:50 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:

>dsi1 wrote:
>> On 1/25/2016 4:09 PM, cibola de oro wrote:
>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>> On 1/25/2016 2:59 PM, Roy wrote:
>>>>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-7, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>> On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>> snip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>>>>>>>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
>>>>>>> feet. They mark all the time
>>>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
>>>>>> appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself
>>>>>> on us
>>>>>> when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
>>>>>> that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
>>>>>> the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect
>>>>>> that
>>>>>> was his plan from day one.
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, they are cunning that way.
>>>>> -----
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The highest level of serving man any cat could attain would be as a
>>>> autonomous killing machine but my cat won't kill a damn thing. He just
>>>> sits there and watches as spiders and roaches parade in front of him as
>>>> we point and yell "kill it, kill it!" Mostly, he's a drain on our
>>>> resources. My wife has to get that premium cat food but if it were up to
>>>> me, he'd get the cheapest bag of crap I could find!
>>>
>>> LOL!
>>>
>>> Wal Mart it is then!
>>
>> That second cheapest cat food mind tricks won't work on me!
>
>LOL!
>
>OK then, I leave you with Mike's pigeons and lotsa feathers...

Trim your posts, you disgusting filthy POS!

Brooklyn1 wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:41:50 -0700, cibola de oro > wrote:
>
>> dsi1 wrote:
>>> On 1/25/2016 4:09 PM, cibola de oro wrote:
>>>> dsi1 wrote:
>>>>> On 1/25/2016 2:59 PM, Roy wrote:
>>>>>> On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 4:54:44 PM UTC-7, dsi1 wrote:
>>>>>>> On 1/25/2016 1:29 PM, Janet B wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Mon, 25 Jan 2016 15:06:08 -0500, Brooklyn1
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>> snip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Leaving no scent is a major feline survival
>>>>>>>>> skill. Dogs wouldn't last a night in the woods with how they stink.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cats have scent glands in many places on their body, especially their
>>>>>>>> feet. They mark all the time
>>>>>>>> Janet US
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll rub the side of my cat's cheek with the back of my fingers to
>>>>>>> appease his scent laying nature. He's always trying to rub himself
>>>>>>> on us
>>>>>>> when we get home or wake up and emerge from our room. The trouble is
>>>>>>> that it's while we're trying to get down the stairs or walking around
>>>>>>> the house. One of these days, he's gonna kill one of us. I suspect
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> was his plan from day one.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, they are cunning that way.
>>>>>> -----
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The highest level of serving man any cat could attain would be as a
>>>>> autonomous killing machine but my cat won't kill a damn thing. He just
>>>>> sits there and watches as spiders and roaches parade in front of him as
>>>>> we point and yell "kill it, kill it!" Mostly, he's a drain on our
>>>>> resources. My wife has to get that premium cat food but if it were up to
>>>>> me, he'd get the cheapest bag of crap I could find!
>>>>
>>>> LOL!
>>>>
>>>> Wal Mart it is then!
>>>
>>> That second cheapest cat food mind tricks won't work on me!
>>
>> LOL!
>>
>> OK then, I leave you with Mike's pigeons and lotsa feathers...
>
> Trim your posts, you disgusting filthy POS!
>

Eat my shorts, OLD man.

I kick trash like you for grins.

On 1/12/2016 4:20 PM, dsi1 wrote:
> On 1/12/2016 2:07 PM, Cheri wrote:
>>
>> "dsi1" > wrote in message
>> ...
>> On Tuesday, January 12, 2016 at 10:25:22 AM UTC-10,
>> wrote:
>>> Warning: Harsh language follows.
>>>
>>> http://www.refugees.bratfree.com/read.php?2,399833
>>>
>>> First post (it's a short thread):
>>>
>>> Christhead
>>> "There was a kfc ad on facebook for the $20 family fill-up. I'm not
>>> sure what this entails but I supposed it's enough slop to feed a
>>> typical famblee of four. Cue breeders bitching in the comments about
>>> how this is false advertising because the family fill-up does not fill
>>> up THEIR famblees. Most of the breeders commenting state they have
>>> families of six, which could be four kids with two parents or five
>>> kids and a single moo or duh. Some people have commented telling them
>>> to buy two fill-ups, but the breeders won't have that and seem to
>>> expect kfc to beef up their offer (but not the price) to satisfy these
>>> piglets. So far nobody has commented that maybe if they don't want to
>>> have to buy two buckets for a total of $40 they shouldn't have had so
>>> many brats."
>>>
>>> mumofsixbirds
>>> "How is it the restaurant's fault that you have so many brats that one
>>> slop bucket isn't going to feed your entire famblee? THIS is what
>>> happens when businesses pander to breeders. It is NEVER good enough
>>> for the breeders, and they will always find something to become
>>> outraged about. Personally, I think it's because their lives are in
>>> the ------- and they need something to bitch about."
>>>
>>> Etc.
>>>
>>>
>>> Lenona.
>>
>> What's really happening is people whining about their inability to
>> reproduce. That's sad.
>>
>> Or at least live and let live, it's about choices and some of the
>> childfree don't factor choices in without a bunch of name calling.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> I believe that "breeders" is a term mostly used by *******s to describe
> straight people. Please don't hold me to that because I'm no expert in
> these things.

It's used by all kinds of misanthropes, not just carpet-munchers. The
earlier poster is correct that the "childfree" grunge tend to use the
term "breeders" a lot. There's a lot of childfree "tells" in the post.