Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|||
|
|||
Scented Nectar wrote:
>>>>>2) veganism isn't a numbers game, >>>> >>>> "Objecting to the 1001st Death" is simply an expression, it does > > not > >>>intend >>> >>>>to reflect a specific number of deaths. >>> >>>It absolutely implies a numbers game, yet it provides no credible or >>>authoitative numerical facts. >> >>===================== >>yet they have been provided. Always snipped out by the likes of >>you.... > > As far as numbers go, usual has posted in > alt.food.vegan proof that at it's very best the > meat industry has a 2.5:1 crop:finalproduct > ratio. Vegan foods of coarse have a 1:1. > > As far as animal deaths from non-veganic > farming goes, at best the meat industry > causes 2.5 times the cds. Thanks for helping to demonstrate that, contrary to the foolish assertions of John Coleman, "veganism" VERY MUCH IS about a numbers game. > > >>>Veganism starts with not eating animal products as a basic, and it > > does > >>>indeed leave much to ones own judgement. I do not regard this as a > > flaw. > >>>Veganism is inclusive and tries not to be too dogmatic. >> >>==================== >>ROTFLMAO It's the very definition os such as practiced here on > > usenet! > > Why do you have to keep on being reminded > that veganism is not a religion? It IS a form of religion. A belief system need not have priests and sacred texts to be a religion, although "veganism" has things very much like priests and sacred texts. > > >>>>It is completely unsubstantiated that "veganic" farming would be a >>> >>>workable >>> >>>>solution to feeding the human population. >>> >>>There is no reason it would not work for most. >> >>================== >>It's still machine intensive you ignorant dolt. > > > No it's not. Veganic farming, I believe uses > compassionate harvesting (=manual, usually). You are wrong, and you had no basis for making the claim in the first place; it's pure fabrication. There is no such word as "veganic". > > >>What a load of BS. What number do you want? There is 1, the moose, > > fool! > >>He provides thousands of meals! Prove that your tofu substitute > > meats > >>cause less than 1, fool. Come on, show your claims! Soy processing > > into > >>tofu is an intensive process, despite your continued claims. massive > > inputs > >>from the petro-chemical industry are required from seeding to putting > > the > >>fake crap on your plate! Destruction and animal deaths around the > > world, > >>not just where you eat the final product. You are seriously > > terminally > >>ignorant if you wish to dispute that. > > > If you are going to compare a wild moose with something, > compare it to similar wildcrafted vegan food, like wild > raspberries, or wild apples, or wild nuts, etc. 0 cds for > everyone. Woops, I forgot, you killed the moose! > 1 cd for you. > > > |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|