So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?

-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com

Yeff > wrote in
news
> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
> -Jeff B.
> yeff at erols dot com
>

She will be missed. Where can you buy black arm bands?

--
Once during Prohibition I was forced to live for days on nothing but food
and water.
--------
FIELDS, W. C.

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:59:12 GMT, hahabogus wrote:

> Yeff > wrote in
> news >
>> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?

> She will be missed. Where can you buy black arm bands?

CNN is also reporting it as breaking news. Dead at 91. Still no other
details.

-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com

In article >,
Yeff > wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:59:12 GMT, hahabogus wrote:
>
> > Yeff > wrote in
> > news > >
> >> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
> > She will be missed. Where can you buy black arm bands?
>
> CNN is also reporting it as breaking news. Dead at 91. Still no other
> details.
>
I saw it on washingtonpost.com. She apparently died in her sleep.

Cindy

--
C.J. Fuller

Delete the obvious to email me

In article >,
Yeff > wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:59:12 GMT, hahabogus wrote:
>
> > Yeff > wrote in
> > news > >
> >> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
> > She will be missed. Where can you buy black arm bands?
>
> CNN is also reporting it as breaking news. Dead at 91. Still no other
> details.
>
I saw it on washingtonpost.com. She apparently died in her sleep.

Cindy

--
C.J. Fuller

Delete the obvious to email me

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:59:12 GMT, hahabogus wrote:

> Yeff > wrote in
> news >
>> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?

> She will be missed. Where can you buy black arm bands?

CNN is also reporting it as breaking news. Dead at 91. Still no other
details.

-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:59:12 GMT, hahabogus wrote:

> Yeff > wrote in
> news >
>> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?

> She will be missed. Where can you buy black arm bands?

CNN is also reporting it as breaking news. Dead at 91. Still no other
details.

-Jeff B.
yeff at erols dot com

"Yeff" > wrote in message
news
> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
> -Jeff B.


MSNBC is reporting same.
http://msnbc.msn.com/id/3694953/

She will be missed.

-Matt

"Yeff" > wrote in message
news
> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?

She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.

Gabby

"Gabby" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Yeff" > wrote in message
> news
> > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
> She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.

Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
But she won't be around for the party.

Gabby

Gabby wrote:

> Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
> But she won't be around for the party.

Okay, that explains it. She was the 'cook' on Good Morning America
for however long, and they aren't on during the weekend. They just
gave her a little salute for her birthday.

Well, at 91, it's okay to go in your sleep. Much less torturous
death than her husband endured. Good job, Julia, you changed a
nation.

nancy

First female grad of Le Cordon Bleu Culinary Academy, wasn't she? Ahead of
her time..... but about time!

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> Gabby wrote:
>
> > Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
> > But she won't be around for the party.
>
> Okay, that explains it. She was the 'cook' on Good Morning America
> for however long, and they aren't on during the weekend. They just
> gave her a little salute for her birthday.
>
> Well, at 91, it's okay to go in your sleep. Much less torturous
> death than her husband endured. Good job, Julia, you changed a
> nation.
>
> nancy

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> Gabby wrote:
>
> > Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
> > But she won't be around for the party.
>
> Okay, that explains it. She was the 'cook' on Good Morning America
> for however long, and they aren't on during the weekend. They just
> gave her a little salute for her birthday.
>
> Well, at 91, it's okay to go in your sleep. Much less torturous
> death than her husband endured. Good job, Julia, you changed a
> nation.
>
> nancy
==========

Yep. In fact, I think she helped to change a lot of nations! She seemed to
be quite a wonderful lady!

Cyndi

First female grad of Le Cordon Bleu Culinary Academy, wasn't she? Ahead of
her time..... but about time!

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> Gabby wrote:
>
> > Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
> > But she won't be around for the party.
>
> Okay, that explains it. She was the 'cook' on Good Morning America
> for however long, and they aren't on during the weekend. They just
> gave her a little salute for her birthday.
>
> Well, at 91, it's okay to go in your sleep. Much less torturous
> death than her husband endured. Good job, Julia, you changed a
> nation.
>
> nancy

"Nancy Young" > wrote in message
...
> Gabby wrote:
>
> > Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
> > But she won't be around for the party.
>
> Okay, that explains it. She was the 'cook' on Good Morning America
> for however long, and they aren't on during the weekend. They just
> gave her a little salute for her birthday.
>
> Well, at 91, it's okay to go in your sleep. Much less torturous
> death than her husband endured. Good job, Julia, you changed a
> nation.
>
> nancy
==========

Yep. In fact, I think she helped to change a lot of nations! She seemed to
be quite a wonderful lady!

