query for the leaky Canadian homo
 

By now you've seen the pathetic bleatings of the stupid
Brit homo "John Jones", ****ing and moaning about
postings to alt.philosophy. Those postings occur
because ****wit (David Harrison) began posting to
alt.philosophy. In consequence, I have replied to him
in alt.philosophy.

The action of replying to alt.philosophy was mine. The
outcome is that "John Jones", drunken Brit homo, is
unhappy about it. Does ****wit share in the
responsibility for "John Jones", leaky Brit homo, being
unhappy?

Of course he does. I personally think ****wit had no
valid reason for "animal rights"-related stuff to
alt.philosophy, given that it was purely trolling, but
post it there he did. He has initiated a process that
has led to the querulous faggot "John Jones" being
unhappy. OF COURSE he shares in the responsibility for it.

JJ is a stupid Welsh homo. There is no need to insult
people on this ng.

"Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
ink.net...
: By now you've seen the pathetic bleatings of the stupid
: Brit homo "John Jones", ****ing and moaning about
: postings to alt.philosophy. Those postings occur
: because ****wit (David Harrison) began posting to
: alt.philosophy. In consequence, I have replied to him
: in alt.philosophy.
:
: The action of replying to alt.philosophy was mine. The
: outcome is that "John Jones", drunken Brit homo, is
: unhappy about it. Does ****wit share in the
: responsibility for "John Jones", leaky Brit homo, being
: unhappy?
:
: Of course he does. I personally think ****wit had no
: valid reason for "animal rights"-related stuff to
: alt.philosophy, given that it was purely trolling, but
: post it there he did. He has initiated a process that
: has led to the querulous faggot "John Jones" being
: unhappy. OF COURSE he shares in the responsibility for it.

formerly known as 'cat arranger' wrote:

> JJ is a stupid Welsh homo. There is no need to insult
> people on this ng.

My apologies. "Jones", of course; I forgot about that
being Welsh.

>
> "Rudy Canoza" > wrote in message
> ink.net...
> : By now you've seen the pathetic bleatings of the stupid
> : Brit homo "John Jones", ****ing and moaning about
> : postings to alt.philosophy. Those postings occur
> : because ****wit (David Harrison) began posting to
> : alt.philosophy. In consequence, I have replied to him
> : in alt.philosophy.
> :
> : The action of replying to alt.philosophy was mine. The
> : outcome is that "John Jones", drunken Brit homo, is
> : unhappy about it. Does ****wit share in the
> : responsibility for "John Jones", leaky Brit homo, being
> : unhappy?
> :
> : Of course he does. I personally think ****wit had no
> : valid reason for "animal rights"-related stuff to
> : alt.philosophy, given that it was purely trolling, but
> : post it there he did. He has initiated a process that
> : has led to the querulous faggot "John Jones" being
> : unhappy. OF COURSE he shares in the responsibility for it.
>
>

On Sun, 16 Jan 2005 20:52:05 GMT, the Gonad wrote:

>By now you've seen the pathetic bleatings of the stupid
>Brit homo "John Jones", ****ing and moaning about
>postings to alt.philosophy. Those postings occur
>because ****wit (David Harrison) began posting to
>alt.philosophy. In consequence, I have replied to him
>in alt.philosophy.
>
>The action of replying to alt.philosophy was mine.

Ooh Gonad...you didn't...oh no...you're doing it again
....what the hell's wrong with you boy?

>The
>outcome is that "John Jones", drunken Brit homo, is
>unhappy about it. Does ****wit share in the
>responsibility for "John Jones", leaky Brit homo, being
>unhappy?

No. It's entirely your fault. What happened anyway?
Did he actually believe your garbage about life not
being a benefit or something?

>Of course he does. I personally think ****wit had no
>valid reason for "animal rights"-related stuff to
>alt.philosophy, given that it was purely trolling, but
>post it there he did.

That was in case anyone wanted to give a philosophic
view of your idiocy Mr Gonad. Don't try to think about it,
or you will just develop an aching between your ears.

>He has initiated a process that
>has led to the querulous faggot "John Jones" being
>unhappy. OF COURSE he shares in the responsibility for it.

