Beer (rec.drink.beer) Discussing various aspects of that fine beverage referred to as beer. Including interesting beers and beer styles, opinions on tastes and ingredients, reviews of brewpubs and breweries & suggestions about where to shop.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to rec.food.drink.beer,soc.culture.usa,alt.society.liberalism,alt.politics.libertarian,alt.politics.homosexuality
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5
Default Liberal prohibitionists try to ban malt liquor

Pabst brewing company is preparing to launch a new brand of malt
liquor called "Blast" which will be promoted by famous rapper, Snoop
Dogg. With an alcohol content of 12%, it is roughly 3-4x stronger
than regular beer, but what really has liberal do-good busybodies'
panties in a bunch is that it is fruit flavored, like the "Four Loko"
brand they succeeded in banning last year.

Four Loko was banned by the FDA on the grounds that caffeine was not a
safe food additive for an alcoholic beverage. Blast contains no
caffeine, putting it out of the reach of the FDA's authority. It's
alcohol content is the result of natural fermentation, just like wine,
and 12% is well within the range of most wines.

Banning malt liquor outright is problematic, since malt is used to
make all beer, and the "malt liquor" term is just a legal term to
differentiate this product from lower-alcohol beers. It would be
difficult to ban one fermented 12% beverage and not another, and
hypocritical to ban a 12% malt beverage preferred by the proles while
permitting a 12% Chardonnay preferred by the elite. Even size can't
be used, since both Blast and most wines come in 700-750ml containers.

There are also quite of a few brands of lower-alcohol malt beverages,
such as Mike's Hard Lemonade, Smirnoff Ice, Seagram's Coolers, Zima,
and so on, that contain around 5% alcohol, roughly the same amount as
beer. Like Blast, they are artificially flavored, often fruit-
flavored, so trying to ban Blast on this ground will not work without
banning all the other flavored malt beverages.

The last argument the liberal prohibitionists will try to use is that
Blast appeals to underage drinkers. This is true only so far that ALL
alcoholic beverages appeal to underage drinkers. There is no evidence
that liquor stores will scrutinize the ID of someone buying Blast less
than they scrutinize IDs of someone buying Bud Light or Jack Daniels.

http://beernews.org/2010/12/pabst-to...cts-next-year/
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Member
 
Location: Ha noi
Posts: 14
Default

Good article! Thank you for your sharing this
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Member
 
Posts: 3
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dänk 666 View Post
Pabst brewing company is preparing to launch a new brand of malt
liquor called "Blast" which will be promoted by famous rapper, Snoop
Dogg. With an alcohol content of 12%, it is roughly 3-4x stronger
than regular beer, but what really has liberal do-good busybodies'
panties in a bunch is that it is fruit flavored, like the "Four Loko"
brand they succeeded in banning last year.

Four Loko was banned by the FDA on the grounds that caffeine was not a
safe food additive for an alcoholic beverage. Blast contains no
caffeine, putting it out of the reach of the FDA's authority. It's
alcohol content is the result of natural fermentation, just like wine,
and 12% is well within the range of most wines.

Banning malt liquor outright is problematic, since malt is used to
make all beer, and the "malt liquor" term is just a legal term to
differentiate this product from lower-alcohol beers. It would be
difficult to ban one fermented 12% beverage and not another, and
hypocritical to ban a 12% malt beverage preferred by the proles while
permitting a 12% Chardonnay preferred by the elite. Even size can't
be used, since both Blast and most wines come in 700-750ml containers.

There are also quite of a few brands of lower-alcohol malt beverages,
such as Mike's Hard Lemonade, Smirnoff Ice, Seagram's Coolers, Zima,
and so on, that contain around 5% alcohol, roughly the same amount as
beer. Like Blast, they are artificially flavored, often fruit-
flavored, so trying to ban Blast on this ground will not work without
banning all the other flavored malt beverages.

The last argument the liberal prohibitionists will try to use is that
Blast appeals to underage drinkers. This is true only so far that ALL
alcoholic beverages appeal to underage drinkers. There is no evidence
that liquor stores will scrutinize the ID of someone buying Blast less
than they scrutinize IDs of someone buying Bud Light or Jack Daniels.

Blast by Colt 45: Pabst Brewing debuts new products next year | Beernews.org
Hey this is pretty scary news hope this doesn't go through !!
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
2001 Haut Bages Liberal Ric Wine 0 22-01-2007 01:52 AM
Malt bagel boiling liquor Mary Fisher Sourdough 2 08-11-2006 09:10 PM
Baked Camembert & liberal quantities of vino LadyJane General Cooking 7 16-07-2006 01:15 PM
ingredient Q: barley malt vs. malt extract t.racer Vegan 1 18-06-2006 10:10 PM
Arroz al Liberal Louis Cohen General Cooking 9 11-12-2005 07:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:10 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"