Cyndi

Gabby wrote:

> Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
> But she won't be around for the party.

Okay, that explains it. She was the 'cook' on Good Morning America
for however long, and they aren't on during the weekend. They just
gave her a little salute for her birthday.

Well, at 91, it's okay to go in your sleep. Much less torturous
death than her husband endured. Good job, Julia, you changed a
nation.

nancy

Seems to be a lot of confusion about her age. Whatever..my favourite TV chef
bar none.

John

Gabby wrote in message >...
>
>"Yeff" > wrote in message
>news
>> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
>She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.
>
>Gabby
>
>

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:03:55 -0300, "Gabby"
> wrote:

> She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.

The news cast I heard said she died 3 days before her 92nd
birthday.

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

"Gabby" > wrote in message
...
>
> "Yeff" > wrote in message
> news
> > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
> She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.

Ooops, my mistake, she would have been 92 on Sunday.
But she won't be around for the party.

Gabby

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:03:55 -0300, "Gabby"
> wrote:

> She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.

The news cast I heard said she died 3 days before her 92nd
birthday.

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

Seems to be a lot of confusion about her age. Whatever..my favourite TV chef
bar none.

John

Gabby wrote in message >...
>
>"Yeff" > wrote in message
>news
>> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
>She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.
>
>Gabby
>
>

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 12:03:55 -0300, "Gabby"
> wrote:

> She's 92 today, haven't heard anything about her dying.

The news cast I heard said she died 3 days before her 92nd
birthday.

sf
Practice safe eating - always use condiments

"Yeff" > wrote in message
news
> So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
>
> -Jeff B.
> yeff at erols dot com

True I am afraid to say, and very sad.

BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

Peter Aitken wrote:
>
> "Yeff" > wrote in message
> news
> > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
> >
> > -Jeff B.
> > yeff at erols dot com
>
> True I am afraid to say, and very sad.
>
> BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.

I heard on GMA this morning that today is her 92nd birthday.

How strange.

nancy

Peter Aitken > wrote:

> "Yeff" > wrote in message
> news
> > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
> >
> > -Jeff B.
> > yeff at erols dot com
>
> True I am afraid to say, and very sad.
>
> BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.

Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is off
the scale left, biased, ***......

On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:41:08 GMT, The Wolf wrote:

> Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is off
> the scale left, biased, ***....

It would be nice if we could keep this about Julia Childs!
--
JakeInHartsel

Glenn Jacobs > wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:41:08 GMT, The Wolf wrote:
>
> > Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is off
> > the scale left, biased, ***....
>
> It would be nice if we could keep this about Julia Childs!

Why some whiner takes a shot at the only legitimate media and it's not
ok to make a correction?

"The Wolf" > wrote in message
.. .
> Glenn Jacobs > wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:41:08 GMT, The Wolf wrote:
> >
> > > Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is
off
> > > the scale left, biased, ***....
> >
> > It would be nice if we could keep this about Julia Childs!
>
> Why some whiner takes a shot at the only legitimate media and it's not
> ok to make a correction?

Ah, the idiot has escaped the kill file. Hmm.......BLAM!!

>>>>>>>>>>>>

"The Wolf" > wrote in message
.. .
> Glenn Jacobs > wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:41:08 GMT, The Wolf wrote:
> >
> > > Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is
off
> > > the scale left, biased, ***....
> >
> > It would be nice if we could keep this about Julia Childs!
>
> Why some whiner takes a shot at the only legitimate media and it's not
> ok to make a correction?

Ah, the idiot has escaped the kill file. Hmm.......BLAM!!

>>>>>>>>>>>>

Glenn Jacobs > wrote:

> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 17:41:08 GMT, The Wolf wrote:
>
> > Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is off
> > the scale left, biased, ***....
>
> It would be nice if we could keep this about Julia Childs!

Why some whiner takes a shot at the only legitimate media and it's not
ok to make a correction?

(The Wolf) wrote:
> Peter Aitken > wrote:
> > "Yeff" > wrote in message
> > news

> > > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?

> > True I am afraid to say, and very sad.

I'm sorry to hear it, to say she was an inspiration is an
understatement.

> > BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.
>
> Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is off
> the scale left, biased, ***......

*Sigh* I've got to quit cleaning out my killfile...


