CHICAGO - A small study suggests that eating dark chocolate can lower
your blood pressure
- a delicious instance in which something that tastes good might, for a
change, be good for
you, too.

http://www.chocolatebite.blogspot.com

koko

koko wrote:
> CHICAGO - A small study suggests that eating dark chocolate can lower
> your blood pressure
> - a delicious instance in which something that tastes good might, for a
> change, be good for
> you, too.
>
> http://www.chocolatebite.blogspot.com
>
> koko

Note the source...

koko wrote:
> CHICAGO - A small study suggests that eating dark chocolate can lower
> your blood pressure
> - a delicious instance in which something that tastes good might, for a
> change, be good for
> you, too.
>
> http://www.chocolatebite.blogspot.com
>
> koko

How about a link to the study results, rather than a link to a site
with the history of chocolate? What does the link have to do with your
post?

salgud wrote:
> koko wrote:
> > CHICAGO - A small study suggests that eating dark chocolate can lower
> > your blood pressure
> > - a delicious instance in which something that tastes good might, for a
> > change, be good for
> > you, too.
> >
> > http://www.chocolatebite.blogspot.com
> >
> > koko
>
> How about a link to the study results, rather than a link to a site
> with the history of chocolate? What does the link have to do with your
> post?

The fact that this person is crossposting this and also going by the
name "koko" makes me think that they are just trying to get some hits
on their website and/or sell some chocolate.

wrote:
> The fact that this person is crossposting this and also going by the
> name "koko" makes me think that they are just trying to get some hits
> on their website and/or sell some chocolate.

and/or = or

On 10 Nov 2006 22:22:21 -0800, wrote:

>The fact that this person is crossposting this and also going by the
>name "koko" makes me think that they are just trying to get some hits
>on their website and/or sell some chocolate.

Koko is a long and established poster here...and is not spamming.

Christine

Christine Dabney > wrote in
:

> On 10 Nov 2006 22:22:21 -0800,
> wrote:
>
>>The fact that this person is crossposting this and also going
>>by the name "koko" makes me think that they are just trying to
>>get some hits on their website and/or sell some chocolate.
>
> Koko is a long and established poster here...and is not
> spamming.
>
> Christine

Seems to be spamming many groups according to Google archives.

http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=aut...%40gmail.com&s
tart=0&scoring=d&num=100&hl=en&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_mi nd=1&as_minm=1&as
_miny=1981&as_maxd=11&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2006&safe =off&filter=0

sandi > wrote in
news.net:

> Christine Dabney > wrote in

>> Koko is a long and established poster here...and is not
>> spamming.
>>
>> Christine
>
> Seems to be spamming many groups according to Google archives.
>
> http://groups.google.ca/groups?q=aut...0322%40gmail.c
> om&s
> tart=0&scoring=d&num=100&hl=en&lr=&as_drrb=q&as_mi nd=1&as_minm=
> 1&as
> _miny=1981&as_maxd=11&as_maxm=11&as_maxy=2006&safe =off&filter=0

Shorter link http://makeashorterlink.com/?U6163152E

On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:39:05 -0700, Christine Dabney
> wrote:

>On 10 Nov 2006 22:22:21 -0800, wrote:
>
>>The fact that this person is crossposting this and also going by the
>>name "koko" makes me think that they are just trying to get some hits
>>on their website and/or sell some chocolate.
>
>Koko is a long and established poster here...and is not spamming.
>
>Christine

Different person. The spammer is koko and doesn't have Koko's sig
line, which I adore.

Damsel in dis Dress > wrote in
news
> On Fri, 10 Nov 2006 23:39:05 -0700, Christine Dabney
> > wrote:
>
>>On 10 Nov 2006 22:22:21 -0800,
>>wrote:
>>
>>>The fact that this person is crossposting this and also going
>>>by the name "koko" makes me think that they are just trying
>>>to get some hits on their website and/or sell some chocolate.
>>
>>Koko is a long and established poster here...and is not
>>spamming.
>>
>>Christine
>
> Different person. The spammer is koko and doesn't have Koko's
> sig line, which I adore.

Yes.

I should have shown the difference between koko and Koko.
I hope everyone reports koko as the spammer to the ISP.
(spam from Malaysia)