|
Attn: WINDOWS users
Go to: microsoft.com
Click "downloads" Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than Leopard. WARNING!!!! FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!! |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"Bob Campbell" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> Go to: microsoft.com >> >> Click "downloads" >> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >> Leopard. > > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us > in the Mac newsgroups. That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote:
>In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. > >That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is >worth every penny you pay for it. > >Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. A lot of times people are swayed by the label. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770 |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"Bob Campbell" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come >> close >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe >> that >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. > > That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is > worth every penny you pay for it. > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. Quite a profound statement. I didn't realize you knew nothing about wines. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
Mayor of R'lyeh wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote: > >> In article >, >> "zara" > wrote: >> Some of them, like some of you, believe that >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. >> That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is >> worth every penny you pay for it. >> >> Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. > > A lot of times people are swayed by the label. > http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...n_page_id=1770 If it's good enough for Egon, it's good enough for me. advocacy removed. -- john mcwilliams |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > There are some tightass's there who come close to some of the Mac users here. You misspelled "tightasses." -- Posted from my 1999 Apple G4 Sawtooth A 450 MHz G4 running OS X 10.4.8 |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote:
> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message > > ... > > > In article >, > > "zara" > wrote: > > >> Go to: microsoft.com > > >> Click "downloads" > > >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) > > >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than > >> Leopard. > > > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us > > in the Mac newsgroups. > > That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close > to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that > the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine. I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > Go to: microsoft.com > > Click "downloads" > > Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) > > This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than > Leopard. > > > WARNING!!!! > > FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!! I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the latest major version of the operating system because it's still so buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating system. It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where new major versions of the operating system are actually worth installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks.... -- "More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way." --George W. Bush in Martinsburg, W. Va., July 4, 2007 |
Attn: WINDOWS users
hOn Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:31:18 -0700, Snit >
wrote: >On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote: >> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > In article >, >> > "zara" > wrote: >> >> >> Go to: microsoft.com >> >> >> Click "downloads" >> >> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >> >> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >> >> Leopard. >> >> > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us >> > in the Mac newsgroups. >> >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. > >Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer >dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine. >I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge. You've always struck me as the kind of man who would like a bottle of Thunderbird. -- Why settle for the lesser evil? Cthulhu for president 2008 |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On 2007-10-09 19:04:28 -0500, Bob Campbell > said:
> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us > in the Mac newsgroups. > > Bob Campbell Quit feeding the troll. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"Snit" > wrote in message ups.com... > On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote: >> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message >> >> ... >> >> > In article >, >> > "zara" > wrote: >> >> >> > snip > Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer > dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine. > I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge. Certainly - do you have a price range in mind? |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"ZnU" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> Go to: microsoft.com >> >> Click "downloads" >> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >> Leopard. >> >> >> WARNING!!!! >> >> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!! > > I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the > latest major version of the operating system because it's still so > buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating > system. > > It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where > new major versions of the operating system are actually worth > installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks.... And you will be patching it for the next two years. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > "ZnU" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > "zara" > wrote: > > > >> Go to: microsoft.com > >> > >> Click "downloads" > >> > >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) > >> > >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than > >> Leopard. > >> > >> > >> WARNING!!!! > >> > >> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!! > > > > I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the > > latest major version of the operating system because it's still so > > buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating > > system. > > > > It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where > > new major versions of the operating system are actually worth > > installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks.... > > And you will be patching it for the next two years. zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he even created a thread about! This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness to a new level. Kudos! -- Sandman[.net] |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
