"Brooklyn1" > wrote in message

> Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
> it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
> the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
> stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
> whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
> killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
> weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
> those who whine the most about what others post are those who
> contribute the least useful information.

I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I would
not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide for myself
what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that I/others have
offended their sensibilities.

Cheri

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:45:27 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>
> > Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
> > it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
> > the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
> > stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
> > whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
> > killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
> > weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
> > those who whine the most about what others post are those who
> > contribute the least useful information.
>
> I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I would
> not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide for myself
> what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that I/others have
> offended their sensibilities.
>
IMO, those who have anything bad to say about kill files don't have
one. The rest of us who do, know we don't want to see certain names
in our TOC and let the program do the skipping for us.


--

sf

sf wrote:

> IMO, those who have anything bad to say about kill files don't have
> one.

True!

> The rest of us who do, know we don't want to see certain names
> in our TOC and let the program do the skipping for us.

Those who consistently use them are the smallest of minorities.

Most claim them, then run around bleating like newly shorn sheep.

Few have your self-discipline.

"sf" > wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:45:27 -0700, "Cheri" >
> wrote:
>
>>
>> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>>
>> > Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
>> > it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
>> > the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
>> > stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
>> > whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
>> > killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
>> > weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
>> > those who whine the most about what others post are those who
>> > contribute the least useful information.
>>
>> I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I would
>> not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide for myself
>> what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that I/others have
>> offended their sensibilities.
>>
> IMO, those who have anything bad to say about kill files don't have
> one. The rest of us who do, know we don't want to see certain names
> in our TOC and let the program do the skipping for us.
>
>
> --
>
> sf

Yes, killfiling is a personal choice IMO. I definitely have a killfile
available, but I'd rather put those that I don't care to read in different
colors, and then choose to read or not depending on the subject.

Cheri

Cheri wrote:

> Yes, killfiling is a personal choice IMO. I definitely have a killfile
> available, but I'd rather put those that I don't care to read in
> different colors, and then choose to read or not depending on the subject.
>
> Cheri


Wow, that's actually a pretty cool way of coding choices here.

Kudos!

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 14:45:26 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
> > On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 10:45:27 -0700, "Cheri" >
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
> >>
> >> > Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
> >> > it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
> >> > the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
> >> > stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
> >> > whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
> >> > killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
> >> > weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
> >> > those who whine the most about what others post are those who
> >> > contribute the least useful information.
> >>
> >> I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I would
> >> not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide for myself
> >> what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that I/others have
> >> offended their sensibilities.
> >>
> > IMO, those who have anything bad to say about kill files don't have
> > one. The rest of us who do, know we don't want to see certain names
> > in our TOC and let the program do the skipping for us.
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > sf
>
> Yes, killfiling is a personal choice IMO. I definitely have a killfile
> available, but I'd rather put those that I don't care to read in different
> colors, and then choose to read or not depending on the subject.
>

You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
names either.


--

sf

sf wrote:

>> Yes, killfiling is a personal choice IMO. I definitely have a killfile
>> available, but I'd rather put those that I don't care to read in different
>> colors, and then choose to read or not depending on the subject.
>>
>
> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
> names either.

True dat.

"sf" > wrote in message
...

> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
> names either.

I can't imagine why people would care what others do with their killfiles.
It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using them
if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)

Cheri

"Cheri" > wrote in message
...
>
> "sf" > wrote in message
> ...
>
>> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
>> names either.
>
> I can't imagine why people would care what others do with their killfiles.
> It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using them
> if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)

Quite so, but what does perplex me, is when someone who is in a kf changes
something and a killfiler starts creating a big fuss about it.

I wonder if they expect the killfiled, to ask permission from the killfiler
first!!!

Such arrogant self importance takes my breath away ...


--
http://www.helpforheroes.org.uk/shop/

On 4/09/2015 6:10 PM, Ophelia wrote:
>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
>>
>> "sf" > wrote in message
>> ...
>>
>>> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
>>> names either.
>>
>> I can't imagine why people would care what others do with their
>> killfiles.
>> It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using
>> them
>> if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)
>
> Quite so, but what does perplex me, is when someone who is in a kf changes
> something and a killfiler starts creating a big fuss about it.
>
> I wonder if they expect the killfiled, to ask permission from the
> killfiler first!!!
>
> Such arrogant self importance takes my breath away ...
>
>
Indeed! ;-)

So simple to just create a new iteration of that particular filter.

No need to whinge, no need to complain, just do it!

--

Xeno

Ophelia wrote:

>> It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using
>> them
>> if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)
>
> Quite so, but what does perplex me, is when someone who is in a kf changes
> something and a killfiler starts creating a big fuss about it.

....because if they had a real killfile they wouldn't even see it....

> I wonder if they expect the killfiled, to ask permission from the
> killfiler first!!!
>
> Such arrogant self importance takes my breath away ...

Lol.

