Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Winemaking (rec.crafts.winemaking) Discussion of the process, recipes, tips, techniques and general exchange of lore on the process, methods and history of wine making. Includes traditional grape wines, sparkling wines & champagnes. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to rec.crafts.winemaking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Another good suggestion on the 'gravity points' of sugar.
I've been making table wines from vinifera grapes for some years, so I probably do have the basics moderately covered - but sweet wines and fruit wines are pretty new to me (third year). And this is a planning metric I've not used - but makles perfect sense. Thanks again. In article > "frederickploegman" > wrote: > R > > Since you seem to have already grasped the basics of how > to go about this, I will try to give you a_very_shorthand > version of how to calculate for such a recipe. > > 1. Estimate where the yeast you are using will "end". eg. > The maximum alcohol tolerance of that yeast. > 2. Figure out how many "gravity points" of sugar it takes to > achieve that amount of alcohol. Write it down. Example: > It takes ~105 gravity points of sugar to produce ~14%ABV. > 3. Decide what your "as indicated" target_end_SG will be. > Example: If your target is say 1.020, write down 20. > 4. To compensate for the effect of alcohol on post pitch SG > readings, write down 12. > 5. Add these three numbers. In this case it is 137. This then > is where to set your OG. eg. 1.137. > 6. If the yeast actually "ends" at 14% (it's seldom exact) you > should end up very close to your target end SG. If it is > higher than your target, it means the yeast didn't produce > the expected amount of alcohol, and if it is lower it means > the yeast produced more alcohol than expected. The only > way to refine this further is by empiracle data for individual > yeast/recipe combinations. > > You have to get pretty deep into this stuff to start using > "gravitypoints of sugar" to calculate things. Most folks just use > the "as indicated" end SG/Brix reading to determine RS. Which > is perfectly all right except it fails to recognize the effect > ofalcohol on post pitch SG readings. > > I think I better stop there. The last time I tried to explain > this,the discussion went off on so many tangents that I couldn't keep > up with it all, and I actually got flamed so bad I had to > give up posting here for a couple of years. I do NOT want > to get all that started again !! HTH > > Frederick > > -- I'm using an evaluation license of nemo since 50 days. You should really try it! http://www.malcom-mac.com/nemo |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
plum wine recipe differences | Winemaking | |||
Dar V ~ plum wine | Winemaking | |||
plum wine | Winemaking | |||
Plum wine | Winemaking | |||
Plum Wine | Winemaking |