Wine (alt.food.wine) Devoted to the discussion of wine and wine-related topics. A place to read and comment about wines, wine and food matching, storage systems, wine paraphernalia, etc. In general, any topic related to wine is valid fodder for the group.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Hunt
 
Posts: n/a
Default Question and comments on wine bottle size and shape (long)

A discussion arose in a thread about the usurping of proper regional names (
French in most instances stated) by US jug-wine producers, that mentioned
bottle size, i.e. quantity. I'd like to open a discussion on bottle size AND
shape.

I realize that many regions of the world have strong traditions as to the
shape, volume and color of their bottles. These specifications are rooted in
many decades, maybe centuries, and possibly millennia of the production of
wine, and the packaging of it into these containers.

I'm too much of a "traditionalist" to want to change any of that - heck, I
hate the thought of giving up cork in favor of selvin, or crown closures, even
though I have an acute awareness of TCA, and the like, but that has been
discussed and I've become convinced that I can drape a white cloth over my
arm, make a big production and just twist off the cap! I'll get over it...
well maybe someday.

What I have complaints about are the proliferation of all sorts of bottle-
shapes by predominantly US producers. To me, the perfect shape for a wine
bottle is the Bordeaux 0.75. With its straight sides, and constant (or nearly
so) diameter, it fits nicely into a case, whether wooden, paste-board, or
Styrofoam. Better yet, it stores in the cellar, regardless of whether one
places it in a single-bottle niche, a diamond-bin, or even in a square or
rectangular bin. It doesn't rock, and doesn't have to balance on a tiny point
of contact. OK, I know that Burgundy, and the Rhône, have put their wine into
the soft-shouldered bottle, whether red, or white. That is fine. That is
tradition. So long as the outside diameter doesn't exceed that of the Bordeaux
bottle, except by a small margin. A note: most of my Burgundies and all of my
Rhône wines fit into my single-bottle niches. Bubblies are an eexception, that
I just have to take into account, and had several storage areas built just for
them, just like my magnums.

Lately, however, several wineries (predominantly in the US, CA) have begun
pushing the envelope, or bottle, as it were. Some producers, like William
Foley, have taken to using Burgundy bottles that are much wider at their
largest diameter, than normal Burgundy bottles. These "cute" shapes might
stand out in the wine shop, provided that they display them upright.
Ravenswood's Icon is another wine, in a similar, though differently
dimensioned bottle. There are many more miscreants along these lines, but I
don't recall the other suspects off the top of my head. These bottles will NOT
fit into a single-bottle rack - they're too damned big. They will not stack in
a diamond, or rectangular bin, except on the top row, and then they teeter
precariously. So far, I've not had any mishaps, but the time IS coming. I have
bins, that only have one row of these monstrosities, balanced on a pin, and I
can't use the rest of the space. They would fit into a magnum slot, but then
the depth of the slot is a problem.

The only solution that I see is to just drink these up in a hurry, and to not
buy any more! I can gain storage for about ten cases of "regular" bottles,
just by eliminating these few oddballs. I just wish that the winemakers would
think about their art, and not the "art" of their marketing directors.

Am I the only person, who has a problem with these mutants? Does anyone have a
solution, other than giving up space designed specifically for my bubblies,
and magnums? Maybe if I collected and drank a lot of wine from the Franken
region of Germany, from a bocksbeutle, I'd feel differently.

Hunt

  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mark Lipton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hunt wrote:

