Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Goo has lost it completely.

The Goober, who never had anything respectable to begin with,
has now lost it completely. Goo can't explain anything, is in denial
about everything, and that's all there appears to be left of Goo
besides childish lies and insults.
  #2 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Goo has lost it completely.

On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 the Goober babbled incoherently:

>On Sun, 21 Sep 2008 19:49:08 -0100, dh@. pointed out:
>
>> The Goober, who never had anything respectable to begin with,
>>has now lost it completely. Goo can't explain anything, is in denial
>>about everything, and that's all there appears to be left of Goo
>>besides childish lies and insults.


>"Getting to experience life" is not a benefit, Goo.


LOL. Thanks for proving me correct AGAIN Goo. You have
lost it completely Goober, and "it" has always been **** poor
even in your "best" times.
  #3 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Mr.Smartypants challenges the Goober

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 "Mr.Smartypants" challenged the Goober:

>On Sep 22, 12:28*pm, Goo again make the apparantly idiotic claim which is
>so completely stupid that even the Goober himself can't attempt to support it:
>
>> It is a *FACT*, Goo, that coming into
>> existence - "getting to experience life", in your *SHIT* terminology -
>> is not a benefit to farm animals.

>
>
>
>Prove it, Boobs.


The only thing the Goober can prove is that he's too inept to
even attempt the challenge...too inept and too cowardly, the
cowardice being a bi-product of his ineptitude. We know for
certain that Goo believes our own pre-existent "selves" are
somehow preventing us from benefitting from life now:

"Life is not a gain because there *was* no person" - Goo

but none of us--including the Goober-- know HOW he thinks
they're doing it! We only know for certain that Goob is certain
that "they" are somehow preventing us all from benefitting...
every being ever born, anywhere...

Goober, try to stop being a cowardly wuss and attempt to
meet Mr. Smartypants' challenge. Try to give evidence that
you have any sliver of a clue what it is you think you're trying
to talk about Goo. GO:


(Note: The Goober has been challenged directly by Rupert,
Mr Smartypants and myself to give evidence that he has
some clue what he thinks he's trying to talk about, and as
yet has been able to present no evidence at all. None.)
  #4 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Mr.Smartypants points out the cluelessness of Goo

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:04:01 -0700 (PDT), "Mr.Smartypants" > wrote:

>On Sep 22, Goo tried to cowardly slink away from one of his absurd claims:


>> Rupert challenged the Goober on his absurd claim:


>> > On Sep 22, 8:29 am, Goo again made a claim he can't back up:


>> >> "Getting to experience life" is not a benefit, Goo.

>>
>> > What's the point?

>>
>> Think about it a little longer, rupie - you can probably get it on your own.

>
>
>LOL!!
>
>You have *NO* clue what point you're trying to make.


That's for sure, and is proven by his inability to even try
to explain what he thinks he thinks he's trying to talk about.
Goo really REALLY does suck at this.
  #5 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Goo thinks his own ineptitude is "devastating" to other people. LOL!

On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 Clueless Goo made the absurd claim:

>On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:18:19 -0100, dh@. pointed out:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 Goo amusingly wrote:
>>
>>>Rupert challenged Clueless to explain:

>>
>>>> On Sep 22, Goo claimed without being able to back it up:

>>
>>>>> dh pointed out that Goo has lost it completely:

>>. . .
>>>>> "Getting to experience life" is not a benefit, Goo.
>>>>
>>>> What's the point?
>>>
>>>Think about it a little longer, rupie - you can probably get it on your own.

>>
>> LOL! That really is amusing coming from you Goo, since you have
>>proven to no clue what you think you're trying to talk about yourself.

>
>No it isn't - it's devastating to you.


LOL!!! All you've done is to prove me correct by outstupiding yourself
again Goober. LOL...how do you think displaying what a completely
inept, clueless, stupid fool you are is devastating to anyone else? We
know it's hilarious Goo, but how do you think it's devastating to anyone
other than yourself? Do you have any clue about that, Goober?

>>Why not try explaining to Rupert HOW you think whatever you think
>>it is (ALL evidence points to your obsession with pre-existence), is
>>preventing beings from benefitting from the lives of positive value that
>>they clearly *appear to be* benefitting from? Try explaining it now Goo.
>>Go:
>>
>>(Note: the reason the Goober will fail to meet the challenge is because
>>his incredible ineptitude prevents him from being able to do so.)




  #6 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default Goo thinks his own ineptitude is "devastating" to other people. LOL!

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 Goo confessed:

>On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:18:05 -0100, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 Clueless Goo made the absurd claim:
>>
>>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 14:18:19 -0100, dh@. pointed out:
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 Goo amusingly wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Rupert challenged Clueless to explain:
>>>>
>>>>>> On Sep 22, Goo claimed without being able to back it up:
>>>>
>>>>>>> dh pointed out that Goo has lost it completely:
>>>>. . .
>>>>>>> "Getting to experience life" is not a benefit, Goo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What's the point?
>>>>>
>>>>>Think about it a little longer, rupie - you can probably get it on your own.
>>>>
>>>> LOL! That really is amusing coming from you Goo, since you have
>>>>proven to no clue what you think you're trying to talk about yourself.
>>>
>>>No it isn't - it's devastating to you.

>>
>> LOL!!! All you've done is to prove me correct by outstupiding yourself
>>again Goober. LOL...how do you think displaying what a completely
>>inept, clueless, stupid fool you are is devastating to anyone else? We
>>know it's hilarious Goo, but how do you think it's devastating to anyone
>>other than yourself? Do you have any clue about that, Goober?