--
J.J. in WA ~ mom, vid gamer, novice cook ~
"I rule you!" - Travis of the Cosmos, ATHF
(COLD to HOT for e-mail)

"The Wolf" > wrote in message
. ..
> Peter Aitken > wrote:
>
> > "Yeff" > wrote in message
> > news
> > > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
> > >
> > > -Jeff B.
> > > yeff at erols dot com
> >
> > True I am afraid to say, and very sad.
> >
> > BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.
>
> Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is off
> the scale left, biased, ***......

Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin please.

I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I know
you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews with
current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a detailed
analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that Fox
intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and republican
agenda. This happens on orders from the highest levels of the company. Not
just a few times, but hundreds if not thousands of times. Yet millions of
people like you continue to buy their drivel, mindlessly accepting what you
want to hear without the slightest regard for the truth. Have you no
self-respect or decency?


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

Peter Aitken > wrote:

> "The Wolf" > wrote in message
> . ..
> > Peter Aitken > wrote:
> >
> > > "Yeff" > wrote in message
> > > news > > > > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
> > > >
> > > > -Jeff B.
> > > > yeff at erols dot com
> > >
> > > True I am afraid to say, and very sad.
> > >
> > > BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.
> >
> > Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is off
> > the scale left, biased, ***......
>
> Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin please.
>
> I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I know
> you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews with
> current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a detailed
> analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that Fox
> intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and republican
> agenda.

And are you going to tell me with a straight face that ABC, NBC, CNN and
CBS don't slant their covrerage to favor liberal democrats?


This happens on orders from the highest levels of the company. Not
> just a few times, but hundreds if not thousands of times. Yet millions of
> people like you continue to buy their drivel, mindlessly accepting what you
> want to hear without the slightest regard for the truth. Have you no
> self-respect or decency?

The Wolf wrote:

>
>
> And are you going to tell me with a straight face that ABC, NBC, CNN and CBS
> don't slant their covrerage to favor liberal democrats?

There is no doubt that all news media have some slant to them, and their editorial
content can be even more skewed. FOX out and out lies. It is really pathetic as a
news source.


>

"The Wolf" > wrote in message
.. .
> Peter Aitken > wrote:
>
> > "The Wolf" > wrote in message
> > . ..
> > > Peter Aitken > wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Yeff" > wrote in message
> > > > news > > > > > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jeff B.
> > > > > yeff at erols dot com
> > > >
> > > > True I am afraid to say, and very sad.
> > > >
> > > > BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.
> > >
> > > Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is
off
> > > the scale left, biased, ***......
> >
> > Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin
please.
> >
> > I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I
know
> > you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> > numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews
with
> > current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> > analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that
Fox
> > intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and
republican
> > agenda.
>
> And are you going to tell me with a straight face that ABC, NBC, CNN and
> CBS don't slant their covrerage to favor liberal democrats?
>

Yes. If you have any evidence to the contrary let's hear it. I didn't think
so. But of course people like you are not interested in evidence. It's so
inconvenient and all. It's so much easier to change the facts to fit your
opinions than the other way around.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

"The Wolf" > wrote in message
.. .
> Peter Aitken > wrote:
>
> > "The Wolf" > wrote in message
> > . ..
> > > Peter Aitken > wrote:
> > >
> > > > "Yeff" > wrote in message
> > > > news > > > > > So Foxnews is saying. Anyone heard for sure?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jeff B.
> > > > > yeff at erols dot com
> > > >
> > > > True I am afraid to say, and very sad.
> > > >
> > > > BTW you are wise to verify anything you hear on Fox news.
> > >
> > > Fox is the only TV news you DON'T have to verify. Everything else is
off
> > > the scale left, biased, ***......
> >
> > Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin
please.
> >
> > I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I
know
> > you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> > numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews
with
> > current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> > analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that
Fox
> > intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and
republican
> > agenda.
>
> And are you going to tell me with a straight face that ABC, NBC, CNN and
> CBS don't slant their covrerage to favor liberal democrats?
>

Yes. If you have any evidence to the contrary let's hear it. I didn't think
so. But of course people like you are not interested in evidence. It's so
inconvenient and all. It's so much easier to change the facts to fit your
opinions than the other way around.


--
Peter Aitken

Remove the crap from my email address before using.

Peter Aitken wrote:
> "The Wolf" > wrote in message

> Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin please.
>
> I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I know
> you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews with
> current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a detailed
> analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that Fox
> intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and republican
> agenda. This happens on orders from the highest levels of the company. Not
> just a few times, but hundreds if not thousands of times. Yet millions of
> people like you continue to buy their drivel, mindlessly accepting what you
> want to hear without the slightest regard for the truth. Have you no
> self-respect or decency?

