> wrote in message
...
>
>
> When usual suspect started calling me names
> without adding anything to the debate, all I have to
> say is:
>
> Game , Set, Match,
>
> See ya.
>
> That means I won, Sparky.
=================
Not even close. Means you're too afraid to take the truth about your
ignorance...

>
>
>
>

i thought that said 'ursula'...you know, that evil queen tentacled sea
monster in little mermaid. funny mental picture ()
> wrote in message
...
>
>
> When usual suspect started calling me names
> without adding anything to the debate, all I have to
> say is:
>
> Game , Set, Match,
>
> See ya.
>
> That means I won, Sparky.
>
>
>
>

wrote:
>
> When usual suspect started calling me names
> without adding anything to the debate, all I have to
> say is:
>
> Game , Set, Match,
>
> See ya.
>
> That means I won, Sparky.

You didn't win. You lost. You're whiffing off.

You never supported your one claim. Your bullshit
about "17 year studies" was empty; your claim remains
unsupported.

Go ahead and **** on off out of here. If you stick
around, fix your ****ing system clock.

*

Jonathan Ball wrote:

> wrote:
> >
> > When usual suspect started calling me* names
> > without adding anything to the debate, all I have to
> > say is:
> >
> > Game , Set, Match,
> >
> > See ya.
> >
> > That means I won, Sparky.
>
> You didn't win.* You lost.* You're whiffing off.
>
> You never supported your one claim.* Your bullshit
> about "17 year studies" was empty; your claim remains
> unsupported.
>
> Go ahead and **** on off out of here.* If you stick
> around, fix your ****ing system clock.

You're a pussy Ball. I love the way this person toyed with you. You did
loose simply by getting all ****ed off. You are too stupid to get it.
You are so dam easy and predicitable. Don't you ever get sick of doing
the same angry shit over and over. It would seem that you live for the
moment when you can just blow steam out your ass. I seriously think you
have brain damage. You know the kind that causes one part of your brain
to hash and rehash shit that makes you blow anger out your ass. Just
look at this whole thread with this person - it could be any number of
people that have yanked your pathetic chain before and you are such a
schumk you would not even catch on. You are pathetic! Now I am going to
repost this with my clock off by a day just to **** your pathetic ass
off.

wrote:
> When usual suspect started calling me names
> without adding anything to the debate,

Do you mean when I called you **** *after* you called me asshole?

> all I have to say is:
>
> Game , Set, Match,
>
> See ya.

Go on. Run away, tail tucked between your legs. You only win if you can prove
your claims. You didn't. I win.

katie top-posted again:
> i thought that said 'ursula'...

No, girly girl, the OP was so jittery from his abject failure to substantiate
his point that he misspelled.

> you know, that evil queen tentacled sea
> monster in little mermaid.
> funny mental picture ()

Funny? No. Childish? Yes.

> wrote in message
...
> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:54:12 GMT, usual suspect >
> wrote:
>
> wrote:
> >> When usual suspect started calling me names
> >> without adding anything to the debate,
> >
> >Do you mean when I called you **** *after* you called me asshole?
>
> No, before that of course. Keep it straight.
>
> >
> >> all I have to say is:
> >>
> >> Game , Set, Match,
> >>
> >> See ya.
> >
> >Go on. Run away, tail tucked between your legs. You only win if you can
prove
> >your claims. You didn't. I win.
>
> You provided no proof, so no you didn't.
========================
ROTFLMAO When are you going to back up your claim, stupid? What you've
poeted so far only proves what *we* have been saying.
You really are too stupid for this, aren't you. Care to explain that
*increase* in cancer with a vegetarian diet that *you* posted?

Didn't think so, since you are running away from actual discussion now...
I would too if I were you. You don't have what it takes.

wrote:

> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:54:12 GMT, usual suspect >
> wrote:
>
>
wrote:
>>
>>>When usual suspect started calling me names
>>>without adding anything to the debate,
>>
>>Do you mean when I called you **** *after* you called me asshole?
>
>
> No, before that of course. Keep it straight.
>
>
>>>all I have to say is:
>>>
>>>Game , Set, Match,
>>>
>>>See ya.
>>
>>Go on. Run away, tail tucked between your legs. You only win if you can prove
>>your claims. You didn't. I win.
>
>
> You provided no proof, so no you didn't.

He demonstrated that you didn't support your claim,
which was the only point at issue. You lost. He won.
I won.

rick etter wrote:

> > wrote in message
> ...
>
>>On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:54:12 GMT, usual suspect >
>>wrote:
>>
>>
wrote:
>>>
>>>>When usual suspect started calling me names
>>>>without adding anything to the debate,
>>>
>>>Do you mean when I called you **** *after* you called me asshole?
>>
>>No, before that of course. Keep it straight.
>>
>>
>>>>all I have to say is:
>>>>
>>>>Game , Set, Match,
>>>>
>>>>See ya.
>>>
>>>Go on. Run away, tail tucked between your legs. You only win if you can
>
> prove
>
>>>your claims. You didn't. I win.
>>
>>You provided no proof, so no you didn't.
>
> ========================
> ROTFLMAO When are you going to back up your claim, stupid?

He won't. He can't. He cited one study that had
nothing to do with his claim.

He'll be gone soon.

When usual suspect started calling me names
without adding anything to the debate, all I have to
say is:

Game , Set, Match,

See ya.

That means I won, Sparky.

