Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
Damage - Killing Kids
For Money
>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.

7-4-5

What they should know about the aspartame connection:

1. Before the approval of aspartame (NutraSweet/Equal/Spoonful, E951,
Canderel) there was no epidemic of Ritalin use or epidemic of learning
disorders and behavioral problems. Renowned neuroscientist, Dr. John
Olney, predicted what would happen to the brains of our children if
aspartame was approved, especially in combination with MSG. He founded
the field of neuroscience called excitotoxicity when he did studies on
aspartic acid, (40% of aspartame) and found it caused lesions in the
brains of mice. Aspartic acid is an excitotoxin, that stimulates the
neurons of the brain to death causing brain damage. Neurosurgeon
Russell Blaylock, M.D., wrote the book on it, "Excitotoxins: The Taste
That Kills". www.russellblaylockmd.com Dr. Olney's report to the Board
of Inquiry of the FDA explaining what would happen to the brains of our
kids can be gotten on CD from Bob Flint, Mission Possible Maine,
It also has the Board of Inquiry report of the FDA
that revoked approval of aspartame. Learn how it finally got approved
by seeing the film Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World, www.docworkers.com.
On the film Washington Attorney James Turner explains how Don Rumsfeld
then CEO of G. D. Searle Co. called in his markers to get approval of a
deadly neurotoxic drug masquerading as an additive. Mr. Turner along
with Dr. John Olney tried to prevent approval.

2. Aspartame interacts with all anti-depressants and psychiatric
medication including Ritalin, of course. Our children are medicated
instead of educated. And aspartame triggers behavioral and psychiatric
problems to begin with. The 50% phenylalanine as an isolate is
neurotoxic and goes directly into the brain lowering the seizure
threshold and depleting serotonin. Lowered serotonin triggers manic
depression or bipolar, suicidal tendencies, mood swings, panic attacks
- all types of behavioral and psychiatric problems. Aspartame knows no
age. Time Magazine ran an article some years ago with bipolar on the
cover. An epidemic of children have bipolar and why does this point to
aspartame? Because children don't get bipolar, its an adult disease.
Psychiatrist and medical director of the Safe Harbor Behavioral Health
Center in Erie, Pennsylvania, Ralph Walton, M.D. has been concerned
about the bipolar and aspartame connection for years and actually did a
study on aspartame which can be found on http://www.wnho.net He was
concerned if aspartame triggers depression what will it do to those
already compromised with these types of problems. Monsanto who owned
NutraSweet at the time told Dr. Walton they would supply the aspartame
but changed their mind because they could not control the study, no
doubt. In the study one subject suffered a retinal detachment while
another had conjunctival bleeding. Many from the compromised group said
they felt they were being poisoned. The institution stopped the study.
Read Dr. Walton's research on scientific peer reviewed studies and
funding. 92% of independent, unbiased research showed the problems, yet
industry "controlled and financed studies" always said it was safe.
This was discussed on 60 Minutes by Dr. Walton when Dr. Olney made
world news about the aspartame/brain tumor association in l996. We are
now taking aspartame brain tumor cases from New York, Madison County,
Illinois, New Jersey and Mississippi for litigation. Aspartame breaks
down to a brain tumor agent, diketopiperazine. You have only to read
the Secret Trade Information, last paragraph on http://www.dorway.com
to know the manufacturer knew it would do this and wanted it approved
anyway. They mentioned they had to consider almost conversion to DKP
and if they told the FDA they wouldn't get it approved. To check this
out in humans Searle sacrificed people in poor villages in 6 countries.
The studies showed that aspartame destroys the brain and central
nervous system, and hardens the synovial fluids, according the horrific
joint pain aspartame victims suffer. Some developed brain tumors and
others seizures. Searle did not publish the findings but we have the
sworn affidavit from the translator.

3. The July 2005 First For Women has the issue of aspartame and anxiety
and irritability on the cover as an alert. On page 24 and 25 Dr. Walton
is quoted as saying: "Just a sip of diet soda can bring on symptoms
like headaches, sluggishness, anxiety, depression and irritability"
..... Lorena Murray, our Mission Possible Hickory, N.C. is being
interviewed and she can be seen in the movie, Sweet Misery. What the
article didn't go into is that Lorena used aspartame during pregnancy
and has aspartame affected children with learning and behavioral
problems. This neurotoxin almost destroyed her life and family.