I must be a real optimist to include this information, because PETER I know
you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
numerous reports lately about the NEW YORK TIMES's bias. These are based
on interviews with
current and past NYT employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a detailed
analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that NYT
intentionally slants news to fit the LIBERAL and DEMOCRATIC
agenda. This happens on orders from the highest levels of the company. Not
just a few times, but hundreds if not thousands of times. Yet millions of
people like you continue to buy their drivel, mindlessly accepting what you
want to hear without the slightest regard for the truth. Have you no
self-respect or decency?

The pot and the kettle going at it again. Irony at it's very best.

--
..-. .-. .---. .---. .-..-.|Experts in Linux/Unix: www.WildOpenSource.com
| |__ / | \| |-< | |-< > / |"Making the bazaar more commonplace"
`----'`-^-'`-'`-'`-'`-' `-' |Check out my new novel: "Cloud Realm" at:
home:www.smith-house.org:8000|http://www.smith-house.org:8000/books/list.html

"Larry Smith" > wrote in message
...
> Peter Aitken wrote:
> > "The Wolf" > wrote in message
>
> > Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin
please.
> >
> > I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I
know
> > you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> > numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews
with
> > current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> > analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that
Fox
> > intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and
republican
> > agenda. This happens on orders from the highest levels of the company.
Not
> > just a few times, but hundreds if not thousands of times. Yet millions
of
> > people like you continue to buy their drivel, mindlessly accepting what
you
> > want to hear without the slightest regard for the truth. Have you no
> > self-respect or decency?
>
> I must be a real optimist to include this information, because PETER I
know
> you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> numerous reports lately about the NEW YORK TIMES's bias. These are based
> on interviews with
> current and past NYT employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> analysis of the news broadcasts themselves.

No there haven't - you are full of shit and made all this up out of thin
air. No, you couldn't even make up something original but had to copy me.
You are not even aware that the NY Times does not broadcast news but prints
it. Another feeble attempt by a right-wing doofus to make up facts they wish
were true. And I bet you are allowed to vote, too.

Pitiful.

Peter Aitken

"Larry Smith" > wrote in message
...
> Peter Aitken wrote:
> > "The Wolf" > wrote in message
>
> > Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin
please.
> >
> > I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I
know
> > you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> > numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews
with
> > current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> > analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that
Fox
> > intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and
republican
> > agenda. This happens on orders from the highest levels of the company.
Not
> > just a few times, but hundreds if not thousands of times. Yet millions
of
> > people like you continue to buy their drivel, mindlessly accepting what
you
> > want to hear without the slightest regard for the truth. Have you no
> > self-respect or decency?
>
> I must be a real optimist to include this information, because PETER I
know
> you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> numerous reports lately about the NEW YORK TIMES's bias. These are based
> on interviews with
> current and past NYT employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> analysis of the news broadcasts themselves.

No there haven't - you are full of shit and made all this up out of thin
air. No, you couldn't even make up something original but had to copy me.
You are not even aware that the NY Times does not broadcast news but prints
it. Another feeble attempt by a right-wing doofus to make up facts they wish
were true. And I bet you are allowed to vote, too.

Pitiful.

Peter Aitken

"Larry Smith" > wrote in message
...
> Peter Aitken wrote:
> > "The Wolf" > wrote in message
>
> > Sigh, looks like the World's Chief Retard is back. Pass the excedrin
please.
> >
> > I must be a real optimist to include this information, because wolfie I
know
> > you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> > numerous reports lately about Fox's bias. These are based on interviews
with
> > current and past Fox employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> > analysis of the news broadcasts themselves. It is abundantly clear that
Fox
> > intentionally slants news to fit the Bush administration's and
republican
> > agenda. This happens on orders from the highest levels of the company.
Not
> > just a few times, but hundreds if not thousands of times. Yet millions
of
> > people like you continue to buy their drivel, mindlessly accepting what
you
> > want to hear without the slightest regard for the truth. Have you no
> > self-respect or decency?
>
> I must be a real optimist to include this information, because PETER I
know
> you will not pay any attention to it, but here goes. There have been
> numerous reports lately about the NEW YORK TIMES's bias. These are based
> on interviews with
> current and past NYT employees, copies of interoffice memos, and a
detailed
> analysis of the news broadcasts themselves.

No there haven't - you are full of shit and made all this up out of thin
air. No, you couldn't even make up something original but had to copy me.
You are not even aware that the NY Times does not broadcast news but prints
it. Another feeble attempt by a right-wing doofus to make up facts they wish
were true. And I bet you are allowed to vote, too.

Pitiful.

Peter Aitken