Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
it is the molecular sulphur dioxide content of free sulphide dioxide that
protects wine from oxidation and microbial attack. the content of molecular sulphur dioxide in the free sulphur dioxide depends on the pH of the wine with lower pH's having the higher content. eg. pH 3.0 = 6% , pH 4.0 = 0.6% therefore it would seem to me if u r using metabisulphite as a sanitising agent for equipment and bottles it is useless unless the water used is acidified to at least below a pH of 4.0. any comment? neil |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
> it is the molecular sulphur dioxide content of free sulphide dioxide that
> protects wine from oxidation and microbial attack. the content of molecular > sulphur dioxide in the free sulphur dioxide depends on the pH of the wine > with lower pH's having the higher content. eg. pH 3.0 = 6% , pH 4.0 = 0.6% > therefore it would seem to me if u r using metabisulphite as a sanitising > agent for equipment and bottles it is useless unless the water used is > acidified to at least below a pH of 4.0. > any comment? > neil You are absolutely correct Neil. Even then, it's not overly effective at killing anything, mainly just stymies (inhibits)the bugs. The same effect occurs in the wine. Most of the cultured yeast used today are quite resilient to sulfur, and once the free levels become bound, the MLF are no loner inhibited either. I've always questioned the use of meta on equipment or bottles. Never seen it done in a winery. I for one don't care to smell that stuff anymore than necessary and would sooner use a simple detergent. But for the record, we do use a non-chlorine sanitizer. clyde Steelville, Missouri, USofA http://www.PeacefulBend.com |
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Metabi is used quite regularly for sanitation throughout the wine industry
(I work for a winery myself). Yes at higher pH there is less molecular, but this is less molecular per gram of metabi added to the liquid. When you're using water you can add as much metabi as you wish to reach the sterilization amount as the minimum molecular or more (ie 1000ppm 10000ppm ....it doesn't matter) an amount which would never be added to a cherished wine! In wine however, most winemakers don't feel comfortable adding such grand amounts. But when its just dissolved in water you can make whatever concentration you wish to achieve. "Neil R." > wrote in message ... > it is the molecular sulphur dioxide content of free sulphide dioxide that > protects wine from oxidation and microbial attack. the content of molecular > sulphur dioxide in the free sulphur dioxide depends on the pH of the wine > with lower pH's having the higher content. eg. pH 3.0 = 6% , pH 4.0 = 0.6% > therefore it would seem to me if u r using metabisulphite as a sanitising > agent for equipment and bottles it is useless unless the water used is > acidified to at least below a pH of 4.0. > any comment? > neil > > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
sanitizing equipment | Winemaking | |||
Using beer bottles for Individual serving bottles of wine | Winemaking | |||
Sanitizing/Cleaning...best? | Winemaking | |||
Sanitizing oak Chips? | Winemaking | |||
sanitizing bottles | Winemaking |