ChattyCathy wrote:
> bulka wrote:
>
>
>> Checked the survey results. One other person admitted to being bored
>> and argumentative. Are you the same one with a gender identification
>> problem?
>>
>> Just askin'.
>>
>
> Heh. I guess there must be a couple of hermaphrodites who read r.f.c out
> there...

You promised never to mention that. =-O


Becca

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:17:32 -0500, Becca wrote:

> ChattyCathy wrote:
>> bulka wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Checked the survey results. One other person admitted to being bored
>>> and argumentative. Are you the same one with a gender identification
>>> problem?
>>>
>>> Just askin'.
>>>
>>
>> Heh. I guess there must be a couple of hermaphrodites who read r.f.c out
>> there...
>
> You promised never to mention that. =-O
>
> Becca

i suppose the proper response to that would be 'go **** yourself.'

your pal,
blake

l, not -l wrote:

> ChattyCathy wrote:
>> bulka wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Checked the survey results. One other person admitted to being
>>> bored
>>> and argumentative. Are you the same one with a gender
>>> identification problem?
>>>
>>> Just askin'.
>>>
>>
>> Heh. I guess there must be a couple of hermaphrodites who read r.f.c
>> out there...
>
> I have read that between 1 and 5 percent of the population is
> transgender; given the total number of respondents to the RFC survey,
> it seems reasonable that there might be 2 or more transgender
> participants.
>

AFAIAA, until as such time as the necessary surgery has been done and
completed successfully, people are either biologically (and legally)
male or female. However, as there are (allegedly) thousands of
participants (a.k.a lurkers) in this newsgroup, I suppose it's not
unreasonable to assume that we might have 2 (or more) transgender
participants.
--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

ChattyCathy wrote:
>
> l, not -l wrote:
>
> > ChattyCathy wrote:
> >> bulka wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Checked the survey results. One other person admitted to being
> >>> bored
> >>> and argumentative. Are you the same one with a gender
> >>> identification problem?
> >>>
> >>> Just askin'.
> >>>
> >>
> >> Heh. I guess there must be a couple of hermaphrodites who read r.f.c
> >> out there...
> >
> > I have read that between 1 and 5 percent of the population is
> > transgender; given the total number of respondents to the RFC survey,
> > it seems reasonable that there might be 2 or more transgender
> > participants.
> >
>
> AFAIAA, until as such time as the necessary surgery has been done and
> completed successfully, people are either biologically (and legally)
> male or female. However, as there are (allegedly) thousands of
> participants (a.k.a lurkers) in this newsgroup, I suppose it's not
> unreasonable to assume that we might have 2 (or more) transgender
> participants.
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy


Or people such as me, who prefer to be sarcastic :P

Arri London wrote:

>
>
> Or people such as me, who prefer to be sarcastic :P

<laugh>

--
Cheers
Chatty Cathy

ChattyCathy wrote:
>
> Arri London wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Or people such as me, who prefer to be sarcastic :P
>
> <laugh>
>
> --
> Cheers
> Chatty Cathy

Perhaps I should promise never to do it again...but then I so hate
breaking promises