Bob Campbell > wrote: > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > > > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. > > > > > > Quite a profound statement. > > > > I didn't realize you knew nothing about wines. > > So you drink Mad Dog? That certainly explains your irrational posts > here. > > Bob Campbell I have a friend who swears that MD 20/20 is what is left over at the bottom of the vat when they make Prestone (g). |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"Sandman" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> "ZnU" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article >, >> > "zara" > wrote: >> > >> >> Go to: microsoft.com >> >> >> >> Click "downloads" >> >> >> >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >> >> >> >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster >> >> than >> >> Leopard. >> >> >> >> >> >> WARNING!!!! >> >> >> >> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!! >> > >> > I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the >> > latest major version of the operating system because it's still so >> > buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old >> > operating >> > system. >> > >> > It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where >> > new major versions of the operating system are actually worth >> > installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks.... >> >> And you will be patching it for the next two years. > > zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he > even created a thread about! > > This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness > to a new level. Kudos! You don't know what I downloaded. Ignorance is bliss. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"Kurt Ullman" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > Bob Campbell > wrote: > >> In article >, >> "zara" > wrote: >> >> > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. >> > >> > >> > Quite a profound statement. >> > >> > I didn't realize you knew nothing about wines. >> >> So you drink Mad Dog? That certainly explains your irrational posts >> here. >> >> Bob Campbell > > I have a friend who swears that MD 20/20 is what is left over at the > bottom of the vat when they make Prestone (g). He's wrong. It's Acetone. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article , "zara" > wrote: > > "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message > ... >> In article >, >> "zara" > wrote: >> >>> Go to: microsoft.com >>> >>> Click "downloads" >>> >>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >>> >>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >>> Leopard. >> >> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us >> in the Mac newsgroups. > > That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close > to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that > the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. > > Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"? |
Attn: WINDOWS users
|
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > >> And you will be patching it for the next two years. > > > > zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he > > even created a thread about! > > > > This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness > > to a new level. Kudos! > > You don't know what I downloaded. I sure as hell know what you DIDN'T download. :) > Ignorance is bliss. How does bliss makes you feel, zara? :-D -- Sandman[.net] |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"George Kerby" > wrote in message ... > > > > On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article , > "zara" > wrote: > >> >> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message >> ... >>> In article >, >>> "zara" > wrote: >>> >>>> Go to: microsoft.com >>>> >>>> Click "downloads" >>>> >>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >>>> >>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >>>> Leopard. >>> >>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us >>> in the Mac newsgroups. >> >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come >> close >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe >> that >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. >> >> > Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"? "Jealous"? Of what? Your mac? Your money? Your palate? Your car? Your women? Your house? - nah - they're all substandard. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > "ZnU" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > "zara" > wrote: > > > >> Go to: microsoft.com > >> > >> Click "downloads" > >> > >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) > >> > >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than > >> Leopard. > >> > >> > >> WARNING!!!! > >> > >> FOR WINDOWS USERS ONLY!!! > > > > I guess if you're stuck on a platform where you can't even install the > > latest major version of the operating system because it's still so > > buggy, it might be nice to get an update for your six year old operating > > system. > > > > It's a little sad, though. I think I'd rather stick to a platform where > > new major versions of the operating system are actually worth > > installing. I'll be installing one in the next three or four weeks.... > > And you will be patching it for the next two years. You mean unlike XP, which you're bragging about still patching after six years? -- "More than two decades later, it is hard to imagine the Revolutionary War coming out any other way." --George W. Bush in Martinsburg, W. Va., July 4, 2007 |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"Sandman" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> >> And you will be patching it for the next two years. >> > >> > zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he >> > even created a thread about! >> > >> > This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness >> > to a new level. Kudos! >> >> You don't know what I downloaded. > > I sure as hell know what you DIDN'T download. :) > >> Ignorance is bliss. > > How does bliss makes you feel, zara? :-D No viruses, ever. No BSOD ever. Sheer Bliss. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > "Sandman" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > "zara" > wrote: > > > >> >> And you will be patching it for the next two years. > >> > > >> > zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he > >> > even created a thread about! > >> > > >> > This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness > >> > to a new level. Kudos! > >> > >> You don't know what I downloaded. > > > > I sure as hell know what you DIDN'T download. :) > > > >> Ignorance is bliss. > > > > How does bliss makes you feel, zara? :-D > > No viruses, ever. No BSOD ever. Sheer Bliss. zara - ignorance personified! And you don't even seem to want to hide it. :) -- Sandman[.net] |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On 10/10/07 9:58 AM, in article , "zara" > wrote: > > "George Kerby" > wrote in message > ... >> >> >> >> On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article , >> "zara" > wrote: >> >>> >>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> In article >, >>>> "zara" > wrote: >>>> >>>>> Go to: microsoft.com >>>>> >>>>> Click "downloads" >>>>> >>>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >>>>> >>>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >>>>> Leopard. >>>> >>>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us >>>> in the Mac newsgroups. >>> >>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come >>> close >>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe >>> that >>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. >>> >>> >> Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"? > > "Jealous"? Of what? Your mac? Your money? Your palate? Your car? Your > women? Your house? - nah - they're all substandard. > > The only "sub-" in here is the size of anything pertaining to your anatomy. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On 10/10/07 12:16 PM, in article , "zara" > wrote: > > "Sandman" > wrote in message > ... >> In article >, >> "zara" > wrote: >> >>>>> And you will be patching it for the next two years. >>>> >>>> zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he >>>> even created a thread about! >>>> >>>> This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness >>>> to a new level. Kudos! >>> >>> You don't know what I downloaded. >> >> I sure as hell know what you DIDN'T download. :) >> >>> Ignorance is bliss. >> >> How does bliss makes you feel, zara? :-D > > Sheer Bliss. Imbeciles are easily amused. > > |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > "Sandman" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > "zara" > wrote: > > > >> >> And you will be patching it for the next two years. > >> > > >> > zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he > >> > even created a thread about! > >> > > >> > This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness > >> > to a new level. Kudos! > >> > >> You don't know what I downloaded. > > > > I sure as hell know what you DIDN'T download. :) > > > >> Ignorance is bliss. > > > > How does bliss makes you feel, zara? :-D > > No viruses, ever. No BSOD ever. Sheer bliss. No viruses either on my Macs. No BSOD ever. Sheer bliss using the Mac. -- Posted from my 1999 Apple G4 Sawtooth A 450 MHz G4 running OS X 10.4.8 |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"George Kerby" > wrote in message ... > > > > On 10/10/07 12:16 PM, in article , > "zara" > wrote: > >> >> "Sandman" > wrote in message >> ... >>> In article >, >>> "zara" > wrote: >>> >>>>>> And you will be patching it for the next two years. >>>>> >>>>> zara said, while downloading the latest patch for Windows XP, which he >>>>> even created a thread about! >>>>> >>>>> This is one of your funniest threads. You've taken your cluelessness >>>>> to a new level. Kudos! >>>> >>>> You don't know what I downloaded. >>> >>> I sure as hell know what you DIDN'T download. :) >>> >>>> Ignorance is bliss. >>> >>> How does bliss makes you feel, zara? :-D >> >> Sheer Bliss. > > Imbeciles are easily amused. Is that why you beat your meat to a pulp? |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >, zara
> wrote: > No viruses, ever. No BSOD ever. Sheer Bliss. A liar and a retard... |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"George Kerby" > wrote in message ... > > > > On 10/10/07 9:58 AM, in article , > "zara" > wrote: > >> >> "George Kerby" > wrote in message >> ... >>> >>> >>> >>> On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article , >>> "zara" > wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message >>>> ... >>>>> In article >, >>>>> "zara" > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Go to: microsoft.com >>>>>> >>>>>> Click "downloads" >>>>>> >>>>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >>>>>> >>>>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster >>>>>> than >>>>>> Leopard. >>>>> >>>>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as >>>>> us >>>>> in the Mac newsgroups. >>>> >>>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come >>>> close >>>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe >>>> that >>>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. >>>> >>>> >>> Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"? >> >> "Jealous"? Of what? Your mac? Your money? Your palate? Your car? >> Your >> women? Your house? - nah - they're all substandard. >> >> > The only "sub-" in here is the size of anything pertaining to your > anatomy. Sorry for your disappointment. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"TH O" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> >> No viruses, ever. No BSOD ever. Sheer Bliss. > > Either you don't receive email or you never have plugged the PC into a > network. clever,-- in your mind I'm sure. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > "TH O" > wrote in message > ... > > In article >, > > "zara" > wrote: > > > >> > >> No viruses, ever. No BSOD ever. Sheer Bliss. > > > > Either you don't receive email or you never have plugged the PC into a > > network. > > clever,-- in your mind I'm sure. How did it make your mind feel? -- Sandman[.net] |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On 2007-10-09 17:32:39 -0700, "zara" > said:
