Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
General Cooking (rec.food.cooking) For general food and cooking discussion. Foods of all kinds, food procurement, cooking methods and techniques, eating, etc. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
How do you know if coffee is stale? Simple test: If it's bitter or
flat, it's too late. Coffee is actually known by connoisseurs as a 'sweet' beverage. But shush... you're not supposed to know that. And who doesn't want you to know? Coffee companies who make their living on convenience. And yes, believing that freshness is as simple as 'burping' air out of a coffee container, is convenient. Truly fresh coffee is a pain because you have to order it frequently. Indubitably some of you have been to this site; but for others, this seems like a decent place for a coffee newbie to start. http://www.coffeefool.com/?Click=11540 --- I agree with this coffee commentary from The Coffee Fool site Beans should be shaved not ground; a good bean grinder will actually peel the beans down to nothing, opposed to a free for all purée style grinders. SO! Having said that, did you know you can get 10 free dollars from Google for shopping at Starbucks? Yeah, you sign up for Google Checkout (plug in your CC) after you sign up for G.C. you are presented with this offers participating merchants. At Starbucks site, they have a 2 bag minimum purchase; Im thinking about ordering the Guatemala Casi Cielo® I've never had beans from this region (lol) BUT they say it's used in the finest food joints around the woild. http://tinyurl.com/2hc467 You can also shop by world region, http://tinyurl.com/dgq3u See, now that I think about it, the Guatemala Casi is listed as a med roast, I better get something darker, but usually I buy the Eight O'Clock beans. Maybe a real aficionado can advise. I want something I can enjoy for 2 bags worth. Sometimes something tastes good but you don't want it everyday. Beta |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Please join my team in the fight against cancer. http://www.grid.org/services/teams/t...3-AEB0DD18A6CE "beta" > wrote in message oups.com... How do you know if coffee is stale? Simple test: If it's bitter or flat, it's too late. Coffee is actually known by connoisseurs as a 'sweet' beverage. But shush... <SNIP> Beta Sigh - plonk. -- Regards. Ken. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "beta" > wrote in message oups.com... How do you know if coffee is stale? Simple test: If it's bitter or flat, it's too late. Coffee is actually known by connoisseurs as a 'sweet' beverage. But shush... you're not supposed to know that. And who doesn't want you to know? Coffee companies who make their living on convenience. And yes, believing that freshness is as simple as 'burping' air out of a coffee container, is convenient. Truly fresh coffee is a pain because you have to order it frequently. Indubitably some of you have been to this site; but for others, this seems like a decent place for a coffee newbie to start. http://www.coffeefool.com/?Click=11540 I love this site. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-01-21, beta > wrote:
> How do you know if coffee is...... This site tells me nothing. Sappy hype like, "...we only roast .....beans in an unhurried, old-fashioned way..." is meaningless. Where's real roasting info, like roast dates, age info, etc. Is the coffee dated? Also, they charge 1lb prices for only 3/4lb. You want good fresh coffee, roast your own. Typically $5 for a *full* lb. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
notbob wrote:
> > On 2007-01-21, beta > wrote: > > How do you know if coffee is...... > > This site tells me nothing. Sappy hype like, "...we only roast > ....beans in an unhurried, old-fashioned way..." is meaningless. > Where's real roasting info, like roast dates, age info, etc. Is > the coffee dated? Also, they charge 1lb prices for only 3/4lb. > > You want good fresh coffee, roast your own. Typically $5 for a > *full* lb. If you want tons of info and a reasonable place to buy green beans (but not the only place), check this out: http://www.sweetmarias.com/ I buy all my beans there, and I just bought my second coffee roaster. Fresh-roasted coffee is so much better than pre-roasted. Once you get used to it, you'll never go back. And if you're the least bit paranoid about what goes into your food, you'll want the option of picking out all the disgusting stuff that normally occurs in raw coffee. (Really ugly, moldy, beans. Bits of plastic, etc.) No commercial roaster is going to pick that stuff out for you. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark wrote:
> Fresh-roasted coffee is so much better than pre-roasted. > Once you get used to it, you'll never go back. And if > you're the least bit paranoid about what goes into your > food, you'll want the option of picking out all the > disgusting stuff that normally occurs in raw coffee. > (Really ugly, moldy, beans. Bits of plastic, etc.) > No commercial roaster is going to pick that stuff out > for you. A recently-aired episode of "America's Test Kitchen" featured a coffee tasting. The upshot of the tasting was that all brands contained a certain number of beans which didn't belong in the bag, either because they weren't roasted properly or they had some other problems. The quality of the coffee was dramatically better when all those beans were picked out before grinding. Considering that I only make coffee occasionally, it wouldn't be any big deal to dump out a bag of roasted coffee beans onto a sheet pan, pick out all the bad beans, and return the remainder to the bag. But I buy Starbucks beans anyway, which turned out to be the brand with the fewest defective beans in the trial. Bob |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bob Terwilliger wrote:
