FoodBanter.com

FoodBanter.com (https://www.foodbanter.com/)
-   Winemaking (https://www.foodbanter.com/winemaking/)
-   -   sanitizing of equipment and bottles with KMS or SMS (https://www.foodbanter.com/winemaking/26827-sanitizing-equipment-bottles-kms.html)

Neil R. 10-04-2004 08:41 AM

sanitizing of equipment and bottles with KMS or SMS
 
it is the molecular sulphur dioxide content of free sulphide dioxide that
protects wine from oxidation and microbial attack. the content of molecular
sulphur dioxide in the free sulphur dioxide depends on the pH of the wine
with lower pH's having the higher content. eg. pH 3.0 = 6% , pH 4.0 = 0.6%
therefore it would seem to me if u r using metabisulphite as a sanitising
agent for equipment and bottles it is useless unless the water used is
acidified to at least below a pH of 4.0.
any comment?
neil



Clyde Gill 12-04-2004 03:21 PM

sanitizing of equipment and bottles with KMS or SMS
 
> it is the molecular sulphur dioxide content of free sulphide dioxide that
> protects wine from oxidation and microbial attack. the content of molecular
> sulphur dioxide in the free sulphur dioxide depends on the pH of the wine
> with lower pH's having the higher content. eg. pH 3.0 = 6% , pH 4.0 = 0.6%
> therefore it would seem to me if u r using metabisulphite as a sanitising
> agent for equipment and bottles it is useless unless the water used is
> acidified to at least below a pH of 4.0.
> any comment?
> neil


You are absolutely correct Neil. Even then, it's not overly effective
at killing anything, mainly just stymies (inhibits)the bugs. The same
effect occurs in the wine. Most of the cultured yeast used today are
quite resilient to sulfur, and once the free levels become bound, the
MLF are no loner inhibited either.

I've always questioned the use of meta on equipment or bottles. Never
seen it done in a winery. I for one don't care to smell that stuff
anymore than necessary and would sooner use a simple detergent. But
for the record, we do use a non-chlorine sanitizer.

clyde
Steelville, Missouri, USofA
http://www.PeacefulBend.com

BooDee 14-04-2004 03:12 AM

sanitizing of equipment and bottles with KMS or SMS
 
Metabi is used quite regularly for sanitation throughout the wine industry
(I work for a winery myself). Yes at higher pH there is less molecular, but
this is less molecular per gram of metabi added to the liquid. When you're
using water you can add as much metabi as you wish to reach the
sterilization amount as the minimum molecular or more (ie 1000ppm 10000ppm
....it doesn't matter) an amount which would never be added to a cherished
wine! In wine however, most winemakers don't feel comfortable adding such
grand amounts. But when its just dissolved in water you can make whatever
concentration you wish to achieve.

"Neil R." > wrote in message
...
> it is the molecular sulphur dioxide content of free sulphide dioxide that
> protects wine from oxidation and microbial attack. the content of

molecular
> sulphur dioxide in the free sulphur dioxide depends on the pH of the wine
> with lower pH's having the higher content. eg. pH 3.0 = 6% , pH 4.0 =

0.6%
> therefore it would seem to me if u r using metabisulphite as a sanitising
> agent for equipment and bottles it is useless unless the water used is
> acidified to at least below a pH of 4.0.
> any comment?
> neil
>
>





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:11 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter