Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!

http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:

> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>
>
You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.

--

sf

On 16/12/2015 10:09 AM, sf wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>
>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>
>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>
>>
> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>
The opposite, I think!

--

On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>
>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>
>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>
>>
> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.

I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.

--
Bruce

On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 12:02:12 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
> >
> >> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
> >>
> >> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
> >>
> >>
> > You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>
> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>
> --
> Bruce

Better than an Aussie who speaks like a Brit with his brains beat out.
====

Roy wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 12:02:12 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>
>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>
> Better than an Aussie who speaks like a Brit with his brains beat out.
> ====
>

Dang roy boy, you gonna go after him???

On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>
>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>
>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>
>>>
>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>
> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>
Read the ****ing article and comment on that!

--

On 17/12/2015 06:57 graham wrote:

> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>
>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>
> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!

I don't eat meat because I care for animals. One article about
greenhouse emissions isn't going to change that. I can probably find 100
articles that explain how bad cattle is for the environment.

--
Bruce

graham wrote:
> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>
>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>
> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>

Go eat some ****ing bacon, greenhouse boy!

Bruce wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 06:57 graham wrote:
>
>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>
>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>
>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>
> I don't eat meat because I care for animals.

But do THEY care for you?

A Croc would have you for a snack if need be.

> One article about
> greenhouse emissions isn't going to change that. I can probably find 100
> articles that explain how bad cattle is for the environment.

Or more, so?

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:

>On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>
>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>
>>>>
>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>
>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>
>Read the ****ing article and comment on that!

Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.

On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>
>>On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>
>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>
>>Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>
> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.

I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.

--
Bruce

On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>
>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>>
>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>
>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>
> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>
I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes. Vegetarians are too
variable in their likes and dislikes.

--

On 17/12/2015 08:36 graham wrote:

> On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>>>
>>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>>
>>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>>
>> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>>
> I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
> is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes.

The very few vegans that I know don't have that attitude. You do.

>Vegetarians are too variable in their likes and dislikes.

What's wrong with that? Do they all have to be the same? And don't they
all share the main principle of not eating animals?

--
Bruce

On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 2:45:55 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 08:36 graham wrote:
>
> > On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
> >> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
> >>>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
> >>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
> >>>>>
> >>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
> >>>
> >>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
> >>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
> >>
> >> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
> >> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
> >> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
> >>
> > I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
> > is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes.
>
> The very few vegans that I know don't have that attitude. You do.
>
> >Vegetarians are too variable in their likes and dislikes.
>
> What's wrong with that? Do they all have to be the same? And don't they
> all share the main principle of not eating animals?
>
> --
> Bruce

I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses.
Woof, woof...them's good vittles.
A meal without meat is incomplete.

=====

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:21:52 -0000 (UTC), Bruce >
wrote:

>On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>
>>>On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>>
>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>>
>>>Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>
>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>
>I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.

You have such an inventive mind - 'hate' vegetarians? Feel
'threatened' by them? Suggest you read the article.

On 17/12/2015 09:29 wrote:

> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 21:21:52 -0000 (UTC), Bruce >
> wrote:
>
>>On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>>On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>>>
>>>>Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>>
>>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>>
>>I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>>to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>>and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>
> You have such an inventive mind - 'hate' vegetarians? Feel
> 'threatened' by them? Suggest you read the article.

He says himself that he has contempt for vegans, so I invented
correctly. And I'm not interested in the article.

--
Bruce

On 2015-12-16 5:29 PM, wrote:

>> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>
> You have such an inventive mind - 'hate' vegetarians? Feel
> 'threatened' by them? Suggest you read the article.
>

This Canadian male does not hate vegetarians or vegans. I simply will
not cater to them. I eat lots of vegetables. I have eaten and enjoyed
some foods that would be vegan. I am an omnivore and I cook omnivorous
food. I accept that there are advantages to eating some vegetarian
foods. I consider veganism to be silly and selfish. Come on now....
won't make a bee spend its live collecting the nectar and producing the
honey that is was genetically programmed to do, but eat food that other
humans worked long and hard to produce.

wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>
>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>
>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>
>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>
> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>

Did you want a cite from Scientific Canucklehead?

graham wrote:
> On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>>>
>>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>>>
>>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>>
>>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>>
>> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>>
> I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
> is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes. Vegetarians are too
> variable in their likes and dislikes.
>

Says Mr. Holier than Them!

You really are a pompous asshat.