4. How can aspartame destroy families? Because of damage of the
hypothalamus and mitochondria this neurotoxin triggers male sexual
dysfunction and ruins female response. Being an endocrine disrupting
drug it stimulates prolactin, changes the menses and causes
infertility. This is discussed in detail in the medical text, Aspartame
Disease: An Ignored Epidemic, by H. J. Roberts, M.D.,
www.sunsentpress.com or 1 800 827 7991 There is also a report by
biochemist, Dr. Madelon Price, who worked with Dr. John Olney for 30
years, and it can be found on http://www.dorway.com A Japanese Study
some years ago also showed aspartame can cause infertility in the male,
and the DNA damage. If a woman gets off aspartame and does get pregnant
aspartame is an abortifacient, the reason for so many miscarriages. It
is also a teratogen and triggers birth defects and mental retardation.
And even if a live child is born it may have heinously damaged DNA for
generations to come.

5. Has it been proven that aspartame causes these problems in children.
Absolutely! Go to the Safe Harbor web site and read Miracle in
Wisconsin . The ADD folks sponsored a program for the worst school in
Wisconsin. All vending and soda pop machines were removed and the
children were given nutritional food. At the end of the program this
was the best school in Wisconsin with zero learning and behavioral
problems. In September the ADD people, Feingold, banned aspartame.

Normally nobody would do a study on aspartame and children because
after a quarter of a century we know without a shadow of a doubt how
this aspartame destroys brains. In fact, some years ago a Norway
University did a study and found aspartame destroys the brain,
especially in the area of learning. However, a study was accidently
done in children by Dr. Baret of the Dominican Republic. Knowing that
small children drinking milk could trigger diabetes, Dr. Baret changed
their diet to replace milk with aspartame laced juice. It affected
immediately almost all 360 children with anxiety, irritability, etc.
Knowing the only thing he did was add aspartame to their diet he
called. He then removed the aspartame laced juice and within 4 days all
the children went back to normal. More information about this is in Dr.
Roberts medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic.

6. Has DNA damage been proven? Beyond a shadow of a doubt. Dr. Russell
Blaylock discussed the Trocho Study done in l998 in Barcelona to the
Minneapolis Neuropathy Association in l999. He said: "A recent study by
Trocho, Pardo and co-workers, have demonstrated that following
aspartame ingestion, significant amounts of formaldehyde accumulate in
the tissues. Formaldehyde is known to bind strongly to proteins and
nucleic acids, forming adducts that are extremely difficult to
eliminate through normal metabolic pathways.

"In this study, they demonstrated that labeled methanol ( as
formaldehyde) accumulated in high concentrations in the liver (50%) and
in lower, but substantial, concenetrations in the kidney, adipose
tissue, brain and retina. Within the cell, they found large amounts
located within the DNA. It was interesting to note that these doses
were lower than that used in toxicity studies. Previous studies have
shown that very high doses of aspartame may not cause acute
symptomalogy. This study indicates the damage may necessitate longer
periods of time to manifest itself and that the eventual effects can be
quite deleterious."

Having spoken to many people in the media who have tried to interview
the researchers in Barcelona, I can tell you they won't be doing more
studies on aspartame and they won't talk. They have been threatened.
This is one of the damning scientific peer reviewed studies done on
aspartame. When you damage DNA you can destroy humanity.

7. Why do not all physicians and consumers known the above information?
Because of the most wicked propaganda. There are many front groups on
the Internet like the Calorie Control Council who had the audacity to
write the Miami Herald and with full knowledge push aspartame on
pregnant women. See Dr. Blaylock's letter to the Miami Herald on
http://www.wnho.net click on aspartame. Does the Miami Herald know
aspartame is a deadly neurotoxin? Absolutely. They picked up propaganda
from another front group two years earlier. They were written by
physicians like Dr. Roberts and overwhelmed with aspartame victims
testimonies. And since the front group was writing about me I sent them
proof they were wrong. This had to do with lecturing for the World
Environmental Conference and I even sent them my invitation to speak.
In both cases the Miami Herald printed none of the letters nor did they
write a retraction . They refused to tell me which reporter published
the propaganda. Obviously since they were writing about me in the first
place they should have contacted me, so intent was made clear. And
while they said they would publish they did not showing they did not
want the public to have the real facts. Shame on the Miami Herald. One
caller reported a woman reading the propaganda in the Miami Herald got
back on aspartame, had a grand mal seizure and died. Professional
organizations also push the manufacturer's propaganda because they
receive their funding. You could write a book on the propaganda mills
and the lobbyists. Dr. Louis Elsas, Pediatric Professor, Genetics,
testified before Congress about what aspartame and birth defects. His
excellent testimony is on http://www.dorway.com and http://www.wnho.net


