I've been away, but when I tried to access rec.food.recipies it's
acting strange. Anyone have some insight? - Mike

It is pretty much DOA.

N.

On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 18:14:55 -0400, wrote:

>I've been away, but when I tried to access rec.food.recipies it's
>acting strange. Anyone have some insight? - Mike

Acting strange? Is it pulling funny faces at you or what?

On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:18:54 GMT, "l not -l" > wrote:

> It has been dormant for 2 or 3 years; IIRC, the long-time moderator wanted
> to move on and nobody stepped forward to assume the duties.

Actually somebody did. Om volunteered, but she didn't have the right
computer system or something. I forget what the exact problem was,
but obviously she wasn't handed the reins.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:49:26 -0300, wrote:

> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:18:54 GMT, "l not -l" > wrote:
>
> >
> >On 20-Oct-2014, wrote:
> >
> >> I've been away, but when I tried to access rec.food.recipies it's
> >> acting strange. Anyone have some insight? - Mike
> >
> >It has been dormant for 2 or 3 years; IIRC, the long-time moderator wanted
> >to move on and nobody stepped forward to assume the duties.
>
> Someone did but they didn't put the stuff up often enough and it died.
> Great shame. I once tried emailing her to see if she would turn it
> over to me but she didn't even reply to that.

Ah, yes... thanks for jogging my memory. I do remember now that
somebody took it over and was not successful at the job.


--
Avoid cutting yourself when slicing vegetables by getting someone else to hold them.

On Tuesday, October 21, 2014 1:12:20 PM UTC-4, Sqwertz wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 08:35:54 -0300, wrote: > On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:25:17 -0500, Sqwertz > > wrote: > >>On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 20:49:26 -0300, wrote: >> >>> On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:18:54 GMT, "l not -l" > wrote: >>> >>>>On 20-Oct-2014, wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've been away, but when I tried to access rec.food.recipies it's >>>>> acting strange. Anyone have some insight? - Mike >>>> >>>>It has been dormant for 2 or 3 years; IIRC, the long-time moderator wanted >>>>to move on and nobody stepped forward to assume the duties. >>> >>> Someone did but they didn't put the stuff up often enough and it died. >>> Great shame. I once tried emailing her to see if she would turn it >>> over to me but she didn't even reply to that. >> >>It's too bad we all just ran off David "Good Bye" Ross - he could have >>made you the moderator. >> >>-sw > > The woman who ran it before that was excellent, she didn't really > moderate as such but was fast in putting the recipes up. I forget the > reason she wanted out, illness I think. Then the one who took over > screwed it all up, maybe got bored with doing it, I dunno. I think the group is destined to stay dead. Nowadays there are millions of recipes on the Internet and plenty of ways to search and publish them. -sw

Yeah, I could search if I knew what to look for,but RFR (and RFC) present suggestion - Mike

On Mon, 20 Oct 2014 23:25:17 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> It's too bad we all just ran off David "Good Bye" Ross - he could have
> made you the moderator.

> I have space for rent inside Barbara's head. It's priced to
> move - well below market price.

> I will give you $5,000 when Burger King announces a Long Whopper. In
> the meantime, I've got a long whopper for you - just bend over and
> I'll give it to you.

> You said "oval-shaped beef patty", not burger, you fat **** asshole.
> You even quoted it for all of us to see. Dumbass.
>
> You lose again.
>
> -sw

On Tue, 21 Oct 2014 12:12:20 -0500, Sqwertz wrote:

> I think the group is destined to stay dead.

> I have space for rent inside Barbara's head. It's priced to
> move - well below market price.

> I will give you $5,000 when Burger King announces a Long Whopper. In
> the meantime, I've got a long whopper for you - just bend over and
> I'll give it to you.

> You said "oval-shaped beef patty", not burger, you fat **** asshole.
> You even quoted it for all of us to see. Dumbass.
>
> You lose again.
>
> -sw