 |
|
| Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote:
> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > wrote: >> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > wrote: >>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any* >>>> animals. What do you have to say to him, Woopert? >> >>> He is incorrect. >> >> That's all??? That's the best you can manage? >> > > Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and > all that needs to be said. It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. |
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote: > > > On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > * *wrote: > >>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any* > >>>> animals. *What do you have to say to him, Woopert? > > >>> He is incorrect. > > >> That's all??? *That's the best you can manage? > > > Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and > > all that needs to be said. > > It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. Well, you're a bit weird. |
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 3/7/2012 8:26 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George > wrote: >> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > wrote: >>>>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any* >>>>>> animals. What do you have to say to him, Woopert? >> >>>>> He is incorrect. >> >>>> That's all??? That's the best you can manage? >> >>> Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and >>> all that needs to be said. >> >> It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. > > Well, you're a bit weird. Nope. You didn't expend a minute fraction as much effort trying to tell "glen" that he's wrong as I did on ****wit Harrison. |
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 7 Mrz., 17:45, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/7/2012 8:26 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any* > >>>>>> animals. *What do you have to say to him, Woopert? > > >>>>> He is incorrect. > > >>>> That's all??? *That's the best you can manage? > > >>> Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and > >>> all that needs to be said. > > >> It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. > > > Well, you're a bit weird. > > Nope. > > You didn't expend a minute fraction as much effort trying to tell "glen" > that he's wrong as I did on ****wit Harrison. Why should I? Your engaging with David Harrison is a complete waste of time. |
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 3/7/2012 8:46 AM, Rupert wrote:
> On 7 Mrz., 17:45, George > wrote: >> On 3/7/2012 8:26 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >>> On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: >> >>>>>>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any* >>>>>>>> animals. What do you have to say to him, Woopert? >> >>>>>>> He is incorrect. >> >>>>>> That's all??? That's the best you can manage? >> >>>>> Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and >>>>> all that needs to be said. >> >>>> It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. >> >>> Well, you're a bit weird. >> >> Nope. >> >> You didn't expend a minute fraction as much effort trying to tell "glen" >> that he's wrong as I did on ****wit Harrison. > > Why should I? Intellectual integrity, maybe? |
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 7 Mrz., 18:10, George Plimpton > wrote:
> On 3/7/2012 8:46 AM, Rupert wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On 7 Mrz., 17:45, George > *wrote: > >> On 3/7/2012 8:26 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>> On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George > * *wrote: > >>>> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > * * *wrote: > >>>>>> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: > > >>>>>>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > * * * *wrote: > >>>>>>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any* > >>>>>>>> animals. *What do you have to say to him, Woopert? > > >>>>>>> He is incorrect. > > >>>>>> That's all??? *That's the best you can manage? > > >>>>> Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and > >>>>> all that needs to be said. > > >>>> It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. > > >>> Well, you're a bit weird. > > >> Nope. > > >> You didn't expend a minute fraction as much effort trying to tell "glen" > >> that he's wrong as I did on ****wit Harrison. > > > Why should I? > > Intellectual integrity, maybe? There was absolutely no breach of intellectual integrity. You asked me to make a comment about what Glen was saying and I did, correctly reporting what my view was. My intellectual integrity was unimpeachable. |
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
On 07/03/2012 16:45, George Plimpton wrote:
> On 3/7/2012 8:26 AM, Rupert wrote: >> On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George > wrote: >>> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote: >>> >>>> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > wrote: >>>>> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: >>> >>>>>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't kill *any* >>>>>>> animals. What do you have to say to him, Woopert? >>> >>>>>> He is incorrect. >>> >>>>> That's all??? That's the best you can manage? >>> >>>> Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and >>>> all that needs to be said. >>> >>> It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. >> >> Well, you're a bit weird. > > Nope. > > You didn't expend a minute fraction as much effort trying to tell "glen" > that he's wrong as I did on ****wit Harrison. Whatsamatter, Mr. I ain't got no PHD but I'm gonna try to impress everyone by braggin I've got one? Can't you do your own dirty work any more? Looking for a bit of support eh? Man what a loser. No wonder St. Derek makes such an easy meal of you every time he shows up. How long did it take him this time? 5 posts? 6? Nah just a couple. *LOL* |
|
Posted to alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,talk.politics.animals,alt.food.vegan,alt.food.vegan.science
|
|||
|
|||
|
Attn: Woopert - "glen" claims to be "cruelty free" (was The'vegan' shuffle)
"glen" or "mark" or "little cocksucker" - friend of Lesley Simon, the
Whore of Ballaghaderreen, County Roscommon - bullshitted: > On 07/03/2012 16:45, George Plimpton wrote: >> On 3/7/2012 8:26 AM, Rupert wrote: >>> On 7 Mrz., 17:14, George > wrote: >>>> On 3/6/2012 11:14 PM, Rupert wrote: >>>> >>>>> On Mar 6, 4:56 pm, George > wrote: >>>>>> On 3/6/2012 12:57 AM, Rupert wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> On Mar 6, 5:08 am, George > wrote: >>>>>>>> Woopert, "glen" here is a "vegan" who claims his diet doesn't >>>>>>>> kill *any* >>>>>>>> animals. What do you have to say to him, Woopert? >>>> >>>>>>> He is incorrect. >>>> >>>>>> That's all??? That's the best you can manage? >>>> >>>>> Seems like an eminently reasonable and sensible statement to me, and >>>>> all that needs to be said. >>>> >>>> It seems pretty weak and begrudging to me. >>> >>> Well, you're a bit weird. >> >> Nope. >> >> You didn't expend a minute fraction as much effort trying to tell "glen" >> that he's wrong as I did on ****wit Harrison. > > Whatsamatter, Nothing. I've established you're a thorough hypocrite and liar. No, nothing is the matter at all, "glen" or "mark" or "little cocksucker" or whatever you're using this week. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| "The 'vegan' shuffle" | Vegan | |||
| The dreaded supermarket shuffle | General Cooking | |||
| Pan shuffle/toss technique!?! | General Cooking | |||
| A Challenge To The Vegan Bakers: Help Me Modify This Recipe :Vegan Pumpkin Flax Muffins | Vegan | |||
Hybrid Mode