> > A recently-aired episode of "America's Test Kitchen" featured a coffee > tasting. The upshot of the tasting was that all brands contained a > certain number of beans which didn't belong in the bag, either because > they weren't roasted properly or they had some other problems. The quality > of the coffee was dramatically better when all those beans were picked > out before grinding. Considering that I only make coffee occasionally, > it wouldn't be any big deal to dump out a bag of roasted coffee beans > onto a sheet pan, pick out all the bad beans, and return the remainder > to the bag. But I buy Starbucks beans anyway, which turned out > to be the brand with the fewest defective beans in the trial. It's not just coffee beans, either. I eat lots of pumpkin seeds, and it's critically important to pick out all the funky-looking ones. Either that, or stand near a sink so you can spit them out and rinse your mouth if you get a bad one. Same thing with popcorn. Spread out a handful of unpopped popcorn on a plate or sheet pan, and you'll find some nasty ones. Pick those out, and you won't run across any foul-tasting ones in the resulting batch after popping. |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Mark Thorson wrote: > It's not just coffee beans, either. I eat lots of > pumpkin seeds, and it's critically important to > pick out all the funky-looking ones. Either that, > or stand near a sink so you can spit them out and > rinse your mouth if you get a bad one. > > Same thing with popcorn. Spread out a handful > of unpopped popcorn on a plate or sheet pan, > and you'll find some nasty ones. Pick those out, > and you won't run across any foul-tasting ones > in the resulting batch after popping. I don't know what another poster is talking about when he calls slow roasting a crock Sure... The site I posted may be a junk site... That was my first trip to that site... Who knows? I can see why a slow roast is better... is there any other way? if you compared roasting beans to roasting beef.. You must cook it slow to make it tender. I bought some chocolate covered beans last week, they were good but I don't care for white chocolate.. its ok.. it just tastes sweet to me I don't taste the cocoa. I think I would like a dark chocolate on my "munching beans". Who would have thought a few culls could ruin a cup of coffee, makes good sense. Who hasn't eaten a bitter pumpkin or sunflower seed. I bet ALL chocolate covered beans are culls, that's why the chocolate, heee I do know that beans have oil in them, I have to clean my grinder from time to time, once in a while I actually scrape my grinder and brew the shake... talk about eye popping caffeine! 2 cups of my oily shake brew, you can read the labels on passenger planes going over-head. beta |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-01-22, beta > wrote:
> I don't know what another poster is talking about when he calls slow > roasting a crock There's an optimum window for roasting coffee, typically around 18-22 mins depending on the bean and the roaster. > I can see why a slow roast is better... is there any other way? Not if you're doing it right. I can roast my beans in as little as 8-9 mins. Better is 10-12 mins. But, I'm using a popcorn popper, not the best roaster. A good quality roasting machine typically costs in the thousands of dollars and will roast in the 15-22 min range with various temperature steps carefully timed and controlled and varying slightly depending on the type of bean and the roast profile. Anything over 20 mins starts drying out the beans excessively. > if you compared roasting beans to roasting beef.. You must cook it slow > to make it tender. Coffee is not beef or pork or any other meat and does not benefit from "low and slow" or "take our time" or "slow roasted" or any of that other drag-out-the-cooking-till-Hell-freezes-over crap where you and the bubbas sit around whittling sticks and drinking moonshine while reminiscing about the time you and Old Blue jumped that coon down in the hollar. I'm far from being any kind of roasting expert, but I know after about 10 mins a good roastmaster is all over that roasting machine like worried grandmother watching for color and aroma and sound cues to determine the best roast. Yes, there are computer controlled roasters that are hands off so illegal immigrant labor can do burger-flipper roasting, but the really good stuff is carefully roasted by meticulous attentive people who have no time to be "unhurried". In fact, when I roast, that's it. I'm locked onto the roast from beginning to end. No distractions, phone calls, tv, etc. "unhurried" is about the last adjective I'd use to describe coffee roasting. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.pets.cats.health+behav
|
|||
|
|||