Well John Jones, if my positing has in some way caused
you unhappiness then I'm sorry that it has, but can't realy
feel any guilt for it, given the freakshow environment that
news groups are and we willingly participate in them. On a
more positive note: the Gonad here is one of the most
childish and dishonest people you will ever meet. Have fun
with the stupid clown. What do you have to lose? It's really
quite amusing some of the stupid things he does, and the
stupid lies that he tells are sometimes hilarious. I can honestly
say that I've laughed at the stupidity of the Gonad more than
any other single thing in my life. Thanks for the years of hilarity
via stupidity Mr Gonad.

I read alt.food.vegan to read about vegan recipies and nutrition.

The kind of content in the post below is not a good use of my time.

I am setting my filters to ignore threads from you. Not personal, but
it doesn't look like you are posting interesting content.

Have a good weekend.

Bye.

Steve


Rudy Canoza wrote:
> By now you've seen the pathetic bleatings of the stupid Brit homo "John
> Jones", ****ing and moaning about postings to alt.philosophy. Those
> postings occur because ****wit (David Harrison) began posting to
> alt.philosophy. In consequence, I have replied to him in alt.philosophy.
>
> The action of replying to alt.philosophy was mine. The outcome is that
> "John Jones", drunken Brit homo, is unhappy about it. Does ****wit
> share in the responsibility for "John Jones", leaky Brit homo, being
> unhappy?
>
> Of course he does. I personally think ****wit had no valid reason for
> "animal rights"-related stuff to alt.philosophy, given that it was
> purely trolling, but post it there he did. He has initiated a process
> that has led to the querulous faggot "John Jones" being unhappy. OF
> COURSE he shares in the responsibility for it.


--

Steve

Be A Healthy Vegan Or Vegetarian
http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdo...ealthyVeg.html

Steve's Home Page
http://www.geocities.com/beforewisdom/

"The great American thought trap: It is not real
unless it can be seen on television or bought in a
shopping mall"

> wrote in message
...
> Well John Jones, if my positing has in some way caused
> you unhappiness then I'm sorry that it has, but can't realy
> feel any guilt for it, given the freakshow environment that
> news groups are and we willingly participate in them.

sadly this is true. the only way to avoid this sort of sewage is to
subscribe to a moderated listing, but then it's very rare that the normally
anally retentive members of such a listing would deign to reply to us mere
mortals in pursuit of illumination. the only thing we can do is to quietly
ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic back-biting, and
perhaps feel a little compassion for the perpetrators who must lead very sad
lives if such as this is the only way to alleviate their feelings of
inadequacy.

> wrote in message
...
> Well John Jones, if my positing has in some way caused
> you unhappiness then I'm sorry that it has, but can't realy
> feel any guilt for it, given the freakshow environment that
> news groups are and we willingly participate in them.

sadly this is true. the only way to avoid this sort of sewage is to
subscribe to a moderated listing, but then it's very rare that the normally
anally retentive members of such a listing would deign to reply to us mere
mortals in pursuit of illumination. the only thing we can do is to quietly
ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic back-biting, and
perhaps feel a little compassion for the perpetrators who must lead very sad
lives if such as this is the only way to alleviate their feelings of
inadequacy.

****

**** off ******

Your father was a good **** but the haemerrhoids got in the way

**** off from altphilosophy you tosser

Your mothers crack was too big to do anything worthwhile with

"John Jones" > wrote in message
oups.com...
> **** off from altphilosophy you tosser

so it's a case of if you can't beat 'em then join 'em eh? not for me jj.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 09:57:57 GMT, "misanthrope" > wrote:

> wrote in message
.. .
>> Well John Jones, if my positing has in some way caused
>> you unhappiness then I'm sorry that it has, but can't realy
>> feel any guilt for it, given the freakshow environment that
>> news groups are and we willingly participate in them.
>
>sadly this is true. the only way to avoid this sort of sewage is to
>subscribe to a moderated listing, but then it's very rare that the normally
>anally retentive members of such a listing would deign to reply to us mere
>mortals in pursuit of illumination.

I try to avoid moderated groups, but believe how things go is greatly
determined by who is moderating. As for replies from the group after
you get in there, I guess it depends on the participants. But in all the
groups I've seen so far there is always an asshole or two, to varying
degrees. I hoped the philosophy group might be different, but Jones
seems pretty much an asshole. Maybe not. Maybe the subject of
whether or not life is a benefit doesn't apply to philosophy, but I feel
that it does. Really almost everything does, and that as much as any
imo.