> What I have complaints about are the proliferation of all sorts of bottle-
> shapes by predominantly US producers. To me, the perfect shape for a wine
> bottle is the Bordeaux 0.75. With its straight sides, and constant (or nearly
> so) diameter, it fits nicely into a case, whether wooden, paste-board, or
> Styrofoam. Better yet, it stores in the cellar, regardless of whether one
> places it in a single-bottle niche, a diamond-bin, or even in a square or
> rectangular bin. It doesn't rock, and doesn't have to balance on a tiny point
> of contact. OK, I know that Burgundy, and the Rhône, have put their wine into
> the soft-shouldered bottle, whether red, or white. That is fine. That is
> tradition. So long as the outside diameter doesn't exceed that of the Bordeaux
> bottle, except by a small margin. A note: most of my Burgundies and all of my
> Rhône wines fit into my single-bottle niches. Bubblies are an eexception, that
> I just have to take into account, and had several storage areas built just for
> them, just like my magnums.
>
> Lately, however, several wineries (predominantly in the US, CA) have begun
> pushing the envelope, or bottle, as it were. Some producers, like William
> Foley, have taken to using Burgundy bottles that are much wider at their
> largest diameter, than normal Burgundy bottles. These "cute" shapes might
> stand out in the wine shop, provided that they display them upright.
> Ravenswood's Icon is another wine, in a similar, though differently
> dimensioned bottle. There are many more miscreants along these lines, but I
> don't recall the other suspects off the top of my head. These bottles will NOT
> fit into a single-bottle rack - they're too damned big. They will not stack in
> a diamond, or rectangular bin, except on the top row, and then they teeter
> precariously. So far, I've not had any mishaps, but the time IS coming. I have
> bins, that only have one row of these monstrosities, balanced on a pin, and I
> can't use the rest of the space. They would fit into a magnum slot, but then
> the depth of the slot is a problem.


Hah! You have just hit upon my current pet peeve. It's not just
limited to CA, though it's certainly more prevalent there. However, all
recent vintages of Ch. de Beaucastel and Ch. de la Gardine no longer fit
in my S. Rhone rack. And so many high end CA cabs (and, increasingly,
Zins) are put into bottles that are easily 50% more massive than the
traditional B'dx bottle. As their shoulders are wider than their base,
they don't stack well either. My biggest concern, however, is that the
increased weight of these bottles will lead to long-term instability of
my racking. Those racks weren't designed for so much extra glass. Grrrr...

Mark Lipton
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mark Lipton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hunt wrote:

> What I have complaints about are the proliferation of all sorts of bottle-
> shapes by predominantly US producers. To me, the perfect shape for a wine
> bottle is the Bordeaux 0.75. With its straight sides, and constant (or nearly
> so) diameter, it fits nicely into a case, whether wooden, paste-board, or
> Styrofoam. Better yet, it stores in the cellar, regardless of whether one
> places it in a single-bottle niche, a diamond-bin, or even in a square or
> rectangular bin. It doesn't rock, and doesn't have to balance on a tiny point
> of contact. OK, I know that Burgundy, and the Rhône, have put their wine into
> the soft-shouldered bottle, whether red, or white. That is fine. That is
> tradition. So long as the outside diameter doesn't exceed that of the Bordeaux
> bottle, except by a small margin. A note: most of my Burgundies and all of my
> Rhône wines fit into my single-bottle niches. Bubblies are an eexception, that
> I just have to take into account, and had several storage areas built just for
> them, just like my magnums.
>
> Lately, however, several wineries (predominantly in the US, CA) have begun
> pushing the envelope, or bottle, as it were. Some producers, like William
> Foley, have taken to using Burgundy bottles that are much wider at their
> largest diameter, than normal Burgundy bottles. These "cute" shapes might
> stand out in the wine shop, provided that they display them upright.
> Ravenswood's Icon is another wine, in a similar, though differently
> dimensioned bottle. There are many more miscreants along these lines, but I
> don't recall the other suspects off the top of my head. These bottles will NOT
> fit into a single-bottle rack - they're too damned big. They will not stack in
> a diamond, or rectangular bin, except on the top row, and then they teeter
> precariously. So far, I've not had any mishaps, but the time IS coming. I have
> bins, that only have one row of these monstrosities, balanced on a pin, and I
> can't use the rest of the space. They would fit into a magnum slot, but then
> the depth of the slot is a problem.


Hah! You have just hit upon my current pet peeve. It's not just
limited to CA, though it's certainly more prevalent there. However, all
recent vintages of Ch. de Beaucastel and Ch. de la Gardine no longer fit
in my S. Rhone rack. And so many high end CA cabs (and, increasingly,
Zins) are put into bottles that are easily 50% more massive than the
traditional B'dx bottle. As their shoulders are wider than their base,
they don't stack well either. My biggest concern, however, is that the
increased weight of these bottles will lead to long-term instability of
my racking. Those racks weren't designed for so much extra glass. Grrrr...

