On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
> wrote:

>On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:55:03 -0400, Dave Smith
> wrote:
>
>>blake murphy wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> blinky, blinky, blinky. for a man, accuracy matters only in ****ing.
>>> (assuming while shitting you can at least hit the toilet.)
>>>
>>
>>Having had a part time job as janitor in a restaurant when I was a student, I can
>>speak with some authority that men are much better at hitting the toilet in public
>>washrooms than women are.
>>
>
>almost every janitor i've heard with an opinion on the subject has
>said the same thing.

I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. They had a
porter and matron on duty all day. The porter spent over 75% of his
day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. The matron
spent almost all her day cleaning hers.

Lou

On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 13:55:03 -0400, Dave Smith
> > wrote:
>
> >>blake murphy wrote:
>
> >>> blinky, blinky, blinky. *for a man, accuracy matters only in ****ing..
> >>> (assuming while shitting you can at least hit the toilet.)
>
> >>Having had a part time job as janitor in a restaurant when I was a student, I can
> >>speak with some authority that men are much better at hitting the toilet in public
> >>washrooms than women are.
>
> >almost every janitor i've heard with an opinion on the subject has
> >said the same thing.
>
> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>
> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. If nothing but
females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
dust it now and then. Males? Completely opposite.

N.

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

>On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy

>> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
>> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
>> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
>> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
>> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>>
>> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. If nothing but
>females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
>dust it now and then. Males? Completely opposite.

I have no idea what the answer to that question is. But I know you're
right. Boys just go in and get the job over at work. Women seem to
consider it a break. Some sleep on the toilet, some find a thrill in
tossing a bloody item on the floor, and some think the sink is in a
dressing room for someone else to clean up the mess.

Nice drift for a food group <eg>

Lou

On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:

>On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>>
>>
>> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
>> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
>> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
>> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
>> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>>
>> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. If nothing but
>females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
>dust it now and then. Males? Completely opposite.
>
>N.

it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on
public johns, for they are delicate creatures.

your pal,
blake

On Jun 10, 11:59*am, blake murphy > wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:20:48 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> >On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
> >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>
> >> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
> >> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
> >> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
> >> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
> >> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>
> >> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> >I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but
> >females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
> >dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite.
>
> >N.
>
> it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on
> public johns, for they are delicate creatures.
>
> your pal,
> blake- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public
restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those
little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers.

N.

On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:


>> > wrote:
>> >On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>> >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>>
>> >> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
>> >> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
>> >> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
>> >> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
>> >> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>>
>> >> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> >I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but
>> >females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
>> >dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite.
>>
>> >N.
>>
>> it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on
>> public johns, for they are delicate creatures.
>>
>> your pal,
>> blake- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public
>restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those
>little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers.

The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything
it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too.

Lou

On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 10:59:07 -0500, Lou Decruss >
wrote:

>On Tue, 10 Jun 2008 11:31:27 -0700 (PDT), Nancy2
> wrote:
>
>
>>> > wrote:
>>> >On Jun 9, 1:02*pm, Lou Decruss > wrote:
>>> >> On Sat, 07 Jun 2008 14:40:11 GMT, blake murphy
>>>
>>> >> I worked in a building that had a few thousand people working in it.
>>> >> There were 6 ea. mens and womens multi-stall bathrooms. *They had a
>>> >> porter and matron on duty all day. *The porter spent over 75% of his
>>> >> day doing things other than keeping up with his bathrooms. *The matron
>>> >> spent almost all her day cleaning hers. *
>>>
>>> >> Lou *- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> >> - Show quoted text -
>>>
>>> >I wonder why it's the opposite in private homes. *If nothing but
>>> >females used my bathrooms, the most I'd have to do to the toilet is
>>> >dust it now and then. *Males? Completely opposite.
>>>
>>> >N.
>>>
>>> it seems many women refuse to completely (or even mostly) sit down on
>>> public johns, for they are delicate creatures.
>>>
>>> your pal,
>>> blake- Hide quoted text -
>>>
>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>>That is true. I suppose that's the main reason why women's public
>>restrooms are messier (if they are). We should all carry around those
>>little purse-packs of toilet seat disposable covers.
>
>The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything
>it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too.
>
>Lou

god have mercy.

your pal,
blake

"blake murphy" > wrote:
>>
>>The building I spoke of had those. Made no difference. If anything
>>it made it worse as they ended up on the floor too.
>>
>>Lou
>
> god have mercy.
>

Careful, dahling. Everyone knows that men who obsess on how "dirty"
women are tend to be 1. really lousy in bed and 2. practicing or potential
homosexuals.