>the only thing we can do is to quietly
>ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic back-biting,

You could take more than one approach...in fact you're taking
a different one now. I will say though that in all the times I've seen
people complain about what was posted in their chosen groups,
I have rarely if ever seen such a person have anything of value
to say.

>and
>perhaps feel a little compassion for the perpetrators who must lead very sad
>lives if such as this is the only way to alleviate their feelings of
>inadequacy.

I guess that varies from person to person too. It makes me wonder
why people do things as much as anything. Especially why do people
lie? There must always be a reason. The Gonad lies about my beliefs,
and feels that his lies are "needed". But why? Why would a person
feel that lies about what I believe, are needed by anyone? What I do
believe is that some farm animals benefit from farming, and that some
do not. That is what it's all about. The Gonad is very much opposed
to people giving such facts consideration, to the point of feeling that
lying about my beliefs is "needed", and of insisting that life has never
been a benefit for anything. But why???

<
> Well John Jones, if my positing has in some way caused
> you unhappiness then I'm sorry that it has, but can't realy
> feel any guilt for it, given the freakshow environment that
> news groups are and we willingly participate in them. On a
> more positive note: the Gonad here is one of the most
> childish and dishonest people you will ever meet. Have fun
> with the stupid clown. What do you have to lose? It's really
> quite amusing some of the stupid things he does, and the
> stupid lies that he tells are sometimes hilarious. I can honestly
> say that I've laughed at the stupidity of the Gonad more than
> any other single thing in my life. Thanks for the years of hilarity
> via stupidity Mr Gonad.

Ray wrote:

Rudy the Spic (AKA) ~~Jonnie Ball~~( Mr. Gonad) is a well known idiot on
these groups,
he dresses in funny clothes and hangs around male public lavatories. he is
best avoided. He is also the group 'Racist' and hates the population of the
UK. He abuses the decent people of Yorkshire and reports group members to
their ISP for sending binary files on 'text only' groups.

I will leave it to your imagination what's at the other end of this rope,
but some poor black family is short of a Father!

BTW. ~~Jonnie~~ is the one with the hat, I have no idea why the other guy
has his hand up his shorts.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 18:31:47 +0000 (UTC), "Ray" > wrote:

>
><
>> Well John Jones, if my positing has in some way caused
>> you unhappiness then I'm sorry that it has, but can't realy
>> feel any guilt for it, given the freakshow environment that
>> news groups are and we willingly participate in them. On a
>> more positive note: the Gonad here is one of the most
>> childish and dishonest people you will ever meet. Have fun
>> with the stupid clown. What do you have to lose? It's really
>> quite amusing some of the stupid things he does, and the
>> stupid lies that he tells are sometimes hilarious. I can honestly
>> say that I've laughed at the stupidity of the Gonad more than
>> any other single thing in my life. Thanks for the years of hilarity
>> via stupidity Mr Gonad.
>
>Ray wrote:
>
>Rudy the Spic (AKA) ~~Jonnie Ball~~( Mr. Gonad) is a well known idiot on
>these groups,

Probably one of the of the best known, considering the volume
of contaminant he is able to produce, and the number of reactions
is able to get from it.

>he dresses in funny clothes and hangs around male public lavatories. he is
>best avoided. He is also the group 'Racist' and hates the population of the
>UK. He abuses the decent people of Yorkshire and reports group members to
>their ISP for sending binary files on 'text only' groups.
>
>I will leave it to your imagination what's at the other end of this rope,
>but some poor black family is short of a Father!
>
>BTW. ~~Jonnie~~ is the one with the hat, I have no idea why the other guy
>has his hand up his shorts.

Gag. Just think what kind of stuff goes on in more private moments.
I wonder if the Gonad has explained to all those guys, and they stupidly
agree with him, that life has never been a benefit for anything.