On Fri, 4 Sep 2015 09:10:43 +0100, "Ophelia" >
wrote:

>
>
> "Cheri" > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > "sf" > wrote in message
> > ...
> >
> >> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
> >> names either.
> >
> > I can't imagine why people would care what others do with their killfiles.
> > It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using them
> > if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)
>
> Quite so, but what does perplex me, is when someone who is in a kf changes
> something and a killfiler starts creating a big fuss about it.
>
> I wonder if they expect the killfiled, to ask permission from the killfiler
> first!!!
>
> Such arrogant self importance takes my breath away ...

Makes you wonder if they need to write new code instead of just press
a button to make the nymshifter go away again.

--

sf

On Thu, 3 Sep 2015 20:03:02 -0700, "Cheri" >
wrote:

>
>"sf" > wrote in message
.. .
>
>> You aren't part of the crowd that calls people who use kill files
>> names either.
>
>I can't imagine why people would care what others do with their killfiles.
>It's a personal choice and there's certainly nothing wrong with using them
>if one chooses to. They're there for a reason. :-)

All those who post about their killfiles most certainly care... hardly
a week passes that sf doesn't boast about her killfile, about who's in
it, urge others to use killfiles, and most especially who to killfile.
Boasting about who's in her killfille sf demonstrates the same level
of classiness her husband would demonstrate boasting about how she
gives great BJs... both are topics normal people STFU about because
they are not going to prove it.

sf wrote:
>>Cheri wrote:
>>>Brooklyn1 wrote:
>>>
>>> > Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
>>> > it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't like
>>> > the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or unsubsribe and
>>> > stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it very easy to ignore
>>> > whatever/whoever without resorting to babyish/low IQ threats of
>>> > killfiles. The mere mention of ones killfile is indicative of the
>>> > weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ on the net. What's ironic is that
>>> > those who whine the most about what others post are those who
>>> > contribute the least useful information.
>>>
>>> I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I would
>>> not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide for myself
>>> what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that I/others have
>>> offended their sensibilities.
>>>
>> IMO, those who have anything bad to say about kill files don't have
>> one.

I use ForteAgent so I have killfile ability but I have never used it
because it's very easy to ignore your 300 pound butt whenever I
choose, but since I don't believe you have a significant other I'd be
happy to treat your big needy butt to a good pounding, all you need do
is ask/beg. LOL-LOL

Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:

>
> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>
> > Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
> > it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't
> > like the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or
> > unsubsribe and stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it
> > very easy to ignore whatever/whoever without resorting to
> > babyish/low IQ threats of killfiles. The mere mention of ones
> > killfile is indicative of the weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ
> > on the net. What's ironic is that those who whine the most about
> > what others post are those who contribute the least useful
> > information.
>
> I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I
> would not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide
> for myself what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that
> I/others have offended their sensibilities.
>
> Cheri

Agree Cheri, I am getting tired of being told I should or shouldn't
read/reply to some folks. I do ignore the true trolls or at least the
nym they troll with, but for anything else I just skip about to what i
want to reply to.
Carol

--

cshenk wrote:
>> >I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I
>> >would not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide
>> >for myself what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that
>> >I/others have offended their sensibilities.
>> >
>> >Cheri
> Agree Cheri, I am getting tired of being told I should or shouldn't
> read/reply to some folks.

Oh?

So you would get "tired" if a cop told you to strop hanging out with
criminals?

> I do ignore the true trolls or at least the
> nym they troll with,

Of course you do.

By creating your own bifurcation you get to proclaim being anti-trolling
whilst simultaneously interacting with the worst trolls here.

Kind of a shitty little act, if you ask me.

> but for anything else I just skip about to what i
> want to reply to.
> Carol

That you do, and it is petty hypocrisy lived large.

"cshenk" > wrote in message
...
> Cheri wrote in rec.food.cooking:
>
>>
>> "Brooklyn1" > wrote in message
>>
>> > Unmoderated Newsgroups are not for the thin skinned/weak minded...
>> > it's that simple... when someone posts something someone doesn't
>> > like the best tact is to STFU and move to the next post or
>> > unsubsribe and stay away from unmoderated Newsgroups. I find it
>> > very easy to ignore whatever/whoever without resorting to
>> > babyish/low IQ threats of killfiles. The mere mention of ones
>> > killfile is indicative of the weakest wussiest wormiest lowest IQ
>> > on the net. What's ironic is that those who whine the most about
>> > what others post are those who contribute the least useful
>> > information.
>>
>> I've never killfiled anyone, but it is easy to skip over them and I
>> would not care much for a moderated newsgroup at all. I can decide
>> for myself what's appropriate, without someone else deciding that
>> I/others have offended their sensibilities.
>>
>> Cheri
>
> Agree Cheri, I am getting tired of being told I should or shouldn't
> read/reply to some folks. I do ignore the true trolls or at least the
> nym they troll with, but for anything else I just skip about to what i
> want to reply to.
> Carol

Even the posters that annoy me at times come up with good tips and things.
It's pretty easy to see where a thread has gone to and ignore it IMO.

Cheri