8. What you can do to help save the children. What is most important at
the present time is that the Alabama Board of Education on July 12 will
vote on a health plan for the Alabama schools to deal with obesity. And
there are some that want to allow caffeinated diet drinks in the
schools for 2005/06 school year. Keep in mind it's the diet drinks that
cause obesity because of the aspartame and a new study has proven it.
http://my.webmd.com/content/article/107/108476.htm

Also read Dr. Sandra Cabot's paper on http://www.dorway.com Aspartame
Makes You Fatter and Dr. Ralph Walton's paper on Aspartame and
Depression and Obesity. It also can precipitate diabetes, simulates and
aggravates diabetic retinopathy and neuropathy and interacts with
insulin as diabetic specialist H. J. Roberts, M.D., discusses in his
medical text, Aspartame Disease: An Ignored Epidemic. The soft drink
industry in Alabama is lobbying hard. We need everyone's help to stop
them. Read the recent article below about lobbying:


The Junk Food Lobby Wins Again

By Michele Simon, AlterNet.
Posted June 17, 2005.

The junk-food industry's lobbyists are working hard to make sure sodas,
candy and fast food are cheap and plentiful in the nation's schools.
Tools

More stories by Michele Simon

On Tuesday, Connecticut Governor Jodi Rell vetoed what would have been
the nation's strongest school-based nutrition law. With one stroke of
the pen, she put to rest an extremely contentious three-year battle to
rid Connecticut schools of soda and junk food.

Similar scenarios are being played out in state capitals all over the
nation, where high-paid lobbyists of multi-national corporations such
as Coca-Cola are swooping in to foil the efforts of local nutrition
advocates, educators. With rising rates of childhood obesity and
diabetes, state legislatures have become a major battleground over the
sale of junk food in public schools.

Ironically, the most common argument made against such bills is that
schools should maintain "local control" over nutrition policy. But
Governor Rell's reasoning is hard to swallow. She invoked the word
"local" no fewer than 16 times in her 3-page veto message. However,
many school policies are made at the state and even national level.
Perhaps the governor has heard of President Bush's "No Child Left
Behind" policy?

But Rell is not alone. All over the country, politicians deep in the
pockets of the junk food lobby are using the excuse of "local control"
to defend their indefensible positions on school nutrition. Trouble is
that local school districts are lured by the much-needed cash generated
by soda and junk food sales. Yet, as many parents are realizing, no
amount of money can justify sacrificing children's health.

Same Story Elsewhere

Recent examples of similar corporate influence include how in March,
the Kentucky state legislature passed a compromise bill that bans soda
only in elementary schools. Kentucky nutrition advocates were worn down
after battling Coca-Cola lobbyists for four years. Allowing companies
to continue to sell soda in middle and high schools was the only way
the bill could possibly pass.

Also, Arizona passed a law in April that bans the sale of soft drinks
and candy during the school day, but only in kindergarten through
eighth grade. The provision that would have extended the ban to high
schools was added and removed from the bill several times, but
ultimately, the junk food lobby got its way.

And in May, a strong piece of legislation was completely gutted in
Oregon thanks to corporate lobbying. The bill would have banned
carbonated soft drinks, candy, and fried pastry products in schools.
But the law that passed calls only for schools to have "wellness
policies." The Oregon Soft Drink Association donated $91,000 in
campaign contributions to state politicians last fall. Three key
lawmakers--members of the education committee--received $2,000 each.

High-powered Lobbying Tactics

The showdown in Connecticut involved an eight-hour House debate in
which lawmakers engaged in such stall tactics as relating memories of
being deprived of candy as a child. (Who cares and why is this is a
basis for policymaking?) The original bill would have allowed only
water, juice, and milk to be sold during the school day, but a
compromise reached at the end of the marathon session allowed diet soda
and sports drinks to be sold in high schools. Then the bill had to go
back to the Senate, where it had already passed. But this time,
lawmakers there attempted to delay the process by adding no fewer than
10 unrelated amendments, such as requiring smoke detectors in school
bathrooms.

And in a particularly underhanded move, while the bill awaited the
governor' s signature, a sign mysteriously appeared on the inside of a
high school vending machine that read "Let the state know how you feel
about the state getting into your lunch program", followed by Governor
Rell's e-mail and phone number. The sign was not approved by the
school, as is required for all public postings.