Roy wrote:
> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 2:45:55 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 08:36 graham wrote:
>>
>>> On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>>>> On 17/12/2015 04:09 sf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 08:39:13 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You're certainly vested in anti-vegetarian bashing.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>>>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>>>>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>>>>
>>>> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>>>> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>>>> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>>>>
>>> I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
>>> is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes.
>>
>> The very few vegans that I know don't have that attitude. You do.
>>
>>> Vegetarians are too variable in their likes and dislikes.
>>
>> What's wrong with that? Do they all have to be the same? And don't they
>> all share the main principle of not eating animals?
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>
> I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses.
> Woof, woof...them's good vittles.
> A meal without meat is incomplete.
>
> =====
>

Ya'll are eating dogs now?

On 17/12/2015 09:06 Roy wrote:

> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 2:45:55 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
>> On 17/12/2015 08:36 graham wrote:
>>
>> > On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>> >> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:

>> >>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>> >>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>> >>>
>> >>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>> >>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>> >>
>> >> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>> >> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>> >> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>> >>
>> > I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
>> > is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes.
>>
>> The very few vegans that I know don't have that attitude. You do.
>>
>> >Vegetarians are too variable in their likes and dislikes.
>>
>> What's wrong with that? Do they all have to be the same? And don't they
>> all share the main principle of not eating animals?
>>
>> --
>> Bruce
>
> I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses.
> Woof, woof...them's good vittles.
> A meal without meat is incomplete.

Just curious. Are you Canadian?

--
Bruce

Bruce wrote:
> On 17/12/2015 09:06 Roy wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 2:45:55 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
>>> On 17/12/2015 08:36 graham wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>>>> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>
>>>>>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>>>>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>>>>>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>>>>> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>>>>> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>>>>>
>>>> I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
>>>> is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes.
>>>
>>> The very few vegans that I know don't have that attitude. You do.
>>>
>>>> Vegetarians are too variable in their likes and dislikes.
>>>
>>> What's wrong with that? Do they all have to be the same? And don't they
>>> all share the main principle of not eating animals?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bruce
>>
>> I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses.
>> Woof, woof...them's good vittles.
>> A meal without meat is incomplete.
>
> Just curious. Are you Canadian?
>

With all the woofing he's either that or a dog-eating North Korean, eh?

"graham" > wrote in message
...
> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>
>
>

I prefer lettuce fed beef. Its the best.

On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 15:51:28 -0800, "taxed and spent"
> wrote:

>
>"graham" > wrote in message
...
>> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>>
>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>>
>>
>>
>
>I prefer lettuce fed beef. Its the best.
>
Good thought

On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 5:06:20 PM UTC-5, Roy wrote:

> I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses.
> Woof, woof...them's good vittles.
> A meal without meat is incomplete.

I assume you're just winding him up with that last one. There are lots
of good meatless meals, starting with the humble tomato soup and
grilled cheese.

I eat meat almost every day, but generally only a couple of ounces
at dinner time. Today I'll probably go meat-free, with Greek salad
for lunch and lentil soup for dinner. Not because I hate meat, but
because each of those is a satisfying and delicious meal.

Cindy Hamilton

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>
> There are lots
> of good meatless meals, starting with the humble tomato soup and
> grilled cheese.

I often eat meatless meals...maybe almost 1/2 the time. But I do want
it other times. Like you, I don't eat much when I do. For me, maybe an
average of one pound per week or maybe a bit more. There are quite a
bit of satisfying vegetarian meals out there. Even some very nice
vegan ones.

On 16/12/15 15:39, graham wrote:
> Well that's one in the eye for the vegetarians!
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/ar...an-bacon-does/
>

Except that it isn't and it doesn't. The article is good but the
headline just misleading click-bait.

In brief: the agricutltural and commercial practices in North America
that bring fresh salad to your plate at great expense are shockingly
wasteful of resources and damaging to the environment.

So you don't need to read it now.

Tim ~w

Cindy Hamilton wrote:
>Roy wrote:
>
>> I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses.
>> Woof, woof...them's good vittles.
>> A meal without meat is incomplete.
>
>I assume you're just winding him up with that last one. There are lots
>of good meatless meals, starting with the humble tomato soup and
>grilled cheese.
>
>I eat meat almost every day, but generally only a couple of ounces
>at dinner time. Today I'll probably go meat-free, with Greek salad
>for lunch and lentil soup for dinner. Not because I hate meat, but
>because each of those is a satisfying and delicious meal.

I average 3-4 meatless days a week... I'm often satisfied with an
omelet containing lots of veggies, I like vegetable soups, I enjoy
meatless pasta dishes. In summer a favorite dinner consists of lots
of diced fresh fruit with cottage cheese or cottage cheese with minced
fresh veggies. At least once a week I'll have a vegetarian oriental
vegetable soup... that'll be lunch today but then tonight I'll be
having that rib roast with one of those huge baked potatoes, and
spinach... dessert will be fudgey brownies. A lot of days I don't eat
meat because I simply don't feel like cooking... I don't consider a
large Greek salad cooking only I don't like fehta so I'll use some
other cheese, even tofu works.