> wrote in message
...
>
> I try to avoid moderated groups, but believe how things go is greatly
> determined by who is moderating. As for replies from the group after
> you get in there, I guess it depends on the participants. But in all the
> groups I've seen so far there is always an asshole or two, to varying
> degrees. I hoped the philosophy group might be different, but Jones
> seems pretty much an asshole. Maybe not. Maybe the subject of
> whether or not life is a benefit doesn't apply to philosophy, but I feel
> that it does. Really almost everything does, and that as much as any
> imo.
>
> >the only thing we can do is to quietly
> >ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic back-biting,
>
> You could take more than one approach...in fact you're taking
> a different one now. I will say though that in all the times I've seen
> people complain about what was posted in their chosen groups,
> I have rarely if ever seen such a person have anything of value
> to say.

jj is an interesting and colourful character on alt.phil, and he's just
****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a circus
by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with their
faecal discharges. i think he voices the opinion of the silent majority in
alt.phil: it's a shame when this sort of thing happens to a group that's
been useful and interesting. it not only deters new members but also drives
away old ones, and can in the long run kill the group.

>
> Ray wrote:

<Snip>
>
> The real Ray Wrote.:

I completely disassociate myself from the earlier posting and binary file
depicting Jonathan Ball on his KKC exploits. It is a complete forgery from
the PC of "Abner Hale" the well known Jonathan Ball impersonator. His
forgery of my address is perfect, you simply can not trust anyone on these
groups.
>
>
>
>
>

misanthrope wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > I try to avoid moderated groups, but believe how things go is
greatly
> > determined by who is moderating. As for replies from the group
after
> > you get in there, I guess it depends on the participants. But in
all the
> > groups I've seen so far there is always an asshole or two, to
varying
> > degrees. I hoped the philosophy group might be different, but Jones
> > seems pretty much an asshole. Maybe not. Maybe the subject of
> > whether or not life is a benefit doesn't apply to philosophy, but I
feel
> > that it does. Really almost everything does, and that as much as
any
> > imo.
> >
> > >the only thing we can do is to quietly
> > >ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic
back-biting,
> >
> > You could take more than one approach...in fact you're taking
> > a different one now. I will say though that in all the times I've
seen
> > people complain about what was posted in their chosen groups,
> > I have rarely if ever seen such a person have anything of value
> > to say.
>
> jj is an interesting and colourful character on alt.phil, and he's
just
> ****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a
circus
> by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with
their
> faecal discharges. i think he voices the opinion of the silent
majority in
> alt.phil: it's a shame when this sort of thing happens to a group
that's
> been useful and interesting. it not only deters new members but also
drives
> away old ones, and can in the long run kill the group.

As you can guess... I am dumpposting insults on this thread. You must
know, I hope, yours got accidentally dumped on. If its alright with
you, I shall continue dumping for our Country and the Glory of our dear
Sovereign Queen.
JJ

misanthrope wrote:
> > wrote in message
> ...
> >
> > I try to avoid moderated groups, but believe how things go is
greatly
> > determined by who is moderating. As for replies from the group
after
> > you get in there, I guess it depends on the participants. But in
all the
> > groups I've seen so far there is always an asshole or two, to
varying
> > degrees. I hoped the philosophy group might be different, but Jones
> > seems pretty much an asshole. Maybe not. Maybe the subject of
> > whether or not life is a benefit doesn't apply to philosophy, but I
feel
> > that it does. Really almost everything does, and that as much as
any
> > imo.
> >
> > >the only thing we can do is to quietly
> > >ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic
back-biting,
> >
> > You could take more than one approach...in fact you're taking
> > a different one now. I will say though that in all the times I've
seen
> > people complain about what was posted in their chosen groups,
> > I have rarely if ever seen such a person have anything of value
> > to say.
>
> jj is an interesting and colourful character on alt.phil, and he's
just
> ****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a
circus
> by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with
their
> faecal discharges. i think he voices the opinion of the silent
majority in
> alt.phil: it's a shame when this sort of thing happens to a group
that's
> been useful and interesting. it not only deters new members but also
drives
> away old ones, and can in the long run kill the group.

As you can guess... I am dumpposting insults on this thread. You must
know, I hope, yours got accidentally dumped on. If its alright with
you, I shall continue dumping for our Country and the Glory of our dear
Sovereign Queen.
JJ

a yappy little Yorkshire terror wrote:
>>Ray wrote:
>
>
> <Snip>
>
>>The real Ray Wrote.:
>
> I completely disassociate myself

Too late, you old tosser. You cross-posted binaries to four non-binary
groups.