To do its bidding, Coca-Cola hired Patrick Sullivan, of Sullivan &
LeShane, which the Hartford Courant has called "the most influential
lobbying firm in the state." For his services, Sullivan is paid $80,000
annually by Coca- Cola 's New York division, plus an additional $7,350
a month by its New England subsidiary.

What Connecticut Governor Rell failed to mention in her veto message
was her own possible conflict of interest: The other co-founder of this
lobbying firm, Patricia LeShane, has served as the governor's campaign
advisor.

Proposals to rid schools of unhealthy food and beverages are currently
pending in several other states where similar battles are being fought.
For example, in California, nutrition advocates are back asking
lawmakers to get soda out of high schools, which were exempted from a
measure passed two years ago thanks to soda industry lobbying. How many
years must go by and how many precious resources must be spent on
accomplishing what should be common sense policy? And when will
politicians begin to show real leadership by placing the health of our
children above corporate profit?

Michele Simon, a public-health attorney who teaches health policy at UC
Hastings College of the Law, is director of the Center for Informed
Food Choices, a nonprofit in Oakland, Calif.

- end of this article -

The Idaho Observer publishes the Artificially Sweetened Times, 24 page
booklets to distribute to friends and families on aspartame. The front
page is titled "What Is Happening To Our Children". You can get your
copies from www.idaho-observer.com You can distribute to PTA's and
schools to alert parents and teachers.

You can also show the movie, Sweet Misery: A Poisoned World,
www.docworkers.com at PTA meetings and at lectures in school systems.

Remember that aspartame interacts with vaccines and is a chemical
hypersensitivity agent. So when children get off aspartame on to such
things as Splenda which is a chlorcarbon poison they can react. Dr.
Blaylock's book Excitotoxins: The Taste That Kills brings out even when
a life child is born of an aspartame user and appears normal, by the
time they reach puberty you can see the problems especially behavioral.


Unfortunately, Dr. John Olney's prophecy has been fulfilled. Help save
the children. Read below: Report of Ritalin Risks Prompts a Federal
Study.

Dr. Betty Martini, Founder, Mission Possible International, 9270 River
Club Parkway, Duluth, Georgia 770 242-2599 http://www.wnho.net and
http://www.dorway.com Aspartame Toxicity Center,
http://www.holisticmed.com/aspartame

New York Times July 1, 2005


Report of Ritalin Risks Prompts a Federal Study

By GARDINER HARRIS

ROCKVILLE, Md., June 30 - Federal health officials said Thursday that
they were looking into a suggestion by a small Texas study that Ritalin
and other stimulant drugs given to children might increase their risk
of cancer later in life.

A team of experts from the Food and Drug Administration, the National
Institutes of Health and the Environmental Protection Agency went to
Texas on May 23 to examine the methods used by the researchers, who
found damage to the chromosomes of 12 children who took Ritalin for
three months.

Ritalin, which entered the market in 1955, has been used for decades to
treat children for attention or hyperactivity problems.

Dr. David Jacobson-Kram of the Office of New Drugs at the food and drug
agency said that the study, by researchers at the University of Texas
and the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, had flaws in its methodology but
that its results could not be dismissed. Drugs that are known to cause
cancer cause similar chromosomal changes, Dr. Jacobson-Kram said.

But other scientists cautioned that the study was far too small and its
finding far too preliminary to cause alarm. The study did not include a
comparison group of children who had not taken Ritalin. And federal
officials said there was no reason for children currently taking
Ritalin or other stimulants to stop taking them.

Dr. Lawrence Greenhill of Columbia University, an expert on Ritalin and
other stimulant drugs used for children, questioned why the government
was devoting so many resources to following up on the study's findings.
Dr. Greenhill, like many other academic researchers, serves as a
consultant for companies that make the drugs.

Several research teams are trying to reproduce the study on a larger
scale, using better controls. And federal officials are examining
millions of health records to determine if children who took Ritalin
decades ago now have higher rates of cancer. The drug agency has also
asked the makers of Ritalin-like stimulants to provide it with any
information about their drugs' effects on chromosomes.

"I would say that if these data are reproducible, then that would be
very concerning," Dr. Jacobson-Kram said.

He added that it would be at least a year before the results of those
studies were known.

It is unclear, Dr. Jacobson-Kram said, how Ritalin might damage
chromosomes.

"There's no obvious mechanism by which these drugs should be doing
this," he said. "And there is nothing about them by which they clue us
that they are DNA damaging."

