Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Vegan (alt.food.vegan) This newsgroup exists to share ideas and issues of concern among vegans. We are always happy to share our recipes- perhaps especially with omnivores who are simply curious- or even better, accomodating a vegan guest for a meal! |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
Posted to talk.politics.animals,alt.animals.ethics.vegetarian,alt.food.vegan,misc.rural
|
|||
|
|||
The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate
On Jul 29, 12:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote:
> Rupert wrote: > > On Jul 28, 10:59 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >> On Jul 27, 4:20 pm, Rupert > wrote: > > >>> On Jul 27, 5:05 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>> Rupert wrote: > >>>>> On Jul 27, 4:31 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie lisped: > >>>>>>> On Jul 27, 12:31 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered: > >>>>>>>>> On Jul 21, 10:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> fatuous shit-4-braincell rupie blabbered: > >>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 20, 4:29 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 3:30 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 12, 12:21 am, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 11, 2:45 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rupert the skirt-boy wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 4:54 pm, Rudy Canoza > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Dutch wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Rupert" > wrote > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Jul 10, 12:45 pm, "Dutch" > wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [..] > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have made it clear that you take the view that I am not entitled > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to basic courtesy. At present, I choose not to engage with you while > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you continue to hold this view. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> How convenient, no loss, you don't engage anyway, you evade, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that is when > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you're not busy being condescending. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me condescending is utterly absurd. You are much more > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> condescending than me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I wouldn't know how to start being as condescending as you are. I would > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> never think of saying to someone that I am debating with that I am being > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> generous by helping them with their arguments like you said to rick. I > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> may be blunt, I may insult people when they get on my nerves, but I'm > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not condescending. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If you look up "condescension" in the dictionary, you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> see the same smug, simpering picture that you see he > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://tinyurl.com/2xwqo6 > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You know, I've been biting my tongue on this one, but I have to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> say that I'm a bit surprised that you feel you're in a position to try > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to put people down for the way they look. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You are the effete, simpering queer you appear. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So this is an actual claim > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The picture speaks for itself. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Just answer the question > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> There /is/ no question, skirt-boy: the picture > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> portrays a fruity, delicate skirt-boy, and it speaks > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> for itself. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> So you can tell from looking at my photo > >>>>>>>>>>>> Your fruity photo. > >>>>>>>>>>> Could you stop beating about the bush > >>>>>>>>>> Your photo is extremely fruity. > >>>>>>>>> Jolly good. Well, > >>>>>>>> So, you beg to be called a fruit. > >>>>>>> Er, no. > >>>>>> ERRRRRRRRRR...yes. > >>>>> Let's focus on this claim clearly, Ball. By publishing my photo on the > >>>>> Internet, I am begging to be called a homosexual. Is that the story? > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidentally there are a number of > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> reasonable questions in the quoted part above which I KNOW you have no > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> adequate response to. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No, you don't. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes I do, because I have read enough of your responses to similar > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> questions to know how you will answer. You will brush the questions > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> aside with evasive, dismissive remarks. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You won't know anything about my response until you > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> agree to act like a decent human being. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> A pact? You stop being condescending and evasive and I will attempt to > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be more "polite". > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You've been far more polite with skirt-boy than I have, > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and it hasn't got you anywhere. He's an arrogant > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> little bitch. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the antis here have been unreasonably rude to me. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You have asked for it. It is perfectly reasonable. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is not reasonable. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It is reasonable. You've asked for it, and your wish > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has been granted. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're not well. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quite well, thanks. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You ask for the treatment you receive. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Your contemptible behaviour > >>>>>>>>>>>> **** off, squirt. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Your calling me "condescending" and "arrogant" is utterly farcical. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> No. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You think that > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We all do. > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You really have no clue about how sensible people > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have more than a 'clue', skirt-boy. > >>>>>>>>>>>>> You really don't > >>>>>>>>>>>> I do, rupie - much more than a clue, in fact. > >>>>>>>>>>> Do you have a clue about how amusing that statement is to me? > >>>>>>>>>> You don't find it amusing, skirt-boy. You find it > >>>>>>>>>> infuriating. I can smell your rage. > >>>>>>>>> Classic, > >>>>>>>> And true. > >>>>>>> Really? > >>>>>> Yes. > >>>>> Good ol' > >>>> Stupid fruity ****wit. > >>> Boring. > >> Sure, rupie - sure. That's why you keep coming back isn't it - > >> because you're bored? Ha ha ha ha ha! > > > It's fairly entertaining most of the time, > > You're a masochist. You think? Funnily enough, I have similar thoughts about you. Come on, Ball, let's be serious here. You really think your lame, childish name-calling has any effect on me other than amusement? You're making a clown out of yourself in public, and I'm enjoying making fun of you. That's what's going on. Let me guess. You're going to snip everything except "You think?" |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
"Fried food heart risk 'a myth' (as long as you use olive oil or sunflower oil)" | General Cooking | |||
The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate | Vegan | |||
The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate | Vegan | |||
+ Asian Food Experts: Source for "Silver Needle" or "Rat Tail" Noodles? + | General Cooking | |||
The myth of food production "efficiency" in the "ar" debate | Vegan |