Mark Lipton
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Bill
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Lipton wrote:

> Hah! You have just hit upon my current pet peeve. It's not just
> limited to CA, though it's certainly more prevalent there. However, all
> recent vintages of Ch. de Beaucastel and Ch. de la Gardine no longer fit
> in my S. Rhone rack. And so many high end CA cabs (and, increasingly,
> Zins) are put into bottles that are easily 50% more massive than the
> traditional B'dx bottle. As their shoulders are wider than their base,
> they don't stack well either. My biggest concern, however, is that the
> increased weight of these bottles will lead to long-term instability of
> my racking. Those racks weren't designed for so much extra glass. Grrrr...



I don't think this is a US problem. More and more low end wine companies
are using bottle design as a marketing tool. There are non-symmetric bottles
from France, very tall Chianti bottles from Italy, strange things from
Argentina. Lets not forget a bottle with a basket on the bottom and even
a bottle in the shape of a fish. If you can't sell the wine based on taste,
sell it with a different bottle design.


  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Max Hauser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mark Lipton" in ...
> . . .
> Hah! You have just hit upon my current pet peeve. It's not just
> limited to CA, though it's certainly more prevalent there.
> . . . so many high end CA cabs (and, increasingly,
> Zins) are put into bottles that are easily 50% more massive
> than the traditional B'dx bottle. As their shoulders are
> widerthan their base, they don't stack well either. . . .Grrrr...


Is the problem, fundamentally, that manufacturers now use these gimmick
bottles, or that the consumers who buy them respond to gimmick marketing
rather than to the content?


Max




  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Max Hauser
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Mark Lipton" in ...
> . . .
> Hah! You have just hit upon my current pet peeve. It's not just
> limited to CA, though it's certainly more prevalent there.
> . . . so many high end CA cabs (and, increasingly,
> Zins) are put into bottles that are easily 50% more massive
> than the traditional B'dx bottle. As their shoulders are
> widerthan their base, they don't stack well either. . . .Grrrr...


Is the problem, fundamentally, that manufacturers now use these gimmick
bottles, or that the consumers who buy them respond to gimmick marketing
rather than to the content?


Max


  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mathew Kagis
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Max Hauser" > wrote in message
m...
> "Mark Lipton" in ...
> > . . .
> > Hah! You have just hit upon my current pet peeve. It's not just
> > limited to CA, though it's certainly more prevalent there.
> > . . . so many high end CA cabs (and, increasingly,
> > Zins) are put into bottles that are easily 50% more massive
> > than the traditional B'dx bottle. As their shoulders are
> > widerthan their base, they don't stack well either. . . .Grrrr...

>
> Is the problem, fundamentally, that manufacturers now use these gimmick
> bottles, or that the consumers who buy them respond to gimmick marketing
> rather than to the content?
>
>
> Max

I suspect a little of both...

Mathew


  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mathew Kagis
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Max Hauser" > wrote in message
m...
> "Mark Lipton" in ...
> > . . .
> > Hah! You have just hit upon my current pet peeve. It's not just
> > limited to CA, though it's certainly more prevalent there.
> > . . . so many high end CA cabs (and, increasingly,
> > Zins) are put into bottles that are easily 50% more massive
> > than the traditional B'dx bottle. As their shoulders are
> > widerthan their base, they don't stack well either. . . .Grrrr...

>
> Is the problem, fundamentally, that manufacturers now use these gimmick
> bottles, or that the consumers who buy them respond to gimmick marketing
> rather than to the content?
>
>
> Max

I suspect a little of both...

Mathew


  #9 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dale Williams
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can add me to list of the folks irritated by this. I currently have 4
separate kinds of racks, only one will handle the biggest (La Gardine and the
like). It's a strange no-name 60 bottle wire one which isn't very efficient,
taking up almost as much space as a 152 bottle grid model. And they're
impossible in diamond bins. GGRRRRRR.
Dale

Dale Williams
Drop "damnspam" to reply
  #10 (permalink)   Report Post  
Dale Williams
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You can add me to list of the folks irritated by this. I currently have 4
separate kinds of racks, only one will handle the biggest (La Gardine and the
like). It's a strange no-name 60 bottle wire one which isn't very efficient,
taking up almost as much space as a 152 bottle grid model. And they're
impossible in diamond bins. GGRRRRRR.
Dale