> from the earlier posting and binary file
> depicting Jonathan Ball on his KKC exploits. It is a complete forgery from
> the PC of "Abner Hale" the well known Jonathan Ball impersonator. His
> forgery of my address is perfect,

How is he spoofing your IP, Raymond?

> you simply can not trust anyone on these
> groups.

Especially drunken Yorkshire racists like you.

a yappy little Yorkshire terror wrote:
>>Ray wrote:
>
>
> <Snip>
>
>>The real Ray Wrote.:
>
> I completely disassociate myself

Too late, you old tosser. You cross-posted binaries to four non-binary
groups.

> from the earlier posting and binary file
> depicting Jonathan Ball on his KKC exploits. It is a complete forgery from
> the PC of "Abner Hale" the well known Jonathan Ball impersonator. His
> forgery of my address is perfect,

How is he spoofing your IP, Raymond?

> you simply can not trust anyone on these
> groups.

Especially drunken Yorkshire racists like you.

"John Jones" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> misanthrope wrote:

<snip>


Ray wrote:

A close look at your message source is interesting JJ.

God bless the Queen my arse. The only Queen around here is you.

"John Jones" > wrote in message
oups.com...
>
> misanthrope wrote:

<snip>


Ray wrote:

A close look at your message source is interesting JJ.

God bless the Queen my arse. The only Queen around here is you.

"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
>a yappy little Yorkshire terror wrote:
>>>Ray wrote:
>>
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>The real Ray Wrote.:
>>
>> I completely disassociate myself
>
> Too late, you old tosser. You cross-posted binaries to four non-binary
> groups.
>
>> from the earlier posting and binary file depicting Jonathan Ball on his
>> KKC exploits. It is a complete forgery from the PC of "Abner Hale" the
>> well known Jonathan Ball impersonator. His forgery of my address is
>> perfect,
>
> How is he spoofing your IP, Raymond?

Same way as a sent me a few thousand virus infected e-mails a couple of
years ago. He's an expert hacker.
>
>> you simply can not trust anyone on these groups.
>
> Especially drunken Yorkshire racists like you.

"usual suspect" > wrote in message
...
>a yappy little Yorkshire terror wrote:
>>>Ray wrote:
>>
>>
>> <Snip>
>>
>>>The real Ray Wrote.:
>>
>> I completely disassociate myself
>
> Too late, you old tosser. You cross-posted binaries to four non-binary
> groups.
>
>> from the earlier posting and binary file depicting Jonathan Ball on his
>> KKC exploits. It is a complete forgery from the PC of "Abner Hale" the
>> well known Jonathan Ball impersonator. His forgery of my address is
>> perfect,
>
> How is he spoofing your IP, Raymond?

Same way as a sent me a few thousand virus infected e-mails a couple of
years ago. He's an expert hacker.
>
>> you simply can not trust anyone on these groups.
>
> Especially drunken Yorkshire racists like you.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:00:18 GMT, "misanthrope" > wrote:

> wrote in message
.. .
>>
>> I try to avoid moderated groups, but believe how things go is greatly
>> determined by who is moderating. As for replies from the group after
>> you get in there, I guess it depends on the participants. But in all the
>> groups I've seen so far there is always an asshole or two, to varying
>> degrees. I hoped the philosophy group might be different, but Jones
>> seems pretty much an asshole. Maybe not. Maybe the subject of
>> whether or not life is a benefit doesn't apply to philosophy, but I feel
>> that it does. Really almost everything does, and that as much as any
>> imo.
>>
>> >the only thing we can do is to quietly
>> >ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic back-biting,
>>
>> You could take more than one approach...in fact you're taking
>> a different one now. I will say though that in all the times I've seen
>> people complain about what was posted in their chosen groups,
>> I have rarely if ever seen such a person have anything of value
>> to say.
>
>jj is an interesting and colourful character

I've yet to see evidence of that.

>on alt.phil, and he's just
>****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a circus
>by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with their
>faecal discharges.

Meaning that philosophy people have no interest in whether or
not life is a benefit to anything. Most of the "Animal Rights" people
feel the same way about it apparently.

>i think he voices the opinion of the silent majority in
>alt.phil: it's a shame when this sort of thing happens to a group that's
>been useful and interesting.

Yes, if it ever was, it's too bad that it isn't any more. I've posted
to it more than once and don't recall anything useful or interesting
coming from it, so I can't be blamed for its downfall.