About 29 million prescriptions were written last year in the United
States for Ritalin and similar drugs to treat attention deficit
disorder and hyperactivity, 23 million of them for children. The drugs
are among the most widely prescribed medicines in the world.

Controversy has long surrounded their use, however, with critics saying
that the medications are greatly over prescribed.

Dr. Jacobson-Kram made his presentation before an F.D.A. advisory
committee called to examine the most recent reports of adverse events
among children taking Concerta, a long-acting form of Ritalin. The
committee found nothing new or unusual about the reports, which
included cases of children who had become psychotic and others who had
developed heart problems.

The drug agency said no committee members had conflicts of interest
that would prevent them from evaluating the drug's safety in an
independent manner.

F.D.A. officials told the committee that the agency planned to change
Concerta's label to make the risks of such side effects clearer. Among
the mental side effects reported among children taking Concerta were
hallucinations, thoughts of suicide, psychotic behaviors and
aggression.

"It's not that this is something new or that this is something that's
happening at a higher incidence than before," Dr. Paul Andreason, a
psychiatrist who is part of the agency's division of neuropharmacologic
drug products, told the committee.

But, Dr. Andreason said, descriptions of these problems in the labels
of Concerta, Ritalin and similar stimulants are often written in
technical language. So the F.D.A. has decided that descriptions of the
drugs' potential side effects must be stated more clearly, he said.

Still, agency officials and several committee members said they were
not convinced that Concerta caused mental problems like hallucinations
and psychosis. Rather, the children taking the drug may also suffer
from other mental disorders.

"The agency believes that it is not yet possible to determine whether
these events, especially the more serious ones, are causally associated
with these treatments," said Dr. Dianne Murphy, director of the Office
of Pediatric Therapeutics at the drug agency.

The most common side effects of Ritalin, Concerta and similar drugs are
appetite suppression, headaches, abdominal pain and sleep disturbances.
Children who take these drugs chronically often weigh less and are
shorter in stature as a result.

wrote:
> Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
> Damage - Killing Kids
> For Money
>>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.

Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."

http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp

usual suspect wrote:
> wrote:
> > Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
> > Damage - Killing Kids
> > For Money
> >>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
>
> Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
> non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
> letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."



**** off ~jonnie~, you little goober.

Betty is not "Nancy Markle" and the letter attributed to "Markle"
wasn't a chain letter you freakin' moron it was an article on
ASPARTAME.





>
> http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp

banbrains wrote:
>
> usual suspect wrote:
>
wrote:
>>
>>>Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
>>>Damage - Killing Kids
>>>For Money
>>>>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
>>
>>Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
>>non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
>>letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."
>
>
> **** off ~jonnie~, you little goober.
>
> Betty is not "Nancy Markle" and the letter attributed to "Markle"
> wasn't a chain letter

For all intents and purposes, "widely disseminated" equals chain.
Particularly when scientifically-illiterate people like you pass these
things on to others (including newsgroups) as "articles".

A widely disseminated e-mail by a "Nancy Markle" links aspartame
to Alzheimer's, birth defects, brain cancer, diabetes, Gulf War
syndrome, lupus, multiple sclerosis and seizures. Right away,
the long list warrants skepticism. Just as no single chemical
cures everything, none causes everything.
http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp

> you freakin' moron it was an article

It wasn't an article. Nancy/Betty isn't a real doctor. Aspartame doesn't
cause every ****ing disease on planet earth. And you don't know the
difference between any of the above.

usual suspect wrote:
> banbrains wrote:
> >
> > usual suspect wrote:
> >
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
> >>>Damage - Killing Kids
> >>>For Money
> >>>>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
> >>
> >>Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
> >>non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
> >>letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."
> >
> >
> > **** off ~jonnie~, you little goober.
> >
> > Betty is not "Nancy Markle" and the letter attributed to "Markle"
> > wasn't a chain letter
>
> For all intents and purposes, "widely disseminated" equals chain.
> Particularly when scientifically-illiterate people like you pass these
> things on to others (including newsgroups) as "articles".
>
> A widely disseminated e-mail by a "Nancy Markle" links aspartame
> to Alzheimer's, birth defects, brain cancer, diabetes, Gulf War
> syndrome, lupus, multiple sclerosis and seizures. Right away,
> the long list warrants skepticism. Just as no single chemical
> cures everything, none causes everything.
> http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp
>
> > you freakin' moron it was an article
>
> It wasn't an article. Nancy/Betty isn't a real doctor. Aspartame doesn't
> cause every ****ing disease on planet earth. And you don't know the
> difference between any of the above.