Dale Williams
Drop "damnspam" to reply


  #11 (permalink)   Report Post  
Anders Tørneskog
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dale Williams" > skrev i melding
...
> You can add me to list of the folks irritated by this. I currently have 4
> separate kinds of racks, only one will handle the biggest (La Gardine and

the
> like). It's a strange no-name 60 bottle wire one which isn't very

efficient,
> taking up almost as much space as a 152 bottle grid model. And they're
> impossible in diamond bins. GGRRRRRR.
> Dale
>

Well, with Stelvin closures we'll not need racks any more, do we?
Anders


  #12 (permalink)   Report Post  
Anders Tørneskog
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Dale Williams" > skrev i melding
...
> You can add me to list of the folks irritated by this. I currently have 4
> separate kinds of racks, only one will handle the biggest (La Gardine and

the
> like). It's a strange no-name 60 bottle wire one which isn't very

efficient,
> taking up almost as much space as a 152 bottle grid model. And they're
> impossible in diamond bins. GGRRRRRR.
> Dale
>

Well, with Stelvin closures we'll not need racks any more, do we?
Anders


  #17 (permalink)   Report Post  
Michael Pronay
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Anders Tørneskog" > wrote:

> Well, with Stelvin closures we'll not need racks any more, do
> we?


Exactly.

M.
  #18 (permalink)   Report Post  
Michael Pronay
 
Posts: n/a
Default

"Anders Tørneskog" > wrote:

> Well, with Stelvin closures we'll not need racks any more, do
> we?


Exactly.

M.
  #19 (permalink)   Report Post  
Cwdjrx _
 
Posts: n/a
Default

While it is no doubt true that now there are many wine bottles too fat
to fit in standard wine racks for single 750ml Bordeaux bottles, there
have long been many fine wines in fat bottles. A prime example is
Romanee-Conti. All of the DRC wines bottles are too fat to fit in my
single bottle racks. They are not alone, as some Burgundy from others
has used fat bottles in the past, and some still do. Sometimes these fat
bottles and Champagne will fit in magnum racks. The most difficult of
all to rack I know of is the Bocksbeutel that has been used to bottle
wines in the Franken region of Germany for likely hundreds of years. I
have one metal rack of shelves spaced closely together to store such
bottles and other such unusual shapes in a single layer. The Bocksbeutel
is at least flat enough on two sides that it will not roll around on a
flat surface. For bottles that tend to roll, a few cheap wooden clothes
pins can have their upper ends cut off to make wedges to keep problem
bottles in place.

My mailbox is always full to avoid spam. To contact me, erase
from my email address. Then add . I do not
check this box every day, so post if you need a quick response.

  #20 (permalink)   Report Post  
Cwdjrx _
 
Posts: n/a
Default

While it is no doubt true that now there are many wine bottles too fat
to fit in standard wine racks for single 750ml Bordeaux bottles, there
have long been many fine wines in fat bottles. A prime example is
Romanee-Conti. All of the DRC wines bottles are too fat to fit in my
single bottle racks. They are not alone, as some Burgundy from others
has used fat bottles in the past, and some still do. Sometimes these fat
bottles and Champagne will fit in magnum racks. The most difficult of
all to rack I know of is the Bocksbeutel that has been used to bottle
wines in the Franken region of Germany for likely hundreds of years. I
have one metal rack of shelves spaced closely together to store such
bottles and other such unusual shapes in a single layer. The Bocksbeutel
is at least flat enough on two sides that it will not roll around on a
flat surface. For bottles that tend to roll, a few cheap wooden clothes
pins can have their upper ends cut off to make wedges to keep problem
bottles in place.

My mailbox is always full to avoid spam. To contact me, erase
from my email address. Then add . I do not
check this box every day, so post if you need a quick response.



  #21 (permalink)   Report Post  
CabFan
 
Posts: n/a
Default

<SNIP>
>
> Hunt


(Thought I'd snip this since there have been so many previous replies....
the most offensive of all of these (IMHO) is Insignia. Not only is the d**m
bottle different sizes and shapes, but it changes every blasted year for the
past 3 or 4. I've just about decided to quit buying for this reason alone
(okay, that and the ever increasing price!)

GRRRRRRRRR!

Gary
  #24 (permalink)   Report Post  
Matija Grozni
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Hi!

I'm just wondering... What do you think of the design of the bottle
(look attached photo)?