![]() notbob wrote: > Coffee is not beef or pork or any other meat and does not benefit from > "low and slow" or "take our time" or "slow roasted" or any of that > other drag-out-the-cooking-till-Hell-freezes-over crap where you and > the bubbas sit around whittling sticks and drinking moonshine while > reminiscing about the time you and Old Blue jumped that coon down in > the hollar. I'm far from being any kind of roasting expert, but I > know after about 10 mins a good roastmaster is all over that roasting > machine like worried grandmother watching for color and aroma and > sound cues to determine the best roast. Yes, there are computer > controlled roasters that are hands off so illegal immigrant labor can > do burger-flipper roasting, but the really good stuff is carefully > roasted by meticulous attentive people who have no time to be > "unhurried". In fact, when I roast, that's it. I'm locked onto the > roast from beginning to end. No distractions, phone calls, tv, etc. > "unhurried" is about the last adjective I'd use to describe coffee > roasting. > > nb Oh damn you said whittling sticks.. I thought it said, whistle sticks, lol.. (sitting around making whistles) man that's funny THE WHOLE DAMN THING IS HILARIOUS beta |
Posted to rec.food.cooking,rec.pets.cats.health+behav
|
|||
|
|||
![]() beta wrote: > notbob wrote: > > > Coffee is not beef or pork or any other meat and does not benefit from > > "low and slow" or "take our time" or "slow roasted" or any of that > > other drag-out-the-cooking-till-Hell-freezes-over crap where you and > > the bubbas sit around whittling sticks and drinking moonshine while > > reminiscing about the time you and Old Blue jumped that coon down in > > the hollar. I'm far from being any kind of roasting expert, but I > > know after about 10 mins a good roastmaster is all over that roasting > > machine like worried grandmother watching for color and aroma and > > sound cues to determine the best roast. Yes, there are computer > > controlled roasters that are hands off so illegal immigrant labor can > > do burger-flipper roasting, but the really good stuff is carefully > > roasted by meticulous attentive people who have no time to be > > "unhurried". In fact, when I roast, that's it. I'm locked onto the > > roast from beginning to end. No distractions, phone calls, tv, etc. > > "unhurried" is about the last adjective I'd use to describe coffee > > roasting. > > > > nb > > Oh damn you said whittling sticks.. > I thought it said, whistle sticks, lol.. (sitting around making > whistles) > > man that's funny > > THE WHOLE DAMN THING IS HILARIOUS > > beta ooops. sorry bout that google removed the text I thought was funny they removed the text because I never edited before the text just a quirk if you ask me here it is... notbob from rfc wrote Coffee is not beef or pork or any other meat and does not benefit from "low and slow" or "take our time" or "slow roasted" or any of that other drag-out-the-cooking-till-Hell-freezes-over crap where you and the bubbas sit around whittling sticks and drinking moonshine while reminiscing about the time you and Old Blue jumped that coon down in the hollar. I'm far from being any kind of roasting expert, but I know after about 10 mins a good roastmaster is all over that roasting machine like worried grandmother watching for color and aroma and sound cues to determine the best roast. Yes, there are computer controlled roasters that are hands off so illegal immigrant labor can do burger-flipper roasting, but the really good stuff is carefully roasted by meticulous attentive people who have no time to be "unhurried". In fact, when I roast, that's it. I'm locked onto the roast from beginning to end. No distractions, phone calls, tv, etc. "unhurried" is about the last adjective I'd use to describe coffee roasting. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() notbob wrote: > Coffee is not beef or pork or any other meat and does not benefit from > "low and slow" or "take our time" or "slow roasted" I disagree nb why would million dollar companies slow roast the beans? you think that's just a marketing buzz phrase? besides, you offer no real reason why slower roasted beans taste the same as lightening fast roasted beans so.. nb turns the oven to 550... when the beans turn brown he pulls them out. and, what's wrong with approaching something in a respectful artful way... at "beta coffees" we slow roast all our beans, we even s l o o o o w g r i n d do you get into a stark freezing car... fire the icy cold motor up and just drive off without warming it up? I tell ya... You're probably right.. I bet they slow roast because they don't want to burn the beans. suppose there IS a fine line between a dark roast and a burnt bean... you'd want to approach the darkest possible roast just prior to burning (if that's the particular target roast) if you approach it fast.. and you burn the beans, for a large company?... it's going to cost you alot of money. beans are not cheap |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-01-23, beta > wrote:
> why would million dollar companies slow roast the beans? They don't. They just say that because 98% of US coffee drinkers don't have a clue. Reality Check: Juan Valdez was not a real person. > ...you think that's just a marketing buzz phrase? You can take it to the bank. They did. nb |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() notbob wrote: > On 2007-01-23, beta > wrote: > > > why would million dollar companies slow roast the beans? > > They don't. They just say that because 98% of US coffee drinkers > don't have a clue. Reality Check: Juan Valdez was not a real person. I wouldn't put it past a white man, lol but come'on, you're using a POPCORN POPPER! I LOVE IT but I do like your creativity beta |
Posted to rec.food.cooking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 2007-01-23, beta > wrote:
> but I do like your creativity Alas, I can't take credit. It was old news long before I got into it. http://www.sweetmarias.com/instructions.html nb |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|