Brooklyn1 wrote:
>
> I average 3-4 meatless days a week...

Oh bullshit and horse turds combined! As much large meat that you
post about buying and cooking here? No way you eat meatless 3-4 days a
week. LOL! Kiss my ass. Completely a lie unless you've got a dozen old
freezers down in that moldy basement of yours.

Time to go mow your lawn, my friend.

Cindy Hamilton wrote in rec.food.cooking:

> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 5:06:20 PM UTC-5, Roy wrote:
>
> > I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care
> > to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses. Woof, woof...them's good
> > vittles. A meal without meat is incomplete.
>
> I assume you're just winding him up with that last one. There are
> lots of good meatless meals, starting with the humble tomato soup and
> grilled cheese.
>
> I eat meat almost every day, but generally only a couple of ounces
> at dinner time. Today I'll probably go meat-free, with Greek salad
> for lunch and lentil soup for dinner. Not because I hate meat, but
> because each of those is a satisfying and delicious meal.
>
> Cindy Hamilton

Same here Cindy. I never really bothered to add it up much but I
suspect we have 2 days a week here that are truely meatless (if eggs
accepted and normally they are) for all meals that day. The variation
will be Don and breakfast.

Meat at lunch? Scratching head but 3 times a week for me. Probably 1
for Charlotte and apt to be 5 for Don. Meat at breakfast tends to be
1-2 times a month for Charlotte and me. Don likes sausage biscuits so
will often have one. Not sure how many days a week.

If you accept that this includes all seafood, we eat meat about 5
nights a week on average.



--

On 17/12/2015 10:20 Bruce wrote:

> On 17/12/2015 09:06 Roy wrote:
>
>> On Wednesday, December 16, 2015 at 2:45:55 PM UTC-7, Bruce wrote:
>>> On 17/12/2015 08:36 graham wrote:
>>>
>>> > On 16/12/2015 2:21 PM, Bruce wrote:
>>> >> On 17/12/2015 08:16 wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> On Wed, 16 Dec 2015 12:57:47 -0700, graham > wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> On 16/12/2015 11:59 AM, Bruce wrote:
>
>>> >>>>> I wonder if this narrowmindedness is a Canadian thing. Or maybe it's a
>>> >>>>> coincidence that Beavis and Butt-head are both Canadian.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>> Read the ****ing article and comment on that!
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Yes, note he bashes you and Canadians, not the article which makes
>>> >>> sense, especially since it comes from Scientific American.
>>> >>
>>> >> I'm not interested in the article. Do you read everything people link
>>> >> to? I just wonder why these narrowminded Canadian men hate vegetarians
>>> >> and vegans so much. They must somehow feel threatened by them.
>>> >>
>>> > I don't hate either! I have nothing but contempt for vegans - and that
>>> > is because of their "holier-than-thou" attitudes.
>>>
>>> The very few vegans that I know don't have that attitude. You do.
>>>
>>> >Vegetarians are too variable in their likes and dislikes.
>>>
>>> What's wrong with that? Do they all have to be the same? And don't they
>>> all share the main principle of not eating animals?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Bruce
>>
>> I care about your love of animals...as I care for them too. I care to EAT their carefully cooked carcasses.
>> Woof, woof...them's good vittles.
>> A meal without meat is incomplete.
>
> Just curious. Are you Canadian?

A telling silence ensued.

--
Bruce

On 12/17/2015 3:01 PM, cshenk wrote:
> we eat meat about 5
> nights a week on average.
>
>
>
> --

Hi, my name's Carol and I feed the worst kind of trolls, those who
criminally STALK women he

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
Wed, 25 Nov 2015 21:18:00 -0600
MicroPlanet-Gravity/3.0.4



She should call the cops. I've already publicly admitted it is me so
a conviction should be a piece of cake and then forging would stop.
So what's stopping her? I think she suffers from Bovism - she just
loves the attention and drama and screw the rest of the group.

-sw

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------


And before that the subhuman virus stalked poor Omelet right of the net!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ost
>
3/18/2011 3:49 PM
Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1162
readnews.com - News for Geeks and ISPs
fa35d278.newsreader.readnews.com


Sorry I don't fit either of your Ideal Psycho Pal Profiles.

-sw
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I'd prefer you use a sniper rifle on me from a few hundred yards away.
There you go - a reason for you to buy yet another gun and ammo.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------