Regards, Matija


Hunt wrote:
> In article >,
> says...
>
>><SNIP>
>>
>>>Hunt

>>
>>(Thought I'd snip this since there have been so many previous replies....
>>the most offensive of all of these (IMHO) is Insignia. Not only is the d**m
>>bottle different sizes and shapes, but it changes every blasted year for the
>>past 3 or 4. I've just about decided to quit buying for this reason alone
>>(okay, that and the ever increasing price!)
>>
>>GRRRRRRRRR!
>>
>>Gary

>
>
> Gary,
>
> I have not received my allocation of the current release of Insignia, but (so
> far at least), they all fit well into my racking system. Because I usually get
> a case, I use the double-depth slots below my counter for these. I have felt
> that the bottles were quite heavy, but had not been offended by their shape,
> or size. I'll stack some of these up, next to each other and see what comes of
> it. Dang, I just hadn't noticed this one. Now, I've recently gotten some Cab
> Francs, and a few other red blends, that were about 3/4" longer (taller) than
> other B'dux bottles. These don't pose a problem for my system, it's the large
> dia. non-parallel side ones that drive me to drink. I also noticed that
> Conundrum's bottle seems to have grown. The dia. is about normal for B'dux,
> but it too is a bit taller - maybe 1/2".
>
> Oh winemakers, please have mercy on us, those who love and collect your art.
> Hunt
>



  #25 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mark Lipton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matija Grozni wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I'm just wondering... What do you think of the design of the bottle
> (look attached photo)?


Matija,
It's an interesting shape, but very impractical for storage.
However, as it appears to be a white wine, the wine itself may not be
intended for storage.

By the way, you really shouldn't attach *anything* to posts made to
newsgroups that don't have "binaries" in their name. Most people
reading your message won't see the attachment anyway, as their news
server will strip the attachment from the post. Usually, the thing to
do (if it can be managed) is to place the picture on a website and
provide a link to the website in your post.

Mark Lipton


  #26 (permalink)   Report Post  
Mark Lipton
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Matija Grozni wrote:

> Hi!
>
> I'm just wondering... What do you think of the design of the bottle
> (look attached photo)?


Matija,
It's an interesting shape, but very impractical for storage.
However, as it appears to be a white wine, the wine itself may not be
intended for storage.

By the way, you really shouldn't attach *anything* to posts made to
newsgroups that don't have "binaries" in their name. Most people
reading your message won't see the attachment anyway, as their news
server will strip the attachment from the post. Usually, the thing to
do (if it can be managed) is to place the picture on a website and
provide a link to the website in your post.

Mark Lipton
  #27 (permalink)   Report Post  
Cwdjrx _
 
Posts: n/a
Default

The more recent Musigny from Comte de Vogue uses bottles that fit in my
wine racks. However in 1949 de Vogue made both a regular and a Vieilles
Vignes Musigny. I have a single bottle of each. The regular will fit the
wine racks, but the Vieilles Vignes uses a slightly different, wider
bottle that will not quite fit the grid opening in my wine racks. I do
not know if this was intentional or not. They could have used up a stock
of wider bottles and started with less wide ones when they were bottling
the 1988s.

Many years ago Port "of the vintage" was sold in the US in very wide,
short bottles that will fit no racks that I have seen. Such wine would
have to be labeled "colheita" today.

I was given a bottle of V. Sattui Winery California Madeira several
years ago. The winery is in St. Helena. The wine is in a short, very
wide bottle about the shape of the "of the vintage of" Port mentioned
above, and it has bright red sealing wax rather than a capsule. I have
no idea how this wine will taste, as I have never seen this wine before.
According to the back label it was made using traditional soleras and
was available only at the winery.

My mailbox is always full to avoid spam. To contact me, erase
from my email address. Then add . I do not
check this box every day, so post if you need a quick response.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Looking for light weight, small size cylindrical or any other shape that is freezer safe to store concentrated stock (Chichen broth for example) Kent[_2_] General Cooking 0 22-03-2010 05:11 PM
Ask the dimension(mm or cm) of only wine bottle (standard size - 750ml) Hina Wine 1 22-02-2006 12:46 PM
Bottle Shape and Color do not spam Winemaking 5 10-12-2005 02:03 PM
How long does an open bottle of red wine last? Bobby Wine 10 05-10-2005 02:20 AM
wine bottle shape Karine Thibault Wine 3 14-10-2004 12:47 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"