> > "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message > ... >> In article >, >> "zara" > wrote: >> >>> Go to: microsoft.com >>> >>> Click "downloads" >>> >>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >>> >>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >>> Leopard. >> >> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us >> in the Mac newsgroups. > > That was done for a reason. You were posting while drunk? -jcr |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"John C. Randolph" > wrote in message news:2007101100234038165-jcrnospam@nospammaccom... > On 2007-10-09 17:32:39 -0700, "zara" > said: > >> >> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message >> ... >>> In article >, >>> "zara" > wrote: >>> >>>> Go to: microsoft.com >>>> >>>> Click "downloads" >>>> >>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >>>> >>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than >>>> Leopard. >>> >>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us >>> in the Mac newsgroups. >> >> That was done for a reason. > > You were posting while drunk? HAR, HAR, HAR - a real thigh slapper. Your newsreader must be broken, you didn't get to see the whole of my response. How many Martini's do you suck down with Lovie before dinner? How many before? |
Attn: WINDOWS users
"Sandman" > wrote in message ... > In article >, > "zara" > wrote: > >> "TH O" > wrote in message >> ... >> > In article >, >> > "zara" > wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> No viruses, ever. No BSOD ever. Sheer Bliss. >> > >> > Either you don't receive email or you never have plugged the PC into a >> > network. >> >> clever,-- in your mind I'm sure. > > How did it make your mind feel? How strange "Foreigners" are. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On Oct 9, 7:31 pm, Snit > wrote:
> > > "Bob Campbell" > wrote: > > > Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. > > > > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us > > in the Mac newsgroups. > > > > That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close > > to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that > > the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. > > Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? Sure. Ever heard of two-buck Chuck? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Shaw_wine And, just to stay on topic for the advocacy groups, http://winehq.org is coming along nicely... it can run Photoshop CS2 pretty well now, and world domination can't be far behind :-) - Dan |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On 10/10/07 5:03 PM, in article , "zara" > wrote: > > "George Kerby" > wrote in message > ... >> >> >> >> On 10/10/07 9:58 AM, in article , >> "zara" > wrote: >> >>> >>> "George Kerby" > wrote in message >>> ... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 10/9/07 7:32 PM, in article , >>>> "zara" > wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message >>>>> ... >>>>>> In article >, >>>>>> "zara" > wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Go to: microsoft.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Click "downloads" >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster >>>>>>> than >>>>>>> Leopard. >>>>>> >>>>>> I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as >>>>>> us >>>>>> in the Mac newsgroups. >>>>> >>>>> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come >>>>> close >>>>> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe >>>>> that >>>>> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Jealousy is a bitch, ain't it, "zero"? >>> >>> "Jealous"? Of what? Your mac? Your money? Your palate? Your car? >>> Your >>> women? Your house? - nah - they're all substandard. >>> >>> >> The only "sub-" in here is the size of anything pertaining to your >> anatomy. > > Sorry for your disappointment. > > Why should I be disappointed that you have Hydrocephalus?!? |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On Oct 9, 7:44 pm, Mayor of R'lyeh > wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote: > >In article >, > > "zara" > wrote: > > >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close > >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that > >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. > > >That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is > >worth every penny you pay for it. > > >Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. > > A lot of times people are swayed by the label.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...s.html?in_arti... It seems convenient for Bob to ignore the Mayor's reply... |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On Oct 9, 9:31 pm, Snit > wrote:
> On Oct 9, 5:32 pm, "zara" > wrote: > > > > > "Bob Campbell" > wrote in message > > ... > > > > In article >, > > > "zara" > wrote: > > > >> Go to: microsoft.com > > > >> Click "downloads" > > > >> Click "WINDOWS update" (FREE) > > > >> This baby upgrades WINDOWS XP to something a lot better and faster than > > >> Leopard. > > > > I'm sure the folks in alt.food.wine are as thrilled with this info as us > > > in the Mac newsgroups. > > > That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close > > to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that > > the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. > > Can you suggest any real good wines that are not expensive? I prefer > dry over sweet. Seriously... even a decent Pinot noir would be fine. > I try to stay away from added nitrates which makes things a challenge. Can anybody recommend a good, dry vintage of butane for Snit to huff? He likes to stay away from added nitrates. Thanks in advance. |
Attn: WINDOWS users
On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 07:50:02 -0700, Edwin > wrote:
>On Oct 9, 7:44 pm, Mayor of R'lyeh > wrote: >> On Tue, 09 Oct 2007 20:40:18 -0400, Bob Campbell > wrote: >> >In article >, >> > "zara" > wrote: >> >> >> That was done for a reason. There are some tightass's there who come close >> >> to some of the maccies here. Some of them, like some of you, believe that >> >> the "more expensive" a commodity, the better it is. >> >> >That's generally true. OS X is worth every penny. Likewise, Linux is >> >worth every penny you pay for it. >> >> >Expensive wines are generally better than MD 20/20 also. >> >> A lot of times people are swayed by the label.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/liv...s.html?in_arti... > >It seems convenient for Bob to ignore the Mayor's reply... Why should Bob work with facts when his myths are so much more supporting of his positions? 8) |
Attn: WINDOWS users
In article >,
"zara" > wrote: > >> clever,-- in your mind I'm sure. > > > > How did it make your mind feel? > > How strange "Foreigners" are. Your mind is "foreign" to you? Well, I guess that makes sense! :-D -- Sandman[.net] |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:58 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
FoodBanter