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 03:23:09 GMT, "katie"
> wrote:

>i thought that said 'ursula'...you know, that evil queen tentacled sea
>monster in little mermaid. funny mental picture ()


It's along the same lines

*

Jonathan Ball wrote:

> wrote:
> >
> > When usual suspect started calling me* names
> > without adding anything to the debate, all I have to
> > say is:
> >
> > Game , Set, Match,
> >
> > See ya.
> >
> > That means I won, Sparky.
>
> You didn't win.* You lost.* You're whiffing off.
>
> You never supported your one claim.* Your bullshit
> about "17 year studies" was empty; your claim remains
> unsupported.
>
> Go ahead and **** on off out of here.* If you stick around, fix your
> ****ing system clock.You're a pussy Ball. I love the way this person
> toyed with you. You did loose simply by getting all ****ed off. You
> are too stupid to get it. You are so dam easy and predicitable. Don't
> you ever get sick of doing the same angry shit over and over. It would
> seem that you live for the moment when you can just blow steam out
> your ass. I seriously think you have brain damage.You know the kind
> that causes one part of your brain to hash and rehash shit that makes
> you blow anger out your ass. Just look at this whole thread with this
> person - it could be any number of people that have yanked your
> pathetic chain before and you are such a schumk you would not even
> catch on. You are pathetic! Now I am going to repost this with my
> clock off by a day just to **** your pathetic ass off.

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 15:01:10 GMT, usual suspect >
wrote:

>katie top-posted again:
>> i thought that said 'ursula'...
>
>No, girly girl, the OP was so jittery from his abject failure to substantiate
>his point that he misspelled.

No, the OP did that on purpose, and next time
will spell it Ursula.

>
>> you know, that evil queen tentacled sea
>> monster in little mermaid.
>> funny mental picture ()
>
>Funny? No. Childish? Yes.

We know what you are too.

On Thu, 11 Mar 2004 14:54:12 GMT, usual suspect >
wrote:

wrote:
>> When usual suspect started calling me names
>> without adding anything to the debate,
>
>Do you mean when I called you **** *after* you called me asshole?

No, before that of course. Keep it straight.

>
>> all I have to say is:
>>
>> Game , Set, Match,
>>
>> See ya.
>
>Go on. Run away, tail tucked between your legs. You only win if you can prove
>your claims. You didn't. I win.

You provided no proof, so no you didn't.

rick etter wrote:

For some reason, the nitwit's posts are showing up as expired. I'm responding to
both the yogi-wannabe and Rick.

>>>>When usual suspect started calling me names
>>>>without adding anything to the debate,
>>>
>>>Do you mean when I called you **** *after* you called me asshole?
>>
>>No, before that of course. Keep it straight.
>>
>>
>>>>all I have to say is:
>>>>
>>>>Game , Set, Match,
>>>>
>>>>See ya.
>>>
>>>Go on. Run away, tail tucked between your legs. You only win if you can
> prove
>>>your claims. You didn't. I win.
>>
>>You provided no proof, so no you didn't.

wannabe: I provided sufficient proof of my claims to counter yours AND I pasted
in the parts of your own "proof" which refute your claim. If your source doesn't
even agree with you, then you cannot win.

> ========================
> ROTFLMAO When are you going to back up your claim, stupid? What you've
> poeted so far only proves what *we* have been saying.

The dope doesn't comprehend what he reads. If he did, he wouldn't have used a
source which supports our claims.

> You really are too stupid for this, aren't you. Care to explain that
> *increase* in cancer with a vegetarian diet that *you* posted?

He can't.

> Didn't think so, since you are running away from actual discussion now...
> I would too if I were you. You don't have what it takes.

Balls? From one of my posts on over-consumption of soy:
----
Semen production requires a lot of zinc, which is often lacking in veg-n diets.
Over-consumption of soy products can lead to feminizing since soy is rich in
phyto-estrogens. There are some studies on such effects of soy.

Rat pups, exposed to high doses of the plant estrogen coumestrol
(found in sunflower seeds and oil and alfalfa sprouts) through
their mother's milk, suffered permanent reproductive problems:
female pups when grown did not ovulate, and males had altered
mounting behavior and fewer ejaculations (2).
[Whitten, P., C. Lewis and F. Naftolin. 1993. A Phytoestrogen
diet induces the premature anovulatory syndrome in lactationally
exposed female rats. Biology of Reproduction 49:1117-21.]

Neonatal and immature rats exposed to coumestrol experienced
estrogen-related responses, such as premature estrous cycles.
Coumestrol also interrupted ovarian cycles in adult female rats
(3).
[Barrett, J. 1996. Phytoestrogens: Friends or Foes?
Environmental Health Perspectives 104:478-82.]

Newborn rats exposed to the phytoestrogen genistein (a compound
found in soy products), experienced altered hormone secretions
and the onset of puberty may have been delayed because female
rats were exposed to the compound as fetuses (3).
[Ibid.]

“In males, levels of 17B-estradiol and testosterone were not
affected, but levels of 3a, 17B- androstanediol glucuronide (a
metabolite of dihydrotestosterone) and dehydroepiandrosterone
sulfate were decreased by 13% and 14%, respectively, after 2-4
weeks of daily soya ingestion.”
[Supported by USPHS CA56273, CA65628, CA45181, John Sealy
Memorial Endowment Fund for Biomedical Research, American
Institute for Cancer Research grant 95B119, and NIH NCRR GCRC
grant M01 RR00073]

All above lifted from:
http://www.cheapbodybuildingsuppleme...estrogen.shtml

Additionally, see:
http://www.t-mag.com/articles/185soy.html
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/satter6.htm
----
That sattvic diet may be great for navel-gazing, but it also turns men into
little girls.