>it not only deters new members but also drives
>away old ones, and can in the long run kill the group.

Well, if instead of discussing the topic you simply complain about
it being brought up, that *could* have a negative influence as well,
imo.

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:00:18 GMT, "misanthrope" > wrote:

> wrote in message
.. .
>>
>> I try to avoid moderated groups, but believe how things go is greatly
>> determined by who is moderating. As for replies from the group after
>> you get in there, I guess it depends on the participants. But in all the
>> groups I've seen so far there is always an asshole or two, to varying
>> degrees. I hoped the philosophy group might be different, but Jones
>> seems pretty much an asshole. Maybe not. Maybe the subject of
>> whether or not life is a benefit doesn't apply to philosophy, but I feel
>> that it does. Really almost everything does, and that as much as any
>> imo.
>>
>> >the only thing we can do is to quietly
>> >ignore these infestations with their pointless and idiotic back-biting,
>>
>> You could take more than one approach...in fact you're taking
>> a different one now. I will say though that in all the times I've seen
>> people complain about what was posted in their chosen groups,
>> I have rarely if ever seen such a person have anything of value
>> to say.
>
>jj is an interesting and colourful character

I've yet to see evidence of that.

>on alt.phil, and he's just
>****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a circus
>by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with their
>faecal discharges.

Meaning that philosophy people have no interest in whether or
not life is a benefit to anything. Most of the "Animal Rights" people
feel the same way about it apparently.

>i think he voices the opinion of the silent majority in
>alt.phil: it's a shame when this sort of thing happens to a group that's
>been useful and interesting.

Yes, if it ever was, it's too bad that it isn't any more. I've posted
to it more than once and don't recall anything useful or interesting
coming from it, so I can't be blamed for its downfall.

>it not only deters new members but also drives
>away old ones, and can in the long run kill the group.

Well, if instead of discussing the topic you simply complain about
it being brought up, that *could* have a negative influence as well,
imo.

> wrote >>on alt.phil, and he's just
>>****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a
>>circus
>>by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with their
>>faecal discharges.
>
> Meaning that philosophy people have no interest in whether or
> not life is a benefit to anything. Most of the "Animal Rights" people
> feel the same way about it apparently.

Life is not "a benefit" you incoherent idiot.

> wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:00:18 GMT, "misanthrope"
> wrote:
> Yes, if it ever was, it's too bad that it isn't any more. I've posted
> to it more than once and don't recall anything useful or interesting
> coming from it, so I can't be blamed for its downfall.

then just maybe it's the wrong group for you.

> >it not only deters new members but also drives
> >away old ones, and can in the long run kill the group.
>
> Well, if instead of discussing the topic you simply complain about
> it being brought up, that *could* have a negative influence as well,
> imo.

that would be valid point in the case of valid topics, but it's not valid
for posts that contain nothing more than back-biting garbage.

**** off from altphilosophy

On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:43:10 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:

>
> wrote >>on alt.phil, and he's just
>>>****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a
>>>circus
>>>by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with their
>>>faecal discharges.
>>
>> Meaning that philosophy people have no interest in whether or
>> not life is a benefit to anything. Most of the "Animal Rights" people
>> feel the same way about it apparently.
>
>Life is not "a benefit" you incoherent idiot.

Life is the benefit which allows zygotes to grow into animals.
Life is the benefit which makes all others possible.

**** off from here then

> wrote in message
...
> On Mon, 17 Jan 2005 19:43:10 -0800, "Dutch" > wrote:
>
> >
> > wrote >>on alt.phil, and he's just
> >>>****ed that what used to be a useful group is now being turned into a
> >>>circus
> >>>by clowns with no interest in anything but infecting groups with their
> >>>faecal discharges.
> >>
> >> Meaning that philosophy people have no interest in whether or
> >> not life is a benefit to anything. Most of the "Animal Rights" people
> >> feel the same way about it apparently.
> >
> >Life is not "a benefit" you incoherent idiot.
>
> Life is the benefit which allows zygotes to grow into animals.
> Life is the benefit which makes all others possible.

Life is good
Benefits are good
therefore Life is a Benefit

Is that it?

You are a ****. Stay off altphilosophy tosspot

"John Jones" > wrote in message
ps.com...
> **** off from here then

Eat shit, netcop