>
>I'm an idiot!!!


You've demonstrated that many times Goo, as you're demonstrating
it again now. The question is: How do you think displaying what an
idiot you are is devastating to anyone other than yourself, Goob?

>...prove that you're an idiot.


LOL!!! So you think that if you display your own stupidity frequently
and consistently enough, you'll get other people to do the same thing
....LOL...what a Goober you are Goo!

>>>>Why not try explaining to Rupert HOW you think whatever you think
>>>>it is (ALL evidence points to your obsession with pre-existence), is
>>>>preventing beings from benefitting from the lives of positive value that
>>>>they clearly *appear to be* benefitting from? Try explaining it now Goo.
>>>>Go:
>>>>
>>>>(Note: the reason the Goober will fail to meet the challenge is because
>>>>his incredible ineptitude prevents him from being able to do so.)


Hmmm...maybe that explains why he keeps outstupiding himself
time after time after time...
  #7 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.satanism
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default A claim but no clue (was: Mr.Smartypants challenges the Goober)

On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 Goo lied in a cowardly attempt to ineptly slink
away from Mr Smartypants' challenge AGAIN:

>On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 10:15:23 -0100, dh@. wrote:
>
>>On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 "Mr.Smartypants" challenged the Goober:
>>
>>>On Sep 22, 12:28*pm, Goo again make the apparantly idiotic claim which is
>>>so completely stupid that even the Goober himself can't attempt to support it:
>>>
>>>> It is a *FACT*, Goo, that coming into
>>>> existence - "getting to experience life", in your *SHIT* terminology -
>>>> is not a benefit to farm animals.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Prove it, Boobs.

>>
>> The only thing the Goober can prove is that he's too inept to
>>even attempt the challenge...too inept and too cowardly, the
>>cowardice being a bi-product of his ineptitude. We know for
>>certain that Goo believes our own pre-existent "selves" are
>>somehow preventing us from benefitting from life now:
>>
>>"Life is not a gain because there *was* no person" - Goo
>>
>>but none of us--including the Goober-- know HOW he thinks
>>they're doing it! We only know for certain that Goob is certain
>>that "they" are somehow preventing us all from benefitting...
>>every being ever born, anywhere...
>>
>> Goober, try to stop being a cowardly wuss and attempt to
>>meet Mr. Smartypants' challenge. Try to give evidence that
>>you have any sliver of a clue what it is you think you're trying
>>to talk about Goo. GO:
>>
>>
>>(Note: The Goober has been challenged directly by Rupert,
>>Mr Smartypants and myself to give evidence that he has
>>some clue what he thinks he's trying to talk about, and as
>>yet has been able to present no evidence at all. None.)

>
>Proved, many times.


Every time you're challenged you give the clear impression
that you don't have the slightest clue what you think you're
trying to talk about Goober, since you can't even attempt to
try explaining what you think it is. But Goob some of us keep
hoping that you will eventually try to explain what you're trying
to think about, since if you ever do chances are excellent that
it will be hilarious. Try doing it now Goo. Try to explain what
you think prevents living beings from benefitting from lives of
positive value. What *ever* you think it is it's okay Goob, just
say exactly what you think it is, and how you think it's doing so.
Go:

Go Goo...it is time...go now:

Go on Goo, do it:

GO!:

NOW Goo GO!!!:

TRY! TO EXPLAIN FOR ONCE YOU STUPID GOOBER! GO!!!:

You sure do suck at this. You have a claim but no clue, Goo.
  #8 (permalink)   Report Post  
Posted to alt.food.vegan,talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.satanism
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,652
Default A claim but no clue (was: Mr.Smartypants challenges the Goober)

On Wed, 24 Sep 2008, Goo lied as he cried:

>On Wed, 24 Sep 2008 13:04:11 -0100, dh@. challenged Goo:
>
>> Every time you're challenged you give the clear impression
>>that you don't have the slightest clue what you think you're
>>trying to talk about Goober, since you can't even attempt to
>>try explaining what you think it is. But Goob some of us keep
>>hoping that you will eventually try to explain what you're trying
>>to think about, since if you ever do chances are excellent that
>>it will be hilarious. Try doing it now Goo. Try to explain what
>>you think prevents living beings from benefitting from lives of
>>positive value. What *ever* you think it is it's okay Goob, just
>>say exactly what you think it is, and how you think it's doing so.
>>Go:
>>
>>Go Goo...it is time...go now:
>>
>>Go on Goo, do it:
>>
>>GO!:
>>
>>NOW Goo GO!!!:
>>
>>TRY! TO EXPLAIN FOR ONCE YOU STUPID GOOBER! GO!!!:

>
>No challenge


LOL!!! We can clearly see that your crying, lying and denying
the challenge for you to explain your claim without a clue can
not do anything to make you any less of a complete failure
Goo. You are a complete failure, and then you lie about it.

>>You sure do suck at this. You have a claim but no clue, Goo.

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help I lost a recipe . . . (actually I lost the book) Lynn from Fargo General Cooking 7 07-11-2008 01:07 PM
And now for something completely different See Hear Diabetic 4 05-04-2006 04:16 PM
and now for something not so completely different sarah bennett General Cooking 5 10-01-2006 03:06 PM
And now for something completely different... Art Sushi 0 06-12-2004 04:14 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 FoodBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Food and drink"