The major part of the "Markle" article was a transcript of a talk given
by Betty Martini some months previous.

If you are going to suggest a "widely disseminated e-mail" is the same
as a chain letter then all the shit you spew on these ngs are "chain"
letters.

Stupid little goober.

More Betty Drool

The "Betty Markel" fraud
WAS "Betty MArtini"

there IS no "Betty Markle"

wrote:
>
> usual suspect wrote:
>
wrote:
>>
>>>Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
>>>Damage - Killing Kids
>>>For Money
>>>>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
>>
>>Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
>>non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
>>letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."
>
>
>
>
> **** off ~jonnie~, you little goober.
>
> Betty is not "Nancy Markle" and the letter attributed to "Markle"
> wasn't a chain letter you freakin' moron it was an article on
> ASPARTAME.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp
>
>

--
"...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
Glen Cook

ted rosenberg wrote:
> More Betty Drool
>
> The "Betty Markel" fraud
> WAS "Betty MArtini"
>
> there IS no "Betty Markle"


We know there is no "Betty Markle" you stupid aspartame pimp.

Now why not get back to misc.health.diabetes where you keep talking the
diabetics into buying aspartame.








>
> wrote:
> >
> > usual suspect wrote:
> >
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
> >>>Damage - Killing Kids
> >>>For Money
> >>>>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
> >>
> >>Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
> >>non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
> >>letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > **** off ~jonnie~, you little goober.
> >
> > Betty is not "Nancy Markle" and the letter attributed to "Markle"
> > wasn't a chain letter you freakin' moron it was an article on
> > ASPARTAME.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp
> >
> >
>
> --
> "...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
> hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
> Glen Cook

AH, it is Bob the PETA asshole
pushing his crap into cyberspace from Mad Betty's bed

Didn't recognize you at first ****wit

wrote:
>
> ted rosenberg wrote:
>
>>More Betty Drool
>>
>>The "Betty Markel" fraud
>>WAS "Betty MArtini"
>>
>>there IS no "Betty Markle"
>
>
>
> We know there is no "Betty Markle" you stupid aspartame pimp.
>
> Now why not get back to misc.health.diabetes where you keep talking the
> diabetics into buying aspartame.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
wrote:
>>
>>>usual suspect wrote:
>>>
>>>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
>>>>>Damage - Killing Kids
>>>>>For Money
>>>>>>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
>>>>
>>>>Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
>>>>non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
>>>>letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>**** off ~jonnie~, you little goober.
>>>
>>>Betty is not "Nancy Markle" and the letter attributed to "Markle"
>>>wasn't a chain letter you freakin' moron it was an article on
>>>ASPARTAME.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp
>>>
>>>
>>--
>>"...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
>>hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
>>Glen Cook
>
>

--
"...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
Glen Cook

ted rosenberg wrote:


You are still the same incredibly STUPID prick you've always been.

MY posts are from Canada.

Robert Cohen's location is Oradell, NJ, USA.






> AH, it is Bob the PETA asshole
> pushing his crap into cyberspace from Mad Betty's bed
>
> Didn't recognize you at first ****wit
>
> wrote:
> >
> > ted rosenberg wrote:
> >
> >>More Betty Drool
> >>
> >>The "Betty Markel" fraud
> >>WAS "Betty MArtini"
> >>
> >>there IS no "Betty Markle"
> >
> >
> >
> > We know there is no "Betty Markle" you stupid aspartame pimp.
> >
> > Now why not get back to misc.health.diabetes where you keep talking the
> > diabetics into buying aspartame.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> wrote:
> >>
> >>>usual suspect wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Ritalin-Aspartame-Chromosome
> >>>>>Damage - Killing Kids
> >>>>>For Money
> >>>>>>From Dr. Betty Martini, D.Hum.
> >>>>
> >>>>Betty Martini's "doctorate" is an honorary degree bestowed upon her by a
> >>>>non-accredited Bible college. She's believed to be behind hoax chain
> >>>>letters sent under the name "Nancy Markle."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>**** off ~jonnie~, you little goober.
> >>>
> >>>Betty is not "Nancy Markle" and the letter attributed to "Markle"
> >>>wasn't a chain letter you freakin' moron it was an article on
> >>>ASPARTAME.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>http://www.snopes.com/toxins/aspartame.asp
> >>>
> >>>
> >>--
> >>"...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
> >>hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
> >>Glen Cook
> >
> >
>
> --
> "...in addition to being foreign territory the past is, as history, a
> hall of mirrors that reflect the needs of souls observing from the present"
> Glen Cook